A comprehensive attempt at cherry-picking facts in order to suit a fan-biased agenda.It had to be an essay because it's a comprehensive analysis of several stats. The analysis is pretty straightforward and demonstrates that Federer was significantly more consistent than Nadal in reaching their projected matches when conditions favored the opponent.
I actually copied the original thread title that the original poster made lol, I should have updated it to a more "Nadal friendly" title.
In the end though I'm merely showing the stats to us Nadal fans that Federer is indeed better on grass and hardcourt. This really goes without saying
lol, no cherry-picking necessary when so many numbers support our "agenda". If you have a different interpretation for the stats in the OP, why not share it?A comprehensive attempt at cherry-picking facts in order to suit a fan-biased agenda.
Am I right or am I right, Fedfan?
No second serve in other racket sports...
Two serve is what's ludicrous. Or why not give give baseliners a chance to repeat a FH or BH?
Please post the stats that show Rafa having a losing H2H against the top 10. Would love to see this.Nadal had losing h2h till recently not sure he still has.
He defended 1 HC title over a 17 year career
Just read this --- not sure why you aren't getting this through your tiny skull, but Fed is again MUCH superior to Nadal on grass and hardcourt, and please don't give me their H2H again which has continued to narrow over the last decade or so. If Nadal was superior, he'd have more hardcourt and grass titles. Fed completely dwarfs him in that area
If you even read the first sentence I simply copy and pasted what someone else wrote. Secondly, all you had to do was read the "overall" points at the top to see the summary, which clearly concludes Fed is a better grass and hardcourt player than Nadal (which is quite sad that it even needs to be said in the first place considering this shouldn't be a shock to anyone)