Devilito
Legend
he major prob is the movement
his major problem is the lack of winning
he major prob is the movement
Actually, Nadal has won 3 Slams beating Fed.
While Fed won the FO only because Nadal was injured.
That, combined with the Olympics Gold, overall H2H, and far better backhand, places Nadal on a whole different level above Fed.
What a dumba$$ excuse! Nadal won his 2 Wimbledon while Fed has mono in 2008 and a back pain last year...
So you guys watch tennis for pretty faces ?? Wow, this forum is getting filled with girly men !!!I've wiped Federer completely from my memory. Is he the ugly Swiss guy with the crap backhand?
Put your fanboyism apart for a moment. Your h2h argument conveniently ignores the fact that Rafa did not reach many finals, and the h2h was largely on clay.Federer was not even the greatest in his own era (8-15 against Nadal) then how can he be the GOAT.
Notice how I used the past tense.
The end is near.
I've wiped Federer completely from my memory. Is he the ugly Swiss guy with the crap backhand?
And it all comes down to his BH. Again, that is not Fed's fault, as his one hander was in the tradition of Sampras and Laver. It is a basic deficiency of the one hander, which now even Djokovic can exploit. It is not Fed's fault that the game has evolved, but that does not grant him an excuse.
You seem to be fan of that Spanish Chimp who, every second minute, thrusts his hand between his butt crack and then publicly smells it with pleasure followed by a loud vamos-fart.
So what if it is mostly on clay? It is neither Fed's fault nor Rafa's fault.
Fact is, the H2H stands. Any number of excuses can be made, but it is the fact. As also that Rafa won the Olympics singles gold.
There is no way Fed can be GOAT when there has been a player in his own time dominating him so ruthlessly.
And it all comes down to his BH. Again, that is not Fed's fault, as his one hander was in the tradition of Sampras and Laver. It is a basic deficiency of the one hander, which now even Djokovic can exploit. It is not Fed's fault that the game has evolved, but that does not grant him an excuse.
Wait why isn't it Rafa's fault he didn't reach more other surface finals from 05-07?
By your logic, since the game always evolves, no former player can ever be GOAT because by current standards, they would have "deficiencies".
No, it is when someone in the same era dominates him due to the weakness that it becomes an issue
Life outside tennis is far more financially lucrative now than then, so there isn't quite the financial or psychological incentive to stay and prove oneself in the game. Indeed, playing past ones peak is probably frowned upon as tarnishing a legend, but I tend to agree this isn't so (or shouldn't be so).
So what if it is mostly on clay? It is neither Fed's fault nor Rafa's fault.
Fact is, the H2H stands. Any number of excuses can be made, but it is the fact. As also that Rafa won the Olympics singles gold.
There is no way Fed can be GOAT when there has been a player in his own time dominating him so ruthlessly.
And it all comes down to his BH. Again, that is not Fed's fault, as his one hander was in the tradition of Sampras and Laver. It is a basic deficiency of the one hander, which now even Djokovic can exploit. It is not Fed's fault that the game has evolved, but that does not grant him an excuse.
Thats your opinion, but not shared by most.It only matters when they played each other. Why they did not play each other is not the point.
Posted by Nadal: I am more than happy with my titles, and I think talk about if I am better or worse than Roger is stupid because the titles say he's much better than me, so that's the truth at that moment. I think that will be true all my life.
Real intent of Humbalito: Everyone knows I am better than Federer. He called me one-dimensional and insulted Uncle Toni for supposedly coaching me. Once he found that he could not beat me, he decided to try some bromance on me. I am a simple kid and don't play mind games, so I just play my best and beat him every time.
It only matters when they played each other. Why they did not play each other is not the point.
Excuses really don't matter. The H2H speaks for itself. Facts cannot be changed.
Agreed, Davydenko's dominance of Nadal H2H speaks for itself. Facts are facts.
That still doesn't change Fed-Nadal H2H though. Davydenko may be the GOAT, but Fed isn't is the point.
Hmmm so Davydenko is the GOAT, yet Fed dominates Davydenko H2H, so that makes him GOAT??? LOL Got yaaaaaaaaaaa. You can't weasel out of this one![]()
Yes, because people always mention Davydenko as GOAT, not Nadal or Federer.
Give it up man.
sureshs is a clown.
Yes, because people always mention Davydenko as GOAT, not Nadal or Federer.
Give it up man.
He jst tries to make some good jokes but his delivery isn't polished. The person good though at delivering a joke is suresh's mom.
That still doesn't change Fed-Nadal H2H though. Davydenko may be the GOAT, but Fed isn't is the point.
Yes, because people always mention Davydenko as GOAT, not Nadal or Federer.
Give it up man.
ROFL X 5000! Brilliant!
Suresh, give the girl a break. I think you've taken her to the cleaners enough times in this one thread alone! LOL!
He jst tries to make some good jokes but his delivery isn't polished. The person good though at delivering a joke is suresh's mom.
No, the person better than her is Federer because he delivers a joke backhand.
Probably you didn't see it, but in the Former Pro Player section, there was a thread about the GOAT from each country. People were suggesting Ramanathan Krishnan and Vijay Amritraj. I corrected them and suggested your name.
Sorry, but Vijay was a movie star too. He wins.
No, I didn't see it but thanks for stating the facts Suresh! I'm indeed the best that country ever produced.
And among the objective reporters of this game, you're certainly the best!
Octopusssy.......
Actually, Nadal has won 3 Slams beating Fed.
While Fed won the FO only because Nadal was injured.
That, combined with the Olympics Gold, overall H2H, and far better backhand, places Nadal on a whole different level above Fed.
That's right, Nadal was on top of the world for 2 whole years!!! That makes him in a whole different class above Federer....meanwhile Federer was only #1 whenever the field sucked. But whenever Nadal was #1, the field was awesome!!!