Wilander says : Iga Swiatek is going to be "the Rafael Nadal of the women's 'big three' "

Razer

G.O.A.T.
Iga Swiatek is going to be "the Rafael Nadal of the women's 'big three'", thinks Mats Wilander.

Wilander's fellow tennis legend Chris Evert recently shared her opinion to Eurosport that a triumvirate - akin to that of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic - could be in the process of forming in the women's game, namely Swiatek, Elena Rybakina and Aryna Sabalenka.

"I see a rivalry with those three that could be very interesting," Evert said.

"We thought when Serena [Williams] retired, 'oh, my gosh, women's tennis is in trouble, and where's the next champion going to come from?' I think we're looking at where the next champion is going to come from - if not three great champions."

And Wilander has now gone one further, assessing who might assume each role of the revered male trio.

"That's an incredible credit to Sabalenka, Rybakina and Swiatek," Wilander, talking to Eurosport's Arnold Montgault, begun.

"When Chris Evert calls them Roger, Rafa and Novak, the 'big three' already, I can see what she means because they all have their own weapons, and when they are playing at their best, I don't think there is a women's player out there that can disturb them at the moment.

"I think you need someone like [former world No. 1] Justine Henin to be able to destroy the rhythm that Sabalenka, Rybakina and Swiatek get into sometimes.

"There are different surfaces where they're going to be better and I think they've proved that already.

"I think Swiatek is going to be dominating, and she's going to be the Nadal of the 'big three'.

"I think Sabalenka needs a little bit faster courts because I believe that she moves a little bit better than Rybakina, but she's not as consistent in terms of her strokes and her serve. So a faster court would be better for her, which is still the Australian Open.

"And now you see Rybakina, she can play on anything. Absolutely. And she might be the one in the end that the other two are most worried about because Rybakina is calm, huge serve, so complete in terms of the groundstrokes and willing to learn more things.

"But it's the attitude that I think makes her maybe the Djokovic out of the three, meaning she's not really worried about the other two."

 
For sure Nadal's outrageous gamesmanship.

yTTNO1P_d.webp
 
Iga Swiatek is going to be "the Rafael Nadal of the women's 'big three'", thinks Mats Wilander.

Wilander's fellow tennis legend Chris Evert recently shared her opinion to Eurosport that a triumvirate - akin to that of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic - could be in the process of forming in the women's game, namely Swiatek, Elena Rybakina and Aryna Sabalenka.

"I see a rivalry with those three that could be very interesting," Evert said.

"We thought when Serena [Williams] retired, 'oh, my gosh, women's tennis is in trouble, and where's the next champion going to come from?' I think we're looking at where the next champion is going to come from - if not three great champions."

And Wilander has now gone one further, assessing who might assume each role of the revered male trio.

"That's an incredible credit to Sabalenka, Rybakina and Swiatek," Wilander, talking to Eurosport's Arnold Montgault, begun.

"When Chris Evert calls them Roger, Rafa and Novak, the 'big three' already, I can see what she means because they all have their own weapons, and when they are playing at their best, I don't think there is a women's player out there that can disturb them at the moment.

"I think you need someone like [former world No. 1] Justine Henin to be able to destroy the rhythm that Sabalenka, Rybakina and Swiatek get into sometimes.

"There are different surfaces where they're going to be better and I think they've proved that already.

"I think Swiatek is going to be dominating, and she's going to be the Nadal of the 'big three'.

"I think Sabalenka needs a little bit faster courts because I believe that she moves a little bit better than Rybakina, but she's not as consistent in terms of her strokes and her serve. So a faster court would be better for her, which is still the Australian Open.

"And now you see Rybakina, she can play on anything. Absolutely. And she might be the one in the end that the other two are most worried about because Rybakina is calm, huge serve, so complete in terms of the groundstrokes and willing to learn more things.

"But it's the attitude that I think makes her maybe the Djokovic out of the three, meaning she's not really worried about the other two."

Of the three, Rybakina, IMO, is the easiest to support: none of the screeching, calm and appears not to have the tendency of blaming losses on other factors.
 
I'm curious to see how long the playing success of Rybakina and Sabalenka lasts, as big hitters tend to be flashes in the pan on the WTA. Very timing dependent to hit that big and avoid error sprees. Those two don't have the variety of any of the big three, so I'm not sure where Wilander and Evert got that idea, other than it perhaps being their jobs to try and inject some excitement.
 
Iga Swiatek is going to be "the Rafael Nadal of the women's 'big three'", thinks Mats Wilander.

Wilander's fellow tennis legend Chris Evert recently shared her opinion to Eurosport that a triumvirate - akin to that of Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic - could be in the process of forming in the women's game, namely Swiatek, Elena Rybakina and Aryna Sabalenka.
I assume Rybakina is Djokovic and Sabalenka is Federer?
 
Swiatek has a very cold on-court personality, really nothing in common with Nadal.
Lacks passion for the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ann
Mats is An Expert

"Roger Federer cannot beat Rafael Nadal on clay" - 2007 (one month later Federer defeated Nadal in Hamburg final on clay)

"Djokovic could potentially be the clay court player of all time" - 2015

"Nobody wants Djokovic to win except a few hundred Serbians" - 2016

"Nishikori has the best backhand in the world except maybe Pouille" - 2016

"Andy Murray cannot be compared to Federer, Nadal and Djokovic" - 2017

"Murray might truly be the greatest player to ever play the game" - 2021

"Tsitsipas has a better forehand than Rafa, better than Roger and better than Novak" - 2021

"Nadal is 'going to be an absolute animal' at Melbourne Park this year" - 2023
 
Swiatek has a very cold on-court personality, really nothing in common with Nadal.
Lacks passion for the game.

Lendl had a "cold" court personality (at least that was the pushed narrative of his professional era), yet he was clearly passionate about his game and trying to overcome his rivals....yeah, that's certainly not Swiatek.


Mats is An Expert



"Murray might truly be the greatest player to ever play the game" - 2021
...now appearing for his 20th year at the Laugh Factory.
 
Evert: "We thought when Serena [Williams] retired, 'oh, my gosh, women's tennis is in trouble, and where's the next champion going to come from?'

Huh?

The last Slam title Serena won was in January of 2017. That's over 6 years ago! In fact, in that whole time period from the time she won the 2017 Australian until she retired last year, Serena only won 1 title... 1 title! And that was at a 250 level event in New Zealand in January 2020.

I'm not trying to diminish Serena's greatness, but to say the tour was in trouble and nobody knew where the next champion was going to come from is just silly. I guess Evert wasn't paying attention for the past 6 years...

Womens-tennis-champions-since-2017.png
 
Evert: "We thought when Serena [Williams] retired, 'oh, my gosh, women's tennis is in trouble, and where's the next champion going to come from?'

Huh?

The last Slam title Serena won was in January of 2017. That's over 6 years ago! In fact, in that whole time period from the time she won the 2017 Australian until she retired last year, Serena only won 1 title... 1 title! And that was at a 250 level event in New Zealand in January 2020.

I'm not trying to diminish Serena's greatness, but to say the tour was in trouble and nobody knew where the next champion was going to come from is just silly. I guess Evert wasn't paying attention for the past 6 years...

Womens-tennis-champions-since-2017.png
Essentially, I've said the same, in that the tour was strong over the past decade while Serena played, and now that's she's retired. In that time, there have been players who won more than single major, all stepping up to do their job. Evert suggesting a panic in the women's tour after Serena retired is either the product of a strangely bush-league level observation, or attempting to cause unnecessary alarm in the sport.
 
We are not getting a big three like the men's for the simple reason that there is no equivalent for Roger Federer and has not been since Martina Navratilova retired.
 
The big three were the big three because they were competing to be the GOAT.

None of those three have yet reached the level of Ash Barty in 2019 or 2021 and kept it there for a full year, not to mention Serena's best year.

Presumably he knows this and will say anything for attention.

The real question is which of those three has the best chance of playing consistently beyond the level of the other two, or even beyond the level of Ash Barty.
Most here are saying Iga, but Rybakina & Aryna have stronger trajectories for now. At the moment Rybakina is playing at the highest level & has been improving fastest. It will probably come come down to who avoids injuries best.
 
Last edited:
She will have to get her head right; she is way to stressed out playing tennis.
She looks miserable at times playing, it looks like she's going to stroke out.
 
Lol women's big three. Equivalent of the big 3 for consistency in womens tennis since Serena would be winning more than a single major. She isn't on rafa's level and there is certainly no female Djoker and Federer.
 
The women do not have to follow everything the men do. This is the one sport where the women are truly bringing it and entertaining us as much as the men in their own unique way.
As a man I genuinely have no preference between men's and women's tennis and actually prefer women's in GS tournaments because best of 5 set matches are too much tennis in a single sitting for me.
I tend to watch the womens GS matches while keeping an eye on the men's only switching channels for a fifth set decider if a player I am interested in is involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ann
The women do not have to follow everything the men do. This is the one sport where the women are truly bringing it and entertaining us as much as the men in their own unique way.
As a man I genuinely have no preference between men's and women's tennis and actually prefer women's in GS tournaments because best of 5 set matches are too much tennis in a single sitting for me.
I tend to watch the womens GS matches while keeping an eye on the men's only switching channels for a fifth set decider if a player I am interested in is involved.
It would be nice to see best-of-five-set GS matches on the women's circuit from the quarterfinals to the final.
:D
 
No b05 in slams for women means it's unlikely we'll ever see anything approaching the dominance of the big 3 in the WTA. It's just obvious, the longer a match goes the less chance there is of a top player being upset...
 
It would be nice to see best-of-five-set GS matches on the women's circuit from the quarterfinals to the final.
:D
I am guessing they wont want to. Who wouldn't want equal pay for less work if the law allows you to get away with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH
Does Mats spend more time in the UK than Sweden nowadays? I know Pat Cash spends more time in the UK than Australia.
I see Iga as later day Steffi in her mobility, but long way to go yet in terms of results and stature. Potential is there, she is a very good player,
 
Back
Top