nolefam_2024
Bionic Poster
Sinner breaks racket
But we should be proud of that.
Recency bias mate. Go and watch some vintage stuff.. It's not even close..Not going to lie, I am starting to think these guys are better in the baseline game. They just hit it so hard and usually pretty consistently.
That said, they do not have the variety, so I would not say the best tennis has ever been played. But for baseline specifics, possibly.
I lived it. The variety makes for better tennis not doubt, but the baseline power is just as good if not better.Recency bias mate. Go and watch some vintage stuff.. It's not even close..
I know you did mate and I don't doubt your honesty in perception but I just recently re-watched several matches played by peak Fed, Nole and Rafa. My god how good they were... I have shed a few tears I have to admit... No doubt Sincaraz are great, I just think Fedalovic were better...I lived it.
I know you did mate and I don't doubt your honesty in perception but I just recently re-watched several matches played by peak Fed, Nole and Rafa. My god how good they were... I have shed a few tears I have to admit... No doubt Sincaraz are great, I just think Fedalovic were better...
The consequence of conditions. It would be shocking if today's players didn't have more solidity and power in the baseline game, off both wings, than the average player 20-25 years ago, for it's the specific game they've trained for their whole lives. Because of the broad racket heads, the poly strings, and the court consistencies, the sport has been leaning that way since they first picked up a racket. Sinner specifically is the heightened version of that style. So yes, I don't think there's any inferiority in that aspect.Not going to lie, I am starting to think these guys are better in the baseline game. They just hit it so hard and usually pretty consistently.
That said, they do not have the variety, so I would not say the best tennis has ever been played. But for baseline specifics, possibly.
Sinner is 6'4"The consequence of conditions. It would be shocking if today's players didn't have more solidity and power in the baseline game, off both wings, than the average player 20-25 years ago, for it's the specific game they've trained for their whole lives. Because of the broad racket heads, the poly strings, and the court consistencies, the sport has been leaning that way since they first picked up a racket. Sinner specifically is the heightened version of that style. So yes, I don't think there's any inferiority in that aspect.
(posted August 2021)Wilander reminds me of a two year old at a family gathering -- no matter how obvious or trite his utterances, some people feel obligated to marvel at it.
I think Wilander uses other stuff.Clostebol can do wonders.
no one cares. i just wont watch him unless he's playing Djokovic or Alcaraz.Who cares if sinner bores some.
I don't think good tennis level is just about what level would beat another. Djokovic was playing great tennis in last year's WTF and in the Olympics final, but he's a solo act. The duo of sinner and alcaraz bring out some transcendent tennis from both men, and it's not ridiculous to say the shot making in their matches are pushing the envelope of tennis even if Djokovic (especially if he was younger) could nullify this if placed on the other side of the net. When I agree with this claim that Sinner and Alcaraz are producing near unparalleled levels of tennis in their matches (not on the level of early fed/nadal and nadal Djokovic just yet), I don't avoid pointing to their own respective performances and results against geriatric Djokovic not just because it contradicts my support. I don't emphasize their results because its really about the spectacle of their matches, and you just got to watch it and enjoy it. Its really not about their level of difficulty they experience in beating similar opponents or respective age feats, just off watching their matches, the tennis is really up there.nole beat both raz and sinner in consecutive matches at last WTF in SF and F. both in pretty convincing 2 sets
Fans of Djokovic's style just have a greater appreciation of nuanced tennis than you do. Stuff like strategic court positioning, phenomenally deep ball placement, masterful anticipation, knowing when to change ball direction, etc. Not everyone understands tennis well enough to appreciate those aspects.Ultronians never minded snoozefest tennis that's for sure![]()
Sinner absolutely dominated Djokovic with his +1 forehands. And return +1 shots.Fans of Djokovic's style just have a greater appreciation of nuanced tennis than you do. Stuff like strategic court positioning, phenomenally deep ball placement, masterful anticipation, knowing when to change ball direction, etc. Not everyone understands tennis well enough to appreciate those aspects.
Thank youI mean all generations in sport are built on the shoulders of the last, Sinner and Alcaraz's games do not exist in a vacuum - that's why it's stupid to say they are "better than anyone else ever" - they have another ten years of new ideas, training, technique and tech that they have built their games around the same as Federer, Nadal and Djokovic built their games around learning from the best of the last generation to make something new and special - it will always happen and its impossible to compare.
As a side note, I know Djokovic and Nadal take a long time between serves but even then , a condensed match between these two is over an hr long.
compared to. Incredible rallies and skills in one of the greatest matches we have witnessed but also lower pace and often less depth. Sinneraz are more aggressive and attack earlier and harder.
Wilander really went from the game's quietest champion to the game's most famous yapperWilander SENDING the whole tennis world in SHOCK, read HERE:
Full comments in Link.
“They are following in the footsteps of the 'Big Three' in terms of level,” Wilander said.
“I hope Roger, Novak, and Rafa are not listening, but in terms of level, when Sinner and Alcaraz are at their best, there is no way anyone has ever played better tennis, that the tennis ball has done more different, complicated, difficult things than the ball is doing between Sinner and Alcaraz.”
![]()
'I hope Roger, Novak and Rafa aren't listening' – Alcaraz-Sinner rivalry gets highest praise
Mats Wilander says matches between Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner should be considered amongst “the best sporting events ever” after their China Open final.www.eurosport.com
Sinner is 6'4"
Mensik is 6'4"
All new guys are tall enough to make into marvel movies. Even Carlos who we call TINY is almost as tall as Federer.
The landscape has shifted.
Few years back tennis was slow and about defense. Zverev says.
Everyone with clear unbiased eyes can see he is telling the truth.
He should switch to stand up comedy.Wilander is the funniest guy
It's a Wilander take.Complete nonense.
In Sinner's case, just one of the reasons mentioned above explains the 95% of his success.Modern equipment, training, drugs, tech, all play a role.
With the addition of a variety of skills that the Fedal generation has/have that disappeared with the generation that sandwiched them.I don't know if I would say that it is "better" tennis, but the power is now at a whole new level. These guys easily outdo Federer and Nadal on average groundstroke pace, with way more risk tolerance on aggressive shots.
Petchey was commentating Fonseca last night and someone texted him this sentiment, which I posted earlier in this thread - Sinner, Alcaraz, Fonseca, Mensik etc... all stand on the shoulders of the greatness that came before them, there would be no Sincarazseca without Fedalovic and Sampragassi before that and so on and so forth... through the annals of the time - nothing happens in a vacuumThey have the potential to give the best tennis human eyes have ever seen BUT so far the gold standard keeps being Fedalovic, and there's evidence of that last year.
In power, absolutely, the ball is moving faster, but Fedalovic were so phisically gifted, I don't know if they could get to the level shown but Nadal for example at the same age. That was just insane.Not going to lie, I am starting to think these guys are better in the baseline game. They just hit it so hard and usually pretty consistently.
That said, they do not have the variety, so I would not say the best tennis has ever been played. But for baseline specifics, possibly.
Mattsie is Just Too Much. How did that claim work out?The "in terms of level" man striks again.