tennis_pro
Bionic Poster
Hes currently sitting at 7 at age 22. 18 to go assuming Djokovic wins no more. What do you think?
With only Sinner being a threat he can easily reach the 10-14 mark in the next 2-3 years and hes halfway at 25. Totally in his hands.If he stays heathy better than even chance, would need 18 in 13-16 years playing.
With even less competition.Yes. I think he does.
Alcaraz is basically what happens when you mix Federer, Nadal and Djokovic together.
For sure, the average number of slams per year for someone of his class is very achievable, and beatable.With only Sinner being a threat he can easily reach the 10-14 mark in the next 2-3 years and hes halfway at 25. Totally in his hands.
It will continueNope.
His game relies too much on his speed/fitness which will dwindle when he gets to his late 20s and 30s and he's not unbeatable, he's had a couple of shock losses and I think that will happen more and more as he goes on and more players will become motivated to learn and beat him. The fact Alcaraz is routinely taken to 5 sets in most slams is already a sign of it, yes his record in said 5 set matches has been fantastic so far but y'all really think that will continue? I don't.
In fact he the two players with the most Slams have low speed/fitnessNope.
His game relies too much on his speed/fitness which will dwindle when he gets to his late 20s and 30s
By 29-30 he could be sitting at 20 Slams.Nope.
His game relies too much on his speed/fitness which will dwindle when he gets to his late 20s and 30s and he's not unbeatable, he's had a couple of shock losses and I think that will happen more and more as he goes on and more players will become motivated to learn and beat him. The fact Alcaraz is routinely taken to 5 sets in most slams is already a sign of it, yes his record in said 5 set matches has been fantastic so far but y'all really think that will continue? I don't.
Easily, he might very well be sitting at 10 slams at 23 and with clowns like Fonseca as his rivals in next 5 years who is gonna stop him ? Sinner is his only rival and he’s also almost 2 years younger.By 29-30 he could be sitting at 20 Slams.
Mensik and Fils?Depends on Sinner. I don't see a 3rd guy appearing soon, and I see Alcaraz having a long career.
Another factor will be his clutchness and 5th set effectiveness. So far, it's been stellar and the GOAT in that department maybe, but he needs that to continue being the case because he gets into long and tough matches basically every slam.
Sounds exactly like what people would say about Rafa early on in his career.Nope.
His game relies too much on his speed/fitness which will dwindle when he gets to his late 20s and 30s and he's not unbeatable, he's had a couple of shock losses and I think that will happen more and more as he goes on and more players will become motivated to learn and beat him. The fact Alcaraz is routinely taken to 5 sets in most slams is already a sign of it, yes his record in said 5 set matches has been fantastic so far but y'all really think that will continue? I don't.
Yeah, you beat me to mention it. Strange that people still believe that after Nadal and also Djokovic in tennis, and after what the general development across many sports shows. Careers of 20 years at the top will be the normality. Or at least a normal possibility if not for specific career-ending injuries and if the motivation always stays the same.Sounds exactly like what people would say about Rafa early on in his career.
fixedYes. I think he does.
Alcaraz is basically what happens when you mix physical precocity with an unprecedented nadir in competition.
We need to see who will emerge. Tough to predict it. If the level of competition remains the same it has been since 2020 throughout his 30s, than it is almost certain that he will break the record.
Depends on his physical fitness/health. If Karl avoids career-threatening injuries, he's quite likely to do it since competition is in complete shambles and not getting better in any foreseeable time. I assume motivation won't be an issue since Alcaraz appears keen on winning and is obviously enjoying himself on court due to his showman nature, which makes a potential burnout unlikely.
Many things have to continue to go right for him to break the record. I would say that’s it’s almost certain that he won’t break the record because of this even though he’s a greater talent than Djokovic.Almost certainly. Unless he suffers a freak injury or loses his motivation. Sky is the limit for him.
This is true because we have to factor in other things besides just number of X won, number of Y weeks, etc.Regardless, I think he'll be in the GOAT conversation if we're fortunate enough to have him around a few more years.
In fairness TB3's slam losses before turning 23 hardly pose a murderer's row besides each other. If you exclude USO24, Carlos has basically only lost to the top guys since breaking through while giving them their fair share of drubbings in return. Lack of truly elite comp or not, he deserves credit for cutting out many of the stupid losses most early careers are plagued with.fixed![]()
Well tbh we have done this with people far less deserving lol. No one has had the start Alcaraz has, and no one has had THIS much talent this young to back it up. I feel you though, it is early af. It’s just hard to see anyone on this tour stepping up.While extremely impressive, 7 is still a very, VERY long way from 25, and there are a ton of unpredictable variables that can occur between now and then that could knock him off course. Honestly, even discussing this as a possibility is kind of stupid at this point. Let's talk when he hits 20.
fixed![]()
As a physically precocious early bloomer, Alcaraz was better at an early age than most ATGs but not Nadal (or Borg). Lack of competition certainly helps to create a perception to the contrary among the non-astute, for example Alcaraz's AO losses to Zedrot and Ancientvic are respected while Nadal's losses to Gonzalez and Tsonga are clowned, nevermind that they were on absolute fire (although Alcaraz at least took a set so gave a bit better performances than Ned but he'd certainly lose comfortably to the Nadal conquerors as well, playing like he did).In fairness TB3's slam losses before turning 23 hardly pose a murderer's row besides each other. If you exclude USO24, Carlos has basically only lost to the top guys since breaking through while giving them their fair share of drubbings in return. Lack of truly elite comp or not, he deserves credit for cutting out many of the stupid losses most early careers are plagued with.
Fed made 10 slam finals in a row from Wimbledon 2005 to USO 2007. Then another 8 finals in a row from RG 2008 to AO 2010. Crazy consistency.As a physically precocious early bloomer, Alcaraz was better at an early age than most ATGs but not Nadal (or Borg). Lack of competition certainly helps to create a perception to the contrary among the non-astute, for example Alcaraz's AO losses to Zedrot and Ancientvic are respected while Nadal's losses to Gonzalez and Tsonga are clowned, nevermind that they were on absolute fire (although Alcaraz at least took a set so gave a bit better performances than Ned but he'd certainly lose comfortably to the Nadal conquerors as well, playing like he did).
Now though he's entering the common peak age for ATGs, the period where all top ATGs were extremely strong and consistent for many years. Let's see how well he can match that. I certainly don't expect anyone to come close to Fed's 23 straight slam semis & 36 straight quarters in my lifetime, at least.
Mensik and Fils?
didn't you say slam record is the most important like 2 weeks ago ?? Djoko fans vex me.What about other main records?
YE#1
Weeks at #1
CGS
WTFs
Masters
GMs
Big titles
Completing tennis
Highest points (17110)
All titles (Connors)
W%
OG (muzza)
4 in a row (Laver CYGS, nole on 3 surfaces)
Impossible to know.What does your crystal ball tell you?
![]()
- Slam recorddidn't you say slam record is the most important like 2 weeks ago ?? Djoko fans vex me.
20+ is bad, but 20 is peRFectly fine.No.
No male player should win 20+ slams and no male player would win 20+ slams if not for the anomaly of consecutive LostGens.
Lol20+ is bad, but 20 is peRFectly fine.