Will Carlos Alcaraz ever win another Grand Slam title again?

Will Carlos Alcaraz ever win another Grand Slam title again?

  • Yes, definitely

    Votes: 55 70.5%
  • Yes, maybe

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Uncertain

    Votes: 4 5.1%
  • Probably not

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Definitely not

    Votes: 13 16.7%

  • Total voters
    78
Alcaraz dropped one set the entire US Open run and faced a total of 9 break points in the entire tournament.

Sinner also dropped just 1 set, but faced 10 break points in the semi final against FAA alone. And 7 in the final against Fritz.

Alcaraz also had to beat Sinner in the final to take the title and that was the only set he lost in the entire tournament.

Sinner had to face Fritz in the US Open final. Not exactly the same.

AO 2025 Sinner dropped 2 sets. So you don't know what you're speaking about sir.

Impressive yes but not as impressive as Alcaraz's 2025 US Open.
Sinner's 2024 USO draw was MUCH tougher than Alcaraz's 2025 USO draw when we consider the form and level of the opponents.
 
Sinner's 2024 USO draw was MUCH tougher than Alcaraz's 2025 USO draw when we consider the form and level of the opponents.

Thank you for confirming statistically you don't know what you're talking about. Alcaraz had to beat Djokovic and Sinner back to back to take the title and Sinner had to beat FAA and Fritz.....

You didn't address the statistics I just provided I wonder why .

Your whole post was suggesting Alcaraz may never win a slam again and not 2 months later he was absolutely dominant and nobody could stop him. Just admit it your post was very silly, and now you need to eat some humble pie.
 
I know that, at first glance, the title of this post may sound somewhat crazy, but please hear me out.
After watching the Roland Garros and Wimbledon finals this year, it is beyond clear that Sinner has figured out Alcaraz on natural surfaces. All it would've taken Sinner to beat Alcaraz in 4 sets at BOTH RG and Wimbledon as well as win 4 Slams in a row (The Sinner Slam) was if he had converted just one of the triple championship points at RG instead of spraying uncharacteristic errors out of nervousness. But at Wimbledon this year, his game has evidently become choke-free.

And it should be obvious to anyone who has been watching tennis with open eyes over the past 2 years that Alcaraz has zero chance of winning the Australian Open as long as Sinner is present. I mean, Carlos couldn't even beat a 38 year old injured Djokovic there. Sinner would've eaten Carlos alive if they met at the AO this year (and last year too).

At the US Open, I'd say Alcaraz also has zero chances because he almost lost to Sinner there back in 2022 - when Alcaraz was actually BETTER at the US Open than he is now and Sinner was far WORSE than now.
At the US Open, current Sinner (if he plays like he did in 2024) >> 2022 Sinner = 2022 Alcaraz > current Alcaraz

So really, I do not see any Slam where Alcaraz is "safe" from Sinner.

Furthermore, so far, Alcaraz has won 4* Slam titles (2 Wimbledon titles, 1* RG title, 1 USO title), but he has never shown a truly dominant run in any of them. He has been taken to five sets multiple times by players he should've beaten much more convincingly, and has even had to save match points (or at least, "de facto" match points) on multiple occasions.

On the other hand, Sinner has been nothing short of utterly dominant in three out of the four Slams he has won so far. So really, what is to stop him from defeating Carlos in every GS final in the future?
I think you can hold your head in shame after this tabloid title "will he ever win a slam again" :-D :-D :-D behave. Since when is it cool to replicate the language of shamless tabloids ? lol
 
Not really. Alcaraz has not won a non-asterisked Slam title since Wimbledon 2024.
Remember, the RG 2025 and USO 2025 do not count. Sinner tanked the finals, remember?
As the saying goes, "you cannot defeat someone who already allowed themselves to be beaten."
LMAO sinner Wimbledon title has a Huge Asterisk he didn't beat dimitrov and was going to lose in straight sets.. Alcaraz US Open Run in 2025 was much better than sinner US open Run in 2024 because Alcaraz beat Djokovic and sinner back to back that's much more impressive than beating draper and Fritz LMAO...All of Alcaraz Runs have been much more impressive and better than sinner.... Alcaraz 2023 Wimbledon Run is a million times better than sinner fake 2025 Wimbledon Run and much better than any of his Runs and same with the US Open in 2025...
 
LMAO sinner Wimbledon title has a Huge Asterisk he didn't beat dimitrov and was going to lose in straight sets..
Nope. There was still a very high chance that Sinner was going to win in 5 sets eventually, similar to what Federer pulled off in the 2012 Wimbledon R3 match against Benneteau.
Imagine if Benneteau in that match got injured after just the first two sets ended and had to retire. Then I bet, without a doubt, that countless fans (especially Djokodal fans) would've asterisked Federer's 2012 Wimbledon win, even though he did end up beating Djokovic and Murray back to back (similar to how Sinner eventually beat Djokovic and Alcaraz back to back).
And remember Djokovic in the 2022 Wimbledon QF? Yeah...

Alcaraz US Open Run in 2025 was much better than sinner US open Run in 2024 because Alcaraz beat Djokovic and sinner back to back that's much more impressive than beating draper and Fritz LMAO...
No. 2024 Draper and Fritz at USO >>> 2025 Djokovic at USO. Anyone who's watched both runs attentively would notice that.

All of Alcaraz Runs have been much more impressive and better than sinner....
Sinner's 2024 AO run >> Alcaraz's 2026 AO run
2024 AO SF Djokovic played much better than 2026 AO F Djokovic.

Alcaraz 2023 Wimbledon Run is a million times better than sinner fake 2025 Wimbledon Run and much better than any of his Runs
Seriously??
Alcaraz in 2023 Wimbledon final faced a 36 year old Djokovic way past his (actual) prime. Even then, it took him 5 close sets to get the job done.
On the other hand, Sinner in 2025 Wimbledon final beat Alcaraz, a prime, in-form ATG. And it only took 4 routine sets.

Convincingly beating a prime young ATG who was also the two-time defending champion >>> needing 5 sets to beat a 36 year old guy who only looked impressive prior due to massive vulturing
 
Nope. There was still a very high chance that Sinner was going to win in 5 sets eventually, similar to what Federer pulled off in the 2012 Wimbledon R3 match against Benneteau.
Imagine if Benneteau in that match got injured after just the first two sets ended and had to retire. Then I bet, without a doubt, that countless fans (especially Djokodal fans) would've asterisked Federer's 2012 Wimbledon win, even though he did end up beating Djokovic and Murray back to back (similar to how Sinner eventually beat Djokovic and Alcaraz back to back).
And remember Djokovic in the 2022 Wimbledon QF? Yeah...


No. 2024 Draper and Fritz at USO >>> 2025 Djokovic at USO. Anyone who's watched both runs attentively would notice that.


Sinner's 2024 AO run >> Alcaraz's 2026 AO run
2024 AO SF Djokovic played much better than 2026 AO F Djokovic.


Seriously??
Alcaraz in 2023 Wimbledon final faced a 36 year old Djokovic way past his (actual) prime. Even then, it took him 5 close sets to get the job done.
On the other hand, Sinner in 2025 Wimbledon final beat Alcaraz, a prime, in-form ATG. And it only took 4 routine sets.

Convincingly beating a prime young ATG who was also the two-time defending champion >>> needing 5 sets to beat a 36 year old guy who only looked impressive prior due to massive vulturing
Nope. There was still a very high chance that Sinner was going to win in 5 sets eventually, similar to what Federer pulled off in the 2012 Wimbledon R3 match against Benneteau.
Imagine if Benneteau in that match got injured after just the first two sets ended and had to retire. Then I bet, without a doubt, that countless fans (especially Djokodal fans) would've asterisked Federer's 2012 Wimbledon win, even though he did end up beating Djokovic and Murray back to back (similar to how Sinner eventually beat Djokovic and Alcaraz back to back).
And remember Djokovic in the 2022 Wimbledon QF? Yeah...


No. 2024 Draper and Fritz at USO >>> 2025 Djokovic at USO. Anyone who's watched both runs attentively would notice that.


Sinner's 2024 AO run >> Alcaraz's 2026 AO run
2024 AO SF Djokovic played much better than 2026 AO F Djokovic.


Seriously??
Alcaraz in 2023 Wimbledon final faced a 36 year old Djokovic way past his (actual) prime. Even then, it took him 5 close sets to get the job done.
On the other hand, Sinner in 2025 Wimbledon final beat Alcaraz, a prime, in-form ATG. And it only took 4 routine sets.

Convincingly beating a prime young ATG who was also the two-time defending champion >>> needing 5 sets to beat a 36 year old guy who only looked impressive prior due to massive vulturing

Nope. There was still a very high chance that Sinner was going to win in 5 sets eventually, similar to what Federer pulled off in the 2012 Wimbledon R3 match against Benneteau.
Imagine if Benneteau in that match got injured after just the first two sets ended and had to retire. Then I bet, without a doubt, that countless fans (especially Djokodal fans) would've asterisked Federer's 2012 Wimbledon win, even though he did end up beating Djokovic and Murray back to back (similar to how Sinner eventually beat Djokovic and Alcaraz back to back).
And remember Djokovic in the 2022 Wimbledon QF? Yeah...


No. 2024 Draper and Fritz at USO >>> 2025 Djokovic at USO. Anyone who's watched both runs attentively would notice that.


Sinner's 2024 AO run >> Alcaraz's 2026 AO run
2024 AO SF Djokovic played much better than 2026 AO F Djokovic.


Seriously??
Alcaraz in 2023 Wimbledon final faced a 36 year old Djokovic way past his (actual) prime. Even then, it took him 5 close sets to get the job done.
On the other hand, Sinner in 2025 Wimbledon final beat Alcaraz, a prime, in-form ATG. And it only took 4 routine sets.

Convincingly beating a prime young ATG who was also the two-time defending champion >>> needing 5 sets to beat a 36 year old guy who only looked impressive prior due to massive vulturing
Jannik sinner is 6-11 in 5th set matches he wasn't going to win you're delusional.. Sinner is not great playing from behind like alcaraz, Djokovic he's a front Runner you casual LMAO.. jack draper wasn't even a Top 20 Player when Sinner beat him in the US Open so Djokovic would've beaten Draper in straight sets and he would've destroyed fritz who's 0-10 Against Djokovic LMAO. Alcaraz in the US Open 2025 destroyed Djokovic and sinner that's a much better feat than beating draper who wasn't even a top 20 player in the US Open and Fritz wasn't even Top 10 so sinner had a cakewalk..... Sinner in Wimbledon in 2023 got destroyed by a 36 year Old Djokovic since you want to make it about Age. Djokovic in 2023 was close to his prime he won 3 slams and the ATP Finals LMAO.... a 36 Year old Djokovic would completely destroy a 21 or 22 year Old Djokovic.. do you forget that a young Djokovic Had a bad Serve ? Djokovic in his 30s has an Elite Serve he didn't have that at a young age.... Carlos Alcaraz at age 22 would destroy a 22 year old Djokovic who had a bad Serve and wasn't great at the Net...
 
Last edited:
Nope. There was still a very high chance that Sinner was going to win in 5 sets eventually, similar to what Federer pulled off in the 2012 Wimbledon R3 match against Benneteau.
Imagine if Benneteau in that match got injured after just the first two sets ended and had to retire. Then I bet, without a doubt, that countless fans (especially Djokodal fans) would've asterisked Federer's 2012 Wimbledon win, even though he did end up beating Djokovic and Murray back to back (similar to how Sinner eventually beat Djokovic and Alcaraz back to back).
And remember Djokovic in the 2022 Wimbledon QF? Yeah...


No. 2024 Draper and Fritz at USO >>> 2025 Djokovic at USO. Anyone who's watched both runs attentively would notice that.


Sinner's 2024 AO run >> Alcaraz's 2026 AO run
2024 AO SF Djokovic played much better than 2026 AO F Djokovic.


Seriously??
Alcaraz in 2023 Wimbledon final faced a 36 year old Djokovic way past his (actual) prime. Even then, it took him 5 close sets to get the job done.
On the other hand, Sinner in 2025 Wimbledon final beat Alcaraz, a prime, in-form ATG. And it only took 4 routine sets.

Convincingly beating a prime young ATG who was also the two-time defending champion >>> needing 5 sets to beat a 36 year old guy who only looked impressive prior due to massive vulturing
Carlos alcaraz won the US open Dropping only 1 set while also getting broken only 3 times and facing only 10 break Points witch is a record and it makes it much more impressive when he had to play by far the best Returners apart from himself in Jannik and Djokovic that Run is much better than sinner 2024 US Open Run... sinner 2024 US Open run isn't impressive he beat Fritz who's 0-10 Against Djokovic LMAO that same Fritz lost to a 38 Year Old Djokovic in the 2025 US Open also jack draper wasn't even a top 20 player LMAO imagine thinking beating a player that's not even Top 20 and a player that's 0-10 Against Djokovic is somehow better than beating Djokovic who was coming off beating Fritz and sinner who was coming in the Finals as the Favorite while being ranked number 1 lol.... keep being Delusional....
 
It’s possible that Alcaraz wins -2 slam titles between now and the end of 2026. That’s how bad that he will be. And that’s unfortunate, because his slam title count by the end of 2026 will be 5 +(-2) =3

During that same time frame, Sinner will win 8 slam titles, which will push him up to 12 by the end of 2026.

At this rate, it’s likely that Benoit Paire passes Alcaraz in the slam title count by a score of 0 to -2 by the end of 2027.

Bottom line: Carlitos should retire right now. This is a case where he could protect his legacy by staying at 5 slam titles instead of dropping down to -2. He’s destined to lose everything and then some.
Just noticing this. Your "prediction" came true.
 
Jannik sinner is 6-11 in 5th set matches he wasn't going to win you're delusional.. Sinner is not great playing from behind like alcaraz, Djokovic he's a front Runner you casual LMAO.. jack draper wasn't even a Top 20 Player when Sinner beat him in the US Open so Djokovic would've beaten Draper in straight sets and he would've destroyed fritz who's 0-10 Against Djokovic LMAO. Alcaraz in the US Open 2025 destroyed Djokovic and sinner that's a much better feat than beating draper who wasn't even a top 20 player in the US Open and Fritz wasn't even Top 10 so sinner had a cakewalk..... Sinner in Wimbledon in 2023 got destroyed by a 36 year Old Djokovic since you want to make it about Age. Djokovic in 2023 was close to his prime he won 3 slams and the ATP Finals LMAO.... a 36 Year old Djokovic would completely destroy a 21 or 22 year Old Djokovic.. do you forget that a young Djokovic Had a bad Serve ? Djokovic in his 30s has an Elite Serve he didn't have that at a young age.... Carlos Alcaraz at age 22 would destroy a 22 year old Djokovic who had a bad Serve and wasn't great at the Net...
2024-present Sinner is light years better than 2023 Sinner. This should be extremely clear to anyone who has been following tennis even remotely attentively.

You know, I posted a thread on TTW a while ago asking how 2023 Djokovic would fare against 2025 Sinner in a match at Wimbledon.

And almost unanimously, people on TTW said that 2025 Sinner beats 2023 Djokovic in straight sets. Seriously, it's not just me, but literally hundreds of posters who agree, and many of them are not even Djokovic haters.
2023 Alcaraz almost lost to 2023 Djokovic, and needed 5 sets (with 6-4 in the 5th) to beat him.
LMAO at anyone who thinks 2023 Alcaraz stands even remotely of a chance against 2025 Sinner on grass.

Prime Sinner is just straight up BETTER than prime Alcaraz at Wimbledon. I mean, I don't call it the "2-0 Open" for nothing ;)
 
Nope. There was still a very high chance that Sinner was going to win in 5 sets eventually, similar to what Federer pulled off in the 2012 Wimbledon R3 match against Benneteau.
Imagine if Benneteau in that match got injured after just the first two sets ended and had to retire. Then I bet, without a doubt, that countless fans (especially Djokodal fans) would've asterisked Federer's 2012 Wimbledon win, even though he did end up beating Djokovic and Murray back to back (similar to how Sinner eventually beat Djokovic and Alcaraz back to back).
And remember Djokovic in the 2022 Wimbledon QF? Yeah...


No. 2024 Draper and Fritz at USO >>> 2025 Djokovic at USO. Anyone who's watched both runs attentively would notice that.


Sinner's 2024 AO run >> Alcaraz's 2026 AO run
2024 AO SF Djokovic played much better than 2026 AO F Djokovic.


Seriously??
Alcaraz in 2023 Wimbledon final faced a 36 year old Djokovic way past his (actual) prime. Even then, it took him 5 close sets to get the job done.
On the other hand, Sinner in 2025 Wimbledon final beat Alcaraz, a prime, in-form ATG. And it only took 4 routine sets.

Convincingly beating a prime young ATG who was also the two-time defending champion >>> needing 5 sets to beat a 36 year old guy who only looked impressive prior due to massive vulturing
Nope. There was still a very high chance that Sinner was going to win in 5 sets eventually, similar to what Federer pulled off in the 2012 Wimbledon R3 match against Benneteau.
Imagine if Benneteau in that match got injured after just the first two sets ended and had to retire. Then I bet, without a doubt, that countless fans (especially Djokodal fans) would've asterisked Federer's 2012 Wimbledon win, even though he did end up beating Djokovic and Murray back to back (similar to how Sinner eventually beat Djokovic and Alcaraz back to back).
And remember Djokovic in the 2022 Wimbledon QF? Yeah...


No. 2024 Draper and Fritz at USO >>> 2025 Djokovic at USO. Anyone who's watched both runs attentively would notice that.


Sinner's 2024 AO run >> Alcaraz's 2026 AO run
2024 AO SF Djokovic played much better than 2026 AO F Djokovic.


Seriously??
Alcaraz in 2023 Wimbledon final faced a 36 year old Djokovic way past his (actual) prime. Even then, it took him 5 close sets to get the job done.
On the other hand, Sinner in 2025 Wimbledon final beat Alcaraz, a prime, in-form ATG. And it only took 4 routine sets.

Convincingly beating a prime young ATG who was also the two-time defending champion >>> needing 5 sets to beat a 36 year old guy who only looked impressive prior due to massive vulturing

Nope. There was still a very high chance that Sinner was going to win in 5 sets eventually, similar to what Federer pulled off in the 2012 Wimbledon R3 match against Benneteau.
Imagine if Benneteau in that match got injured after just the first two sets ended and had to retire. Then I bet, without a doubt, that countless fans (especially Djokodal fans) would've asterisked Federer's 2012 Wimbledon win, even though he did end up beating Djokovic and Murray back to back (similar to how Sinner eventually beat Djokovic and Alcaraz back to back).
And remember Djokovic in the 2022 Wimbledon QF? Yeah...


No. 2024 Draper and Fritz at USO >>> 2025 Djokovic at USO. Anyone who's watched both runs attentively would notice that.


Sinner's 2024 AO run >> Alcaraz's 2026 AO run
2024 AO SF Djokovic played much better than 2026 AO F Djokovic.


Seriously??
Alcaraz in 2023 Wimbledon final faced a 36 year old Djokovic way past his (actual) prime. Even then, it took him 5 close sets to get the job done.
On the other hand, Sinner in 2025 Wimbledon final beat Alcaraz, a prime, in-form ATG. And it only took 4 routine sets.

Convincingly beating a prime young ATG who was also the two-time defending champion >>> needing 5 sets to beat a 36 year old guy who only looked impressive prior due to massive vulturing
So
Nope. There was still a very high chance that Sinner was going to win in 5 sets eventually, similar to what Federer pulled off in the 2012 Wimbledon R3 match against Benneteau.
Imagine if Benneteau in that match got injured after just the first two sets ended and had to retire. Then I bet, without a doubt, that countless fans (especially Djokodal fans) would've asterisked Federer's 2012 Wimbledon win, even though he did end up beating Djokovic and Murray back to back (similar to how Sinner eventually beat Djokovic and Alcaraz back to back).
And remember Djokovic in the 2022 Wimbledon QF? Yeah...


No. 2024 Draper and Fritz at USO >>> 2025 Djokovic at USO. Anyone who's watched both runs attentively would notice that.


Sinner's 2024 AO run >> Alcaraz's 2026 AO run
2024 AO SF Djokovic played much better than 2026 AO F Djokovic.


Seriously??
Alcaraz in 2023 Wimbledon final faced a 36 year old Djokovic way past his (actual) prime. Even then, it took him 5 close sets to get the job done.
On the other hand, Sinner in 2025 Wimbledon final beat Alcaraz, a prime, in-form ATG. And it only took 4 routine sets.

Convincingly beating a prime young ATG who was also the two-time defending champion >>> needing 5 sets to beat a 36 year old guy who only looked impressive prior due to massive vulturing
Djokovic himself said he played the worst match of his career after losing to Sinner in the 2024 AO LMAO also sinner was 2 sets to 0 Down to medvedev and the only reason why he came back and won was because Medvedev was on court for 21+ Hours going into the finals so he he ran Out of gas against Sinner after going up 2 sets to 0 so sinner AO has an Asterisk and so does his Wimbledon Title. you said it took Alcaraz 5 sets to beat a 36 year old Djokovic ? That same Djokovic that was 36 destroyed Prime Sinner in straight sets in Wimbledon LMAO... since you want to Assume that Alcaraz was in his prime at age 20 well Sinner at age 20 and 21 couldn't beat Djokovic in Wimbledon LMAO.. sinner 2025 Wimbledon Run was a Joke he got bailed out that Dimitrov got injured then he played an injured Djokovic and Tired Alcaraz.... sinner is not going to have that same luck in 2026.... that 2025 Wimbledon Title has the biggest Asterisk ever...Alcaraz never had that type of luck... Alcaraz is much more complete than that overrated Bum who camps at the baseline and has peak already.... sinner is Highly overrated his delusional fans like you think he's better than Alcaraz LMAO.. sinner is one dimensional he can only win 1 way while Alcaraz Multiple Ways
 
About 18 more ;)

shawn-michaels-entrance.gif
 
2024-present Sinner is light years better than 2023 Sinner. This should be extremely clear to anyone who has been following tennis even remotely attentively.

You know, I posted a thread on TTW a while ago asking how 2023 Djokovic would fare against 2025 Sinner in a match at Wimbledon.

And almost unanimously, people on TTW said that 2025 Sinner beats 2023 Djokovic in straight sets. Seriously, it's not just me, but literally hundreds of posters who agree, and many of them are not even Djokovic haters.
2023 Alcaraz almost lost to 2023 Djokovic, and needed 5 sets (with 6-4 in the 5th) to beat him.
LMAO at anyone who thinks 2023 Alcaraz stands even remotely of a chance against 2025 Sinner on grass.

Prime Sinner is just straight up BETTER than prime Alcaraz at Wimbledon. I mean, I don't call it the "2-0 Open" for nothing ;)
what thread?

I don’t think 2025 sinner beats 2023 Djoker at wimbledon. The dude beat Dimitrov without winning a set and lost to medvedev the year before.
 
2024-present Sinner is light years better than 2023 Sinner. This should be extremely clear to anyone who has been following tennis even remotely attentively.

You know, I posted a thread on TTW a while ago asking how 2023 Djokovic would fare against 2025 Sinner in a match at Wimbledon.

And almost unanimously, people on TTW said that 2025 Sinner beats 2023 Djokovic in straight sets. Seriously, it's not just me, but literally hundreds of posters who agree, and many of them are not even Djokovic haters.
2023 Alcaraz almost lost to 2023 Djokovic, and needed 5 sets (with 6-4 in the 5th) to beat him.
LMAO at anyone who thinks 2023 Alcaraz stands even remotely of a chance against 2025 Sinner on grass.

Prime Sinner is just straight up BETTER than prime Alcaraz at Wimbledon. I mean, I don't call it the "2-0 Open" for nothing ;)
Prime Alcaraz is straight up better than Prime Sinner at the US Open which he's 2-0 Against Sinner and he's also better in roland garros which he's also 2-0 LMAO.. Yes Sinner is much in 2024 than 2023 and since 2024 Alcaraz is 7-2 Against Prime sinner destroying him in the US Open Finals.... Alcaraz is better on clay and Hard Courts than sinner.... Alcaraz overall is a much better Player than Sinner... Djokovic from 2023 would destroy Sinner in Wimbledon from 2025 we're talking about the same sinner who was down 2 sets to 0 against a Washed up dimitrov LMAO....
 
Prime Alcaraz is straight up better than Prime Sinner at the US Open which he's 2-0 Against Sinner and he's also better in roland garros which he's also 2-0 LMAO.. Yes Sinner is much in 2024 than 2023 and since 2024 Alcaraz is 7-2 Against Prime sinner destroying him in the US Open Finals.... Alcaraz is better on clay and Hard Courts than sinner.... Alcaraz overall is a much better Player than Sinner... Djokovic from 2023 would destroy Sinner in Wimbledon from 2025 we're talking about the same sinner who was down 2 sets to 0 against a Washed up dimitrov LMAO....
No, he wouldn't. No chance. He wouldn't even win a set against Sinner in Wimbledon from 2025.
Just saying: the magnitude of difference in level between 2023 Wimbledon Sinner and 2025 Wimbledon Sinner is even greater than the difference in level between 2015 Nadal and 2017 Nadal at Roland Garros.

Calling 2023 Sinner "prime" is even worse than calling 2015 Nadal "prime."

2025 Sinner destroys 2023 Djokovic 10/10 on any surface, any tournament, any match. Anyone who disagrees is just a delusional Djokovic fanatic.
96% of this TTW forum agrees with me.

Sorry to tell you, mate ;)
 
what thread?
This one:

I don’t think 2025 sinner beats 2023 Djoker at wimbledon. The dude beat Dimitrov without winning a set and lost to medvedev the year before.
I don't think 2012 Federer beats 2012 Djoker at Wimbledon. The dude was 2-0 down in sets vs Benneteau and lost to Tsonga the year before.

Oh wait...
 
No, he wouldn't. No chance. He wouldn't even win a set against Sinner in Wimbledon from 2025.
Just saying: the magnitude of difference in level between 2023 Wimbledon Sinner and 2025 Wimbledon Sinner is even greater than the difference in level between 2015 Nadal and 2017 Nadal at Roland Garros.

Calling 2023 Sinner "prime" is even worse than calling 2015 Nadal "prime."

2025 Sinner destroys 2023 Djokovic 10/10 on any surface, any tournament, any match. Anyone who disagrees is just a delusional Djokovic fanatic.
96% of this TTW forum agrees with me.

Sorry to tell you, mate ;)
You have to be trolling LMAO because Sinner is Alcaraz's Bitc*..... Alcaraz is Jordan to Sinner Malone..... Alcaraz is the Michael Jordan of tennis a freak Athlete who's Mentally Unbroken.... Alcaraz is the most complete tennis player there's ever been and ever will be...
 
You have to be trolling LMAO because Sinner is Alcaraz's Bitc*..... Alcaraz is Jordan to Sinner Malone..... Alcaraz is the Michael Jordan of tennis a freak Athlete who's Mentally Unbroken.... Alcaraz is the most complete tennis player there's ever been and ever will be...
So you're saying that you're more correct than 96% of this forum's people who've been watching and meticulously analyzing tennis for decades by now?

Let me re-iterate one thing: almost everyone here agrees that 2025 Sinner >>> 2023 Djokovic.
Undeniable.
 
Prime Alcaraz is straight up better than Prime Sinner at the US Open which he's 2-0 Against Sinner and he's also better in roland garros which he's also 1*-0 LMAO.. Yes Sinner is much in 2024 than 2023 and since 2024 Alcaraz is 7-2 Against Prime sinner destroying him in the US Open Finals.... Alcaraz is better on clay and Hard Courts than sinner.... Alcaraz overall is a much better Player than Sinner... Djokovic from 2023 would destroy Sinner in Wimbledon from 2025 we're talking about the same sinner who was down 2 sets to 0 against a Washed up dimitrov LMAO....
FTFY
Remember: the 2025 RG win was a huge asterisk, due to Sinner tanking the match!
Maybe you delusional Alcatraz fans don't get it.
 
Prime Alcaraz is straight up better than Prime Sinner at the US Open which he's 2-0 Against Sinner and he's also better in roland garros which he's also 2-0 LMAO.. Yes Sinner is much in 2024 than 2023 and since 2024 Alcaraz is 7-2 Against Prime sinner destroying him in the US Open Finals.... Alcaraz is better on clay and Hard Courts than sinner.... Alcaraz overall is a much better Player than Sinner... Djokovic from 2023 would destroy Sinner in Wimbledon from 2025 we're talking about the same sinner who was down 2 sets to 0 against a Washed up dimitrov LMAO....
LMAO you've got to be kidding me.
3 Slams + 1 F + 2 ATP Finals titles > 3 Slams + 0 F + 0 ATP Finals titles
Cope harder
 
This one:


I don't think 2012 Federer beats 2012 Djoker at Wimbledon. The dude was 2-0 down in sets vs Benneteau and lost to Tsonga the year before.

Oh wait...
not a particularly fair comparison or active thread. 2026 sinner lost to geriatric djokovic on his best surface.
 
2024-present Sinner is light years better than 2023 Sinner. This should be extremely clear to anyone who has been following tennis even remotely attentively.

You know, I posted a thread on TTW a while ago asking how 2023 Djokovic would fare against 2025 Sinner in a match at Wimbledon.

And almost unanimously, people on TTW said that 2025 Sinner beats 2023 Djokovic in straight sets. Seriously, it's not just me, but literally hundreds of posters who agree, and many of them are not even Djokovic haters.
2023 Alcaraz almost lost to 2023 Djokovic, and needed 5 sets (with 6-4 in the 5th) to beat him.
LMAO at anyone who thinks 2023 Alcaraz stands even remotely of a chance against 2025 Sinner on grass.

Prime Sinner is just straight up BETTER than prime Alcaraz at Wimbledon. I mean, I don't call it the "2-0 Open" for nothing ;)

Current Sinner is no longer ‘24/25 Sinner
 
Current Sinner is no longer ‘24/25 Sinner
Oh come on, please.
He's just had TWO losses so far in 2026 and yet, y'all are acting like he's already finished/washed up.
I mean, the overreaction is just outrageous.
To put things into perspective, Djokovic in 2015 also had two losses at the start of the season - one in Doha and another one in Dubai. And yet, no tennis fan in their right mind would call 2015 Djokovic "washed up."
 
i really dont understand these "better" comparisons
this one does not involves djoker so it shows my dislike not related to goat debate
that said i need to use djoker as an example
the winner of each match depends on various factors
at sw19
in 2018 rafa might (or not of course) defeat djoker with the roof remained opened
in 2019, an ace would make fed the champion
my point is it is unnecessary to use matches (or even records) to assess which one or who is better

disclaimer - djoker is the god of tennis, not just goat
 
So you have to be dominant for the slam to count? How dominant though?

Amount of majors won without dropping a set:

Nadal - 4

Federer - 2 (different surfaces)

Djoko - 0

Sinner - 0

Alcaraz - 0
 
How many of them are funny? 5% maybe? Miserable number compared to obnoxious trolls.

For instance Federer and Del Potro is a funny one. I wouldn't call him a troll though, he's rather a guy who likes to joke around about pretty much everything and he's funny. These guys who are obvious trolls like megafan and many other like him are just boring. Or fantards who troll about players they don't like. They are destroying discussions and communication.
 
How many of them are funny? 5% maybe? Miserable number compared to obnoxious trolls.

For instance Federer and Del Potro is a funny one. I wouldn't call him a troll though, he's rather a guy who likes to joke around about pretty much everything and he's funny. These guys who are obvious trolls like megafan and many other like him are just boring. Or fantards who troll about players they don't like. They are destroying discussions and communication.
That’s a different matter but I like funny trolls , problem is some obnoxious posters you deem as troll barely come under the troll and more of crazy fanboys. My favourite troll is grasscraz
 
How many of them are funny? 5% maybe? Miserable number compared to obnoxious trolls.

For instance Federer and Del Potro is a funny one. I wouldn't call him a troll though, he's rather a guy who likes to joke around about pretty much everything and he's funny. These guys who are obvious trolls like junkieballer, GoatNo1 and many other like him are just boring. Or fantards who troll about players they don't like. They are destroying discussions and communication.
FTFY
 
How many of them are funny? 5% maybe? Miserable number compared to obnoxious trolls.

For instance Federer and Del Potro is a funny one. I wouldn't call him a troll though, he's rather a guy who likes to joke around about pretty much everything and he's funny. These guys who are obvious trolls like megafan and many other like him are just boring. Or fantards who troll about players they don't like. They are destroying discussions and communication.
Just ignore that guy and don’t give his intentionally stupid and unoriginal posts any air.
 
Back
Top