Will djoker’s numbers be surpassed in our lifetime?

Cannot see Novak’s numbers being eclipsed, and I think he will add significantly to them before he leaves the game. His health and fitness is unbelievable, not in a ped’s use sense, just overall in the sports world. Tennis I think can be much harder on one’s body than many other activities. The guy is a rock…but like a rubber rock!

I’d like to see him get to 25 slam’s.

the big 3 got 20+ slams each all the while competing against eachother..
the FO was off limits becuz of rafa, W becuz of roger, and AO becuz of djoko...
with them gone its not a question of if alcarez can win the CYGS, its how many times he can win the CYGS :)
he should be able to really rack them up
 
the big 3 got 20+ slams each all the while competing against eachother..
the FO was off limits becuz of rafa, W becuz of roger, and AO becuz of djoko...
with them gone its not a question of if alcarez can win the CYGS, its how many times he can win the CYGS :)
he should be able to really rack them up
Nothing is a guarantee though. You assume things like this but they rarely go to script.

We just have to see how he goes but I certainly see him getting above 10 at least if he keeps going strong.

I’d expect a rival or 2 to challenge him on a surface in future and no one knows how his body will hold up over time. Hopefully he doesn’t lose motivation or get distracted by other issues whether personal, etc.
 
Nothing is a guarantee though. You assume things like this but they rarely go to script.

We just have to see how he goes but I certainly see him getting above 10 at least if he keeps going strong.

I’d expect a rival or 2 to challenge him on a surface in future and no one knows how his body will hold up over time. Hopefully he doesn’t lose motivation or get distracted by other issues whether personal, etc.

thats true but i think alcarez has a chance of winning the CYGS next year at 21y.o.. so he has more opportunities than the big 3 had for sure
the FO will become a winnable tournament again instead of the rafa cup
 
Nice discussion, although I feel like y’all talk past each other a little.


To your credit, I think it’s inarguable that the level in basketball (and many other sports) is higher today.

That said, I’m squeamish about dinging past players for this because it’s a matter of chronology. The pesky flow of time will nearly always (and I’d argue unduly) penalize players of yore.

Shohei Ohtani, for instance, is a better baseball player than Babe Ruth in absolute terms, but does that remain the case if you reverse their birth years? Impossible to say.

At the same time, league quality *does* still matter in baseball, so you also *can’t* just refer to their raw statistical output…there’s a reason only 2 players whose careers have occurred within the last 60 years are in the Top 15 in career baseball WAR.

Much harder to separate oneself from the historical pack today, precisely because LQ is higher.

With basketball it’s, IMO, a little murkier because while the quality of the league has improved, the statistical difference between top players and replacement-level players has barely shifted. Part of this is due to b-ball evolving into a more heliocentric sport, with team playbooks being more slanted toward squeezing every bit of juice from a teams star player…TL;DR - top players appear to be optimized better today. Unlike in baseball, the bulk of best all-time (per-possession) statistical seasons did not occur in the early years of the sport. There’s actually a pretty even statistical distribution.


As for the specific examples you cite, I can’t speak on Phelps as I have next-to-no knowledge of swimming but I know for certain that Magic was a pretty good shooter. He was deadeye from the line and had a very good long-two game. Much like with Jordan, there’s an inverse correlation between attempts and poor %’s from the arc, meaning the more he took the better he shot. If you teleport him to todays game, does he become an elite 3 point shooter? No, I don’t think so. But what if he were born in, say, 1990? Ultimately it’s unknowable. Same w the question of how, say, a ‘40-born Durant would fare in the 60’s. By the rules of the day, he’d get called for palming on every possession if he dribbled the same way.
giphy.gif
 
I only know about Magic from South Park.
Scared to watch that. lol

I only really knew of Jordan, Magic, Bird and Barkley when I was growing up. I find it amusing how I knew of Barkley because he was so good in the video game I had, so I'm thinking back to spamming with him. The funny thing is how Barkley doesn't want to be used in the video games unless all the players past and present receive a certain amount. Quite nice of him to try and shake down those greedy bleeps.

I enjoy listening to him on NBA shows. Their pre- and post-match is more entertaining than football now.
 
A 5th major will be added ($) The Jokerbots will be on TTW in 2035 claiming that it's an unfair comparison to stats set in the 4 slam era.

Despite the fact that 99% of the current users don't acknowledge the advantage the Big 3 have comparing current stats to the 3 slam era, or even know that AO used to be the final slam of the season.
 
Just playing devils advocate, why do you assume that similar advancements in medicine and sports science can't lead to continued gains in physical fitness, longevity, endurance, etc. as we have already seen over the last couple of decades? What makes you think Djokovic has achieved the peak of what will be possible for the next 50+ years?

It seems more likely than not that the records will be surpassed, based on the current rate of gains in the longevity of pro athletes.
You'd still need an extraordinary set of circumstances to manifest a wide enough gap between a player and his next generations, since the benefits should in theory benefit the tour at large. Extend Med's C game for a few years longer and watch the 'meh' unfold.
 
Back
Top