veroniquem
Bionic Poster
Who?
10char
Look at the list of guys who beat him all those years he didn't make the RG final... And no, it's not just Fed and Nadal...
Who?
10char
Three sets. He lost in Madrid.
Look at the list of guys who beat him all those years he didn't make the RG final... And no, it's not just Fed and Nadal...
I'm not talking about in the past; I am talking about now. So,again,who is going to beat him there in the future?
I'm not talking about in the past; I am talking about now. So,again,who is going to beat him there in the future?
I'm not talking about in the past; I am talking about now. So,again,who is going to beat him there in the future?
The same guys who beat him in the past.
The same guys who beat him in the past.
lol Seppi was 2 sets to 0 up, Tsonga had 4 match points. Basically draw a name out of a hat. Djokovic could win RG or he could lose to anyone. He's getting older, picking up more milage :lol: US Open proved he's already declined from the AO this year
Sure. Why not? Djoko has always shown vulnerability at RG. Not that he cannot win it. He can, no doubt. But he's also plenty beatable there.
Because it's ridiculous to suggest those guys are going to outlast him in a best of 5 match. They would be fortuante to push him to a tiebreaker,and taking even just one set would take an intervetion from God himself. They will never,ever beat Cvac at a slam again.
:lol: No way,Towser. Just because he's not double bageling folks doesn't mean he's declining. You're just being silly saying things like that.
Lol you're funny. Djoko got beaten in slams this year (and every year that was not 2011) and he will get beaten again and no alien or supernatural intervention will be required
It took Fed playing out his skin, and the clay GOAT to take out Djoker at RG the last two years.. Rest assured, Nadal won't be around forever.. And Fed isn't going to play out of skin at the French vs. Djoker again.
And there is no one else right now, besides Nadal who can take Nole out at the French.. Nole has a good half a dozen chances to grab a few French Open titles. Unless people think Nadal will continue his domination at the French for another 4-6 years.. That aint happening
The clay field is pretty weak right now.. Even Murray sucks on clay.. So that leaves Djoker with a TON more opportunities
I'm just using your logic. Nadal winning MC, Rome, Barca and RG dropping only one set and he's apparently declining. I guess cos he needs to win them all in straight sets tripple bagelling people. He's a hardcourt mug who always needed a miracle to beat Djokovic according to you but pushing Djokovic to the edge in IW, Miami and AO apparently means he's declining..
And you must be able to see Djokovic had a long 5 set with Murray at the US open and then beat Nadal in 6 hours, but at the US Open he couldn't outlast Murray in the final. 2011 was his peak and he will never play like that again.
He is a big favourite to make the final every year but he can be beaten and was almost beaten by Seppi and Tsonga. So he is not totally immune to a shock loss. Let's not forget in 2011 Bellucci and Murray almost beat him in Rome. Djokovic is a good clay court player but he is not safe from being upset
Barely. He's practically unbeatable in best of 5 matches,and has been for nearly 2 years now.
Nadal IS hardcourt mug. He sucks on hc and always will. He was very fortunate to win what he has on hc because of it.
I definitely disagree with that. I think we will see Cvacman again starting at the AO next year. I have no doubt in my mind about that.
Yes he is.
. 2 of his losses didn't even go to a 5th.
It took Fed playing out his skin, and the clay GOAT to take out Djoker at RG the last two years.. Rest assured, Nadal won't be around forever.. And Fed isn't going to play out of skin at the French vs. Djoker again.
And there is no one else right now, besides Nadal who can take Nole out at the French.. Nole has a good half a dozen chances to grab a few French Open titles. Unless people think Nadal will continue his domination at the French for another 4-6 years.. That aint happening
The clay field is pretty weak right now.. Even Murray sucks on clay.. So that leaves Djoker with a TON more opportunities
yeah, he's won 1 out of the last 4 slams and was a break down in the final set of the only one he did win. 2 of his losses didn't even go to a 5th.
That's the poorest use of the words "barely" and "practically". You should look them up in a dictionary
Soderling made 2 FO finals, you can argue Nole is behind him, let alone Federer. And don't even get started with who had greater competition. Roger had a much better version of Nadal on clay from 2005-2009. Nole will benefit from a declining Nadal(especially his movement), so he does have an easy chance to win the FO in the future.
Hilarious. Nadal has only won 2 out of the last 8 slams yet you don't think he's past his prime and in decline. You then turn around and say Cvac is declining because he has won only 1 slam out of the last 4. Last year Nadal only won 1 slam out of the 4 as well but you insisted he was still in his prime while he was losing over and over again. Funny how the rules change when it comes to your favorite player. :lol:
I said Djokovic wasn't practically unbeatable because he had lost in 3 out of 4 slams. I didn't ever say Nadal was practiaclly unbeatable or barely lost in a slam while last year,or any year, so your point fails.
And the decling stuff was taking the ****, sarcastically copying you :lol: I do think he peaked in 2011 and will never reach that level again, and I do think he's not as good as he was even at the AO this year meaning that he will probably be more likely to be upset than he was this year where he almost lost to seppi and Tsonga at RG, but I still think he has a few years of winning slams.
Also you still can't make up your mind who my favourite player even is, so once again you are confused.
Sure it was. :lol:
No. Just no,no,no. You don't really believe that anyway.
Huh? I know you're a ******* and a Cvactard. They are both you're your favorites so I don't see the problem in addressing them as such.
I don't think ANYONE other that clarky thinks Novak is unbeatable. Let's be serious, please. He just lost to Querrey
yes but she doesn't even understand the difference between losing one match and being finished :lol:
I thought that was a tankjob. Look at all the Cvactards,and several *******s who argued till they were blue in the face that it was.
Didn't it go 3 sets? Definitely not a tank job.
It was clarky,sorry you didn't see that.
And how does Djokovic fallaway totally in the 5th set of the US Open if he was as good as in the AO 2012? He doesn't have the same stamina which could be aslight decline from his absolute peak.
No, you claim I'm a ********* who isn't a federer fan, then claim the opposite.
Basically I argue with you, with veroniquem, with NadalAgassi, with GodNovak, F1Bob, have argued with Monfed and I'm over in one of macenroeartist's threads saying he's being biased towards Federer and against Nadal. I'm also having an argument with gonzo because I say Murray who I dislike is better on indoor hard than Djokovic.
I have my favourites but I'm not a ****. But everyone who doesn't agree with you is a ****, despite the fact you are just a weird variety of *******.
I thought that was a tankjob. Look at all the Cvactards,and several *******s who argued till they were blue in the face that it was.
As I recall, you argued that it wasn't a tankjob as well.
I'd tell you what I think,but you'll just insult my sanity again so I won't.
When did I say that? I know you like them both.
You think I am a *******? I am harsh on Nadal and never hero worship him so how do I qualify as a *******?
Please refer to post 234.
well you can say what you think happened if you like. Tbh I think he put too much into the first 2 sets that he lost and didn't have enough in the 5th (maybe more mentally) I do think from AO 2011 to AO2011 Djokovic just had more to give, but that wasn't a normal level anyway so I'm fine with him dropping his level a bit.
Nah,I said to you before Federer is my favourite player and you basically said i was talking BS.
Yeah you're hard on Nadal even if he steam rollers everyone. You're hard on him when he wins slams dropping only one set. You maintain he is playing total garbage. You claim he is a hardcourt mug but then get annoyed with him when he narrowly loses to "the best hardcourt player in the world" - what did you expect?
Basically what this implies is unless Rafa wins every single event he enters, you can only explain it by claiming he is playing to 1% of his ability. Every time he loses he was playing bad blah blah blah. You are a ******* because you can't except he can have any loss unless he is playing terribly. And you come up with rubbish like djokovic being the best hc player in 2010to bolster nadal's US Open win.
Also i think the 7 losses to Djokovic will never leave you no matter what Nadal has or will achieve, so that's where all the negativity comes from. You'd rather he actually never made those finals.
Btw a lot of the posts you and I argue about is me saying Djokovic won't ever match up to nadal, that he won't do this and that, we're arguing here about him being a sure bet for RG, so how does that make ME a *********? Just using your logic.
When is the last time Nadal steam rolled anyone? Seriously,it's been years so I don't really think that matters.
Again,he IS a hardcourt mug. He has been hilariously bad on hc throughout his entire career,losing again and again to even the biggest of mugs. Do you think he's a top hardcourt player? If you say yes you have got to be kidding me.
I never said he had to win everything he enters. Where you got that from is a mystery to me.
You got that right. I'd rather someone else make those finals so Cvac had to actually work to win all those titles. They were gifted to him on a silver platter by Nadal's lousy play. Nadal also has zero business being in a hc final against Cvac anywhere at anytime or else it's only going ot yet another title for Cvac.
I meant in the popularity department. It's true that he will never be as popular as Nadal or Fed. I think that probably bugs someone that thrives on attention like Cvac does.
Clarky; Do you want Rafa to come back or stay away? Seems like the latter. You see him as a complete failure.
Last time he steamrollered someone? Try everyone in clay season. Djokovic 6-1 6-3, Ferrer 7-6 6-0 and 6-2 6-2 6-1, Monaco who you thought would trouble him - 6-2 6-0 6-0 :shock:
And again if he's always been such a hardcourt mug, what did you expect him to do vs Djokovic in IW, Miami, US Open AO? Considering he's so terrible, against prime Novak he did BETTER than you could expect. So all your talk of him playing WORSE then ever is just being sore because you hate the fact he lost to Djokovic.
Well whenever he doesn't win anything you maintain it was because he was mugging it up etc. Even when he wins easily you are never happy. That's basically excuse making - nadal didn't win 6-0 6-0 oh he was playing badly
The thing about djokovic is not quite what i meant.My point is if you criticising nadal means you're not a ******* then me criticising Djokovic means i'm not a *********.
Nadal has dominated on clay forever, and he also beat Djokovic in 3 clay finals last year, so evidently he "belongs" in finals against Cvac on at least one surface. I'd ask you to stop being ridiculous, but I know that's pointless.
Clarky: When did you become a Rafa fan and what made you become a fan?