Will Djokovic ever win another Slam?

Will Djokovic ever win another Slam?


  • Total voters
    148
He has 0.0% chance at Wimbledon 2025 unless Alcaraz is meaningfully injured or absent.
Not if he faces Alcaraz but Alcaraz is still prone to upsets at an early round. I can see someone like Zverev having a lights out serving day taking him out if Alcaraz isn't playing his best.
 
Nobody thought Kerber or Halep or Bianca would defeat Serena in a grand slam final. But they played lights out in that match. Against Osaka it was like preparing for coronation. But Osaka gave rude shock and Serena used the warning to make it a circus.
Yes right now novak can beat everyone else other than Sinner and Alacaraz. But for how long is the question
I agree Djokovic is a favorite against Med and Zed but the gap has closed. In NY on hardcourt, I think the gap between these 2 and Djokovic is smaller than ever before assuming Zed's knee recovers by then.
 
Djoko's friends Med & Zed will beat Alcaraz at AO/USO, they will clear the path for Nole who will be on the opposite half, so he will :)
 
The era of the Big 3 is over. We need to accept it at some point. Fed is gone, Rafa is checked out and even though made the finals of AO Semi and Wimby Finals, he hasnt had the same results as last year or the previous. And yes, he was injured and had surgery but it's astonishing to knowwe are more than half way into the year and Djoko has ZERO titles.
 
Sampras even at 31 was in as bad shape (worse infact) as Djokovic is at 37 (minus the injury), so a fit Djokovic winning is as likely as it was for Sampras .... plus Med/Zed can do the dirty work for Novak which Agassi did for Pete in removing the obstacle before the final.

Physically, Sampras was fine. I’d favor 31 yo Sampras to beat this Djokovic in both USO and Wimbledon. Sampras could have won more slams in his 30’s like Agassi, but simply didn’t have the motivation to do so. He actually beat Federer in an exhibition match in 2007 at 36 years old. The entire series was very competitive.
 
Right, and Musetti has been looked at as a clay specialist who was gonna get wiped out on grass

How many other players have reached the Queen's final and Wimbledon Semi in the same season?

I don't personally think Djoko is the Grass GOAT but the majority do, so I just go with that instead of arguing in every thread
I don’t think thinks he’s the grass GOAT. I think at most what some would say is that the difference between him and Federer on grass, while real, is not huge.

Edit: I’d add that grass has become a very specialized surface, basically one very prestigious tournament and that’s it. Not sure talking of a grass GOAT even makes sense
 
Yeah USO was a gift and so was AO but Djokovic cracked against Sinner lol.

Ever since his last year's wimbledon loss he has been vulnerable vs youngsters, I agree, as one approaches 37 these cracks tend to show. Now Djoker has reached a stage where he will be the oldest slam winner if he wins a slam.
 
Not sure he will ever beat Alcaraz and Sinner in best of 5 sets anymore. Their weight of shot off both wings is a killer for any player as you have to do so much running let alone a 37 year old.
Im not entirely sure on hard courts he can now beat a well playing Medvedev in best of 5 either. Zverev i think he would have a chance due to the Zverev FH which is still suspect.
Novak can beat everyone else though even this version. While there are only two or 3 guys who are better, then obviously he can win another one.
If Djokovic loses to Tiafoe at a Major or Fritz that will be when i will write him off. Or Tsitsipas or Rublev.
 
Not sure he will ever beat Alcaraz and Sinner in best of 5 sets anymore. Their weight of shot off both wings is a killer for any player as you have to do so much running let alone a 37 year old.
Im not entirely sure on hard courts he can now beat a well playing Medvedev in best of 5 either. Zverev i think he would have a chance due to the Zverev FH which is still suspect.
Novak can beat everyone else though even this version. While there are only two or 3 guys who are better, then obviously he can win another one.
If Djokovic loses to Tiafoe at a Major or Fritz that will be when i will write him off. Or Tsitsipas or Rublev.
Lol he needs to retire right on the spot if he were to lose to one of those two in a slam. I don't think Fritz can even beat a 45 year old Djokovic.
 
I don’t think thinks he’s the grass GOAT. I think at most what some would say is that the difference between him and Federer on grass, while real, is not huge.

Edit: I’d add that grass has become a very specialized surface, basically one very prestigious tournament and that’s it. Not sure talking of a grass GOAT even makes sense

I agree w/everything you said, just kind of sarcastically parroting the mainstream narrative that Djoko > Fed at Wimby bc of h2h with Legends Tour Fed

Not sure he will ever beat Alcaraz and Sinner in best of 5 sets anymore. Their weight of shot off both wings is a killer for any player as you have to do so much running let alone a 37 year old.
Im not entirely sure on hard courts he can now beat a well playing Medvedev in best of 5 either. Zverev i think he would have a chance due to the Zverev FH which is still suspect.
Novak can beat everyone else though even this version. While there are only two or 3 guys who are better, then obviously he can win another one.
If Djokovic loses to Tiafoe at a Major or Fritz that will be when i will write him off. Or Tsitsipas or Rublev.

If Sinner had got through Alcaraz, I think Djokovic would've had a better chance than against Alcaraz. Sinner just hits really hard but his movement is way worse especially on natural surfaces.

You could see from the start Djoko knew he couldn't take CA's legs
 
USO 2024, AO 2025 and Wimbledon 2025 will be his last three chances. I think he can get one.

He's been terrible this year but can still return to a good level for a few months. Federer was poor in 2018 and then he almost won one in 2019. I think Djokovic will be in a similar position that he can take one but remains to be seen if he will actually do it.

I suspect what many will discover over the coming months is that Djokovic is no Federer and that he flattered to deceived - that is his success over the the last decade was largely due to the lost 90's generation and that fact that he played almost his entire career without having to face a younger all time great.
 
I suspect what many will discover over the coming months is that Djokovic is no Federer and that he flattered to deceived - that is his success over the the last decade was largely due to the lost 90's generation and that fact that he played almost his entire career without having to face a younger all time great.
You really are a salty Federe fan lol
Novak has surpassed your player on virtually every level and taken nearly all of his records.

Fact is Roger was getting beaten in his prime on his favourite surface by likes of Tspnga and Berry has back in 2010 and 2011.
 
I think he will win one of these 3 majors: 2024 USO, 2025 AO, 2025 Wimbledon - most likely 2025 AO.

He's been terrible in 2024 so far, although I can see him still getting to the 2nd week of this year's USO.

As long as he does not play against Alcaraz or Sinner, he's definitely in with a shot as the rest of the players are too mentally weak to stop him in best of 5 sets.
 

Oldest Grand Slam Champion​


RankCountryNameAgeSeasonTournament
1
au.png
AUS
Ken Rosewall37 years 1 mon 24 days1972Australian Open
2
ch.png
SUI
Roger Federer36 years 5 mons 7 days2018Australian Open
3
au.png
AUS
Ken Rosewall36 years 4 mons 5 days1971Australian Open
4
rs.png
SRB
Novak Djokovic
active.png
36 years 3 mons 6 days2023US Open
5
rs.png
SRB
Novak Djokovic
active.png
36 years 6 days2023Roland Garros
6
es.png
ESP
Rafael Nadal35 years 11 mons 19 days2022Roland Garros
7
ch.png
SUI
Roger Federer35 years 10 mons 26 days2017Wimbledon
8
au.png
AUS
Ken Rosewall35 years 10 mons1970US Open
9
rs.png
SRB
Novak Djokovic
active.png
35 years 7 mons 25 days2023Australian Open
10
es.png
ESP
Rafael Nadal35 years 7 mons 14 days2022Australian Open
11
ch.png
SUI
Roger Federer35 years 5 mons 8 days2017Australian Open
12
rs.png
SRB
Novak Djokovic
active.png
35 years 1 mon 5 days2022Wimbledon
 
This is Djokovic we're talking about.. He will never be content with being 1 slam away from the outright record in all of tennis, Court shouldn't have that record with 40% of her slams being total jokes. Djokovic deserves it and he'll bend over backwards to get it, I'm sure of that. Speaking as a Nadal fan over here ;)

11602761095b4110c36211b042802905_orig.jpg

cb2ad0cf-4cb0-49b9-a47c-a2b12ac93736
More like as a Court detractor.
 
This is wrong. Where did you get this? From the usermade webpage UTS? That webpages can contain errors like this one.

The Roland-Garros 2022 final was held the 5th of June of 2022, when Rafael Nadal was 36 years and 2 days old.

UTS always considers the day the slam begins, it does not consider the day of the final, thats why. Most of the data in UTS is accurate upto 2023 end.
 
I suspect what many will discover over the coming months is that Djokovic is no Federer and that he flattered to deceived - that is his success over the the last decade was largely due to the lost 90's generation and that fact that he played almost his entire career without having to face a younger all time great.



Again the same nonsense of no younger ATG when Nadal, Murray and himself are all separated by a year. And until last year he was beating and going toe-to-toe with Sinner and Alcaraz, only this year he fell off.

Who cares that there was no "younger" ATG in the past 10 years when Nadal was winning slams until mid-2022 two years ago. Or if Nadal was born a year later it would change things completely because he'd be older.

And Wawrinka and Murray are finished now but they weren't 10 years ago.

Even if you erase THREE of Djokovic's slams in the past 3 years, he still has more slams than Federer. So you can delete those weak wins and he's still ahead. Unless you think not winning is better than winning against weak competition and he should be punished for winning "weak" slams.
 
UTS always considers the day the slam begins, it does not consider the day of the final, thats why. Most of the data in UTS is accurate upto 2023 end.
Which is wrong, and I think we'll agree here. You should consider how old is the player the day he wins the Slam, not the day the Slam starts. The opening day of the Slam the player still hasn't won it.

It's simple mathematics, if you start counting from the day the Slam begins rather than from the final, you're counting the player as about 14 days younger than he actually is the day he wins the Slam.
 
Last edited:
Which is wrong, and I think we'll agree here. You should consider how old is the player the day he wins the Slam, not the day the Slam starts. The opening day of the Slam the player still hasn't won it.

It's simple mathematics, if you start counting from the day the Slam begins rather than from the final, you're counting the player as about 14 days younger than he actually is the day he wins the Slam.

How does that make a difference ? You want 14 days added to Nadal's count so that he looks 36+ ... this is not a big deal
 
How does that make a difference ? You want 14 days added to Nadal's count so that he looks 36+ ... this is not a big deal
You're right that it does not make a difference in the list, but it could be more accurate.

Anyway, Rosewall is still the record-holder of oldest Slam winner.

You think Novak will beat this record of Ken?
 
You're right that it does not make a difference in the list, but it could be more accurate.

Anyway, Rosewall is still the record-holder of oldest Slam winner.

You think Novak will beat this record of Ken?

If he wins another Slam then Rosewall's record will be broken since he will be older than Rosewall's last slam age by the time of US Open, so he will have to create a record now.
 
Raz, Paul and Meds were the in form players of SW, Djoko was not
even in the same ballpark that was obvious from the start even till the end.

While aging Nole keeps going to the opening of envelopes outside of tennis
and not slowing down as a night owl, he is in a downward spiral and should
join Murray sooner than later as the commitment to tournaments before Majors
has dwindled and that is more dangerous to his counter style game.

Fed could attack the net as often for he had natural sense in attack
while Nole looks like a kamikaze virgin teen at the net in this recent loss.

His best chance to win a last major is SW next year as he needs to keep
points shorter as he ages but his game is closer to Murray and Simon.
 
I agree w/everything you said, just kind of sarcastically parroting the mainstream narrative that Djoko > Fed at Wimby bc of h2h with Legends Tour Fed



If Sinner had got through Alcaraz, I think Djokovic would've had a better chance than against Alcaraz. Sinner just hits really hard but his movement is way worse especially on natural surfaces.

You could see from the start Djoko knew he couldn't take CA's legs
Interesting. I think Sinner may have choked if he had faced Novak. A Wimbledon final is still on a different level to the other slams.
Assuming he didnt choke i wonder if Novak would have still been overpowered, although it is true Sinner doesnt have the variety that Alcaraz can bring on big points.
 
Lol he needs to retire right on the spot if he were to lose to one of those two in a slam. I don't think Fritz can even beat a 45 year old Djokovic.
I dont see what Fritz brings at all lol. no BH, an above average FH i guess, and a decent serve, but no defensive skills at all, poor movement and no volleying ability. How he is above top 40 i'll never know.
 
Again the same nonsense of no younger ATG when Nadal, Murray and himself are all separated by a year. And until last year he was beating and going toe-to-toe with Sinner and Alcaraz, only this year he fell off.

Who cares that there was no "younger" ATG in the past 10 years when Nadal was winning slams until mid-2022 two years ago. Or if Nadal was born a year later it would change things completely because he'd be older.

And Wawrinka and Murray are finished now but they weren't 10 years ago.

Even if you erase THREE of Djokovic's slams in the past 3 years, he still has more slams than Federer. So you can delete those weak wins and he's still ahead. Unless you think not winning is better than winning against weak competition and he should be punished for winning "weak" slams.

2024 is the first year that Djokovic has had to contend with seriously good players in Sinner and Alcaraz that are significantly younger and the results speak for themselves.

Nadal and Murray were contemporaries. Your point doesn't change the fact that he played almost his entire career without having to face a significantly younger all time great.

Were Sinner or Alcaraz born in the nineties his record would have been much different.

He was lucky but good enough to capitalise on that luck.
 
2024 is the first year that Djokovic has had to contend with seriously good players in Sinner and Alcaraz that are significantly younger and the results speak for themselves.

Conveniently you want to start counting from this year. Not last year when he beat Sinner in straights in Wimbledon and almost beats Alcaraz in the final too. Or when he beat Alcaraz in RG and Cinci. Or when he beat BOTH back to back in the Masters. He was a few points away from beating Alcaraz and Sinner back to back at the Masters and Wimbledon in the same year.


Nadal and Murray were contemporaries. Your point doesn't change the fact that he played almost his entire career without having to face a significantly younger all time great.

No, he had to play with an older one and one his same age. Sampras and Agassi also played virtually all of their careers without facing a younger ATG. Federer played without facing an older one or a contemporary one. Alcaraz and Sinner now don't have an older one except Nadal that is virtually retired and Djokovic that will soon be as well.


Were Sinner or Alcaraz born in the nineties his record would have been much different.


It would be much different from them as well. Last year as a 36yo he did better than them combined, imagine if he was 30-33.



He was lucky but good enough to capitalise on that luck.

He was lucky but so were many others in other circumstances.
 
2024 is the first year that Djokovic has had to contend with seriously good players in Sinner and Alcaraz that are significantly younger and the results speak for themselves.

Nadal and Murray were contemporaries. Your point doesn't change the fact that he played almost his entire career without having to face a significantly younger all time great.

Were Sinner or Alcaraz born in the nineties his record would have been much different.

He was lucky but good enough to capitalise on that luck.

2024 Djokovic level is below his 2007 and mobility has never been worse, he could not stretch at all off both sides
and volleys were worse than before hiring Woodforde. 2023 Nole Level was closer to 2008 level and yet lost.

None of the ATGs faced a significantly younger ATG, Nole vs Raz 15+ years etc.

Sinraz born in the 90s would be an issue with racquets, balls, surfaces and medical technologies.
Sinner would break his wrists using a Murray like heads and Raz would cry with an RD-7 or heavy
PK Destiny painted as a Babolat.

Nole was very lucky, luck won him all those 24 majors specially lucky that he was treated as the
party crasher or a water bending wacko for supporting Masaru Emoto's proven works.

Seeing how long Tennis has waited for someone to come along and beat the ATG or big3
its seems NextGenies were wrong to say that only when the big3 retire they will have a chance.

The reality is injuries, old age, slow recovery = too many bad losses before calling it quits.

The way society is going and sucked into technology for convenience and entertainment,
the future gens are going to be nothing like the Big3 as the distractions of our modern tech
controlled lives is impeding the focus needed for their brains to master tennis properly.
 
I agree Djokovic is a favorite against Med and Zed but the gap has closed. In NY on hardcourt, I think the gap between these 2 and Djokovic is smaller than ever before assuming Zed's knee recovers by then.
Hard to sayhe is a favourite where Zverev and Medvedev are concerned as it’s nearly a year since he played either of them. 2024 Djokovic will be someone they are more likely to beat now.
 
Big 3 lifetime issues

Fed had issues vs Nadal FH onto his BH
Nadal had issues with players that hit on the rise
(atm too slow, FH missing under pressure and Stamina)
Nole still cant hit overheads properly
(atm volleys are an issue, focus, serve, BH, FH errors galore)
I believe he is going to be an embarrased finalist for rest of his career.

NextGen hopefuls to replace Big3

Alcaraz just needs better Focus and patience
and it seems to be happening with age.

Sinner needs better volleying skills, more variety
and confidence when going gets tough.

Fonseca needs Federer mentorship
and even Feds old team has more
promise than Mensik who is too heavy
 
Morale is low for our Nolefams, most of them like Nachiket, Sonny T, RF18 and the gang are demoralized, they've been subjected to the harsh reality of life that players do decline a lot in 30s, everything that they've believed on Federer being at his peak in 2015 or Novak being at his peak in recent years has been shattered.

Under these extraordinary circumstances I must defend Novak by holding the line, so I'll say that he will win 1 more, all hope is not lost for him, his knee will get better and his movement will get better to do what it is needed to go toe to toe with Alcaraz, with better movement his other strokes will also get better, like @NeutralFan said Novak's speed is still intact and so there is hope. He might never beat Alcaraz at slams again but his level next year could be what it was in 2023 i'e last year and it could be still be enough to sneak past SInner/Mugvedev/Zverev type guys in case they can take out Alcaraz before the final. Novak however will have to maintain his top 3-4 ranking and not drop below this, so he will have to play small tournaments more, I think he will even have to lock horns with Alcaraz in smaller tournaments just to see if he can inflict some defeats there to cast some doubts on his mind. This is the way forward for Djokovic to win 1 more slam.

As @Drob mentioned in another thread, Novak has 12 months left, the race to 2025 Wimbledon is on, he has to win 1 before that, his window closes at 2025 wimbledon/possible 2025 US open @Kralingen
Nadal has said good bye and slam race is over. #25 may come may not come but Novak has outlasted his great rival fedrer and nadal.
2025 will be novak last hurrah. If he win 1 slam he will continue otherwise 2025 US open will be his last . I hope he win first and then say good bye.
 
Nadal has said good bye and slam race is over. #25 may come may not come but Novak has outlasted his great rival fedrer and nadal.
2025 will be novak last hurrah. If he win 1 slam he will continue otherwise 2025 US open will be his last . I hope he win first and then say good bye.

I don't think 2025 is 1 last hurrah, he is still in shape to play slams and compete at the business end of the slams. Unless 2025 proves that he is losing in 1st week, he ain't leaving.
 
Multiple slams for Djokovic before retirement. Let him collect his 25th and 26th and then ponder about grand slam number 30. No pressure.
 
Back
Top