Will Djokovic will 18 slams or more?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Frying Pan Forehand, Jan 27, 2013.

?

How many will he will?

  1. 18

    5 vote(s)
    7.2%
  2. 19

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 20

    6 vote(s)
    8.7%
  4. 40

    58 vote(s)
    84.1%
  1. Frying Pan Forehand

    Frying Pan Forehand Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    297
    Will he more than ********?
     
    #1
  2. kalyan4fedever

    kalyan4fedever Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    3,827
    he can easily win 40 , nadal is almost broke ,fed never know , murraa pathetic 7 years with 5 slams each can easily take him till 41 and he will be only 30
     
    #2
  3. Clarky21

    Clarky21 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    12,656
    Yep.

    10yeps.
     
    #3
  4. tusharlovesrafa

    tusharlovesrafa Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,463
    Location:
    Lucknow to kolkata
    Omg!!.....
     
    #4
  5. SLD76

    SLD76 Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    9,805
    Location:
    Minneapolis, North of the Wall
    20 slams minimum
     
    #5
  6. psYcon

    psYcon Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    625
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    10 maximum.
     
    #6
  7. tusharlovesrafa

    tusharlovesrafa Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,463
    Location:
    Lucknow to kolkata
    hahahahaha...polling results!
     
    #7
  8. Clarky21

    Clarky21 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    12,656
    Not nearly enough.
     
    #8
  9. TheFifthSet

    TheFifthSet Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,578
    When Federer was Djokovic's age (25 years 8 months), he had 10. Just two months later, he won his 11th, and two months after that he won his 12th. And Federer's game is far less physical than Novak's.

    Barring a miracle, it's not happening. I don't think 12 is outside the realm of possibility, though.
     
    Navdeep Srivastava likes this.
    #9
  10. Djoker

    Djoker Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Messages:
    115
    "will Djokovic will....." wtf?

    Whatever the thread question is,
    17 slams and probably counting,- those are Godzilla-like numbers. I love Nole but sometimes you've got to acknowledge that some hurdles are just insurmountable.
     
    #10
  11. 90's Clay

    90's Clay Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2012
    Messages:
    9,349
    IF he can win all 4 this year that could put him in position to attempt to challenge the slam record
     
    Tarkovsky and Nadalgaenger like this.
    #11
  12. slowfox

    slowfox Professional

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,105
    Will posters please learn grammar and spelling? Maybe I'll start a poll...
     
    #12
  13. jm1980

    jm1980 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    10,016
    He has a chance of surpassing Nadal, but I highly doubt his body will hold up long enough to win any more slams after that.
     
    #13
  14. Tropikal_Knights

    Tropikal_Knights Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Messages:
    188
    Look....surpassing Fed means your body has to hold up....

    Lance, Rafa and the Scotsmans games are just too physical......

    Unless they develop the ability to actually kill the ball before the 40th stroke of a rally they will surpass fed....

    If Lance wants to do it got to tailor his regime perfectly....With testing to get more stringent soon dont see it happening. Without the juice or (gluten free) as he calls it I dont see his body holding up.......

    Rafa well all he has to do is give up playing just come back each year and play the French open for the next 8 years and he will surpass fed............

    Muzza mentally an infant

    Mentally though in all seriousness the Djoker is the most toughest. The guy is Big Time. Clutch points , phases of matches he raises his games and goes for bigger shots.......

    Mentally he is a giant.....Added with the juice the guy is unbeatable on a hard court
     
    #14
  15. Netspirit

    Netspirit Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,351
    Location:
    Snoqualmie, WA
    LOL at the poll results
     
    #15
  16. Frying Pan Forehand

    Frying Pan Forehand Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    297
    for those who didnt get it: yea he will WILL 40 slams for sure.
     
    #16
  17. NadalAgassi

    NadalAgassi Guest

    Only about a 5% chance to win that many slams. He would need to either average 1.5 slams per year for the next 8 years, or average 2.5 slams per year for the next 4 years, then win another couple more after that at 29/30 and beyond. Not impossible, but extremely unlikely. I know this is a troll thread anyway though.
     
    #17
  18. Monsieur_DeLarge

    Monsieur_DeLarge Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    493
    Players who've won three slams or more in one season during the Open Era:

    • Laver (all 4 in 1969)
    • Connors (3 in 1974)
    • Wilander (3 in 1988)
    • Federer (3 in 2004, 2006, 2007)
    • Nadal (3 in 2010)
    • Djokovic (3 in 2011)

    A list of greats, to be sure. And there's many more ~ Agassi, Sampras, Lendl, Borg ~ who are absent, having never achieved that particular success. But the important thing to note is that Federer is the only one to have managed the feat more than once. There's too many people on this board who think that the last ten years is the be-all and end-all of tennis. It's not. Federer is, statistically, a tennis anomaly, hence how he has so many more major titles to his name than any of his rivals. Djokovic himself fulfilled a pattern I highlighted at the end of 2011: that players who win three slams in a year tend to win no more than one the following year.

    There are things in Djokovic's favour compared to his predecessors: 32 seeds in a draw intead of 16, more homogenized surfaces, etc etc. But people talking about "if he wins all four this year..." or "if he wins three per year for the next five years..." are getting a wee bit carried away based on the flimsiest of evidence.

    He's already 25, he's only [sic] got six slams to his name so far, and he has a very physical, strenuous style of play. And for all the hyperbole, can I point out that apart from his glory year in 2011 ~ which as I've pointed out he's statistically unlikely to repeat ~ he's never won a single slam anywhere outside Melbourne. So I think the Nole-haters should relax a little bit. He's getting nowhere near Roger's tally. Matching Nadal's going to be a push even if the Spaniard doesn't add to his slam count this year.


    Regards,
    MDL
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2013
    #18
  19. dysonlu

    dysonlu Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,001
    Well duh. He's gonna do AT LEAST 5 calendar slams.

    You're basically asking a baby to stop peeing on himself.
     
    #19
  20. Frying Pan Forehand

    Frying Pan Forehand Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    297
    Not everybody is murrican.
     
    #20
  21. New Era UK

    New Era UK Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2013
    Messages:
    7
    I cant agree more with the poll. If Federer is human and he wins 17 slams then Djokovic as an alien can do much more!
     
    #21
  22. adil1972

    adil1972 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2012
    Messages:
    1,949
    you can not predict the future or change the future

    hehehhehehhehehhe

    getting bored
     
    #22
  23. smiley_face

    smiley_face Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    139
    41, I guess.
     
    #23
  24. Phoenix1983

    Phoenix1983 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2012
    Messages:
    4,163
    LOL @ the typo.

    Yes, he will will 18 slams or more to himself, just by thinking about the achievement. There's no need to actually play the tournaments if the Djoker can will himself into becoming the champion. :)
     
    #24
  25. westside

    westside Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,771
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    How's this even a question? He's easily going to get 40
     
    #25
  26. Wilander Fan

    Wilander Fan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,579
    He is on pace to match Wilander.
     
    #26
  27. NetNinja68

    NetNinja68 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    299
    Somewhere around 10 most likely.
     
    #27
  28. Gonzo_style

    Gonzo_style Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2012
    Messages:
    3,923
    there's a lot of *********s lol
     
    #28
  29. mattennis

    mattennis Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,311
    LOL, people don't even know how tough is to win a GS tournament.

    Even in a homogeneous conditions era like the current one (where it is easier for the top top players, in my opinion, to inflate their nÂș of GS titles, finals, SF, QF,...), to win 10+ GS is very very difficult.

    In about 34 years (from 1968 to about 2001, both included) of polarized conditions eras, only two players did it (Borg with 11 and Sampras with 14 ).

    In about a decade of homogenous conditions era, another two players have done it (Federer with 17 and Nadal with 11 ).

    Djokovic will probably get there, with 11 or 12 GS, but I think he is not winning 18 GS at all.

    The only chance for him to achieve something like 15+ GS is Nadal not getting back to top-level and Murray stopping improving so that he could be head and shoulders the best player for the following 3 or 4 years (something similar to Federer 2004-2007 seasons).
     
    #29
  30. nowhereman

    nowhereman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2015
    Messages:
    4,258
    Location:
    Here, There and Everywhere
    He can definitely win 40. And I'm glad so many people agree, because anything less would be underrating Djokovic. :mad:
     
    #30
  31. nowhereman

    nowhereman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2015
    Messages:
    4,258
    Location:
    Here, There and Everywhere
    Nope.
     
    #31
  32. nowhereman

    nowhereman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2015
    Messages:
    4,258
    Location:
    Here, There and Everywhere
    Interesting. Do you still hold the same sentiments now, 3 years later?
     
    #32
  33. jm1980

    jm1980 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    10,016
    Now I think his chances of surpassing Nadal are more remote than what they were in 2013

    Even if Nadal doesn't win another one, 4 Slams is a lot of Slams for someone who's almost 29
     
    #33
  34. Algo

    Algo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2013
    Messages:
    1,848
    Location:
    Santiago, Chile
    It's possible until he hangs it up.
    It will be less and less likely every time he loses a Grand Slam.
     
    mattosgrant likes this.
    #34
  35. mattosgrant

    mattosgrant Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    6,480
    This is a strange thread to start in 2013 when he was struggling to maintain dominance post 2011, even if he was mostly ranked #1. I would expect threads like this at the end of 2011, or today, but not sometime in 2013.
     
    Phoenix1983 and Nadalgaenger like this.
    #35
  36. mattosgrant

    mattosgrant Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    6,480
    LOL at Djokovic having a hard time winning another 4 slams. 4 slams is the absolute minimum realistically.
     
    #36
  37. nowhereman

    nowhereman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2015
    Messages:
    4,258
    Location:
    Here, There and Everywhere
    To be fair, this was made at the very start of 2013 when he won Australia for the 4th time. Nadal was still injured, Murray was not too much of a threat, Federer was getting older, and he started the season off great, so I guess people were feeling optimistic that he would dominate again.
     
    #37
  38. jm1980

    jm1980 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    10,016
    Do I need to remind you he won a total of 3 Slams in 2012-2014?

    Too many wasted opportunities for Djoko in his prime
     
    ktwtfd and FedFosterWallace like this.
    #38
  39. metsman

    metsman Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2015
    Messages:
    7,621
    do i need to remind you that the tour had a pulse in 2012-2014?
     
    #39
  40. mattosgrant

    mattosgrant Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    6,480
    He had much tougher competition in 2012 and 2013 than he does the next 2-3 years. You forget he was losing many of those slams to Nadal (4 in fact) for starters, 3 of those at RG. Hard to fault him for that.
     
    #40
  41. jm1980

    jm1980 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    10,016
    I would just contain my enthusiasm for a bit. At right around this age Fed fans (2010) and Nadal fans (2014) both thought their guys would win a ton of Slams.
     
    #41
  42. mattosgrant

    mattosgrant Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    6,480
    I cant speak for others, but I thought Nadal was almost done winning slams after his 2014 RG title. He looked pretty mediocre even in winning there. I would have guessed 2 more slams for Federer right after the 2010 Australian Open (1 more after say the 2010 U.S Open) and like I always am was pretty much right on the mark. For Djokovic I would give the range of a lowest possible of 15 and a highest possible of 20. Given my extremely high end intelligence and immense tennis knowledge (despite being even more knowledgable in the areas of football, yoga, and a few other things than tennis), and that I give myself a pretty large and safe range without being bold or more specific, it is pretty much a certain guarantee it will be somewhere in that range. Where exactly we will find out. Yes though worst case Djokovic will end up with 15 slams, which in worst case would tie Nadal in the unlikely event Nadal wins another slam (thus for them to even be tied in slam wins requires 2 unlikely events, only 4 more slams for Djokovic, and another slam for Nadal).
     
    #42
  43. Doctor/Lawyer Red Devil

    Doctor/Lawyer Red Devil G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2015
    Messages:
    10,197
    If only you joined before 2010 so we could actually dig up your posts where you were making those predictions about Fed and Nadal. ;)
     
    #43
  44. Shaolin

    Shaolin Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    5,991
    Location:
    Kansas
    Especially at TTW where unless you have just won a major without dropping a set then you suck and need to retire immediately.
     
    helterskelter likes this.
    #44
  45. mattosgrant

    mattosgrant Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    6,480
    I have no problems admitting when I was wrong about something (extremely rare given my high end intelligence and depth of tennis knowledge, but it does happen). I have no problem admitting I would have only predicted 3 or 4 slams for Djokovic at the end of 2010, and definitely never winning Wimbledon, so that is one rare instance even I was wrong. Everyone will be wrong sometimes, from the most intelligent individuals like myself, to the very bottom feeders in intellect and tennis knowledge such as TMF, and everyone in between.

    I also have no problem admitting I was wrong and an idiot to trust Boston Rob during my Survivor stint. On my vote off episode I had 110% certainly that Rob and Phillip were going to go along with what they told me about voting off Natalie T and didn't even remotedly consider them voting me out instead, so that is another example of when I was extremely wrong in what I believed would happen, and openly admit it. It happens even to the best of us.
     
    #45
  46. DerekNoleFam1

    DerekNoleFam1 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2014
    Messages:
    1,022
    Location:
    Newcastle Oz
    There was genuine feeling that 2013 was going to be an epic year after that AO, that is correct, even from non-Djoker fans and neutral tennis commentators.
    Nobody expected that Nadal resurgence so quickly, or Murray at Wimby etc.
    Even after that 2013 RG loss it was expected he would bound back quickly. (not take until Wimby 2014!). Nadal's stunning 2013 hard court summer caught everyone off guard too.
    But, the OP was still very optimistic for a then 6 Slam champion.
    I always expected him to get to 10-12 Slams, but in a slightly different and more consistent fashion.
    He may well exceed this, but he has done more than enough already.
     
    #46
  47. mattosgrant

    mattosgrant Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    6,480
    I am sick of this topic. I know I am partly at fault since while I don't start the discussion I give my views and evaluate pros and cons and odds in depth for no reason other than that is what I like to do in general. Lets not even discuss it until Novak gets to 15 ok please. I would rather discuss his current tennis and everyone elses current tennis, and the interesting things going on in the game NOW then the Novak 18 or more slams for the 1000th time (then again maybe the overdoing of this topic is a sad reflection of the lack of decent storylines in the game today).
     
    Navdeep Srivastava likes this.
    #47
  48. metsman

    metsman Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2015
    Messages:
    7,621
    again you keep ignoring the big ass elephant in the room. Nadal might have been down around the 2010 AO but he was still a very real threat. Djokovic and Murray weren't looking great but still around. Granted no one predicted that 2010 would turn up like that but it was very possible and even likely that Nadal would return to #1 before long. Djoker might have been down around the 2014 FO but he was still a very real threat. Everyone is down right now and no one is a real threat.
     
    #48
  49. djokerer

    djokerer Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2015
    Messages:
    763
    20 is a given now.
     
    #49
  50. mattosgrant

    mattosgrant Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2015
    Messages:
    6,480
    Just noticed this now. I think he has a good shot at reaching 12. ;) He might even go beyond 12.
     
    pc1 likes this.
    #50

Share This Page