Will Djokovic win more slams in his 30's than his 20's?

No?


  • Total voters
    39
  • Poll closed .

ADuck

Legend
He won 12 slams in his 20's and has currently won 10 slams in his 30's with 5 more years to add to the tally. Seemed impossible he would do this but now it's inevitable.
 
In the reality of his fans, he already made it.
The Serbian wolf has already won 10 in his 30s, plus the hypothetical 4 (Wimbledon and the US Open 2020, the Australian Open and the US Open 2022), it means that he has already surpassed what he achieved in his 20s (12 Major titles).
Without a doubt, he is in the prime of his career.
:giggle:
 
In the reality of his fans, he already made it.
The Serbian wolf has already won 10 in his 30s, plus the hypothetical 4 (Wimbledon and the US Open 2020, the Australian Open and the US Open 2022), it means that he has already surpassed what he achieved in his 20s (12 Major titles).
Without a doubt, he is in the prime of his career.
:giggle:

Nadal has won "only" 7 + * and would give his foot to have a chance to vulture a few more. ;)
 
Yes i think he will.

This also reminds us how careful we should be with comparing different eras. Djokovic is about to win the larger part of his slams at an age where for example Sampras was retired. Im not saying the slams are worth less, just that you cant compare across eras.
 
Yes i think he will.

This also reminds us how careful we should be with comparing different eras. Djokovic is about to win the larger part of his slams at an age where for example Sampras was retired. Im not saying the slams are worth less, just that you cant compare across eras.

To be a little less diplomatic: Those who seriously think Novak from 2017 -> is better than the one prior to 2017, needs to see someone.

To OP: Yes
 
No, because i think he’ll “only” win 2 more. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.

This. I think he wins one or two more.

He might very well tie the number but hard to surpass it.

But who knows, with the injuries of Zverev and Thiem + the poor form of Medvedev it will depend on Alcaraz and Rune (and Sinner?). Alcaraz is injured too and will see how he deals with the pressure of winning a slam and reaching #1. And Rune might still need time to break through at slams.

So maybe it's even more than expected, especially given he's unbeaten at Wimbledon and AO since January 2018.
 
Roger retired, tennis died.
Now it's just geriatric tennis. Weakest era ever.
 
To be a little less diplomatic: Those who seriously think Novak from 2017 -> is better than the one prior to 2017, needs to see someone.

To OP: Yes
Yup. To me GOATery is more about dominance than the number of titles. Dominance and longevity are two separate things.
 
Last edited:
Djokovic has peaked at last, so - if everything's fair - he should add at least half as many titles as he won in his pre-prime 20s.
 
Bump! Honestly though...this sounds like a given to me now...at this point it's more likely that Djokovic wins multiple slams in a season in 2024 again, than him not winning any at all...LOL in all honesty though, i think that next season it will be a 2-2 split with Alcaraz if that happens...but even if not, i can see Novak bagging at least one of the four!...
 
Djokovic in his 20s: 12 of 36 slams won from 2008-2016 (33%)
Djokovic in his 30s: 12 of 21 slams won from 2018-2023 (57%)
 
Djokovic in his 20s: 12 of 36 slams won from 2008-2016 (33%)
Djokovic in his 30s: 12 of 21 slams won from 2018-2023 (57%)
It took Novak several years in his early career to figure out and single-handedly break the Fedal duopoly.
From 2011 to 2016, he won 11 GS plus 7 finals in 6 years.
From 2018 to 2023, he won 12 GS plus 3 finals in 6 years.
It shows that he has been playing at a consistently high level. His level dipped around 2017, when the Fedal duopoly resurfaced. Novak broke it again, single-handedly, and for good this time.
 
Back
Top