Why is it unlikely? He needs 3 more Slams to surpass his total in his 20s, which at the moment seems very achievable.Unlikely but if there is someone who could do it, it's him.
In the reality of his fans, he already made it.
The Serbian wolf has already won 10 in his 30s, plus the hypothetical 4 (Wimbledon and the US Open 2020, the Australian Open and the US Open 2022), it means that he has already surpassed what he achieved in his 20s (12 Major titles).
Without a doubt, he is in the prime of his career.
![]()
Yes i think he will.
This also reminds us how careful we should be with comparing different eras. Djokovic is about to win the larger part of his slams at an age where for example Sampras was retired. Im not saying the slams are worth less, just that you cant compare across eras.
No, because i think he’ll “only” win 2 more. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Yup. To me GOATery is more about dominance than the number of titles. Dominance and longevity are two separate things.To be a little less diplomatic: Those who seriously think Novak from 2017 -> is better than the one prior to 2017, needs to see someone.
To OP: Yes
Unlikely but if there is someone who could do it, it's him.
What does this tell you?Djokovic in his 20s: 12 of 36 slams won from 2008-2016 (33%)
Djokovic in his 30s: 12 of 21 slams won from 2018-2023 (57%)
It took Novak several years in his early career to figure out and single-handedly break the Fedal duopoly.Djokovic in his 20s: 12 of 36 slams won from 2008-2016 (33%)
Djokovic in his 30s: 12 of 21 slams won from 2018-2023 (57%)