Grigor Dimitrov, his comeback at 32 and his one-hander have captivated me. I'd put him in the group of players such as Tsitsipas and Thiem but not Pete Samprass and Roger Federer as the great Bulgarian doesn't have the drive to the net or anticipation of the former which is probably why Stefanos and Dominic can't keep up with the top. One-handed backhanders in the very top, from what I know, cannot be flirting with the baseline rallies like the two-handed backhanders can.
This we do agree on. Very much so.
I think it's insane for one-handers to try and play from the baseline with two-handers. I think that's a losing proposition.
No, get thee to the net. Pronto. End the point.
As I go astray, this is why I was never all that enamored with Federer. I desperately wanted to like him, but I could just never get into him. And that's because he stayed at the baseline way too damn much for my liking.
Of course, that was his game, and he's one of the greatest (if not the greatest) player ever, but I just did not like him playing like that. And he when he would lose to Nadal, it would always be like, "Yeah, you're getting into baseline rallies with Nadal. Guess what, he's going to crush your backhand. So stop getting into baseline rallies with Nadal."
But alas, it was what it was.
No, if you hit a one-handed backhand, then you play like Pete Sampras. You serve and volley, and you occasionally stay back.
Of course, since they slowed down the courts I guess it's a little more difficult to do that. But I digress...
Also with Federer I wanted him to be the second coming of Pete Sampras from an athletic standpoint. But Sampras was a straight-up jock and Federer was more graceful. I like the "straight-up jock" style more. That's why I like Dimitrov more than Federer. Dimitrov is more of a "straight-up jock" like Sampras was.
But yep, I'll enjoy Dimitrov for the next couple of years until he fades away, and hopefully someone else will come along and play similarly.