Will Jannik Sinner end up winning 40+ Grand Slam Singles titles?

[Megafanoftennis100]

Not as hard as it sounds. Just needs to win at least 2 Slams per year over the span of 20 years or so. For someone like Sinner, it is a very simple task. Heck, I bet all my life's savings that he will break Weakdal's RG record, *********'s Wimbledon record, and Fraudovic's AO record with utter ease. The Big 3 are complete incompetent rubbish compared to Jannik Sinner (of course, otherwise, they are phenomenal legends).
Sinner is, since 2024, the most unbeatable tennis player the world has ever seen, and that too against top-notch competition (tennis EVOLVES since 2024).

 

[ghostofMecir]

Please stop and get some help.

 

[Megafanoftennis100]

Please stop and get some help.

I will if you admit that Jannik Sinner did not intentionally dope and that he is completely innocent

 

[Sudacafan]

What’s the rush?

 

[Poisoned Slice]

 

[RS]

Well all props to him if he does. Unless modern medicine extends careers to 40s and 50s it will be incredibly hard for anyone to win that many slams in B05.

 

[gamelovergold]

If you have to dream . Dream big . Aim for the moon so even if you miss you will be among the stars.

 

[Sudacafan]

To have an idea of what we’re dealing with, 40 slams in the least time possible means 10 years of consecutive slam tournaments won.
I thought I needed to clarify this, because of the superficiality some topics are discussed here.

 

[Nappa]

Maybe he can win 0.5 slams over the span of 80 years

 

[GrassMasters]

You're underselling him methinks

 

[TennisGrandpA]

40 seems way too much ,i think he wins 20+ easily.

 

[Megafanoftennis100]

Maybe he can win 0.5 slams over the span of 80 years

Which is what Nadal actually deserved, especially at Roland Garros. But because he never faced any opponent like Sinner in his entire career on any surface, he was able to vulture 14 RG titles. With Sinner competing in the same era as him, Nadal would be very lucky to win even 5 RG titles.

 

[Winner Sinner]

To have an idea of what we’re dealing with, 40 slams in the least time possible means 10 years of consecutive slam tournaments won.
I thought I needed to clarify this, because of the superficiality some topics are discussed here.

Here it is not a question of superficiality but of trolling.

But does anyone really take these topics seriously?

 

[GRASScaraz]

11/10

 

[Megafanoftennis100]

Here it is not a question of superficiality but of trolling.

But does anyone really take these topics seriously?

Why wouldn't Sinner be able to win 40 Slams?
He does not have Nadal on clay to compete with (even if he did, he would still win 10+ RG titles), nor does he have Federer on grass (even if he did, he would still win 10+ Wimbledon titles). Alcaraz is far inferior to Sinner, Medvedev is essentially his punching bag now, Djokovic (who is also his punching bag) is almost retired, Zverev either loses badly or routinely chokes leads, and basically all the other top players are irrelevant.
In 20 years, I highly doubt the strength of the field would get any stronger.

 

[SonnyT]

I bet he'll win at least 100 GS!

 

[RS]

40 seems way too much ,i think he wins 20+ easily.

I would be surprised if he won less than 10 but 20+ only the big 3 managed that

 

[TennisGrandpA]

Big 3 are products of modern medicine and great age shift and they won’t be only one to enjoy success till mid 30s. 20 is not a safe number imo

I would be surprised if he won less than 10 but 20+ let's only the big 3 managed that

 

[RS]

Big 3 are products of modern medicine and great age shift and they won’t be only one to enjoy success till mid 30s. 20 is not a safe number i

Yeah it's not necessarily safe and I think 24 slams will be broken eventually.

 

[Djokovic_is_the_best#1]

Yeah it's not necessarily safe and I think 24 slams will be broken eventually.

24 slams will likely get broken eventually. The only record that is safe in my opinion is Nadal’s 14 RG

 

[Sudacafan]

24 slams will likely get broken eventually.

Not so sure about that.
It requires very dominant players (not more than 3) for a long time.

 

[thrust]

Please stop and get some help.

I AGREE! Some of the posts here are beyond belief.

 

[TennisGrandpA]

24 slams will likely get broken eventually. The only record that is safe in my opinion is Nadal’s 14 RG

True, with Sinners phenomenal rise any number seems possible. U have never seen a more complete player than Sinner.

 

[TheGoldenEra1990’s]

If he starts dominating outside hards honestly who knows. This is getting very close to 2004-2009! except you don’t have the likes of Djoker and Nadal around to put a monkey wrench in his plans

 

[thrust]

Which is what Nadal actually deserved, especially at Roland Garros. But because he never faced any opponent like Sinner in his entire career on any surface, he was able to vulture 14 RG titles. With Sinner competing in the same era as him, Nadal would be very lucky to win even 5 RG titles.

One can't make this stuff up- LOL!

 

[gamelovergold]

This sinner tale is going like fairy tale.
I am itching to put my share.
8 Wimbeldon (still acheivable)
10AO ( still acheivable)
14RG ( not possible)
5 USO (Surely he can )
If he has Fedrer like wimbeldon story. Nadal like RG story and Novak like AO story and again fedrer like USO story still he is on 37 slams but......
20 is very good number if he reach there . Same goes for alcaraz. If they start their own slam race they will have their own fanbase and they will create their own space .