Will Nadal will 47 slams in his career or more, or not that that many?

Nadal winning 47 slams or more?

  • yes he will win 47 slams or more

    Votes: 108 51.2%
  • no he he wont win that many slams

    Votes: 103 48.8%

  • Total voters
    211
I seee my Nadal winning 47 slams. He will plays the next 15 years and win every French Open to give him 17 there. He will 2 out of every 3 Auastralian Open, US Open, and Wimbledons to give him 10 of each. I think that makes 47, yeah 15 + 10+10 +10 =47. So will my Nadal win 47 slams in his career, or more, if you mean more vote yes. Wont he wint that on the other hand with 47 being too many. Vote your choice.
 
Rob the Tennis Player said:
Sampras only won 14

Sampras had great competition. Even though I am a big Nadal fan I admit he plays a bunch of losers like Federer, Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Nalbandian, peopel that just suck. The up and comers like the two french players, Berdych, Ancic, all suck too. That is not his fault, he is awesome too, how awesome he is and the lossers he plays again equals up to alot of titles.

Sampras also was not nearly as good with his groundstrokes, movements, fitness, or return of serve as my Nadal. Samprwas was a great player but Nadal is better at all baseline shots and just more endurance and fit an athlete.
 
For those of you who think I am not being reasonable please explasin to me why. I see it that Nadal has the talent, worth ethic and mental toughness to play until 35 years old. That is another 15 years. He is so hard to even not be embarassed by and win sets against now on any surface, let alone win a whole match which is a miracle. He is also not nearly as great a player as he will be in 7 years or so. So why would winning all the French opens for the next 15 years, and 2 out of 3 at every Australian, Wimbledon, and U.S Open be unreasonable? Please explain if you think it is really crazy or something sine I dont understand why that would be.
 
KBalla08 said:
uh 1st of all, berdych and ancic arent french...
2nd of all, ur nuts...

I said Bercyh, Ancic, AND the two French gusy. I forget their names, I think Monfiles and Gasquer, but I was talking about them seperately from Berdych and Ancic. Either way they all are loser and suck compared to my Nadal and will never beat him.
 

malakas

Banned
though..i believe..that he will win at least 55!he will surely play until 36!I mean..come on!loser Agassi managed to play until 36 and not super,sexy nadal??This is ridiculous!
I vote for 50 nadal girl!

:mrgreen:
 

zhan

Banned
im a HUGE Rafa fan and I dont think Rafa can win a quarter of what you are asking... ( 1/4 of 47 is about 12)
he has 2 right now (french at the roland garros)
if he were to continue and win french EVERY year until he is thirty then he would have 11... but i doubt that will happen
to achieve 40+ you have to win every grand slam in 10 years ...
 
zhan said:
im a HUGE Rafa fan and I dont think Rafa can win a quarter of what you are asking... ( 1/4 of 47 is about 12)
he has 2 right now (french at the roland garros)
if he were to continue and win french EVERY year until he is thirty then he would have 11... but i doubt that will happen
to achieve 40+ you have to win every grand slam in 10 years ...

Therei s no reason for cute Rafal to stop at 30. There is no reason with his worth ethic, talent, heart, determination, and desire to not play until 35.

Look at that, almost half votes yes, obviously it is not unreasonable.
 
zhan said:
im a HUGE Rafa fan and I dont think Rafa can win a quarter of what you are asking... ( 1/4 of 47 is about 12)
he has 2 right now (french at the roland garros)
if he were to continue and win french EVERY year until he is thirty then he would have 11... but i doubt that will happen
to achieve 40+ you have to win every grand slam in 10 years ...

I agree with every part of that post. including the first sentence
 

malakas

Banned
Rob the Tennis Player said:
i was predicting.. 100 but hell make it 120

Reckon so?no..120 are just too many..don't you think??
Ah..and don't forget..
HE MUST be given credit of the slams he didn't play in JUST because he happened to be injured..!!I mean...come on!
 
nadalgirl26 said:
Therei s no reason for cute Rafal to stop at 30. There is no reason with his worth ethic, talent, heart, determination, and desire to not play until 35.

Look at that, almost half votes yes, obviously it is not unreasonable.

Worth ethic? dont you mean work?
 
malakas said:
Reckon so?no..120 are just too many..don't you think??
Ah..and don't forget..
HE MUST be given credit of the slams he didn't play in JUST because he happened to be injured..!!I mean...come on!

okay im sorry. 120 was a bit exaggerated.. how about 115?
 

Raistlin

Rookie
C'mon he can win like 70 grandslams think about it!:mrgreen:

20 wimbledon
20 french
10 us opens
20 Australian opens

Fanatics really crack me up:rolleyes:
 

punch

Semi-Pro
I can't believe 5 voted yes, must be all the Rafa lovers, should have made it a public poll so I can see the dumb ones..
 

arosen

Hall of Fame
nadalgirl26 said:
I think that makes 47, yeah 15 + 10+10 +10 =47. Wont he wint that. Vote your choice.

Nadal girl, I know your heart belongs to Rafa, but after reading the above, I have to confess to you that I am in love with you. The love that burns in you is contagious, I simply could not resist. You love, it's so strong, the math or grammar becomes simply irrelevant.
 
Morons%20from%20Outer%20Space_2D_PACKSHOT.jpg
 
arosen said:
Nadal girl, I know your heart belongs to Rafa, but after reading the above, I have to confess to you that I am in love with you. The love that burns in you is contagious, I simply could not resist. You love, it's so strong, the math or grammar becomes simply irrelevant.

Thank you, you are a sweet person too. :)
 
D

Deleted member 6835

Guest
malakas said:
15+10+10+10=45!!

frig seriously. nadal girl must be like 12 years old... :neutral:

ah well, back on topic, someone mentioned how sampras only won 14 slams. nadal might be able to smell 20, but not more. also, that babolat might give him arm problems, ending his career quite a few years early :rolleyes:
 

TokyopunK

Professional
tennis_nerd22 said:
frig seriously. nadal girl must be like 12 years old... :neutral:

ah well, back on topic, someone mentioned how sampras only won 14 slams. nadal might be able to smell 20, but not more. also, that babolat might give him arm problems, ending his career quite a few years early :rolleyes:

Well if he does get arm problems then.............

RoboNadal.jpg


WE WILL BE SEEING THIS WHEN HE WINS HIS 21st SLAM!!!
 

Volly master

Semi-Pro
lol can i wack Nadalgirl with my racquet?

good thing its a POG, the graphite will make a dent in her head. good thing too :p

where did all the cool posts go..honestly.

*mumbles* first the seles/graf fight, then Federer/Nadal..honestly...*mumbles*
 

oscar_2424

Legend
nadalgirl26 said:
I seee my Nadal winning 47 slams. He will plays the next 15 years and win every French Open to give him 17 there. He will 2 out of every 3 Auastralian Open, US Open, and Wimbledons to give him 10 of each. I think that makes 47, yeah 15 + 10+10 +10 =47. So will my Nadal win 47 slams in his career, or more, if you mean more vote yes. Wont he wint that on the other hand with 47 being too many. Vote your choice.
you cannot be serious
 

caesar66

Professional
can we just collectively stop responding all together to nadalgirl? maybe she'll quit w/ no attention.
 

dh003i

Legend
nadalgirl, why not just say 400 slams? So, ya know, he'll be playing tennis for the next 100 years, and winning 4 slams a year.

That's about as stupid as your example.
 

superman1

Legend
We've seen that Nadal is a tremendous athlete at 18/19/20 years old. He will most certainly be winning majors well into his 60's, he's such a great athlete. So I predict that he will win over 100 Slams. If he wins 4 per year for 40 years, that's 160 Slams!!! I'm being sarcastic!!! Can you tell??
 
Top