40 is doable. 47 is a tall ask
He would have, if coronavirus didn't happen.
How many slams shy is he of 47?Gettin' there.
I always believed.
How many slams shy is he of 47?
He will still win slams at 47.How many slams shy is he of 47?
More like a stroll through the park, than a conquer27 left to conquer.
The only thing failing with him is the transplantHe will win 47 Rolling Garrotes, or maybe more.
The last one of which will come in the same year he achieves integral baldness.
My apologies, poor choice of word.More like a stroll through the park, than a conquer
The only thing failing with him is the transplant![]()
Don't worry, will come back stronger in 2022. It's only 27 slams to win, pretty easy task.Nadal pulled out of Wimbledon. I'm started to get nervous about this.
Don't worry, will come back stronger in 2022. It's only 27 slams to win, pretty easy task.
Probably not, but I've heard ATP Barcelona is under consideration.It's practically done. It's Cincy a Slam already?
M-C, Barca and Rome are all made slams retroactively to go along with The Real Slam and those paltry two-week exhos in Melbourne, Paris, London and NYC. That puts The Nadal way past 47, no?Probably not, but I've heard ATP Barcelona is under consideration.
That's very true.M-C, Barca and Rome are all made slams retroactively to go along with The Real Slam and those paltry two-week exhos in Melbourne, Paris, London and NYC. That puts The Nadal way past 47, no?
Yes, what a waste of precious talent by making them win one more set than a regulation match just so Joe Kovic can yell to the throngs the immortal words of The Spaniard, “Are you not being entertained?”That's very true.
In 15 years people will be laughing at irrelevant Melbourne International, ITF Roland Garros, AELTC Outdoors and New York Cup.
Shame on those players who are chasing these Mickey Mouse trophies nowadays.
Such as?In 15 years there may be less tennis than now if we dont do the right things.
Getting our house in order.Such as?
And he, of all people i, s already out of breath like never before..Well……you’re almost half right. Only another 27 to go![]()
![]()
![]()
Your statement is a joke, no?Nadal has won 20 Grand Slams. Laver only 2. Nadal is ten times as good as Laver.
If joke, I didn’t understand its purpose.Your statement is a joke, no?
NadalGirl was SoBad.To put Nadal's (and Federer's and Djokovic's) career into perspective, the OP wrote this when she was 26. Now she is 41 (God bless her wherever she is) and Nadal is stilll going strong.
Amazing.
To put Nadal's (and Federer's and Djokovic's) career into perspective, the OP wrote this when she was 26. Now she is 41 (God bless her wherever she is) and Nadal is stilll going strong.
Amazing.
“She” might have been banned for communicating via the same IP address as an already established account.That's amazing indeed.
She might have kids in college.
Simple arithmetic. Laver won 2 Grand Slams, Nadal has won 20 Grand Slams....Nadal must be ten times as good as Laver.If joke, I didn’t understand its purpose.
Simple arithmetic. Laver won 2 Grand Slams, Nadal has won 20 Grand Slams....Nadal must be ten times as good as Laver.
Lol, that's my girl.Sampras had great competition. Even though I am a big Nadal fan I admit he plays a bunch of losers like Federer, Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Nalbandian, peopel that just suck. The up and comers like the two french players, Berdych, Ancic, all suck too. That is not his fault, he is awesome too, how awesome he is and the lossers he plays again equals up to alot of titles.
Sampras also was not nearly as good with his groundstrokes, movements, fitness, or return of serve as my Nadal. Samprwas was a great player but Nadal is better at all baseline shots and just more endurance and fit an athlete.
Nice prediction broHe won't get by Agassi's number.
FTFYLol, that's my boy SoBad
LolFTFY
Now it's just downhill.he’s almost halfway there!