Will Nadal win THREE slams on each of the three surfaces?

Will Nadal win THREE slams on each of the three surfaces?

  • Yes

    Votes: 16 42.1%
  • No

    Votes: 22 57.9%

  • Total voters
    38

6-1 6-3 6-0

Banned
Nadal currently has 8 slams on clay-courts, 3 slams on hard-courts, and 2 slams on grass-courts. Nadal would need to win one more Wimbledon to be the first man in world history to win THREE slams on each of the three surfaces. Only Mats Wilander has even won TWO slams on each of the three surfaces (he currently shares the record with Nadal).

Do you think Nadal can do it? If so, when?
 
He needs to get his grass game together again to achieve this. He should be able to do that and win Wimbledon in alteast one of 2014 or 2015. There is no real competition on grass today except for Murray. Djokovic isnt even that good a grass courter and still has a wimbledon title and 2 Wimbledon finals the last few years which shows the lack of grass depth.
 
He needs to get his grass game together again to achieve this. He should be able to do that and win Wimbledon in alteast one of 2014 or 2015. There is no real competition on grass today except for Murray. Djokovic isnt even that good a grass courter and still has a wimbledon title and 2 Wimbledon finals the last few years which shows the lack of grass depth.

Do you think Nadal-Murray will become the new great grass-court rivalry?
 
It could be. Nadal at his best should play every Wimbledon final against Murray for the next 4 or 5 years probably.

I'd love to see Nadal and Murray dish it out in the Wimbledon finals for the next 4-5 years. Nadal has the advantage of already having a 3-0 h2h against Murray at Wimbledon (9-1 in sets).
 
Nadal should play Queens. It is more similar to Wimbledon. He'll lose confidence in Halle since that is like playing on 90's grass.
 
That would be quite impressive, although he's always well-placed to do '...on each surface' records, because he has two shots per year at his weakest surface.
 
If Nadal spends a week at Queens he will have to pay tax to HMRC on 1/52nd of his annual global earnings. I think that kinda turns him off.

That is true, he openly spoke about it, but since he started skipping Queens, his Wimbledon results took a steep drop. So this stinginess towards the Queen might cost him a lot actually.
 
Right Halle still is grass as long as he can adjust to the surface he'll be fine.
He can't adjust to this slicker and softer grass. Queens and Wimbledon are firmer surfaces. But I guess Nadal likes challenges. Winning Halle would be the ultimate challenge for Nadal's gamestyle.
 
If he loses early at Halle, which I think he will, I wonder if he can just go off to Wimbledon right away and get used to the grass there instead...
 
Today's Murray is better than today's Nadal at Wimbledon. I hope they won't meet though, because that means Claydal is going deep into the tournament (something I don't want to see).
 
Last edited:
Today's Murray is better than today's Nadal at Wimbledon. I hope they won't meet though, because that means Claydal is going deep into the tournament (something I don't want to see).

If they meet, I wouldn't expect a blowout, but I'd favor Nadal - he's been consistently great in the Wimbledon late stages. If he makes it there.
 
The more relevant question today is if Alcaraz can be the first player to have the "quadruple surface slam" as he is half-way there at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jav
Glad Nadal didn’t vulture a 3rd Wimbledon.

Rosol, Darcis, Kyrgios, Brown, Muller, Djokovic, Federer made sure Wimbledon was in safe hands.

In all honesty, if Nadal had won Wimbledon 2018 or 2019, they wouldn't be seen as vultured titles, because he would have beaten the best in epics for them.
 
Back
Top