nadal_slam_king
Banned
Definetely. On HC. At RG and Wimbledon Murray can't take a set off Rafa.
Agreed 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000%.
Definetely. On HC. At RG and Wimbledon Murray can't take a set off Rafa.
Actually, Murray was the guy nobody wanted in their QF at the AO since Murray had reached a slam final on HC before, something Denko has never done at any slam...
Federer lost a set 3-6 to Rafa in the Final, without Rafa doing anything special, so I can't say I was stunned by Federer's form. And I think a match vs Murray, the most exhausting matchup Rafa can get on a hardcourt is a lot more difficult than the consistent several weeks of tennis that Federer played. In fact that's an understatement![]()
So one match up is more exhausting than several weeks of intense matches, not to mention all the travelling? Okay. I guess that is fact then.
I will agree that no one wanted Murray for the reason you stated. BUT, it was Davydenko who was carving up the opposition leading into the event. Beat Rafa three straight times, Del Potro, Djokovic, and Federer two straight times. The guy could not lose. Before the WTF, everyone said he did not have what it takes to win any big event, and by proving he could, albeit a three set event, it got everyone's attention, the next step was a slam. Call it what you want, no one wanted Davydenko either.
Blame? What's that got to do with anything? I'm telling you it's Rafa's problem that he has so much trouble putting Murray away. So of course he only has himself to blame. When did I imply that he blame someone else? Where's your anger come from regarding this?
Why do you bother? It's Cyan and the usual band of *******s afterall.:mrgreen:Davy was the guy that NO-ONE wanted in their quarter, especially after he had been beating EVERYONE left and right in the weeks leading into the event. And Federer had to work really hard to win that match. Hardly a lucky draw.
Exactly, Davy is a 3-set-man, Murray is Rafa's worst nightmare.
And who came up with all those lame excuses after the match? Nadal. Followed by the *********s such as yourself.
A loss in a loss, Nadal was simply outplayed. Washed off the court. His game fell into pieces when he realized that hitting to Federer's backhand wasn't going to win him the match.
End of story.
Why do you bother? It's Cyan and the usual band of *******s afterall.:mrgreen:
Federer lost a set 3-6 to Rafa in the Final, without Rafa doing anything special, so I can't say I was stunned by Federer's form. And I think a match vs Murray, the most exhausting matchup Rafa can get on a hardcourt is a lot more difficult than the consistent several weeks of tennis that Federer played. In fact that's an understatement![]()
Rafa was very agressive after losing that first set, at the start of the second. Sorry, but it was a tussle, until Roger broke free in the third.
So one match up is more exhausting than several weeks of intense matches, not to mention all the travelling? Okay. I guess that is fact then.
Yet most of your posts do read like you think you can read the future.I don't read the future, and I don't make bets.
I did, and I explained clearly why I think he is unlikely to. Even if he is a better player he is extremely unlikely to have as good a year as 2010 - simply because of all the other players who're improving or coming back to form. He doesn't control enough of the factors (i.e. other players) to be the significant element in it.You didn't even consider the possibility of him actually having a better 2011 than 2010. That isn't very open-minded of you...
I think we can all agree that players get rusty with prolonged time off, and many times that first tournament back they are not match tough. They also have to build up their endurance and the feeling of playing matches with nerves and adrenaline.
Conversely, a player can play all those weeks in a row and get weary, which didn't happen with Fed, so good on him.
Only one person is going to win, so, meh. It's time for the Oz in a few weeks. Moving forward.
Blood spinning treatment? sounds like voodoo to me.
Probably. But he will only regain the #1 for a few weeks.
Well. If he gets a very lucky draw at a slam and plays the likes of Denko and Tsonga in slam QF and SF and scared Murray in the finals, like the last time he won the AO, then yes he can win a slam.
Davy was the guy that NO-ONE wanted in their quarter, especially after he had been beating EVERYONE left and right in the weeks leading into the event. And Federer had to work really hard to win that match. Hardly a lucky draw.
Exactly, Davy is a 3-set-man, Murray is Rafa's worst nightmare.
Was this the match that featured Federer's famous bathroom break??![]()
I would be surprised if Fed didn't make #1.
He's been steadily getting better since Toronto.
Right now he's playing the best tennis by a pretty good margin.
Though he's older he has the physical skills still and that won't drop off hardly at all in a year.
He's working with Annacone and resolving problem areas as far as I can see, it should continue.
Yes, I do agree.
However, my point is that you can't quantify exhaustion. If said poster can say one match took the wind out the sails of a player, then another can say several weeks of continuous matches also took the wind out of the sails of his opponent. But of course ****s, not fans will always say that their player was never at his best when he lost, after all they are a ****.
Moving on.
Yes, I do agree.
However, my point is that you can't quantify exhaustion. If said poster can say one match took the wind out the sails of a player, then another can say several weeks of continuous matches also took the wind out of the sails of his opponent. But of course ****s, not fans will always say that their player was never at his best when he lost, after all they are a ****.
Moving on.
All Fed needs is 1 week and 1 day at #1 and he surpassed Pete
So basically 2 weeks :lol:
How many other players on tour played a total of 81 matches (or more) in 2010 (not to mention winning 3 GS titles, 3 consecutive MS1000 titles, various other titles and appearances in a slew of finals)? It's very understandable how Rafa can be the most tired and worn out of all players.
Federer, in 2010, played 78 matches - winning 1 GS, 1 MS title, the WTF title and appearances in a few finals).
And who came up with all those lame excuses after the match? Nadal. Followed by the *********s such as yourself.
A loss in a loss, Nadal was simply outplayed. Washed off the court. His game fell into pieces when he realized that hitting to Federer's backhand wasn't going to win him the match.
End of story.
Yet most of your posts do read like you think you can read the future.
I did, and I explained clearly why I think he is unlikely to. Even if he is a better player he is extremely unlikely to have as good a year as 2010 - simply because of all the other players who're improving or coming back to form. He doesn't control enough of the factors (i.e. other players) to be the significant element in it.
As usual and as most here no doubt already know, you're just showing you can't read or reason to any useful level. The best thing you ever seem to come up with is: Ooooohhh, he got blood spinning! :lol::lol:
Interesting.Fed says he was basically exhausted playing for so many weeks.But of course that dosen't count right?I think we can all agree that players get rusty with prolonged time off, and many times that first tournament back they are not match tough. They also have to build up their endurance and the feeling of playing matches with nerves and adrenaline.
Conversely, a player can play all those weeks in a row and get weary, which didn't happen with Fed, so good on him.
Only one person is going to win, so, meh. It's time for the Oz in a few weeks. Moving forward.
Hey Senti,I'm good.Hope you're doing great too^^ Hey mandy, how is you ?
Hope you've enjoyed your rest and will be able to shake the rust off by Jan 17th![]()
Interesting.Fed says he was basically exhausted playing for so many weeks.But of course that dosen't count right?
Let's just go with the convenient narrative(convenient for Nadal and his ****s that is) -Federer was fresh as a daisy,while Nadal was extremely weary after taking three weeks off,getting enough matches at the WTF to shake his rust off by the finals and playing a tedious slugfest against Murray .
You have no idea yet you have no problem announcing his form and making convenient assumptions here.LOL.I have no idea what Fed said because I don't follow him.
There is nothing wrong with my post, but as usual you've got your undies in a bunch.
"Go away"..LOL...And she talks of others getting their "undies in a twist" .Hilarious.Go away. I have no idea how you got off of ignore anyway, but it's getting corrected pronto!
Bye bye!
I've been goodhiya mandy! how you been?
I've been goodAll the Serendipitouslove put me in dire need of a break
And you?
*sigh* true...Serendipitoustardism really gets too much sometimes :evil:I've been good too! Took a break myself. Happy that the new season is starting. I anticipate some more breaks in my future. LOL. ****ism gets a bit much sometimes.
oh i love serendip. and that's the only quality i have. You'll just have to bear with it :twisted:I've been goodAll the Serendipitouslove put me in dire need of a break
And you?
:shock::shock::evil:oh i love serendip. and that's the only quality i have. You'll just have to bear with it :twisted:
*sigh* true...Serendipitoustardism really gets too much sometimes :evil:![]()
pfffffffI find him quite funny. Sometimes the cat pics are a bit much, but provide some comic relief!
pfffffff...I hope I wont have to add you to the long list of his ****s! :sad:![]()
Probably not, I think he's a bit miffed after I asked him not to flood the Nadal thread with cat pics and the like. I feel like a jerk now![]()
How many other players on tour played a total of 81 matches (or more) in 2010 (not to mention winning 3 GS titles, 3 consecutive MS1000 titles, various other titles and appearances in a slew of finals)? It's very understandable how Rafa can be the most tired and worn out of all players.
Federer, in 2010, played 78 matches - winning 1 GS, 1 MS title, the WTF title and appearances in a few finals).
You have no idea yet you have no problem announcing his form and making convenient assumptions here.LOL.
"Go away"..LOL...And she talks of others getting their "undies in a twist" .Hilarious.
And if you're putting someone on ignore why do they need to know?Do I care? no.Does ANYONE care about being on YOUR ignore? no.But you have to make such announcements everytime you meet someone you know wont take your crap as if you're some VIP and people are going to fall all over themselves and beg you not to put them ignore.
Childish,lame, attention-seeking rubbish again :lol: