No I mean just 1 slam not the career slamA grand slam means winning all four in one year.
If he does this, he deserves that crown of his, and I shall stop calling him Shankipas.
No I mean just 1 slam not the career slam
The window isn't closing at all. If we assume that after getting 40 even Djokovic is likely done at the absolute top, then Tsitsipas still has around 5 years or 20 chances of winning a Slam. Even if in the later years he isn't at his absolute best anymore himself, who says there won't be ONE time where everything opens up for him? In the years without Djokovic everything is possible at any Slam.Turning 25 this year and he still has a window but it’s closing slowly…
Career highlights -
1 World Tour final
2 masters 1000
2 Slam RUPs
1 Slam is not a Grand Slam. A career Slam is not a Grand Slam either. You title and response are both confusing. A Grand Slam is four Slam wins in a row and can be done in a calendar year (CYGS as Laver did in 1969 in the Open era) or just in a row [NCYGS as Novak did in 2015-16)No I mean just 1 slam not the career slam
Who knows at that time who rules the roost most likely Alcaraz, rune and sinner are much better than him and even someone new in their teens just comes up and dominates.. We assume he stays the same and doesn’t get demotivated by not winning as wellThe window isn't closing at all. If we assume that after getting 40 even Djokovic is likely done at the absolute top, then Tsitsipas still has around 5 years or 20 chances of winning a Slam. Even if in the later years he isn't at his absolute best anymore himself, who says there won't be ONE time where everything opens up for him? In the years without Djokovic everything is possible at any Slam.
He'll win RG2023.Turning 25 this year and he still has a window but it’s closing slowly…
Career highlights -
1 World Tour final
2 masters 1000
2 Slam RUPs
Yes for sure it’s gotten confusing it should have been slams one singular grand slam is still called a grand slam but also the CYGS is referred as ‘the grand slam’ career slam is just winning all 4 at some point1 Slam is not a Grand Slam. A career Slam is not a Grand Slam either. You title and response are both confusing. A Grand Slam is four Slam wins in a row and can be done in a calendar year (CYGS as Laver did in 1969 in the Open era) or just in a row [NCYGS as Novak did in 2015-16)
A grand slam means winning all four in one year.
If he does this, he deserves that crown of his, and I shall stop calling him Shankipas.
1 Slam is not a Grand Slam. A career Slam is not a Grand Slam either. You title and response are both confusing. A Grand Slam is four Slam wins in a row and can be done in a calendar year (CYGS as Laver did in 1969 in the Open era) or just in a row [NCYGS as Novak did in 2015-16)
That is THE Grand Slam, not A Grand Slam
Wiki says:
A Grand Slam, also referred to as a Calendar-year Grand Slam or a Calendar Slam, is the achievement of winning all four major tennis championships in one discipline in a calendar year.
It depends on Zverev.
Sascha in a good shape is unstoppable for the Greek.
Without danger from Zverev Tsitsipas has an open draw in both Melbourne and Paris.
"The Australian Open is the first of the four Grand Slams"
![]()
Australian Open - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It used to be like that, today the term Grand Slam refers to the winning of any major title. This term became the name of the most prestigious category of tennis tournaments. Winning all four major titles in one season is now called the Calendar Grand Slam.A grand slam means winning all four in one year.
If he does this, he deserves that crown of his, and I shall stop calling him Shankipas.
No he wont. Sinner will surpass him in the next 6-8 months, Rune in a year-18months and I predict he will get his hands on a slam before the Greek. Sinner will be considered a bigger threat at majors than Pas' circa 2023 WB-future. Returns and Backhands are stronger for Sinner and you have to break serve in order to win a slam. Tsitsipas doesnt have any of those attributes, and yet has not made any form of improvements and this will be the factor that will prevent him from winning slams, much less a slam.2022 was a bum year for him. It won’t be the norm. He’ll win multiple slams when it’s all said and gone. His attitude and mindset this year has been stellar and he’s been working so hard. He’s evolving in the right direction. The addition of Philippoussis to his team is going to give him exponential returns IMO. It’s all about that first breakthrough. After that, the sky is the limit for Tsitsipas. I see him win 3+ slams IMO.
Finally, at least someone’s sees what I’m seeing1 or 2. He won’t win anything when Alcaraz, Rune and Sinner are at their peak though.
Zverev, Med and Tsitsipas will be the new LostGen. The 2000s gen looks far superior.Finally, at least someone’s sees what I’m seeing
Let it go man. It’s 5-1 now.No he wont. Sinner will surpass him in the next 6-8 months, Rune in a year-18months and I predict he will get his hands on a slam before the Greek. Sinner will be considered a bigger threat at majors than Pas' circa 2023 WB-future. Returns and Backhands are stronger for Sinner and you have to break serve in order to win a slam. Tsitsipas doesnt have any of those attributes, and yet has not made any form of improvements and this will be the factor that will prevent him from winning slams, much less a slam.
I’ll come back to this when their careers are said and doneLet it go man. It’s 5-1 now.
A 21 year old nearly beat a peaking 24 year old. I think I’ll stay on the 21 year old bandwagon
Sinner will have a better career than Tsitsipas. Probably by a landslide.
It depends on Zverev.
Sascha in a good shape is unstoppable for the Greek.
Without danger from Zverev Tsitsipas has an open draw in both Melbourne and Paris.
I have to admit I'm interested to see what tennis and its popularity will look like after Nadal and Nole leave.Maybe after Djokodal retire when nobody will give a cr@p about tennis
We’ll seeSinner will have a better career than Tsitsipas. Probably by a landslide.
Bookmarked!We’ll see![]()