CosmosMpower
Hall of Fame
Good feedback good to hear it’s more powerful and spinny. Is yours on spec for balance or more head heavy than advertised?
Wilson Blade v10 2026
- Thread starter henrytennisadelaide
- Start date
Good feedback good to hear it’s more powerful and spinny. Is yours on spec for balance or more head heavy than advertised?
1HBHfanatic
Legend
Wilson Blade v10s
-finally got to play test these (wilson blade v10s)
-i am in the 3rd day of play testing these in contrast to the v9s
-right away i can say the "feel" at inpact has changed
-the v10s have a more krisp feel, than the softer, more muted feel of the v9s
-the added krispness of the v10s add to the control & power
-the color of the racquet is more pronounced, as per the pictures..
-the v9s are softer at impact and more muted in "feel"
-the contrast is imediate and distinct
-while the W-rep mentioned that it was "just a tweek" to the blade, the result/outcome was significant..
-i strung both v9s and v10s with luxilon.element.SOFT at 52lbs
-both racquets are 98" head size and similar in weight and balance
-so if you like a Krisper responce at impact, the v10 might be for you
-i liked the v9 feel, so this is going to be a adjustment for me..
-i will soon be testing the v10-100" (more to come)..
-finally got to play test these (wilson blade v10s)
-i am in the 3rd day of play testing these in contrast to the v9s
-right away i can say the "feel" at inpact has changed
-the v10s have a more krisp feel, than the softer, more muted feel of the v9s
-the added krispness of the v10s add to the control & power
-the color of the racquet is more pronounced, as per the pictures..
-the v9s are softer at impact and more muted in "feel"
-the contrast is imediate and distinct
-while the W-rep mentioned that it was "just a tweek" to the blade, the result/outcome was significant..
-i strung both v9s and v10s with luxilon.element.SOFT at 52lbs
-both racquets are 98" head size and similar in weight and balance
-so if you like a Krisper responce at impact, the v10 might be for you
-i liked the v9 feel, so this is going to be a adjustment for me..
-i will soon be testing the v10-100" (more to come)..
Tan Tennis
Rookie
Hi. For me the v10 feels a bit stiffer overall and plays with more easy power and it offers much better forgiveness. Blade Noir feels better and plusher at sweetspot but outside of that still stiff. I think the heaviness and plow from the Blade Noir are more solid and confident to me, but v10 is easier and better on defense, as well as for majority of intermediate players.
Recoveringhobo
Rookie
I just tried the Blade v10 16x19 for one hour and I think this version may be a downgrade for me. Caveat is that this was a demo from TW with dead strings and a lower SW than my Blades which are all 295 unstrung. The v10 definitely feels more rigid and has a boost in power but it feels less forgiving to me. The sweet spot seems smaller and power dropped off outside the sweet spot more than the v9. The launch angle was lower and I was hitting the top of the net more. Maybe these issues are due to SW and strings but I don't know if I want to buy a new one to figure that out.
alexg
Rookie
Played the Blade v7 98 16x19 for a long time. Eventually got tired of the 330 SW. I skipped v8, as I felt it became stiff but did not yield power, and went the Extreme Tour / Extreme Pro route for a few years.
Tried the v10, and am glad to back with the Blade. It's more demanding than the Extreme, for sure but here's why I like it:
- Depolarized setup - there is some mass everywhere, so it swings very "true" if that makes sense. About mass, you may want to measure them before you buy them. I was fortunate to be able to measure two racquets before I picked one. Chosen racquet was 308g static with plastic wrap on handle (but cardboard off), 31.52 balance. The other one was 311g static and 31.9 balance (would have been too much). Swing weight of chosen one with gut 17g and poly 16l and a 4g dampener is 325.
- Firm but comfortable response. It's basically what I hoped the TFight 305S would be, but the TF turned out to be a vibration buzz machine that hurt my wrists in 15 minutes (even with gut and poly)
- I can swing flat all I want, the ball stays in
- I can produce top spin - swinging fast with confidence because I know I'm not going to overhit (that was my chief complain with the Extreme, the pattern is slightly too open to be trustable ; maybe someone with heavy topspin wouldn't have this problem)
- You get out of your swings what you put in. Can't be lazy and arm the shots ; you have to swing the racquet and use the mass / momentum of the racquet to produce shots ; it will remind you of that. But everything you put in gets paid with great balls: pace, precision, topspin, you name it.
- That new green and shine says "action!" - v8 and v9 were just not exciting. v7 was not mind blowing but the green was bright at least.
- Love that Wilson grip. Did they increase the butt flare? I remember having to beef up the flare on my v7s, but don't need to do that with v10.
Thought I would share. Cheers.
Tried the v10, and am glad to back with the Blade. It's more demanding than the Extreme, for sure but here's why I like it:
- Depolarized setup - there is some mass everywhere, so it swings very "true" if that makes sense. About mass, you may want to measure them before you buy them. I was fortunate to be able to measure two racquets before I picked one. Chosen racquet was 308g static with plastic wrap on handle (but cardboard off), 31.52 balance. The other one was 311g static and 31.9 balance (would have been too much). Swing weight of chosen one with gut 17g and poly 16l and a 4g dampener is 325.
- Firm but comfortable response. It's basically what I hoped the TFight 305S would be, but the TF turned out to be a vibration buzz machine that hurt my wrists in 15 minutes (even with gut and poly)
- I can swing flat all I want, the ball stays in
- I can produce top spin - swinging fast with confidence because I know I'm not going to overhit (that was my chief complain with the Extreme, the pattern is slightly too open to be trustable ; maybe someone with heavy topspin wouldn't have this problem)
- You get out of your swings what you put in. Can't be lazy and arm the shots ; you have to swing the racquet and use the mass / momentum of the racquet to produce shots ; it will remind you of that. But everything you put in gets paid with great balls: pace, precision, topspin, you name it.
- That new green and shine says "action!" - v8 and v9 were just not exciting. v7 was not mind blowing but the green was bright at least.
- Love that Wilson grip. Did they increase the butt flare? I remember having to beef up the flare on my v7s, but don't need to do that with v10.
Thought I would share. Cheers.
1HBHfanatic
Legend
-yes, the buttcap was flared on the v8 and v9,, key points they talked about
-the v9 is different, very plush and muted, dampened, clean vibrations IMO
-the v8 was a bit in between the v10 and v9
-the v8 color was also not my favorite, army forest green camo
-the v9, my favorite, does have the dark green color way..
-but yes, the v10 color is nice; more modern
-the v10 feel and performance is definatly Krisper..
-i stopped using the 18/20s since the v8 models, bit too low powered and demanding for me now
-but now im wondering if the added power of the v10 would make the v10 18/20 a viable option for me again!?
-the added control/feel from a 18/20 w.blade is something special..
thebigz
Professional
I agree. Bigger difference in experience than on paper. v10 also more solid/stable feeling at my copies tested where almost same SW and static weight with minor weight distribution differences
gebruikershaes
Rookie
I just playtested the 98 16x19 version and it’s just a blade… I have been playing with the 2013 v4 18x20 version voor about 10 years. Loved it and hated it at the same time. Loved it for the feel, the pop and spin potential. Hated it because it can feel very unpredictable at times. So I switched to the UT 18x20. Beefed it up to 342g and fell in love with it. The balance is just right, the feel amazing, control outstanding and the slice.. razor sharp. But I do miss a bit of power and spin. And I feel it produces too clean of a ball that is not challenging to my opponent.
Decided to give the blade another go, this time the v10 version. And yeah, it’s just a blade. Same as ever. Still unpredictable, launchy at times and dead on off center hits. The feel is exactly the same as the v4, maybe the v10 is a tad softer. Swing weight feels the same to me. Still mediocre on the slice and good on serve and has decent pop.
If you’re looking for a blade, just buy the v4 or v5 version used. Save some money and buy practically the same blade Wilson made years ago.
Decided to give the blade another go, this time the v10 version. And yeah, it’s just a blade. Same as ever. Still unpredictable, launchy at times and dead on off center hits. The feel is exactly the same as the v4, maybe the v10 is a tad softer. Swing weight feels the same to me. Still mediocre on the slice and good on serve and has decent pop.
If you’re looking for a blade, just buy the v4 or v5 version used. Save some money and buy practically the same blade Wilson made years ago.
Last edited:
I would love a blade v10 98 compared to ultra tour 98 ? Which has more power ?
Ultra Tour 98 (Nishikori) has more power because it has higher swingweight (slightly extended by 0.25 inches) but I haven’t tested them with same specs.
I would guess Ultra Tour would be more powerful even with same specs, it really has some great punch and power! Surprisingly good spin also with 18x19. Even more than with Blade 16x19 imo.
Blade is more control oriented.
jklos
Professional
I haven't served a lot with it but I have hit with it now for a few days. It is maybe slightly more unforgiving outside of the sweet spot but only because the hoop feels a lot firmer. It's also more rewarding when you do make clean contact. I found it very predictable as well and would consider it an upgrade from the V9. I'll have to serve with it more to know if I can get more speed than with the V9 which used for a year or two. If the Python or Redline or whatever plays somewhat similar with maybe some added pop and spin, then I'll for sure be purchasing a few.
NetDump5000
New User
First time I have bought a non-discounted or second-hand racket in years with a Blade 98 16x19 v10, and from the local brick and mortar tennis shop too. Impressed too with the QC. The first one off the shelf was nearly on the mark in unstrung specs, measured in the shop (with plastic on handle): 307.3g static, 31.7cm bal, 289.8 SW.
After a bit of casual hitting when strung with X1 1.30, have put on a relatively thick Decathlon leather grip (26g cut) and my preferred overgrip too, amounting to 331g, 32.1cm bal, 321sw (add 2g for the dampener). Opening up the butt cap, one side is fully filled with silicon and the other foam, so it seems they are making some real effort to bring them up. Will take it straight to matches, since it's not a big jump from a pro staff v13 with almost the exact same specs modded and I had a v8 before. If my arm accepts the Blade, will get a second to match the first whenever they drop in price.
After a bit of casual hitting when strung with X1 1.30, have put on a relatively thick Decathlon leather grip (26g cut) and my preferred overgrip too, amounting to 331g, 32.1cm bal, 321sw (add 2g for the dampener). Opening up the butt cap, one side is fully filled with silicon and the other foam, so it seems they are making some real effort to bring them up. Will take it straight to matches, since it's not a big jump from a pro staff v13 with almost the exact same specs modded and I had a v8 before. If my arm accepts the Blade, will get a second to match the first whenever they drop in price.
sebash
Rookie
For those who have been playing with the Blade 98 16x19 V10, have you tried adding weight at 3&9 for stability and making the sweetspot bigger? That 13,5 TW is very low... I wish the Blade was a little thicker/stiffer. These are the things that I found big cons with this racket. I added 4g at 3&9 and didn't feel a difference at all.
Also in this case does anyone know if stringing lower, or higher, and/or with a 4lbs difference between mains and crosses can make a difference via ball pocketing?
Thank you thank you thank you!
Also in this case does anyone know if stringing lower, or higher, and/or with a 4lbs difference between mains and crosses can make a difference via ball pocketing?
Thank you thank you thank you!
You want a different racquet then. Blade Pro is exactly that. V10 Blade doesn't perform much different than all the previous Blades, which is good for those who like Blades.
V10 Blade 16x19 started to feel unstable for me. I felt it needed more torsional stability.
Tried lead at different spots on hoop.
4g at 12 = Weird combination of power/spin but still unstable and wobbly.
4g at 10/2 = Better stability but quite heavy to swing.
4g at 3/9 = Great stability, awful to swing. Felt like swinging 360g racket, no spin.
2g at throat = BINGO! Never had lead in throat before, but that was the magic spot. Very stable, powerful, spin, you name it. Also didnt affect on swing speed or serve! Amazing effect only with 2g of lead!! Feels also that sweetspot is bigger now, but I guess the lead lowered the sweetspot just little lower where I tend to hit the ball more.
Maybe Blade should be ~310g right away from the factory? I guess control orientated rackets needs weight.
Now it feels like you can rip the ball as hard as you can!!
Tried lead at different spots on hoop.
4g at 12 = Weird combination of power/spin but still unstable and wobbly.
4g at 10/2 = Better stability but quite heavy to swing.
4g at 3/9 = Great stability, awful to swing. Felt like swinging 360g racket, no spin.
2g at throat = BINGO! Never had lead in throat before, but that was the magic spot. Very stable, powerful, spin, you name it. Also didnt affect on swing speed or serve! Amazing effect only with 2g of lead!! Feels also that sweetspot is bigger now, but I guess the lead lowered the sweetspot just little lower where I tend to hit the ball more.
Maybe Blade should be ~310g right away from the factory? I guess control orientated rackets needs weight.
Now it feels like you can rip the ball as hard as you can!!
sebash
Rookie
Thank you for your feedback. Although it kinda goes against all what's been said about customization...
Weight at 3 and 9 is theoretically the best solution for stability. Have you tried 2g instead of 4g?
You complain about maneuverability with weight at 3 and 9 more than at 12 o'clock or 10/2 which brings the SW way higher... How come do you think?
Couldn't the 2g at throat be just placebo? It should help with comfort as with mass at any location, but Very stable, powerful and spin?? Wow.
CosmosMpower
Hall of Fame
After buying and playing v10 for 8 hours I feel it’s pretty much the same as v9. V8 is a bit more muted and plusher and slightly less maneuverable but I could pick up any of the 3 gens and play a match with little to no difference in results. All are customized to the same weight and balance and strung with the same string and tension.
The v10 did start 7 grams lighter than my v8 and v9
The v10 did start 7 grams lighter than my v8 and v9
thenewbig3
Hall of Fame
While true sometimes one racket modificaiton combo is most compatible with the player stokes - automatically leading to more centered contact - feeling more stable and more contact at the appropriate distance in front - leading to more confidence -..... Only good things happen from there.
thebigz
Professional
Not sure about powerful and spin. But I’d tried throat weight with many sticks I have. It provides exactly the effect I need many of the time. Throat weight can add stability without affecting the maneuverability or balance much.
Some racquets that I feel like the head want to come around too quickly on swing, after throat weight it swings more uniformly and I can time the ball better. Some units don’t need it at all. There’s no formula for this though as this is something I apply when I feel a difference in a specific stick’s weight distribution and throat weight helps it match up to what I’m used to.
It can help the frame feel more solid in a different way than 3/9 lead but definitely very noticeable even with 1g on each side of throat, 2g total. If you try it on court and peel it off I don’t think you would say the difference is placebo.
For some sticks I had before, it completely changed my perception of how they played and that was all the customization I needed. I encourage trying this in any thin flexi throat sticks including Ezone, Gravity, Blade 98, or even 2026 PA.
For example, very recently I tested a Blade V10 against my RG Blade V9 98. The specs were near identical, same weight, balance, 1 point off SW. but they actually swung through the air quite differently and needed big adjustments in timing, with my V9 feeling like more weight was higher in the hoop, and more momentum bringing the racquet head around. 2g of weight in the throat of V9 pretty much solved the difference and made them swing nearly the same.
Last edited:
thebigz
Professional
I had the exact same experience with adding throat weight to my V9 Blade 98 copy. The V10 I tested it against was much more solid similar to the V9 after throat weight.
So I think these are normal and very minor weight distribution differences that can be resolved with minimal customization.
Adding weight to 3/9 is never my first choice to solve instability since even 2g total feels like it decreases maneuverability a lot especially for my forehand.
However I’ve worked with others who much prefer 3/9 weight bc their strokes are different, where as my preference is almost always 12 lead and throat lead, before considering 3/9
thebigz
Professional
Exactly how I would describe it. Sometimes these minor modifications that don’t alter racquet performance drastically can completely change the timing that suits a specific player’s stroke production.
The exact needed location can also be dependent on the weight distribution of a specific copy of a racquet. This is the more nuanced part of matching sticks imo.
Very well said! I felt the timing was off for me with the Blade V10 and it swinged too fast and maybe thats why also felt unstable.
Lead in throat didnt affect on swing style but made the timing better and of course added even more stability but with same Blade performance off the shelf.
Lead at 12 or especially 3/9 changed quite a lot how the racket swinged and also drastically decreased manuevurability on my forehand. Lead in throat kept pretty much the same specs. so it’s clearly also the timing of your swing which customization might help…
I usually have added lead only 12 so I kinda knew already 3/9 dont suit my swing style. Throat weight was especially at least in this frame very successful customization. Must be the best I have ever done!
Also quite amazed how much of an effect 2g of lead does in throat. Frame feels much more powerful and heavier (more stable) in good way.
I remember that Alcaraz added 5g of lead in his frame for this season and his team spoke about they wanted to add more power to his strokes and carlos liked also the throat setup the best for his swing.
thebigz
Professional
Carlos ended up removing the 4-5g he added for a period I believe. For most folks that's too much to start. 2g total would be plenty to see the effect and can go from there. I rarely need more than 3g tbh unless I'm building up a very underspec copy up higher.
sebash
Rookie
Yeah that was for AO 2025 and I think he removed it. Still surprised they went for so much weight at first try. He’s definitely someone who’ll look into adapting his material again for his wrist.
As for me I’ll definitely try the throat weight with my RF01 300g.
I orderered 2 Blades V10 16M on Monday (having liked it a lot on demo) but have since then played 3 times with my RF01 (with alu rough at 44/44) and never felt this good and confident on court with the RF as I won all my sets after struggling to win anything for months. I regret ordering the Blades because I’m not nearly as confident being aggressive with them when I tried them as with the RF. I found them unstable and lacking directional control, and much more unforgiving actually. If I keep the Blades I would try adding a ton of weight at 3&9 for stability (TW is low on TWU) and strung at maybe 55/50 for control and pocketing for directional control. But with what has been said I’m not sure anymore the Blade is for me… I’m a OHBH flat hitter.
Last edited:
Yeah 5g is monster weight on throat for sure to add from scratch, really felt the 2g difference also.
I actually added 4g first at throat and that was too much. Then splitted it half to 2g total and right away felt superior.
Blade V10 indeed is definately best suitable for aggressive players where you like to dictate the play and point. There are much better and easier options for counterpunching or defensive style.
I have never played with blades that much before. They can be quite anemic if you dont like to rip the ball and be aggressive.
I remember blade that they had reputation of very good weight/stability ratio and rarely anyone added any weight to them. V10 clearly has gone other direction. I have 2 of them and both copies seem to have same thing and need for customization.
Cannot wait for the new Redline to try out. Going to add weight to throat also for that one.
I actually added 4g first at throat and that was too much. Then splitted it half to 2g total and right away felt superior.
Blade V10 indeed is definately best suitable for aggressive players where you like to dictate the play and point. There are much better and easier options for counterpunching or defensive style.
I have never played with blades that much before. They can be quite anemic if you dont like to rip the ball and be aggressive.
I remember blade that they had reputation of very good weight/stability ratio and rarely anyone added any weight to them. V10 clearly has gone other direction. I have 2 of them and both copies seem to have same thing and need for customization.
Cannot wait for the new Redline to try out. Going to add weight to throat also for that one.
sebash
Rookie
Oh I don't think I made myself clear. I think the RF is better for me for dictating the point whereas the Blade is more suited for counterpunching.
The RF has a higher twisteight, tighter mains and is stiffer, the connection to the ball is exceptional and directional control amazing. Perfect for taking the ball early.
The Blade is soft with much much less point and shot abilities and directional control too. I thought the V10 was different but I'm not sure anymore... I demoed the 18x20 V10 too but found it much more muted like the V9 was.
Last edited:
Not just Blade, pretty much all racquets have trended lighter these days due to the influence of modern swing technique. I have a couple K-Blades that are 312 and 313 SW unstrung. Pretty much nobody wants that these days. They'd lose a whole lot more customers who can't play with a heavy spec than they'd lose to those who can't be bothered to slap on a little lead tape.
thebigz
Professional
Yes I do find the RF 300g being good for taking balls on the rise specifically. Very maneuverable stick and control was very good when redirecting on the rise balls.
In my mind that would suit counter punchers better right? Anyway, game style aside Blade 98 requires much higher racquet head speed to get more out of. Probably requires you to change how you play quite a bit to suit the blade’s character better. It’s really for player who can generate a lot of pace with full fast swings instead of for redirecting pace.
Probably some other racquets would be better if you are not the type to hit the cover off the ball. The point and shoot redirection you are speaking about is almost always easier with firmer frames like Vcore 100 type.
thebigz
Professional
the copy of the Blade V10 I tested felt super solid at 320 SW strung and I didn’t think it needed any throat weight at all. I’m sure there’s spec variation at play with their improved tolerance still, but it’s also about our preference.
I have gone down a ton in SW over the last decade, The Vcore 98 I used 10 years ago in high school/college was 340 SW strung stock I found out when I got the briffiddi.
Nowadays my ideal spec is 315-322 SW range, depending on the frame and geometry. My game benefit more from being able to accelerate faster easier than more plow through mass at expense of racquet head speed.
That would sounds low for many here, but to each of their own. I can still play higher swingweight but the cons outweighs the pros for me. With the modern game I really think younger players generally want the lightest frames that are just solid enough.
I have a good collection of sticks from 10 years ago - SV98, DR98, G XT Speed Pro, etc. I can say for sure those frames requires much more mass for stability than frames today with more advanced layup. Even at 10 points higher SW and higher stiffness, SV98 is less solid than today’s Vcore 98.
Dadof2wildmonkeys
Rookie
Sorry is this is been said a million times already, but is the h22 retail blade pro 98 the same across versions 7-10? Gladiators tribe seems to make reference to the v10 having something new in the layup. Thanks in advance
Thomas the Tank Engine
Rookie
I have both the V8 and V9 b/g for the 18x20 model. I may also have some left for the V7 18x20, I’d have to check. Send me a pm if you’re interested. I’m in europe.
I need it for 16x19. Thank you though!
CosmosMpower
Hall of Fame
Anyone notice the handle is filled with foam on one half and silicone on the other? Seems odd for retail
NetDump5000
New User
I mentioned the foam and silicone above on my retail v10 98 16x19.
Still maining it, but I note it is a tiny bit more taxing on the elbow compared to Prince racquets or Pro Staff v13, but then I play exclusively outdoors in Ireland. In this region (UK + Ireland), it has been exceptionally windy and wet all year so far, save for heatwaves... Off-centre hits are a way of life...
Still maining it, but I note it is a tiny bit more taxing on the elbow compared to Prince racquets or Pro Staff v13, but then I play exclusively outdoors in Ireland. In this region (UK + Ireland), it has been exceptionally windy and wet all year so far, save for heatwaves... Off-centre hits are a way of life...
It's not the whole chamber it's just a little at the end to correct weight/balance issues, and not all of them have silicone. I two frames one w/ some silicone and one all foam. And the one that's all foam is underspec, so the factory doesn't seem to be consistent even with their QC correction process.
PhxRacket
Hall of Fame
Longtime Blade user (going back to 2011), just wrapped up a demo of the new Blade 98 16x19, Blade Pro 16x19 and Blade Pro 100,
The Blade Pro 16x19 felt the best. Thumpy power. Smooth. Hit big, heavy groundies, but was unsustainable for more than two sets. Too much for me.
The Blade Pro 100 really needs lead or tungsten. It was too light.
I was hoping for a Goldilocks thing with the standard Blade 98 16x19 and it was very similar in many respects to the v9 Blade. It was stiffer and produced more pop. But if one hits the frame too often, I could see it being a problem.
The Blade Pro 16x19 felt the best. Thumpy power. Smooth. Hit big, heavy groundies, but was unsustainable for more than two sets. Too much for me.
The Blade Pro 100 really needs lead or tungsten. It was too light.
I was hoping for a Goldilocks thing with the standard Blade 98 16x19 and it was very similar in many respects to the v9 Blade. It was stiffer and produced more pop. But if one hits the frame too often, I could see it being a problem.
danbrenner
Legend
blade 100L v9 to v10 is it just a cosmetic difference? or did they actually change anything?
SupahMan5000
Hall of Fame
layup change
danbrenner
Legend
OK, cool I was under the impression because when you look at his description, it really just starts by saying this is a cosmetic change. So I thought the 100s really just had nothing changed but I appreciate you noting that. By any chance, do you know what was changed in the layup and does that go for the L 100 standards
jonnyboi09
Rookie
After much ‘holicing over the last few years with frames such as the V9 Blade 98 16x19, Pure Drive, Pure Aero 98, Speed MP, and Ezone 100, here are my thoughts about the Blade 98 16x19 V10 and why I’m playing my best tennis with it.
At my level(4.0-4.5 USTA league player) and gamestyle(heavy topspin attacking baseliner), this racquet allows me to keep my foot on the gas while maintaining my level for 3 sets+.
I’ve improved my fitness over the last year losing 30 pounds and working with a pro getting lessons a few times each month. I previously played with the V9 Blade before my fitness improved and it would usually tire me out by the 1 hour mark. I loved the feel and control of the V9 but it didn’t help you whatsoever. You had go swing out to get anything out of the frame.
Compared to racquets like the Aero 98 and Vcore 98, the control is a significant step up, especially at faster swing speeds. It’s also much more whippy and maneuverable so swinging fast is much easier.
The V10 is also very solid at the net and the maneuverability shines for doubles. The racquet allows for quick reflex volleys as well as good feel to place volleys where you like.
I think the V10 is perfect for an attacking player, go 16x19 if you want easier access to topspin and a higher launch or 18x20 if you want flatter precision and like to mix in slice.
I actually hit with the 18x20 first at my club as the 16x19 was checked out. I played a set of doubles and loved it. The only thing I didn’t like was the lower launch, so I immediately demoed the 16x19 once it became available and purchased after the demo period.
This racquet isn’t going to give you the free power of a Vcore or Aero but what it lacks in “free power” it more than makes up for in confidence inspiring control. These racquets aren’t similar to the V10 in most aspects.
The most similar racquet I’ve used compared to the V10 is actually the Speed MP. The Speed launches higher and has a slightly higher power potential at high swing speeds but is noticeably more sluggish and doesn’t have the accuracy of the V10. I also struggle in doubles with the Speed with reflex shots.
Though a lot of reviewers have said the Blade is a dying racquet, I don’t see that at all. At my club on my 4.5 team, 4 of our 5 singles players use the 16x19 Blade V9 or V10. Wilson really done a great job updating a good frame in the V9 Blade and injecting it with a small but noticeable increase in power.
Also, for those curious, I play my Blades unstrung at 306g, 31.8cm, 294SW. Plenty of stability when hitting with my Coach/pro who is a UTR 11+ and absolutely destroys the ball.
At my level(4.0-4.5 USTA league player) and gamestyle(heavy topspin attacking baseliner), this racquet allows me to keep my foot on the gas while maintaining my level for 3 sets+.
I’ve improved my fitness over the last year losing 30 pounds and working with a pro getting lessons a few times each month. I previously played with the V9 Blade before my fitness improved and it would usually tire me out by the 1 hour mark. I loved the feel and control of the V9 but it didn’t help you whatsoever. You had go swing out to get anything out of the frame.
Compared to racquets like the Aero 98 and Vcore 98, the control is a significant step up, especially at faster swing speeds. It’s also much more whippy and maneuverable so swinging fast is much easier.
The V10 is also very solid at the net and the maneuverability shines for doubles. The racquet allows for quick reflex volleys as well as good feel to place volleys where you like.
I think the V10 is perfect for an attacking player, go 16x19 if you want easier access to topspin and a higher launch or 18x20 if you want flatter precision and like to mix in slice.
I actually hit with the 18x20 first at my club as the 16x19 was checked out. I played a set of doubles and loved it. The only thing I didn’t like was the lower launch, so I immediately demoed the 16x19 once it became available and purchased after the demo period.
This racquet isn’t going to give you the free power of a Vcore or Aero but what it lacks in “free power” it more than makes up for in confidence inspiring control. These racquets aren’t similar to the V10 in most aspects.
The most similar racquet I’ve used compared to the V10 is actually the Speed MP. The Speed launches higher and has a slightly higher power potential at high swing speeds but is noticeably more sluggish and doesn’t have the accuracy of the V10. I also struggle in doubles with the Speed with reflex shots.
Though a lot of reviewers have said the Blade is a dying racquet, I don’t see that at all. At my club on my 4.5 team, 4 of our 5 singles players use the 16x19 Blade V9 or V10. Wilson really done a great job updating a good frame in the V9 Blade and injecting it with a small but noticeable increase in power.
Also, for those curious, I play my Blades unstrung at 306g, 31.8cm, 294SW. Plenty of stability when hitting with my Coach/pro who is a UTR 11+ and absolutely destroys the ball.
sebash
Rookie
The written review with scores has been uploaded and I'm very surprised at the low score (8.2 overall). The V9 got 8.8. Both in 98 16v19.
The tapered beam and stiffer hoop should have been straight improvements. It's just a score though and it's not the same reviewers which doesn't allow comparaison between versions.
It's always weird when they give RAVE reviews of Aeros, Tfights and even the last Blade, but a good interesting update gets punished this hard??
The tapered beam and stiffer hoop should have been straight improvements. It's just a score though and it's not the same reviewers which doesn't allow comparaison between versions.
It's always weird when they give RAVE reviews of Aeros, Tfights and even the last Blade, but a good interesting update gets punished this hard??
