wilson blx six one 95 vs pro staff 95

[tennis4fun]

both are similar in specs. any difference between wilson blx six one 95 (2012) and pro staff 95 (2014)? I am looking to get either one

 

[SpinToWin]

do you mean the 6.1 95 or the Pro Staff Six.One 95? (The one without gold accents or the one with gold accents)

 

[CopolyX]

try them if you can,,,pro staff...you will feel the diff...if your hands have a heart beat...

 

[mye0330]

I have both of them and they don't play similar. six.one is much more heavy, stable, and powerful. PS is more maneuverable. I like both, but prefer the PS more.

Sent from my LG-H900 using Tapatalk

 

[ByakuFubuki]

Six.One 95 (16x18) has more Power, Pro Staff more Control and Maneuverability. I won't compare them on the Feel department because I never hit with the 2014 Pro Staff 95, but 2012 vs 2012 the Pro Staff was softer but somehow also gave me a better feedback (I had a better idea of how well/bad I hit the ball and in which part of the stringbed). Incredible dwell-time, also. I also found it easier to generate Spin with the Pro Staff despite it having one more Cross, but that is very personal. Most prefer the 6.1 by a mile, as you can see I have a different opinion. Demo both, if you can.

 

[tennis4fun]

do you mean the 6.1 95 or the Pro Staff Six.One 95? (The one without gold accents or the one with gold accents)

I'm talking about the one with gold accent (2012) vs the red and white (2014). I was able to hit with the 2012 yesterday. 2014 has the parallel drilling. I was wondering what effect it will have on the racquet

 

[SpinToWin]

I'm talking about the one with gold accent (2012) vs the red and white (2014). I was able to hit with the 2012 yesterday. 2014 has the parallel drilling. I was wondering what effect it will have on the racquet

2012: More muted, flexy feeling, feels like it has more dwell time.

2014: More crisp, stiff, and direct in response.