haqq777
Legend
Fingers crossed.I would assume/hope that if this is in fact not a 'limited' release then there will be enough demand/asks for grommets in time that they'll make some available.
Fingers crossed.I would assume/hope that if this is in fact not a 'limited' release then there will be enough demand/asks for grommets in time that they'll make some available.
To me that is likely bc they took the ultra pro v3 out of ultra page and put it in pro labs page
Pro Labs - Tennis
www.wilson.com
When I followed the link it asked me if I wanted the UK site but let me go to the Pro labs microsite (which has now gone down again).
No mention of H19/H22 that I could see.
There’s no Wilson website for RussiaAlso Russia maybe...
I feel like the clock struck midnight and my coach turned back into a pumpkin.
I had to read this 4 times at first before I understood the reference...Still waiting ....
There's no way it was ever available. Thinking about it before.Was going to get 16x19 Ultra Pro but it is out of stock? How come it sold out so quick?? I would have thought the Blade Pro would be the ones to go first if anything... does anyone know if they were even available from get go?
Only slight red flag is they say the beam is 21.5mm on the wilson site. I suspect that is an error, especially since the frame looks like an h22 in the pictures. But i guess ill find out.
Only slight red flag is they say the beam is 21.5mm on the wilson site. I suspect that is an error, especially since the frame looks like an h22 in the pictures. But i guess ill find out.
what I am curious is whether this is going to push Head to do the same....Do you guys think they will add more Pro Stock rackets in the futur or are these the only one used on tour?
If every brand started selling pro stock frames that would be dope!!what I am curious is whether this is going to push Head to do the same....
They also list their Ultra Pro/Tour at 20.6 mm flat beam. Guess that's just what they measured, I think it's still safe to assume that the Blade Pro is an H22.Only slight red flag is they say the beam is 21.5mm on the wilson site. I suspect that is an error, especially since the frame looks like an h22 in the pictures. But i guess ill find out.
It's from the children's fairy tale Cinderella.I had to read this 4 times at first before I understood the reference...
I thought you said your tennis coach turned into a pumpkin....Is this some weird Halloween thing I don't know about?
Do you often use your coach as a mode of transport?
Btw, between delivery fee and taxes, price for US was $301
Was it not the case already once with the UT that it was the H19 mold but other than that the racquet was a bit underwhelming?
I know (now). I was jokingly trying suggest do you ride on the back of your tennis coach to get around.It's from the children's fairy tale Cinderella.
I've read elsewhere that the beam is actually 21.5 on an H22, but perhaps more well versed experts can weigh in.
$270 for me. Free shipping if you want to wait 10-14 days for delivery.
Their copy is very sporadic. For the UP 18x20 they list the balance asOnly slight red flag is they say the beam is 21.5mm on the wilson site. I suspect that is an error, especially since the frame looks like an h22 in the pictures. But i guess ill find out.
Unstrung Balance | 8 pts HL / 31.5cm |
Unstrung Balance | 31.5CM/9 Pts HL |
Early guess. H22s. Why?
I think the balance point indicates decent weight in the head despite low stock weight.Hey guys, I'm thinking about getting one of the Blade Pros/H22s but this from Wilson made me nervous: "...this racket features a light stock weight that enables users to easily customize and add weight for more power, if desired." Do people think these will be playable at stock weight? Or is Wilson selling us anemic pro stock hairpins that absolutely need customization to be playable?
Don't be afraid if racquet companies or retailers round off specs to what they think players will like.Their copy is very sporadic. For the UP 18x20 they list the balance as
For the UP 16x19 they list the balance as
Unstrung Balance 8 pts HL / 31.5cm
Unstrung Balance 31.5CM/9 Pts HL
So same balance measure, 1pt difference in balance. Based on this alone I would say they need to fix the specs
Makes sense! So kind of like a Blade-ish weight/balance, suggesting a more than healthy enough SW. I feel better about these now.I think the balance point indicates decent weight in the head despite low stock weight.
Early guess. H22s. Why?
They will not be anemic. They will have plenty of mass in the hoop. I plan to play mine stock and only add weight to the handle if I have to or to the hoop for matching purposes. v1-v6 Blades had the same 305/32.5 spec with 330+ SW strung and a lot of people played them stock and still do. Wilson may make the layup slightly firmer which imo is a good thing so we don't have to add tons of weight to make the frame stable/powerful enough.Hey guys, I'm thinking about getting one of the Blade Pros/H22s but this from Wilson made me nervous: "...this racket features a light stock weight that enables users to easily customize and add weight for more power, if desired." Do people think these will be playable at stock weight? Or is Wilson selling us anemic pro stock hairpins that absolutely need customization to be playable?
Ohhh... Lucky you. Yeah they look a little off to me to normal Blades.yea these were a small run made for Fritz awhile back. Going to compare with the blade pro when they come in
Perfect--the Blade specs work well for my game and I'm not really an at-home customizer. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't getting something totally bare bones!They will not be anemic. They will have plenty of mass in the hoop. I plan to play mine stock and only add weight to the handle if I have to or to the hoop for matching purposes. v1-v6 Blades had the same 305/32.5 spec with 330+ SW strung and a lot of people played them stock and still do. Wilson may make the layup slightly firmer which imo is a good thing so we don't have to add tons of weight to make the frame stable/powerful enough.
Ohhh... Lucky you. Yeah they look a little off to me to normal Blades.
Oh, trust me I don't mind what they call the points in balance. I just find it funny that both are 31.5cm but one is 9HL and one is 8HL. It's just inconsistent presentation of the data.Don't be afraid if racquet companies or retailers round off specs to what they think players will like.
Blade 93 - 20.2mm listed as 20mm or 21mm lol.
TF40 - 21.7mm listed as 22mm
i was going to say the same.. the weight is slightly lower than blade v7 but balance is more head heavy... it's also thicker beam... it'll hit just fine... I am curious about RA though...They will not be anemic. They will have plenty of mass in the hoop. I plan to play mine stock and only add weight to the handle if I have to or to the hoop for matching purposes. v1-v6 Blades had the same 305/32.5 spec with 330+ SW strung and a lot of people played them stock and still do. Wilson may make the layup slightly firmer which imo is a good thing so we don't have to add tons of weight to make the frame stable/powerful enough.
Yeah definitely Pro stock. They seem to make the gloss extra shiny and durable for pros even though they scratch them up quicker and replace.pretty cool. Paint seems a bit glossier and no specs in the throat
Haha yeah. You'd think from the same company would be bad enough... But at the same time for different products?Oh, trust me I don't mind what they call the points in balance. I just find it funny that both are 31.5cm but one is 9HL and one is 8HL. It's just inconsistent presentation of the data.
Since you've had experience with pro stock, is your opinion that the Ultra Tour HAS been an H19 (regardless of layup), and do you expect the Ultra 97 Pro to be a legit 16x19 H19?They will not be anemic. They will have plenty of mass in the hoop. I plan to play mine stock and only add weight to the handle if I have to or to the hoop for matching purposes. v1-v6 Blades had the same 305/32.5 spec with 330+ SW strung and a lot of people played them stock and still do. Wilson may make the layup slightly firmer which imo is a good thing so we don't have to add tons of weight to make the frame stable/powerful enough.
yeah that I might do that (leather grip) as well. i am not touching the hoop on these things... 6hl unstrung is right there already for me and I don't like to get too much above 340gr as the SW should be mid 330s already..The blade 16x19 needed weight 2&10, it just wasn’t stable. This is an entirely different racquet altogether so will play stock first and see what I want to do. As a minimum, will be adding a leather grip