That is wrong imo. The Tour95 has a very high spin potential. It has even a more open string pattern than the 6.0 95!jonas-the-ball-basher said:No spin.
That is wrong imo. The Tour95 has a very high spin potential. It has even a more open string pattern than the 6.0 95!jonas-the-ball-basher said:No spin.
That's true, but it's much stiffer.hedonist said:That is wrong imo. The Tour95 has a very high spin potential. It has even a more open string pattern than the 6.0 95!
What head size is the PC?jonas-the-ball-basher said:That's true, but it's much stiffer.
Go try a PC600 and see for yourself, it feels much better and firmer.
93 Square inches, but some say it is actually 89.5.aj_m2009 said:What head size is the PC?
What about the mid+? I don't think I would be too comfy with something any smaller than 95 but I would try something smaller if I must.jonas-the-ball-basher said:93 Square inches, but some say it is actually 89.5.
I think also the Head Liquid Metal Prestige mid is a nice frame as well.
I would but right now I don't have $180 for a racket.johnmcc516 said:If you are interested in the ProStaff, you should try out the new ncode line nCode nSix-One 95.
So about how much do your rackets weigh now?nytennisplayer said:I have two wilson tour 95s. i lead them up quite alot so that both are even balanced, and i love it. when i played them stock they were mediocre and not that stable. the reason i bought them is the same as yours. I don't want to pay 180 for a stick, so i got two sticks for the same price!
Yes, I ve tried PS 6.1 both classic and strecth. In fact I'm in love with themaj_m2009 said:Ok, thanks. Have either of you(or anybody) tried the PS 6.1? If you have, what did you think of it?