Wilson Racquets!!

danielno

New User
Between Wilson Ncode Six-one 95 16x18 and Wilson Pro Staff Original 95, which one is better?
I´ve noticed that swingweight in the original is very low...what does it mean? is it a good or bad thing?
 
I use Wilson N Six One 95 16x18 and the Swing Weight felt like it had a low moment of inertia, which meant that i could swing it freely and it would not experience much resistance to motion. Its suitable for players who have a feel for a long swing pattern, because that is wheret the power in the stroke would come in.

In contrast, players who are often late in their stroke should avoid a low swingweight i guess.
 
I leaded up my nCode6195 and it plays much like my PS6095, just a bit heavier. But both are solid, manuverable players frames. Love 'em both.
You can swing as hard as you want without flying the ball and volley the hardest groundie, no problem.
 
Breakpoint???

I'm sure he'll chime in here.

With my limited experience with both racquets, I'd have to say the original is easier to work with and has better feel. In stock form it felt less stable to me, but the nCode just seemd like such a club to me, and less maneuverable. Some of this might be in my head because of the beam thickness being wider on the NCode.

I think there is more room to work with the original in terms of customization.

Rich
 
Both are great racquets. The PS 6.0 95 is more flexible, easier to swing, and has a lot more feel. It suits all-court and serve-and-volley styles very well.

On the other hand, the nCode 95 is stiffer, swings heavier, and is more powerful. I would say it's more suitable for pure baseline bashers.

Both serve very well, but the PS 6.0 95 is more maneuverable and is less stressful on the shoulder, if you're getting up there in age.

If you try both of them you'll notice that they feel very different. The nCode 95 feels more stable and muted but the PS 6.0 95 feels sweeter and more raw. Like with all racquets, it's a personal choice.
 
Back
Top