Exactly that!Really nice looking shoe. The 3s were great except the forefoot really curved in sharply over my toes, cramming the outside of my wider forefoot. I'd be curious about the fit here, too, though I would suspect something similarly made for the average foot rather than for the wider.
absolutely agree!Well,
I'm a big fan of the Wilsons, tho the Rush 2.5 is the best for me (and I hope they keep it in the lineup).
I also have one pair each of the Rush 3.0 and the KAOS 3.0, but the lateral support and general fit of the 2.5 is way more suited for my foot and for my game.
I will definitely check these out when I get a chance.
I recommend to anybody who hasn't tried one of the Wilsons — do so when you can. They are excellent kicks.
/Acey
I believe the step in comfort is better than the Res 8 or SoleCourt. Felt more plush and spongy.I really liked the 3.0’s except the traction was really sticky in the start, made my knees hurt. However the fit, comfort and durability and weight were great, however not as good as my Asics.
When do you think we will see them in the US? There is zero selection of Wilsons at the moment. Seems like it has been like that for weeks or longer. Chinese tariffs? I'll take anything in size 10.5. Don't care if it is 3.0 or 2.5 even. Of course, a light blue to match my ultra tours would be 1st on the list.
![]()
They came on the market out of the blue.No preview,no playtest nothing.The 3.0 is on strong sale right now so maybe the US market is waiting to sell their stock before bringing the new model in.All I could get from the net was""By offering a lighter model than version 3.0, the Wilson Rush Pro 3.5 shoe improves its performance to give you the perfect combination of explosiveness and stability. ''When do you think we will see them in the US? There is zero selection of Wilsons at the moment. Seems like it has been like that for weeks or longer. Chinese tariffs? I'll take anything in size 10.5. Don't care if it is 3.0 or 2.5 even. Of course, a light blue to match my ultra tours would be 1st on the list.
![]()
They came on the market out of the blue.No preview,no playtest nothing.The 3.0 is on strong sale right now so maybe the US market is waiting to sell their stock before bringing the new model in.All I could get from the net was""By offering a lighter model than version 3.0, the Wilson Rush Pro 3.5 shoe improves its performance to give you the perfect combination of explosiveness and stability. ''
Wilson Rush Pro 3.0 12.8 oz / 362 g (size 42)
WILSON RUSH PRO 3.5 11.9 oz / 337 g (size 42)
The blade and their racquets in general is getting hammered. I’ve checked 5 places and nobody had any. Insane!Supply chain problems are killing Wilson at the moment.
The Rush Pro 2.5 was amazing!
The very next time I saw them, I bought the last pair even though I knew they were half a size smaller, hoping for a miraculous foot-shrinkage incident.
SPOILER: It didn't happen.
The Rush Pro 2.5 was amazing!
The very next time I saw them, I bought the last pair even though I knew they were half a size smaller, hoping for a miraculous foot-shrinkage incident.
SPOILER: It didn't happen.
thats the issue i have with almost every tennis shoe. running shoes have the foot shape figured out, tenny shoes ... not so muchReally nice looking shoe. The 3s were great except the forefoot really curved in sharply over my toes, cramming the outside of my wider forefoot. I'd be curious about the fit here, too, though I would suspect something similarly made for the average foot rather than for the wider.
why are they doing the 2.5 “reissues” in the US?
How many hours is that? My Asics GR8 shoes last me only about 4-5 weeks before they get too soft and cause knee/foot soreness. I play about 15 hours per week on outdoor hard courts and so, the shoes have to be replaced every 60-75 hours. In the past, I used to wear heavier Barricade 7s (aka Novak) and they lasted 6-7 weeks. I’ve never had any shoes from Nike/Adidas/Asics last me more than 100 hours before they came too soft or the sole wore out so that I could send it back for warranty replacement.No idea but I got a pair of the "2021 issue" and they are fine shoes - though pretty fast wearing. I don't expect this pair to last any more than 10 weeks or so, whereas other shoes will last 12-16 weeks.
How many hours is that? My Asics GR8 shoes last me only about 4-5 weeks before they get too soft and cause knee/foot soreness. I play about 15 hours per week on outdoor hard courts and so, the shoes have to be replaced every 60-75 hours. In the past, I used to wear heavier Barricade 7s (aka Novak) and they lasted 6-7 weeks. I’ve never had any shoes from Nike/Adidas/Asics last me more than 100 hours before they came too soft or the sole wore out so that I could send it back for warranty replacement.
Just so everyone is aware, Wilson like many other manufacturers, are having supply chain issues that center around availability of ***shipping containers***. I have two durability warranty vouchers from Wilson that I am waiting to redeem but everything is out of stock. The last email I got from a Wilson support representative says they will hopefully have shoes back in stock in about two weeks.
[/QUOTE
Short answer not enough containers are returning and global demand is up about 25%. Largest shortage in Asia , second Europe. Largest surplus North America. Shipping costs are over double their normal rates.
Like the OP, I had problems with toe-jamming with the 2.5. Nice shoe otherwise.The Rush Pro 2.5 was amazing!
The very next time I saw them, I bought the last pair even though I knew they were half a size smaller, hoping for a miraculous foot-shrinkage incident.
SPOILER: It didn't happen.
same here. i didnt like em at first but they took a little break in. now theyre fitting like a ... well ... a rather heavy glove.the Nike Vapor Cage 4 (these are my go-to now)
the rush 3.0s are rubbing my little toes. not enough width in the toebox. cant go up any on size or theyll be clown shoes.
Update: I've had the shoes for a few weeks now and they're killing my toes whenever I stop after a full sprint.
Would not recommend for this reason alone, in particular if you're playing on a surface you can't slide on.
I played tennis 4 times this week in these shoes and I can see bruising underneath my big toe's nail.
I don't know about the previous shoes but I think the issue is the extremely hard toeguard thing it has at the front of the shoe. It's a very stiff material. I didn't have this on my last pair. My big toes are always banging into them and coming out worse for wear.Same issues I had with the 3.0. So, I see it's the same shoe.
Can confirm. Bought some 2.5s on closeout in November and just got a pair of 3.5s dropped in the mail for warranty b/c the toe-box wore completely through on them.Wilson's best shoe. These shoes come with warranty AFAIK.
This is the color I have on the way. Even the wife approved of them! (She generally hates my shoe choices)see that t-dub has the 3.5 now ... and its BLUE![]()
For those that have played the Wilson shoes how are they overall? I have a narrow foot and Adidas/Nike have been fitting well over the last few years. I remember wearing the Old Wilson Pro Staff shoes - they were heavy but built like tanks back then. How are is the current lineup? I do have ankle roll issues so the amplifeel look interesting, but heavy. Currently playing in Nike Zoom Zero's and like the fast/cushioned feel. Thanks
3.5 are soft,wide toe box and really comfortable.Stability is very good and the quality is great.The only thing I cannot review is durability.I don't slide and I only play on clay.For those that have played the Wilson shoes how are they overall? I have a narrow foot and Adidas/Nike have been fitting well over the last few years. I remember wearing the Old Wilson Pro Staff shoes - they were heavy but built like tanks back then. How are is the current lineup? I do have ankle roll issues so the amplifeel look interesting, but heavy. Currently playing in Nike Zoom Zero's and like the fast/cushioned feel. Thanks
same here. i didnt like em at first but they took a little break in. now theyre fitting like a ... well ... a rather heavy glove.