prayingd
New User
Although an older thread exists on this topic, I need additional input from those who have owned either; especially from those who have used both extensively.
I was surprised that in a previous thread it appeared as if the Steam 105s was preferred over the 99s. Although I expected that might be the case for 3.0 - 3.5 rated players & seniors, numerous 4.0-5.0 players also preferred the 105s.
I had previously assumed that the only advantage of the 105s was additional power and a slightly larger sweet spot. Yet several users commented that the 105s is more comfortable AND just as accurate as the 99. (In comments from another website, several users indicated that adding weight to the handle of the 105s makes it more stable and controlled than a stock 99s!)
That kind of blew me away, is it makes the 105s appear to be the more favorable of the two.
On the other hand, racquet reviews from the retailers indicate that the 105s is almost overpowered and definitely lacks the control of the 99s. Which obviously swings things in favor of the 99s for those seeking control over power.
So I'm somewhat confused. Although there seems to be no question that the 105s has more power, there seems to be a lack of consensus concerning comfort & control.
Unless I misunderstand, it sounds as if adding some weight to the handle of the 105s may transform it into a preferable racquet. Increasing string tension or using a less lively string may help harness the extra the power.
The bottom line is that I'm now leaning toward the Steam 105s. Can anyone convince me otherwise? Any input from past or current users is greatly appreciated!
Sent from my N9518 using Tapatalk
I was surprised that in a previous thread it appeared as if the Steam 105s was preferred over the 99s. Although I expected that might be the case for 3.0 - 3.5 rated players & seniors, numerous 4.0-5.0 players also preferred the 105s.
I had previously assumed that the only advantage of the 105s was additional power and a slightly larger sweet spot. Yet several users commented that the 105s is more comfortable AND just as accurate as the 99. (In comments from another website, several users indicated that adding weight to the handle of the 105s makes it more stable and controlled than a stock 99s!)
That kind of blew me away, is it makes the 105s appear to be the more favorable of the two.
On the other hand, racquet reviews from the retailers indicate that the 105s is almost overpowered and definitely lacks the control of the 99s. Which obviously swings things in favor of the 99s for those seeking control over power.
So I'm somewhat confused. Although there seems to be no question that the 105s has more power, there seems to be a lack of consensus concerning comfort & control.
Unless I misunderstand, it sounds as if adding some weight to the handle of the 105s may transform it into a preferable racquet. Increasing string tension or using a less lively string may help harness the extra the power.
The bottom line is that I'm now leaning toward the Steam 105s. Can anyone convince me otherwise? Any input from past or current users is greatly appreciated!
Sent from my N9518 using Tapatalk