Tommy Haas
Hall of Fame
I think he meant that the handle is molded with an indentation to apply lead tape into which doesn't change the size of the grip.
Sorry for my Bad English.What do you mean? Is the handle shape different?
Sorry for my Bad English.
Yes different from usual shape
It looks more like a head shape than a Wilson shape .
I play long Time with frames "head" but when I played babolat, the horror of the old form babolat, so I cast the handle directly on the frame (form wilson on my babolat) and they look different Of this handle. This handle seems rather rectangular than the wilson shape
What do you mean by truer launch (angle)?
Have you played the RF97, I remember the same being said of its shape when it came out. It had slightly different and smaller dimensions.
No sorry , since wilson introduced the amplifeel technology, I no longer touch a wilson (except H19 / H22 / H25) I can not compare with the RF97
No sorry , since wilson introduced the amplifeel technology, I no longer touch a wilson (except H19 / H22 / H25) I can not compare with the RF97
I wanted to check if the handle was filled with foam as indicated on this forum, and the answer is NO !!
it's silicone and I am happy!
See the pics
Hey Vidda that reminds me of something........ popped the buttcap the other day on a RF97A and it had foam in one channel and some silicone in the other. I suspect both sides are foam filled but they leave room for silicone to try and match specs, maybe the same with the UT?
Anybody else with a RF97A popped the buttcap and can tell me if theres foam + silicone inside?
Hey Vidda that reminds me of something........ popped the buttcap the other day on a RF97A and it had foam in one channel and some silicone in the other. I suspect both sides are foam filled but they leave room for silicone to try and match specs, maybe the same with the UT?
Anybody else with a RF97A popped the buttcap and can tell me if theres foam + silicone inside?
Very wise decision in my opinionThey got rid of ampifeel a few years ago I thought
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's highly probableI had three with foam and one with a narrow inject of silicone in both sides. Seemed to be for weight / balance matching.
I had three with foam and one with a narrow inject of silicone in both sides. Seemed to be for weight / balance matching.
Did you get to play with an ultra tour? What is the behavior compared to the pro tour? What pros and cons?I was comparing with my PT630, other than it has 1mm wider beam & slightly larger head, it looks very similar to me.
It's highly probable
That's exactly what it's there to do...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Nice review! Quick question though, you say the UT is more demanding than your blade 18x20...however you've had to weight you blade upto 12.3 oz's whereas the UT is fine at stock weight?
Just tested the Ultra Tour stringed with MSV HEX 1.18mm and a wilson overgrip. My previous racquets have been:
- Head Microgel Radical MP (Weight 319g with one overgrip)
- Blade 98, 2015 (Weight 339g with leathergrip and one overgrip)
I really loved the Blade 98, but it was way too headheavy for me making me late on many deep balls, strugling with swinging fast enough, so I added a leather grip to make it more headlight. However, it was rock solid and I gain a lot of plow through with this racquet when I have the time to get in position.
With the WIlson Ultra I get a much more manueverable racquet. With strings and one overgrip it weights 326g. The biggest different between the Blade and the Ultra is the power - the Ultra has less power and the sweet spot seems much smaller, but it allows me to swing much faster and control the balls. I definately have to work harder with the Ultra.
I feel that I lack a little bit of plow through with the Ultra. Do you think it will help adding a leather grip even though this will result in a much more headlight balance? The total weight will then be around 335g. My Blade is 338g and it almost feels too heavy, so Im not interested in adding too much weight. Can two racquets differ in manueverability even though they are same weight?
But then it will become more headheavy ?Just add some lead at 3+9 to increase stability and power. Adding weight at the handle doesn't really do that and is mostly for getting the balance right.
But then it will become more headheavy ?
I did not mention Phantom in the above? Did you mean to post that in phantom thread?Dgoran..so what you are saying the new phantom is a rebrand off the tour basically?
I get in moods for a flexly racket and reach into my collection and grab my old tours..or my tech 315 Ltd or blade 104..
I think the tech 315 Ltd is my favorite of that bunch...
I was going to get a phantom..but perhaps I'll pass and use that money and get the new ultra 97 instead..
Can two racquets differ in manueverability even though they are same weight?
But then it will become more headheavy ?
But then it will become more headheavy ?
It does have that pro stock feel that is hard to describe but it's not pro tour 630 soft.Botton line, is the Ultra Tour good enough comfort and control wise to be a pro stock (H19 + PT57A) alternative? How does it play compared to the real deal and is it an improvement? It was supposed to be a real H19 and now we know it's not, but I still want to know how close it comes to one.
Botton line, is the Ultra Tour good enough comfort and control wise to be a pro stock (H19 + PT57A) alternative?
Haha. Nice one!It does have that pro stock feel that is hard to describe but it's not pro tour 630 soft.
You can imagine it like this:
Ultra tour is a kitkat:
And Pro tour is Kinder:
They are both very sweet but one is little crunchier
Since 11.8oz seems to be the the upper limit of your preferred weight, I would stick with the synthetic and overgrip or replace the setup altogether and use a better more absorbent and tacky replacement grip like Wilson Micro-Dry Comfort and you won't need to use an overgrip.
Then place some lead at 3 and 9 o'clock and see how you like it. If you feel that you need more tail weight, add some putty inside the buttcap and adjust little by little. The problem with leather grips and overgrips is that it doesn't allow you to fine tune in smaller weight increments like you can with lead and putty.
Are you sure that it won't get just a bit more plow through when increasing the total weight with a leather grip?Just add some lead at 3+9 to increase stability and power. Adding weight at the handle doesn't really do that and is mostly for getting the balance right.
Yes they can. Even if the balances are the same, the distribution of weight can affect how a racquet swings. For instance, most of the weight on Racquet A could be concentrated at the tip, and on Racquet B, the weight could mostly be in the throat. This is why racquets can have the same weight and balance but different swingweights.
Yes, it will. That's what happens when you add weight to the head. You don't need a ton of lead to improve stability--I find that even 2g can make a difference, but maybe 4g (which is about the weight of a dampener, and a couple grams shy of an overgrip) between 3&9, and a lesser to equal amount of weight to counterbalance in the handle will give you the qualities you want out of the frame.
It's worth experimenting with. Lead is always cheap and easy to tinker with.
Are you sure that it won't get just a bit more plow through when increasing the total weight with a leather grip?
If I choose to add lead at 3 and 9 I think it will become too head heavy. If I then have to add lead to the handle also, then Im afraid it becomes too heavy. But again, it will might be more manueverable than the Blade even though its the same weight?!
Maybe I really am a freak, but I can't use mix brands for racquet and dempener
I did not mention Phantom in the above? Did you mean to post that in phantom thread?
But to answer your question as of now, I would get Phantom over Ultra tour and 315ltd combined...
What I was trying to say if you have 315ltd not sure you need ultra tour
Sweetspot is low and stringbed felt slightly boardy and a bit unstable towards the edges (could've been considerably worse considering light weight and swingweight). I've added some lead at 10+2, 3+9 and some on V throat to even out and it generally helped with stability and expanded "sweetspot" some but stringbed still felt uneven, I'll have to spend more time figuring this out.
Then you go with some lead at 12 o'clock (instead of 10+2 lead preferrably, possibly this amped up too much the power for the groundstrokes). Say, 2 grams at 12 o'clock, 4 grams at the top of the handle for a swing compensation. Will shift the sweet spot.
Just leave a small gap in the lead tape at 12 o'clock or wherever the mount/s is/are.
Then you go with some lead at 12 o'clock (instead of 10+2 lead preferrably, possibly this amped up too much the power for the groundstrokes). Say, 2 grams at 12 o'clock, 4 grams at the top of the handle for a swing compensation. Will shift the sweet spot.
Just leave a small gap in the lead tape at 12 o'clock or wherever the mount/s is/are.
Lead with a gap tooth between the center mains!
Lateral Stability would suffer and I want all I can get here.