Well the same RBA lost 2-1 vs Federer in Halle and it was 4-4 even in the third set before RBA chocked badly and lost the match.
So what are you talking about?
But Fed had good runs in 2014 and 2015 and then it turned out playing Nole was very different thing. I don’t think Agut was ever really close today. Nole lost his concentration in the second set but after that he was in control for the rest of the match
Agut always takes a set against Djoker in slamsI agree that the final result was never in doubt. But Djoko should have taken out Agut with much less effort in a Wimbledon semifinal. And he was not all of that in control in the third set.
Agut always takes a set against Djoker in slams
If you reach Wimbledon SF having lost only one set, as RBA did, it means you are playing very well. Not sure why Nole was supposed to simply steamroll Agut.I agree that the final result was never in doubt. But Djoko should have taken out Agut with much less effort in a Wimbledon semifinal. And he was not all of that in control in the third set.
Two reasons I have little hope for Federer this time -
1. Abnormally low bouncing grass.
2. Towards the end of Nadal match Federer brought his 2017 level with even better forehand. If his ground game works throughout the match - especially the forehand he can win this match. No loopy forehands in final please.
Lol all this analyzing, yall are hilarious Djokovic in 4 and I have no interest in watching. My one Djokovic match per tourney quota was filled today unless Rafa won.
You’re falling into the trap. Even in 2015-2016 Djokovic looks average up until the final. Sure what about the AO this year?. He will play out of skin tomorrow and win in 4 maxBefore the tournament, I would have had Djokovic as clear favourite against Federer in a final - but Novak doesn't quite look himself IMO.
So I'll tentatively go for Federer in 4.
Oh indeed, that's a definite possibility. He's done it before.You’re falling into the trap. Even in 2015-2016 Djokovic looks average up until the final. Sure what about the AO this year?. He will play out of skin tomorrow and win in 4 max
That’s true but Federer also has a stellar SF then meets Nole and loses. I remember that masterclass against Murray then Djokovic eased past him. Can only see Djokovic winning unless Fed serves high FS and paints linesOh indeed, that's a definite possibility. He's done it before.
But he can't do it every time.
Oh indeed, that's a definite possibility. He's done it before.
But he can't do it every time.
I actually believe that the extra low bouncing grass is working perfect for Fed.
It favors the fact that Roger sticks on baseline to rally.
The match vs Rafa clearly showed this. He took great advantage from low bouncing, allowing him to get in even more.
The conditions are perfect for Roger, and if his groundstrokes are at the level of the semifinal, we might see the most memorable beat down of the Roger Novak H2H.
Federer in 3 clean sets.
If Federer will lose it will not be because he played a semifinal against Nadal.And even Fed's biggest haters shouldn't expect Fed at nearly to bring his best level against another ATG in the second consecutive match. Djokodal will never have to do that.
Why not? He is nearly 38 and has to play 2 successive younger ATG to win the title. He had to raise his level for Nadal so it's asking too much to have to do it for another ATG.If Federer will lose it will not be because he played a semifinal against Nadal.
I like Rog but he hasn't proven he can beat Djoker in Bo5 for a long time now
There was never a 4-3 in the third setAgut almost took two sets. He was the better player up to 4-3 on third set.
In 2014 and 2015 he had easy paths to Wimbledon finals (an even easier one to USO 2015 final) and he still lost. On the other hand in AO 2017 he played a few five set matches and still beat Nadal in the final. So it's not about the path to the final. He just has problems against a specific player since he got older. Nadal is now an easy matchup for him, with Djokovic it is the opposite.Why not? He is nearly 38 and has to play 2 successive younger ATG to win the title. He had to raise his level for Nadal so it's asking too much to have to do it for another ATG.
Last year Djokovic had Anderson for example so of course he didn't need to raise or maintain his level.
Wimb 2015 was very similar. Had to raise his level to beat a former champion in the semis against Murray. Then he couldn't replicate that level in the final.In 2014 and 2015 he had easy paths to Wimbledon finals (an even easier one to USO 2015 final) and he still lost. On the other hand in AO 2017 he played a few five set matches and still beat Nadal in the final. So it's not about the path to the final. He just has problems against a specific player since he got older. Nadal is now an easy matchup for him, with Djokovic it is the opposite.
Go for roger, Novak still has chances with this abysmal field and he is atleast getting to finals. Fed can easily lose n r4 at the uso to tsitsipas like he did at AO. He also won a slam this year.I am pretty torn about this. Both of Djokovic and Fed are my Favorites and both of them are at a stage where they might not win a slam hereafter at all.
Yes that applies more to Fred and that's why I want him to win slightly more, but people forget just last year before WB Djokovic was in a very very bad place.
Hopefully both of them give great accounts of themselves and play as well as they can. The only thing I want is this to not be a beatdown from either side. There's weeks off after this, hopefully both put in their everything here.
I would be happy if both have moments of brilliance. A good close match. For once I won't be worrying about winner or loser.
May the best man win.
CHUM JEZTE ROGER ! IDEMO NOLE !.
Do you think Rafa is better prep for Novak than Murray or other way around.Wimb 2015 was very similar. Had to raise his level to beat a former champion in the semis against Murray. Then he couldn't replicate that level in the final.
Same thing here, only that he had to play better against Rafa.
My point is that if he had to face somebody like Querrey in the semifinals I would still expect Djokovic to win the final. He is just a very tough matchup for current Federer.Wimb 2015 was very similar. Had to raise his level to beat a former champion in the semis against Murray. Then he couldn't replicate that level in the final.
Same thing here, only that he had to play better against Rafa.
Federer has simply been dealt with an unfair deck of cards. That is all.My point is that if he had to face somebody like Querrey in the semifinals I would still expect Djokovic to win the final. He is just a very tough matchup for current Federer.
Lol all this analyzing, yall are hilarious Djokovic in 4 and I have no interest in watching. My one Djokovic match per tourney quota was filled today unless Rafa won.
Djokovic is a marginal favorite, nothing more than that IMO. Both will have one significant dip atleast in the match - not just Fed.
If Novak tries to slice/come to the net like he did vs RBA or like vs Thiem at RG (net play), he'll be beaten. He'll have to go back to the old style of relentless groundstrokes if he has to beat Fed.
If even Nadal was struggling vs the Fed slice when it stayed low, expect djokovic to struggle as well. Lets see how much part that plays in the final.
Well, don't know what to say. I would always prefer a victory over Rafa because any victory over his nemesis gives him confidence.Do you think Rafa is better prep for Novak than Murray or other way around.
Weren't Wimbledon 2017 and Australia 2018 recent enough?A bit unfair how Federer has to pull the Djokodal gauntlet here at nearly 38 to win this slam, while Djokodal have had easy slam wins for a while now.
I don’t get it either. from what I’ve seen Novak is playing as well or better than in 2015. His return numbers are a lot betterTo me it feels like people are just trying to convince themselves that Djokovic has looked average this tournament so far when reality says otherwise.
Djokovic has looked just fine this tournament.