Wimbledon 2025 - 2nd round - Jack Draper (4) vs Marin Cilic

More and more proof this whole *insert top 80's or 90's player* cannot compete and would be dummied by *insert current top player here* is such a load...
Congrats Marin.
I somewhat agree and would agree more if I felt he could give Sinacraz the business in similar fashion, which of course he’d be a major underdog to do.
 
ZBKD42K.png
 
I hate to brag but I had my broken clock moment with this one. Proof can be found in the men’s thread. It just had upset all over it.
 
turns out that in the battle between Cilic’s choking and Draper’s home favourite pressure, the latter was the immovable object
 
I somewhat agree and would agree more if I felt he could give Sinacraz the business in similar fashion, which of course he’d be a major underdog to do.
I think he could absolutely beat Alcaraz on first week grass. The level he brought today was a lot better than Fognini’s on Monday. Additionally, he pushed Raz to 5 in 2022 at the US Open despite being old af back then as well.

Sinner probably a more difficult challenge. He will also lose to his father Djokovic if they play here, unfortunately.
 
Was just listening to McEnroe talk and he mentioned that Cilic hit 53 winners today to 34 UO's. I knew he was hitting winners for fun but 53 winners in 4 sets (especially when he lost one of those sets 6-1) is crazy good!
 
I saw Cilic play the world no. 229 Zachary Svajda at Ilkley a few weeks ago. At that stage, he struggled to move, was completely powerless in most of the baseline rallies, and he barely threatened on Svajda’s serve (he had 0 break points). He was heavily reliant on big serves to win points.

Clearly he was very much finding his feet again on grass at that stage, and has improved considerably since then, winning the title Nottingham in-between then and the main event.

I remember the nature of his defeat to Pella in 2018, when many people thought he was a title contender, and how it triggered a sharp decline.

I thought that many analysts, including numerous non-British ones, were jumping the gun in anointing Draper as a serious title contender at this tournament, clearly largely due to his nationality. I thought that the realistic aim this year, and before the draw came out, was for him to reach the last 8. I still expected him to clear the 2nd round here for the first time in his career !
 
:laughing:

They used to do it with Timmy too. :rolleyes:

At least Henman had reached 2 Wimbledon quarter-finals by this stage of his career though. Draper is still yet to even reach the 3rd round.

Draper was pretty open in his press conference about his forehand is far better suited to hard courts and clay, and than on grass it is vulnerable to pace and being rushed.

Some the biggest arrogance by the British media when it came to tennis, was at Wimbledon 2009, when they widely assumed that there would be a Federer-Murray final, and that everyone else in the draw was basically irrelevant. There were even previews about what might happen in a Federer-Murray final, on the morning of the semi-finals. I'll never forget John Lloyd 'insisting' that Murray was the favourite, ahead of his semi-final in 2011. McEnroe, no stranger to saying dumb things himself as an analyst over the years, was trying not to laugh.
 
Thoughts:
1. Draper losing = bad for tennis. Great to have a good looking superstar brit to be hyped by such an influential media market as the UK. Not saying i’m a Draper fan, just that his success is a good thing.

2. Awesome to see Cilic roll back the years. Who can’t appreciate the aging veteran battling back from surgeries to have another moment in the sun? “He ain’t as good as he once was, but he can be good once, as he ever was.”

3. Of course he will now immediately lose to Munar—the worst possible result for the good of the sport.
 
Back
Top