Wimbledon 2026 SF: [7] Novak Djokovic vs. [1] Jannik Sinner

WWW

  • Total voters
    118
Novak has a 10% chance , may the Gods roll the dices .

WV78.gif
 
Last edited:
Maybe you guys who think it's 50-50 should all bet on Sinner, because the bookies are putting him at an 80-85% favorite for the SF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH
ForehandCross said:
I am not sure about this. Level of play wise, Sinner is way off of his usual self.

Again a usual Sinner beats this Djokovic in straight sets but this isn't usual Sinner. Struff was outplaying him in play and Sinner only got by due to his serve. Djokovic is able to defend more, inject more pace and not just from forehand but both wings and will return more balls in serve than any player that Sinner had trouble against till Quarters.

Unless something radically changes, Djokovic is outplaying Sinner. The question is for how long and if that length will be enough to get a decisive lead. Even if he played 5 hours, he still gets 2 day rest.

It all depends on how much the 39 year old has left in the tank to actually complete the match.

For Sinner, I have never seen his game be this disjoint. Never seen his Backhand cough up errors on routine balls and his Forehand is shambolic right now.

He is doing a 2010 Federer without a Berdych to knock him out and end his misery.
Click to expand...

Much like Djokovic throughout most of his career (we are not taking into account exceptional years like 2011 or exceptional tournaments), I don’t believe that Sinner has some magic level that causes eyes of the viewer to leave orbits. He just steps on the court, does his boring as hell sh*t, and wins 95 matches out of 100. If you’ve followed Djokovic’s career with enough attention, you will recognise this pattern. They are always looking like some random guy in the 4th round is about to kick them out, but then they win the tournament.
 
Sinner really didn't impress me in this tournament yet. He barely surivived the first round and very well could have lost a set to Struff yesterday. Djokovic on the other hand also had his struggles, but also moments of brillance. The fatigue factor won't be too decisive I think. I mean, of course today he'll still be a physical wreck, but it's only Wednesday and the match is on Friday.

It's a 50/50 match, but I have a slight feeling Djokovic will take it again. People who think EVERYTHING needs to be perfect for Djokovic to have a chance shouldn't forget that the AO match actually wasn't perfect for him and had a horrible first set for example.
 
I think Sinner in 4, perhaps against better judgement. I make this prediction because I found Sinner's rebound from RG last year at Wimbledon quite impressive and it showed he does have some resilience in him. I think he will find a good enough level here.
 
The fact they played on Tuesday makes this interesting for me. Obviously Djoker will be creaking harrrd from that match yesterday, but will he still be creaking by Friday morning if he takes today super light?

I didn’t watch the match yesterday apart from a brief period in the 2nd set which looked pretty meh (after he faked a calf injury(?)), but from what I have read, it seemed like a classic match where the quality was pretty good overall - at least enough to suggest that if Djoker brings that level from set 5 on Friday, Sinner will have to play well

And this is the thing - Sinner looks still really off for me. He has had no fear factor at all this tournament, no sense of invulnerability. Someone who can serve better and hit the ball harder than Mochi, can move and return better than Struff, would have done real damage to him in the last 2 matches. Djoker obviously fits both categories

If Sinner locks in and produces his level from last year’s SF, then Sinner in 3. If he plays like he has so far this tourney… Sinner in 5??
 
jl809 said:
The fact they played on Tuesday makes this interesting for me. Obviously Djoker will be creaking harrrd from that match yesterday, but will he still be creaking by Friday morning if he takes today super light?
Click to expand...


Not at all bold prediction: Djokovic's fitness and stamina will not even be a small issue for him. This will be a proper tennis match won by the better player.
 
DSH said:
In the decisive tie-break, Djokovic did his thing and FAA self-destructed with so many unforced errors.
:X3:
Click to expand...
Will Sinner allow lightning to strike twice? Or will he exert his Gen Z dominance over his Millennial predecessor?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH
dking68 said:
Will Sinner allow lightning to strike twice? Or will he exert his Gen Z dominance over his Millennial predecessor?
Click to expand...
In theory he should win in straight sets, but he has lost some of his mental consistency this season in the Major tournaments.
His defeats in Australia and at RG are unheard of.
That will make the match more even than it should be.
But the winner is not in question if he manages to be efficient at the breaking points he will have in his favor.
:)
 
jl809 said:
The fact they played on Tuesday makes this interesting for me. Obviously Djoker will be creaking harrrd from that match yesterday, but will he still be creaking by Friday morning if he takes today super light?

I didn’t watch the match yesterday apart from a brief period in the 2nd set which looked pretty meh (after he faked a calf injury(?)), but from what I have read, it seemed like a classic match where the quality was pretty good overall - at least enough to suggest that if Djoker brings that level from set 5 on Friday, Sinner will have to play well

And this is the thing - Sinner looks still really off for me. He has had no fear factor at all this tournament, no sense of invulnerability. Someone who can serve better and hit the ball harder than Mochi, can move and return better than Struff, would have done real damage to him in the last 2 matches. Djoker obviously fits both categories

If Sinner locks in and produces his level from last year’s SF, then Sinner in 3. If he plays like he has so far this tourney… Sinner in 5??
Click to expand...
That’s the only small straw us Djokovic fans can cling to.

He still going to probably lose but I just hope he can recover physically. He played well this event so if he can then maybe he can do a bit better than im predicting.

If he can’t then sinner in 3 but if he can then it could go 4 sets and sinner winning in tight 4 setter!
 
TennisFan3 said:
LOL - Novak's level today was far better than anything Sinner has shown this tournament.
Not to mention Sinner doesn't have a big serve like FAA did.
Djokovic, if he plays his A game, is more likely to win in straight sets under 2 hours.
Click to expand...

Very bad news for tennis if the #1 server doesn't have a serve.
 
mike danny said:
Make or break match for Sinner. I don’t ever wanna hear hype words for him if he loses this
Click to expand...

Great players raise their level against the best, despite being scrappy in the earlier rounds. Big 3 were always like that. Now let’s see what Sinner is really made of. No excuses losing this one. I know for sure Alcaraz would have the clear edge against this Novak. Not so sure about Sinner. He’s lost so many close ones now.
 
Krish0608 said:
Great players raise their level against the best, despite being scrappy in the earlier rounds. Big 3 were always like that. Now let’s see what Sinner is really made of. No excuses losing this one. I know for sure Alcaraz would have the clear edge against this Novak. Not so sure about Sinner. He’s lost so many close ones now.
Click to expand...
Previously, your mettled was tested against ATGs in their primes?

Now it is tested against 39 year olds
 
mike danny said:
Previously, your mettled was tested against ATGs in their primes?

Now it is tested against 39 year olds
Click to expand...
That's fair but Djokovic is very far from being a normal 39 year old, he's still really really good even in his declined from prime form.

Regardless, if Sinner doesn't win this match I'm not sure where he goes from here as that would be a big hit to his confidence to lose back to back to Djokovic and go slamless in Carlos's absence (assuming, praying that he's back for the USO) so even though 25 is an important achievement I think this match is WAY bigger for Sinner's legacy. I think Sinner gets his revenge on Friday and he better get his revenge or some questions will really come into play for him.
 
NYTennisfan said:
That's fair but Djokovic is very far from being a normal 39 year old, he's still really really good even in his declined from prime form.

Regardless, if Sinner doesn't win this match I'm not sure where he goes from here as that would be a big hit to his confidence to lose back to back to Djokovic and go slamless in Carlos's absence (assuming, praying that he's back for the USO) so even though 25 is an important achievement I think this match is WAY bigger for Sinner's legacy. I think Sinner gets his revenge on Friday and he better get his revenge or some questions will really come into play for him.
Click to expand...
Even if he is not your regular 39 year old, he is still not 25 anymore and will never play like he was 25 ever again. He is still easier to beat.
 
There's little doubt that Sinner is not at his best. Part of that has to do with his physical state as well as his own confidence and part of that is that other players right now are not as pressured into going for too much thinking they have absolutely no chance. His mechanics are unchanged otherwise.

On the other hand, we should point out that the rhetoric about the Felix v Djokovic match needs to be put in perspective. While it's of course great for Novak from the standpoint of being able to compete with what the tour largely offers these days and he can still play long matches at his age, Felix had previously only ever won a total of 7 matches at Wimbledon in his entire career before this year.

That includes 3 straight first round losses to players most here would usually mock as well as losing in 4 sets last year to Struff, the same guy Sinner today beat in straight sets. FAA is not a good barometer of elite performance at Wimbledon. He can't perform in the forecourt, returns poorly and has huge liabilities on the backhand side. All of that provides a comfort level for a top player which Sinner absolutely does not. Let's not forget, Djokovic was tested by lesser players all throughout this tournament in fact.

The only real drama here is which Sinner we will get. Djokovic will be fine enough physically with the time he has to recover but if it's the Sinner who has regularly beaten down the field (minus Alcaraz) then Sinner should prevail.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I agree with you guys that it must win slam for Sinner. He simply must get back on track especially with Alcaraz still out the picture.

The first 2 slams of 2026 were very disappointing for his high standards. I think that will motivate him though and his little barren slam run ends in SW19. Pressure on sinner but in the main he handles pressure very well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH
vwanderaa said:
Not in terms of legacy. He can lose in the final and it won’t change how he’s seen in 10 years, but he can’t lose against ancient Djokovic as a 25 years old defending champion at the peak of his career
Click to expand...
already happened to him in january
 
vwanderaa said:
Not in terms of legacy. He can lose in the final and it won’t change how he’s seen in 10 years, but he can’t lose against ancient Djokovic as a 25 years old defending champion at the peak of his career
Click to expand...
That makes no sense. Are you saying it worse to lose to 39 year old Djokovic who won 24 slams than to Zverev/fritz/cobolli? The odds have Djokovic the 2nd favourite after sinner so losing to Djokovic least the embarrassing result for him.

I might be wrong but I firmly believe if not for sinner, Djoko would still be the favourite for winning his 25th slam right now. Even at 39 and after a 5 hour match.
 
intrepidish said:
On the other hand, we should point out that the rhetoric about the Felix v Djokovic match needs to be put in perspective. While it's of course great for Novak from the standpoint of being able to compete with what the tour largely offers these days and he can still play long matches at his age, Felix had previously only ever won a total of 7 matches at Wimbledon in his entire career before this year.

That includes 3 straight first round losses to players most here would usually mock as well as losing in 4 sets last year to Struff, the same guy Sinner today beat in straight sets. FAA is not a good barometer of elite performance at Wimbledon. He can't perform in the forecourt, returns poorly and has huge liabilities on the backhand side. All of that provides a comfort level for a top player which Sinner absolutely does not. Let's not forget, Djokovic was tested by lesser players all throughout this tournament in fact.
Click to expand...
Totally agree. If it were say Fritz instead of FAA it would still be noteworthy considering the form and grass court capabilities.
 
Djokovic_is_the_best#1 said:
That makes no sense. Are you saying it worse to lose to 39 year old Djokovic who won 24 slams than to Zverev/fritz/cobolli? The odds have Djokovic the 2nd favourite after sinner so losing to Djokovic least the embarrassing result for him.

I might be wrong but I firmly believe if not for sinner, Djoko would still be the favourite for winning his 25th slam right now. Even at 39 and after a 5 hour match.
Click to expand...
Not great when viewed on the broader scale
 
mike danny said:
Yeah, but happening again would be the final nail in the coffin
Click to expand...
Not really! It would be a big blow but it not going to stop him winning future slams and tournaments.

I agree though to get his aura back now and validate him the true world no1 in needs this slam. He majored in minors so far in 2026 but a players of the class of sinner has to end this mini slam drought especially with Alcaraz out.
 
Djokovic_is_the_best#1 said:
Not really! It would be a big blow but it not going to stop him winning future slams and tournaments.

I agree though to get his aura back now and validate him the true world no1 in needs this slam. He majored in minors so far in 2026 but a players of the class of sinner has to end this mini slam drought especially with Alcaraz out.
Click to expand...
No matter how many more slams he wins, we know he is winning them in a weak era for sure if he doesn’t win on Friday
 
Djokovic may win a set if he can find some slip up.. Sinner would have done his homework after AO and contrary to most of the opinions he is playing well..he had an issue with FH in the first match, that is sorted now..there is no real weakness gpt Djokovic to exploit, except variety..which will be difficult after a 5 hour match..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Enceladus
  • Poll Poll
2026 Australian Open QF: [2] Jannik Sinner vs. [8] Ben Shelton
3 4 5
Replies
227
Views
4K
Jezza94
Jezza94
Aabye5
  • Poll Poll
2024 Cincinnati Open - Jannik Sinner [1] vs Frances Tiafoe
4 5 6
Replies
265
Views
13K
Vincent-C
Vincent-C
weakera
Jannik Sinner looking to join VERY exclusive company in his SF vs. Novak Djokovic...
Replies
28
Views
2K
gamelovergold
G
Enceladus
  • Poll Poll
2026 Rome Masters Final: [1] Jannik Sinner vs. [23] Casper Ruud
3 4 5
Replies
224
Views
3K
robyrolfo
robyrolfo
Vincent-C
Indian Wells 2026 QF: Jannik Sinner v. Learner Tien, match thread
Replies
0
Views
163
Vincent-C
Vincent-C
Back
Top