If that's true about being taxed by the country that pays the prize money, it still doesn't address the question that she owes her country of citizenship, the one that produced her and helped make her who she is today, a portion of her income as well.
If that's true about being taxed by the country that pays the prize money, it still doesn't address the question that she owes her country of citizenship, the one that produced her and helped make her who she is today, a portion of her income as well.
Franky, she would probably do better with her money if she donated it to some charity in her home country.
Adressed in my next post:
Kvitova pays taxes on the money she makes in her own country. With her move to Monaco, the money she earns overseas cannot be taxed.
If that's true about being taxed by the country that pays the prize money, it still doesn't address the question that she owes her country of citizenship, the one that produced her and helped make her who she is today, a portion of her income as well.
But morally it should be, since she owes her support to the country that produced her.
That's why it's a dooshbag move, no matter how "legal."
I know a lot of the selfish Republican types have trouble grasping the concept of "society" though.
Do you know this for a fact? How much hand the Czech republic did indeed have in producing her and helping making her who she is today?
Monaco is a sovereign nation which has no income tax. So what're you proposing, invade the country and force them to change their laws? Conquer them outright?What needs to be ended are the very existence of tax havens and all the loopholes that are deliberately left in the law for clever accountants to exploit. In short, capitalism has to go, because governments in democratic capitalist society are controlled by big business elites, and they want tax loopholes, whatever they may say in the media.
Monaco is a sovereign nation which has no income tax. So what're you proposing, invade the country and force them to change their laws? Conquer them outright?
Monaco is a sovereign nation which has no income tax. So what're you proposing, invade the country and force them to change their laws? Conquer them outright?
Not really. It's daylight robbery. There's nothing immoral about looking out for yourself.
Imagine...
You win $100,000 in France, this money gets taxed locally (let's say 50%), you end up with $50.000
Then you come back to your own country and you are taxed another 50% (just as an example)
So bascially it's a double tax and very unfair. Living in Monaco, allows you to circumvent the additional 50% tax so you ONLY get taxed locally - which is FAIR, since you're playing in that country.
Once again, Kvitova DOES pay taxes on the money she makes in her own country (which is quite a bit I'd imagine and will only go up after her second Wimbledon title). So she IS contributing. Not to mention she's also putting her country on world stage as tennis power, playing in FedCup and encouraging kids in her country to play tennis by seeing her win big titles.
It's a non story really. A digusting attempt by politician to attract attention to himself and for media to blow this out of proportions.
Oh, poor you...so unfair! You people are such big frickin' babies. You think selfishness is actually a VIRTUE, when it is right up there with the ugliest traits in humanity.
Don't worry--the world sees you for what you are.
So in other words, you have no argument and resort to personal attacks. Gotcha. :neutral:
She entered a tournament and won the prize, why should she have to hand over a portion of that prize to the government? She earned it. It's hers.
Corporations pay little tax because they shift expenses to corporate entities in countries with higher taxes ...
and corporate profits earned within a country are shifted to corporate entities in countries with low tax rates.
You really don't have a clue as to how civilization works, do you?
Civilization here was just fine the first 100 years of the US when there was no federal income tax.
What is capitalism?
Oh, poor you...so unfair! You people are such big frickin' babies. You think selfishness is actually a VIRTUE, when it is right up there with the ugliest traits in humanity.
Don't worry--the world sees you for what you are.
You really don't have a clue as to how civilization works, do you?
I have no clue what this meansLeftists don't care what anyone does, as long as it is mandatory.
Civilization here was just fine the first 100 years of the US when there was no federal income tax.
LOL. How can people be so clueless? There was a wild west and people ruled by their guns. You need to shoot people to stay alive. That is no civilization.
I don't want to go back to 19th century. I hope civilization advanced a bit since then.
where do you live?People still rule by guns. We call them "politicians". If you don't do what they say, they will have you shot.
I have no clue what this means
Do you know this for a fact? How much hand the Czech republic did indeed have in producing her and helping making her who she is today?
Sorry, but your question is idiotic.
It's her money and she can live where she wants to live unless you think she has a moral obligation to live in a place that has high tax rates. If so, the logic is convoluted. You and she can certainly avoid paying taxes legally. That is what she is doing. To say that avoiding taxes legally is morally wrong is sort of silly. Ask any tax attorney or the IRS. They will tell you to pay the least tax you can legally.
maybe its because those average folk have matured and realize you dont deserve other peoples wealth just because your envious.
now I am not rich but i dont feel they owe me anything either. Poor people are selfish too. as is anyone who expects something for nothing just because they somehow deserve it.
understand this and you will be a better tennis player. nothing is free...nothing is easy.
magnutLOL. You must be a leftist
LOL. How can people be so clueless? There was a wild west and people ruled by their guns. You needed to shoot people to stay alive. That is no civilization.
I don't want to go back to 19th century. I hope civilization advanced a bit since then.
"Abstract
Contrary to popular perception, the Old West was much more peaceful than American cities are today. The real culture of violence on the frontier during the latter half of the nineteenth century sprang from the U.S. government’s policies toward the Plains Indians. "
"However, even in a cattle town like Abilene, Kan., the murder rate was much lower than in most modern American cities. Larry Schweikart, a historian at the University of Dayton, estimates that there were probably fewer than a dozen bank robberies in the entire period from 1859 through 1900 in all the frontier West. Schweikart summarizes: "The record is shockingly clear: There are more bank robberies in modern-day Dayton, Ohio, in a year than there were in the entire Old West in a decade, perhaps in the entire frontier period!" - See more at: http://perc.org/articles/old-west-violence-mostly-myth#sthash.NpjWUIMV.dpuf
Just to add, Government should have the right to tax you on money won overseas.
There were a lot less murders and shootings in the "wild" west than you think.
http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?a=803
http://perc.org/articles/old-west-violence-mostly-myth
Don't believe everything you see on TV(esp. westerns).
She won the Wimbledon tennis singles title for the second time just one week ago. But now the Czech tennis star and current world number 4 Petra Kvitová is facing criticism for an alleged lack of patriotism stemming from the fact that for tax purposes, she is registered as a resident of the tiny southern European principality of Monaco.
Last Saturday, the 24-year-old Petra Kvitová beat the Canadian newcomer Eugenie Bouchard in straight sets to take the Wimbledon title for the second time in her career. But the glow of that victory has been somewhat dampened following a demand by Social Democrat MP Stanislav Huml that the player, who has listed Monaco as her place of residence for the purposes of avoiding income taxes, should be stripped of her Czech citizenship.
Here is Huml explaining to Radio Impuls the Facebook comments he made that sparked off the storm:
“I think that we should all have a long and hard think about the fact that if someone leaves the Czech Republic and becomes a member of another state, then they should lose their Czech citizenship. Because I don’t know that the few percent less in taxes that she stands to pay in a country like Monaco deflects from the fact that perhaps the Czech Republic actually helped her achieve some of her success.”
Such is the populist take being heard by several left-of-centre Czech politicians. They argue that using tax shelters is essentially a slap in the face for the investment that a country such as the Czech Republic has made in one of its citizens. The Czech Republic has a 22 percent income tax rate for its wealthiest citizens – Monaco’s rate is zero. Czech law mandates that taxes can be avoided if a citizen sets up residency in another country and spends more than half a year living at that location. So should Petra Kvitová actually be playing for Monaco?
Ivo Kaderka, president of the Czech Tennis Association was quick to join a chorus of countering views coming to the players’ defence. He told reporters that Czech society was not only adept at questioning success, but was now going so far as to punish it. Others have pointed out that Kvitová serves as an ambassador for her country, and is by far not the only transgressor with regards to tax avoidance – many Czech tennis stars, including Radek Štepánek, Tomáš Berdych and Lucie Šafářová make use of tax havens as well, either based in Monte Carlo or Monaco. Indeed, Monaco has become something of a tax haven for many of the world’s tennis stars.
Source: Radio Prague
What needs to be ended are the very existence of tax havens and all the loopholes that are deliberately left in the law for clever accountants to exploit. In short, capitalism has to go, because governments in democratic capitalist society are controlled by big business elites, and they want tax loopholes, whatever they may say in the media.
22%? That's not bad. With all the (legitimate) tax avoidance and tax reduction schemes out there, she and the rest of the Czech's could easily afford to live there and pay back some of the multiple benefits they received from their country as they were growing up. Many countries are a lot worse. Spain has a 56% top rate but most of the Spaniards love their country enough to continue to live there.
Exact opposite? Not plausible.
So if everyone was a successful tax avoider who would pay the bills?
They have the legal right to do so, as do countries have the legal right to take away citizenship from them. A company wouldn't, for instance, invest in the education of an employee who planned to abandon the company after gaining the education. If a country provided infrastructure to an athlete, it is not unreasonable for the country to also not want to be abandoned after an athlete becomes successful.
But morally it should be, since she owes her support to the country that produced her.
That's why it's a dooshbag move, no matter how "legal."
I know a lot of the selfish Republican types have trouble grasping the concept of "society" though.
There were a lot less murders and shootings in the "wild" west than you think.
http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?a=803
http://perc.org/articles/old-west-violence-mostly-myth
Don't believe everything you see on TV(esp. westerns).
LOL Typical conservative fact twisting. "As long as we all have guns we can all protect ourselves. We don't need government, we don't need roads, we don't need education, we don't need health care, we are going to educate ourselves at home, we are going to cure ourselves as well".
Sorry but that is not civilized society. I do not want to go back to 19th century, or even worse to middle age as you propose.
Society is not something that can be bought or forced, that's called fascism.
What's moral is for people who work to keep the fruits of their labor, not give it to overblown bureaucrats who ruin their countries.
When will people ever learn that liberalism doesn't work, ever? Greece, bankrupt and ruining it for everyone else. Spain, on it's way, selfish and ruining it for everyone else.
Look at FACTS. Liberal states and cities, California, liberal and bankrupt. Chicago, Liberal and bankrupt, Michigan, Liberal and bankrupt, Texas, extremely conservative and thriving, everyone's leaving their liberal states to move to Texas as are businesses.
Look at New York State. They raise taxes, and collect less because many left. What are they doing now? They are running television ads daily claiming the NY is a great place to do business, why? They are offering a 10 year tax holiday! So for NY to survive, against what they believe, are being forced to offer a conservative norm, low to no taxes.
There is not ONE example of a liberal government working, ever. On the other hand there is not one example of a conservative government NOT working.
Wake up people, put aside your emotions and use your head, you are destroying your countries and yourself, and that IS heartless.