Wimbledon champion Kvitova faces storm over Monaco tax haven

Graf=GOAT

Professional
Just to add, Government should have the right to tax you on money won overseas.

I'm sure Kvitova pays taxes on the money she earns in Czech Republic (via endorsements)
 

Graf=GOAT

Professional
If that's true about being taxed by the country that pays the prize money, it still doesn't address the question that she owes her country of citizenship, the one that produced her and helped make her who she is today, a portion of her income as well.

Adressed in my next post:

Kvitova pays taxes on the money she makes in her own country. With her move to Monaco, the money she earns overseas cannot be taxed.
 
If that's true about being taxed by the country that pays the prize money, it still doesn't address the question that she owes her country of citizenship, the one that produced her and helped make her who she is today, a portion of her income as well.

Franky, she would probably do better with her money if she donated it to some charity in her home country.
 

AtomicForehand

Hall of Fame
Adressed in my next post:

Kvitova pays taxes on the money she makes in her own country. With her move to Monaco, the money she earns overseas cannot be taxed.

But morally it should be, since she owes her support to the country that produced her.

That's why it's a dooshbag move, no matter how "legal."

I know a lot of the selfish Republican types have trouble grasping the concept of "society" though.
 

eelhc

Hall of Fame
If that's true about being taxed by the country that pays the prize money, it still doesn't address the question that she owes her country of citizenship, the one that produced her and helped make her who she is today, a portion of her income as well.

Do you know this for a fact? How much hand the Czech republic did indeed have in producing her and helping making her who she is today?
 

Graf=GOAT

Professional
But morally it should be, since she owes her support to the country that produced her.

That's why it's a dooshbag move, no matter how "legal."

I know a lot of the selfish Republican types have trouble grasping the concept of "society" though.

Not really. It's daylight robbery. There's nothing immoral about looking out for yourself.


Imagine...

You win $100,000 in France, this money gets taxed locally (let's say 50%), you end up with $50.000

Then you come back to your own country and you are taxed another 50% (just as an example)

So bascially it's a double tax and very unfair. Living in Monaco, allows you to circumvent the additional 50% tax so you ONLY get taxed locally - which is FAIR, since you're playing in that country.

Once again, Kvitova DOES pay taxes on the money she makes in her own country (which is quite a bit I'd imagine and will only go up after her second Wimbledon title). So she IS contributing. Not to mention she's also putting her country on world stage as tennis power, playing in FedCup and encouraging kids in her country to play tennis by seeing her win big titles.

It's a non story really. A digusting attempt by politician to attract attention to himself and for media to blow this out of proportions.
 

Sander001

Hall of Fame
What needs to be ended are the very existence of tax havens and all the loopholes that are deliberately left in the law for clever accountants to exploit. In short, capitalism has to go, because governments in democratic capitalist society are controlled by big business elites, and they want tax loopholes, whatever they may say in the media.
Monaco is a sovereign nation which has no income tax. So what're you proposing, invade the country and force them to change their laws? Conquer them outright?
 

Graf=GOAT

Professional
I also guarantee that had Kvitova lost in R3 to Venus, this story would not even exist. Similar to why Stepanek and Safarova aren't hounded for doing the same thing. Successful multi Wimbledon winner - that's another matter.
 

AtomicForehand

Hall of Fame
Not really. It's daylight robbery. There's nothing immoral about looking out for yourself.


Imagine...

You win $100,000 in France, this money gets taxed locally (let's say 50%), you end up with $50.000

Then you come back to your own country and you are taxed another 50% (just as an example)

So bascially it's a double tax and very unfair. Living in Monaco, allows you to circumvent the additional 50% tax so you ONLY get taxed locally - which is FAIR, since you're playing in that country.

Once again, Kvitova DOES pay taxes on the money she makes in her own country (which is quite a bit I'd imagine and will only go up after her second Wimbledon title). So she IS contributing. Not to mention she's also putting her country on world stage as tennis power, playing in FedCup and encouraging kids in her country to play tennis by seeing her win big titles.

It's a non story really. A digusting attempt by politician to attract attention to himself and for media to blow this out of proportions.

Oh, poor you...so unfair! You people are such big frickin' babies. You think selfishness is actually a VIRTUE, when it is right up there with the ugliest traits in humanity.

Don't worry--the world sees you for what you are.
 

Graf=GOAT

Professional
Oh, poor you...so unfair! You people are such big frickin' babies. You think selfishness is actually a VIRTUE, when it is right up there with the ugliest traits in humanity.

Don't worry--the world sees you for what you are.

So in other words, you have no argument and resort to personal attacks. Gotcha. :neutral:
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
I hate to inform people with regard to certain facts, but you pay tax on income and capital usually where you earn it.

Income earned and taxed overseas is not usually taxed again, but if you earn more income on that repatriated income - bank interest is a simple example - you'll usually be taxed on that.
 
Last edited:

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
Corporations pay little tax because they shift expenses to corporate entities in countries with higher taxes ...

and corporate profits earned within a country are shifted to corporate entities in countries with low tax rates.
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
So Kvitova will take all the money she's earned, and paid taxes on in the countries she's earned it, back to Monaco where she'll make more money or turn it into capital to make more money and because it has no taxes she's better off than staying in the Czech Republic.

The only time she needs to pay the Czech Government anything is on money, property or capital kept in the country.
 

tacou

G.O.A.T.
She entered a tournament and won the prize, why should she have to hand over a portion of that prize to the government? She earned it. It's hers.
 
Corporations pay little tax because they shift expenses to corporate entities in countries with higher taxes ...

and corporate profits earned within a country are shifted to corporate entities in countries with low tax rates.

Thank goodness. The way to remedy this is not to spread the misery and get rid of tax havens but to reduce corporate taxes locally. That way, the corporations can repatriate the funds and use them to give dividends(which are taxed) or create jobs(which increase the tax base).
 

bjsnider

Hall of Fame
Civilization here was just fine the first 100 years of the US when there was no federal income tax.

Yes, but the US couldn't afford the welfare-warfare state, and all its spiffy aspects, so I don't understand your point. Where would we all be if politicians didn't have enough money to kill us all?
 

magnut

Hall of Fame
Oh, poor you...so unfair! You people are such big frickin' babies. You think selfishness is actually a VIRTUE, when it is right up there with the ugliest traits in humanity.

Don't worry--the world sees you for what you are.

you seem to think ENVY is also a virtue and justification for taking what other people have worked for.

Nobody owes you anything. Go out and stake your claim.
 

tacou

G.O.A.T.
You really don't have a clue as to how civilization works, do you?

Uhh yeah I do. I pay my taxes. However, I don't dedicate my life to a grueling physical pursuit that requires constant global travel. She decided she wants to keep her $$ and went to Monaco. If the Czech people want to reject her, so be it. I don't see anything wrong with what she has done...it's not like she's ever around to enjoy the nation's public transport, parks+rec, etc.
 

Chico

Banned
Civilization here was just fine the first 100 years of the US when there was no federal income tax.

LOL. How can people be so clueless? There was a wild west and people ruled by their guns. You needed to shoot people to stay alive. That is no civilization.

I don't want to go back to 19th century. I hope civilization advanced a bit since then.
 
Last edited:

bjsnider

Hall of Fame
LOL. How can people be so clueless? There was a wild west and people ruled by their guns. You need to shoot people to stay alive. That is no civilization.

I don't want to go back to 19th century. I hope civilization advanced a bit since then.

People still rule by guns. We call them "politicians". If you don't do what they say, they will have you shot.
 

eelhc

Hall of Fame
Do you know this for a fact? How much hand the Czech republic did indeed have in producing her and helping making her who she is today?

Sorry, but your question is idiotic.

So no facts... just mindless political/social dribble...

One has a moral obligation to help the less fortunate. Paying taxes is a legal obligation (who know how many trillions of tax dollars have been spent on weapons to destroy mankind).
 

esgee48

G.O.A.T.
It's her money and she can live where she wants to live unless you think she has a moral obligation to live in a place that has high tax rates. If so, the logic is convoluted. You and she can certainly avoid paying taxes legally. That is what she is doing. To say that avoiding taxes legally is morally wrong is sort of silly. Ask any tax attorney or the IRS. They will tell you to pay the least tax you can legally.
 

eelhc

Hall of Fame
It's her money and she can live where she wants to live unless you think she has a moral obligation to live in a place that has high tax rates. If so, the logic is convoluted. You and she can certainly avoid paying taxes legally. That is what she is doing. To say that avoiding taxes legally is morally wrong is sort of silly. Ask any tax attorney or the IRS. They will tell you to pay the least tax you can legally.

Exactly... and there are much better ways to help out one's countrymen and the less fortunate than to pay taxes that one could avoid. I haven't run into a noble and honest government yet. I have run into businesses and charities that are however...
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
maybe its because those average folk have matured and realize you dont deserve other peoples wealth just because your envious.

now I am not rich but i dont feel they owe me anything either. Poor people are selfish too. as is anyone who expects something for nothing just because they somehow deserve it.

understand this and you will be a better tennis player. nothing is free...nothing is easy.

nothing is free :confused:

but you have no problem with the wealthy taking advantage of 0% tax havens :rolleyes:

sure thing...
 

jm1980

Talk Tennis Guru
Those who think welfare is a waste of money need to go to countries where welfare is deficient to understand why it's needed. And if you think the poor are selfish, you probably don't understand what it means to be poor. Not everyone is born with a silver spoon in their mouth.

It's within Kvitova's rights to do what she did, but the criticism she is receiving is well deserved.
 
Last edited:
LOL. How can people be so clueless? There was a wild west and people ruled by their guns. You needed to shoot people to stay alive. That is no civilization.

I don't want to go back to 19th century. I hope civilization advanced a bit since then.

There were a lot less murders and shootings in the "wild" west than you think.

http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?a=803

"Abstract

Contrary to popular perception, the Old West was much more peaceful than American cities are today. The real culture of violence on the frontier during the latter half of the nineteenth century sprang from the U.S. government’s policies toward the Plains Indians. "


http://perc.org/articles/old-west-violence-mostly-myth

"However, even in a cattle town like Abilene, Kan., the murder rate was much lower than in most modern American cities. Larry Schweikart, a historian at the University of Dayton, estimates that there were probably fewer than a dozen bank robberies in the entire period from 1859 through 1900 in all the frontier West. Schweikart summarizes: "The record is shockingly clear: There are more bank robberies in modern-day Dayton, Ohio, in a year than there were in the entire Old West in a decade, perhaps in the entire frontier period!" - See more at: http://perc.org/articles/old-west-violence-mostly-myth#sthash.NpjWUIMV.dpuf

Don't believe everything you see on TV(esp. westerns).
 
Last edited:

OrangePower

Legend
Just to add, Government should have the right to tax you on money won overseas.

Each government sets its own rules on this.

The United States for example taxes all earnings of its citizens, regardless of where the income was generated. So a US citizen resident in Monaco would still have to pay US tax on foreign earnings. You would get a US tax credit for any foreign tax already paid (but since Monaco does not tax income that credit in this case is zero). Basically a US citizen cannot avoid tax on foreign earnings the way European athletes do, unless willing to give up US citizenship completely.

Interesting, isn't it, considering some of the rants in this thread against capitalism in general and US income disparity in particular. Because at least in this example, the capitalist US tax system is more progressive than that of European countries.

Back to Kvitova and Czech tax, if the Czech government has issues with athletes claiming Monaco residency to avoid Czech tax, then don't blame the athletes; all they need to do is require citizens to pay Czech tax on all income regardless of where it was generated, same as the good old USA.
 

DRII

G.O.A.T.
There were a lot less murders and shootings in the "wild" west than you think.

http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?a=803




http://perc.org/articles/old-west-violence-mostly-myth



Don't believe everything you see on TV(esp. westerns).

sure :rolleyes:

you're one of the types who would claim that Black Americans were better off as slaves in the U.S. because at least their families were intact and there wasn't as many black children born out of wedlock.

pure delusion...
 

SublimeTennis

Professional
She won the Wimbledon tennis singles title for the second time just one week ago. But now the Czech tennis star and current world number 4 Petra Kvitová is facing criticism for an alleged lack of patriotism stemming from the fact that for tax purposes, she is registered as a resident of the tiny southern European principality of Monaco.

Last Saturday, the 24-year-old Petra Kvitová beat the Canadian newcomer Eugenie Bouchard in straight sets to take the Wimbledon title for the second time in her career. But the glow of that victory has been somewhat dampened following a demand by Social Democrat MP Stanislav Huml that the player, who has listed Monaco as her place of residence for the purposes of avoiding income taxes, should be stripped of her Czech citizenship.
Here is Huml explaining to Radio Impuls the Facebook comments he made that sparked off the storm:
“I think that we should all have a long and hard think about the fact that if someone leaves the Czech Republic and becomes a member of another state, then they should lose their Czech citizenship. Because I don’t know that the few percent less in taxes that she stands to pay in a country like Monaco deflects from the fact that perhaps the Czech Republic actually helped her achieve some of her success.”
Such is the populist take being heard by several left-of-centre Czech politicians. They argue that using tax shelters is essentially a slap in the face for the investment that a country such as the Czech Republic has made in one of its citizens. The Czech Republic has a 22 percent income tax rate for its wealthiest citizens – Monaco’s rate is zero. Czech law mandates that taxes can be avoided if a citizen sets up residency in another country and spends more than half a year living at that location. So should Petra Kvitová actually be playing for Monaco?

Ivo Kaderka, president of the Czech Tennis Association was quick to join a chorus of countering views coming to the players’ defence. He told reporters that Czech society was not only adept at questioning success, but was now going so far as to punish it. Others have pointed out that Kvitová serves as an ambassador for her country, and is by far not the only transgressor with regards to tax avoidance – many Czech tennis stars, including Radek Štepánek, Tomáš Berdych and Lucie Šafářová make use of tax havens as well, either based in Monte Carlo or Monaco. Indeed, Monaco has become something of a tax haven for many of the world’s tennis stars.

Source: Radio Prague


Good for her!! Tired of over bloated bureaucratic governments raping their citizens. Most people have no clue that most of their tax money paid is a complete waste.
 

SublimeTennis

Professional
What needs to be ended are the very existence of tax havens and all the loopholes that are deliberately left in the law for clever accountants to exploit. In short, capitalism has to go, because governments in democratic capitalist society are controlled by big business elites, and they want tax loopholes, whatever they may say in the media.

What country do you see free market capitalism? Certainly not the US. We haven't had a free market since before 1913. What you see today is NOT free market capitalism.

Citizens need to demand an end to all income taxes. Countries operated perfectly well before taxes on income came into law (A relatively recent event)
 

SublimeTennis

Professional
22%? That's not bad. With all the (legitimate) tax avoidance and tax reduction schemes out there, she and the rest of the Czech's could easily afford to live there and pay back some of the multiple benefits they received from their country as they were growing up. Many countries are a lot worse. Spain has a 56% top rate but most of the Spaniards love their country enough to continue to live there.

"That's not bad"? See how people have been brainwashed by their countries?

"Multiple benefits they received from their country"? People don't realize that governments have NO MONEY. The money they receive is at least in the US borrowing, printing, import and excise, and taking money from citizens income.

It's the COUNTRY who has received BENEFITS from it's citizens, you got it backwards. It's like when Obama said "If you own a business, you didn't build that". He explained that the roads and other things the FG provides it what made it possible for them. What he and many don't understand is that the roads and bridges were originally paid for by it's CITIZENS. Again, the FG has no products to sell, is not a business, doesn't make any money aside from stealing it from it's citizens.
 

SublimeTennis

Professional
Exact opposite? Not plausible.

So if everyone was a successful tax avoider who would pay the bills?

Pay the bills? What bills? Do you mean the US FG losing, that is unaccounted for half a billion dollars as far as they can tell? Pay for a over bloated unnecessary government? Pay one billion dollars a year for "maintenance of our embassy in Iraq" and other equally wonderful "Bills"?

It's a FACT, and I'm sure you will disagree with facts, but a across the board 5% tax on every US citizens income would generate more income for the treasury than the high taxes we see today. Those that are at the highest level never pay it because of loopholes, it's a joke.
 

SublimeTennis

Professional
They have the legal right to do so, as do countries have the legal right to take away citizenship from them. A company wouldn't, for instance, invest in the education of an employee who planned to abandon the company after gaining the education. If a country provided infrastructure to an athlete, it is not unreasonable for the country to also not want to be abandoned after an athlete becomes successful.

Who paid for that infrastructure? I can't believe how stupid people are.

People actually go out and vote to have their Government control them.

If people would actually STUDY and find out how things work the world would be a rich and wonderful place, but no people with zero information but the ability to vote must abide with us and ruin it for everyone.
 

SublimeTennis

Professional
But morally it should be, since she owes her support to the country that produced her.

That's why it's a dooshbag move, no matter how "legal."

I know a lot of the selfish Republican types have trouble grasping the concept of "society" though.

Society is not something that can be bought or forced, that's called fascism.

What's moral is for people who work to keep the fruits of their labor, not give it to overblown bureaucrats who ruin their countries.

When will people ever learn that liberalism doesn't work, ever? Greece, bankrupt and ruining it for everyone else. Spain, on it's way, selfish and ruining it for everyone else.

Look at FACTS. Liberal states and cities, California, liberal and bankrupt. Chicago, Liberal and bankrupt, Michigan, Liberal and bankrupt, Texas, extremely conservative and thriving, everyone's leaving their liberal states to move to Texas as are businesses.

Look at New York State. They raise taxes, and collect less because many left. What are they doing now? They are running television ads daily claiming the NY is a great place to do business, why? They are offering a 10 year tax holiday! So for NY to survive, against what they believe, are being forced to offer a conservative norm, low to no taxes.

There is not ONE example of a liberal government working, ever. On the other hand there is not one example of a conservative government NOT working.

Wake up people, put aside your emotions and use your head, you are destroying your countries and yourself, and that IS heartless.
 

Chico

Banned
There were a lot less murders and shootings in the "wild" west than you think.

http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?a=803




http://perc.org/articles/old-west-violence-mostly-myth



Don't believe everything you see on TV(esp. westerns).

LOL Typical conservative fact twisting. "As long as we all have guns we can all protect ourselves. We don't need government, we don't need roads, we don't need education, we don't need health care, we are going to educate ourselves at home, we are going to cure ourselves as well".

Sorry but that is not civilized society. I do not want to go back to 19th century, or even worse to middle age as you propose.
 

SublimeTennis

Professional
LOL Typical conservative fact twisting. "As long as we all have guns we can all protect ourselves. We don't need government, we don't need roads, we don't need education, we don't need health care, we are going to educate ourselves at home, we are going to cure ourselves as well".

Sorry but that is not civilized society. I do not want to go back to 19th century, or even worse to middle age as you propose.

Typical diverting from the issues, I didn't say ONE of those stereotypes you talked about.

Instead of changing the subject, why don't you try to answer what I wrote??? Reason is you can't argue with facts.
 

Chico

Banned
Society is not something that can be bought or forced, that's called fascism.

What's moral is for people who work to keep the fruits of their labor, not give it to overblown bureaucrats who ruin their countries.

When will people ever learn that liberalism doesn't work, ever? Greece, bankrupt and ruining it for everyone else. Spain, on it's way, selfish and ruining it for everyone else.

Look at FACTS. Liberal states and cities, California, liberal and bankrupt. Chicago, Liberal and bankrupt, Michigan, Liberal and bankrupt, Texas, extremely conservative and thriving, everyone's leaving their liberal states to move to Texas as are businesses.

Look at New York State. They raise taxes, and collect less because many left. What are they doing now? They are running television ads daily claiming the NY is a great place to do business, why? They are offering a 10 year tax holiday! So for NY to survive, against what they believe, are being forced to offer a conservative norm, low to no taxes.

There is not ONE example of a liberal government working, ever. On the other hand there is not one example of a conservative government NOT working.

Wake up people, put aside your emotions and use your head, you are destroying your countries and yourself, and that IS heartless.

Ridiculous and not true.
 
Top