Wimbledon is gonna be sinners playground not carlos’

Not really sure that's even what Carlos does on grass. He's extremely aggressive on grass and goes for the jugular shortening points with his fantastic forehand strokes and netplay. Completely different to how he plays on clay and slow hard court.

His drop shot is also deadly on grass.

Heres hoping we get Sinner and Alcaraz in the final though.
Exactly! Carlos's hyper aggressive game is actually very suited to grass if you think about it. It's actually very impressive that his game is so balanced that he can tweak it to adapt to high bouncing clay, and flat skidding grass
 
Clay is also Carlos' weakest surface, considering that he makes a whole bunch of unforced errors. In all three slam matches, Sinner has led Carlos by 2-1 sets, and let 2 of them get away. If he won them, he would be leading the slam race by 3-1.

If Sinner leads the next slam match by a 2-1 lead, he better closes it out. Or else we'll know the latest rivalry is made of many close matches, but one guy always wins.
 
If I was a Carlos fan I won't be too confident about his Wimbledon chances. He barely beat Sinner in 5 sets on his weakest surface. Imagine what prime Sunner would do to Carlos where Sinner thrives the best? I see a straight set beating from Sinner if they meet at SW19 this year. Wimbledon will be Sinner's playground since he has entered his prime now. Who is going to stop him? LOL
i love the "barely beat" part everyone uses all the time with alcaraz lol, 6-4, 6-3 in the last two sets... coming from an injury and missing the whole clay season, when carlos stops having those up and downs in matches (which is normal at his age) sinner is not gonna be able to win a set against him
 
It is a bit trollish but I think intellectually enticing. How will have more success on the grass?

On the highest level of tennis matchups and surface really matter, exemplified by the specific advantages Nadal enjoyed against Federer on clay. Alcaraz is an incredible player in his own right but will increasingly profit from the superpower of shapeshifting.

Much has been said that he seems confused sometimes about how he should play but experience and his staff will ease his ability to counter and upset the gameplan of his opponent.

However I do think that Alcaraz will have a long-term Sinner problem on the faster surfaces. Sinner has improved his relative serve strength and was clearly hampered by clay and injury in his latest encounter and still out-pointed him. On faster courts Alcaraz can not return as deep without enabling more attacking play by Jannik.

Overall it will be a pleasure to watch the tactical shifts and struggles of biggest rivalry in tennis in the post-Covid era.
 
Explain what's wrong with his take?
That a player who won queens and wimbledon last year (beating one of its historically biggest champs in the final no less) is less suited to win over there than a "mythical" player who hasnt really won a lot on grass, and faced a complete beatdown by Djokovic last year in the semis. Just because he crushes the ball from both ends doesnt mean his "era on grass" has begun when he has showed no signs of doing so till now, whereas the other player literally went undefeated on grass last year, and has an equally suited game on grass with his dominant FH, very good net play, ultra aggressive mindset and variety. I even think Alcaraz is a better mover on grass at this moment between the two. Alcaraz beat freakin Djokovic last year by playing a very good GRASS game (not clay game).
Calling this an "era of grass dominance" for sinner is just ridiculous when no signs point towards it. If you think Alcaraz is going to play Sinner the same way he played him in the FO semis a few days ago, youre so wrong. Both players' games can adapt from clay to grass perfectly well. I am not even saying alacarz is better on grass, just that theres no clear cut favorite on grass right now
Cant you utlra hyper SInner fans stop taking his D in your mouth for one second?
 
If I was a Carlos fan I won't be too confident about his Wimbledon chances. He barely beat Sinner in 5 sets on his weakest surface. Imagine what prime Sunner would do to Carlos where Sinner thrives the best? I see a straight set beating from Sinner if they meet at SW19 this year. Wimbledon will be Sinner's playground since he has entered his prime now. Who is going to stop him? LOL
Youre not doing it right. Gulp more. Youre not taking all of it in the mouth. Keep practicing to inhibit the gag reflex, thats when you will properly take it all in
 
I would never be so simple as to dismiss Alcaraz so easily, but I am old enough to remember 2 years ago when Sinner absolutely whipped his ass here.

Carlito obviously came along way since then, but so has Sinner. Both of them looked incredible last year until Sinner's forehand (nothing else about his game, just his forehand) collapsed against Djokovic. It's going to be great to see how they follow up in 2024. Hope we get that rematch.
 
Nah. The goal post will be moved for as long as it takes for the two-years-older Sinner to hit his mythical prime.

So in other words, no matter what Sinner does, he will always be a worthless chancer?

The troll posts like OP may be ridiculous but the constant gaslighting of genuine, level headed Sinner fans is the worst I have ever seen.
 
I keep hearing about the dominance of Sinner over Alcaraz yet Alcaraz keeps beating him at big tournaments in 2024 which was supposed to be Peak Sinner when Sinner wins all.the slams and never looks back. I do admire the Sinnerholics for their undying devotion to their guy but it's also filled with delusions.

With that said, Wimbledon is up for grabs. I could see Sinner winning it but we're hearing about this grass dominance from him that has never actually happened. The actual defending champion of Queens and Wimbledon has proven grass court dominance so naturally that guy will have a chance.
 
Last edited:
So in other words, no matter what Sinner does, he will always be a worthless chancer?

The troll posts like OP may be ridiculous but the constant gaslighting of genuine, level headed Sinner fans is the worst I have ever seen.
You're a new user I see. I am replying to a few chronic Sinner fans who love nothing more than to hype their player for reasons that cannot be apparently attributed to others including the younger, vastly more accomplished Alcaraz.

Chill out and get a measure of this forum. You'll know what I'm saying. And I'm not gonna diminish Sinner's chances lol but "when Sinner hits his prime you'll see" isn't the same argument as "wait, Alcaraz is younger and already is proven there. So, perhaps pay some respect to his name?".

Sinner is very much in his prime and a hot contender at Wimbledon. Just don't also put Alcaraz down in a dumbass way. Not you. Idk you, but do get a feel of this forum.
 
I keep hearing about the dominance of Sinner over Alcaraz yet Alcaraz keeps beating him at big tournaments in 2024 which was supposed to be Peak Sinner when Sinner wins all.the slams and never looks back. I do admire the Sinnerholics for their undying devotion to their guy but it's also filled with delusions.

Again, where is this mythical cadre of worshippers you speak of? OP aside I have not seen this ridiculous fanbase with their dumb takes, but I have seen a lot of users constantly moan about them and Sinner.

Stop judging the two youngest slam winners and their supposed rivalry when they haven’t even faced each other in a slam final. Sinner literally lost weight and still took Alcaraz to 5 sets on the most physically demanding surface. To suggest this is “over” before it has even begun is far more disingenuous than anything the OP might have said.
 
Again, where is this mythical cadre of worshippers you speak of? OP aside I have not seen this ridiculous fanbase with their dumb takes, but I have seen a lot of users constantly moan about them and Sinner.

Stop judging the two youngest slam winners and their supposed rivalry when they haven’t even faced each other in a slam final. Sinner literally lost weight and still took Alcaraz to 5 sets on the most physically demanding surface. To suggest this is “over” before it has even begun is far more ******** than anything the OP might have said.
I know you're agitated. But there is more than one poster like the OP here in this very thread. Look around without the need to defend Sinner (he'll continue being world class without any of our validation).

Again, you're new here. Just go through threads of Sinner hyperbole over the past many months. You'll see.
 
You're a new user I see. I am replying to a few chronic Sinner fans who love nothing more than to hype their player for reasons that cannot be apparently attributed to others including the younger, vastly more accomplished Alcaraz.

Chill out and get a measure of this forum. You'll know what I'm saying. And I'm not gonna diminish Sinner's chances lol but "when Sinner hits his prime you'll see" isn't the same argument as "wait, Alcaraz is younger and already is proven there. So, perhaps pay some respect to his name?".

Sinner is very much in his prime and a hot contender at Wimbledon. Just don't also put Alcaraz down in a dumbass way. Not you. Idk you, but do get a feel of this forum.

I respect Alcaraz, it would be stupid to deny such a young and accomplished player. I have seen a few posts but they have been given a lot of push back by this forum. I certainly don’t see any dominance of these types of trash-talkers. What I dislike more than the open trash talk is the trash talk that is disguised as level-headed criticism. I can read between the lines.
 
If I was a Carlos fan I won't be too confident about his Wimbledon chances. He barely beat Sinner in 5 sets on his weakest surface. Imagine what prime Sunner would do to Carlos where Sinner thrives the best? I see a straight set beating from Sinner if they meet at SW19 this year. Wimbledon will be Sinner's playground since he has entered his prime now. Who is going to stop him? LOL

It doesn't usually work that way (especially between top players), can't extrapolate it like that. If they meet at Wimbledon, I expect another 5 setter.
 
Last edited:
Again, where is this mythical cadre of worshippers you speak of? OP aside I have not seen this ridiculous fanbase with their dumb takes, but I have seen a lot of users constantly moan about them and Sinner.

Stop judging the two youngest slam winners and their supposed rivalry when they haven’t even faced each other in a slam final. Sinner literally lost weight and still took Alcaraz to 5 sets on the most physically demanding surface. To suggest this is “over” before it has even begun is far more ******** than anything the OP might have said.
I'm not going to call them out by name but there's a group of specific posters that constantly have been speaking of Sinner's dominance over Alcaraz being inevitable, posters that have already posted in this thread. One of them literally said that Sinner will give Alcaraz a straIght set beating at Wimbledon and diminished his FO win over Sinner unsurprisingly.

I'm sorry but what did I say was over before it began? I'm so confused.

I literally said Wimbledon is up for grabs and that Sinner could very well win it but he hasn't displayed this grass dominance that he's bound to have apparently unlike the guy who actually won the tournament last year so I'm saying that this isn't Sinner's tournament to lose, that the other guy has a chance too, ya know the defending champion who beat the 4 time reigning champion.
 
What odds?
Made a large bet at 4.4 (+340) in March when I saw how ****ty Novak was playing and now again at much worse odds (2.75/+175) with the news that Novak’s knee is probably preventing him from playing.

However you can still get good value on Wimbledon for that exact reason by the way, the odds have still priced in Djovak’s odds. Although he has slipped to 3rd in odds, once he officially withdraws, Sinner and Carlos will both experience huge boosts in their odds so getting in now is smart.

I used this strategy for AO and USO ‘22 where I essentially made a calculated bet that Novak would not play due to vaccines, and got boosted futures odds for other players as a result. For example Alcaraz at huge + odds for USO 22 saved my boneheaded Nadal CYGS bets simply because of how big the payout was for him. Always looking for arbitrage. Hurkacz, Fritz, and Dimitrov are nice long shots too,

I don’t think you can really beat the books betting individual matches at Masters/Slams on a daily basis anymore. I mean you can bet momentum swings and live bet over/unders, but I mean pre match bets it’s just too difficult, the odds are too sharp nowadays. I used to bet ITF/Challenger matches during college/COVID, I would have multiple screens of it up during the ret but I’m just too old for it now and I have too much going on to track that much information. So futures bets are to me the best singular bet going right now, at least for me, because they offer great hedging opportunity and are often heavily mispriced. Apologies for the rant to your simple question, lol.
 
I'm not going to call them out by name but there's a group of specific posters that constantly have been speaking of Sinner's dominance over Alcaraz being inevitable, posters that have already posted in this thread. One of them literally said that Sinner will give Alcaraz a straIght set beating at Wimbledon and diminished his FO win over Sinner unsurprisingly.

I'm sorry but what did I say was over before it began? I'm so confused.

I literally said Wimbledon is up for grabs and that Sinner could very well win it but he hasn't displayed this grass dominance that he's bound to have apparently unlike the guy who actually won the tournament last year so I'm saying that this isn't Sinner's tournament to lose, that the other guy has a chance too, ya know the defending champion who beat the 4 time reigning champion.

I wasn’t referring to you. I’m sorry for causing some confusion.

You are quite right. This is Sinner’s tournament to win, and I believe he must win it to maintain some kind of self-belief that will propel him further. As the newly crowned no. 1, Sinner will be under immense pressure to win it, and I think he has what it takes to do it, like he did in Australia. The grass season is my personal favourite and Wimbledon is the ultimate tennis achievement aside from the year end no. 1 IMO.

I have been a long-time Murray fan since his Gasquet epic 5-setter in 2008, btw.
 
Made a large bet at 4.4 (+340) in March when I saw how ****ty Novak was playing and now again at much worse odds (2.75/+175) with the news that Novak’s knee is probably preventing him from playing.

However you can still get good value on Wimbledon for that exact reason by the way, the odds have still priced in Djovak’s odds. Although he has slipped to 3rd in odds, once he officially withdraws, Sinner and Carlos will both experience huge boosts in their odds so getting in now is smart.

I used this strategy for AO and USO ‘22 where I essentially made a calculated bet that Novak would not play due to vaccines, and got boosted futures odds for other players as a result. For example Alcaraz at huge + odds for USO 22 saved my boneheaded Nadal CYGS bets simply because of how big the payout was for him. Always looking for arbitrage. Hurkacz, Fritz, and Dimitrov are nice long shots too,

I don’t think you can really beat the books betting individual matches at Masters/Slams on a daily basis anymore. I mean you can bet momentum swings and live bet over/unders, but I mean pre match bets it’s just too difficult, the odds are too sharp nowadays. I used to bet ITF/Challenger matches during college/COVID, I would have multiple screens of it up during the ret but I’m just too old for it now and I have too much going on to track that much information. So futures bets are to me the best singular bet going right now, at least for me, because they offer great hedging opportunity and are often heavily mispriced. Apologies for the rant to your simple question, lol.
Should’ve caught him at 1/14. The China open was the defining moment in his career and I knew it.
 
I would never be so simple as to dismiss Alcaraz so easily, but I am old enough to remember 2 years ago when Sinner absolutely whipped his ass here.

Carlito obviously came along way since then, but so has Sinner. Both of them looked incredible last year until Sinner's forehand (nothing else about his game, just his forehand) collapsed against Djokovic. It's going to be great to see how they follow up in 2024. Hope we get that rematch.

Charlie also attacked his forehand which is the sharper sword but the weaker shield. Hip issues played a part this year.

Jannik has made big strides with his forehand in the last years, however but relative to Alcaraz his biggest advantage apart from his serve is his dependable backhand.
 
Sinner is a former skiier. He moves better on grass and hits a hell lot bigger and serves better
As an Austrian i always wonder what this "former skiier" argument should demonstrate? It has no other impact than other sports where you need a little bit of balance.
Alcaraz moves better and especially on grass. His movement there last year was above all the others.
Sinner serves better, but doesnt hit bigger. The final stroke is bigger on Alcarazs side, while the regular strokes might be bigger in Sinners game. Sinner cant play the balls on grass and clay as early as on hard court without errors.

I see Alcaraz ahead on surfaces where you profit from a little bit of variety. Sinner takes the ball earlier and will be ahead on hard court.

That said i like them both and enjoy watching both. Something i couldnt say about the big 3.
 
I wasn’t referring to you. I’m sorry for causing some confusion.

You are quite right. This is Sinner’s tournament to win, and I believe he must win it to maintain some kind of self-belief that will propel him further. As the newly crowned no. 1, Sinner will be under immense pressure to win it, and I think he has what it takes to do it, like he did in Australia. The grass season is my personal favourite and Wimbledon is the ultimate tennis achievement aside from the year end no. 1 IMO.

I have been a long-time Murray fan since his Gasquet epic 5-setter in 2008, btw.
I didn't say it was Sinner's tournament to win lol. I said he's on a short list of guys that can win it.
I do agree that he's under the most pressure to win Wimbledon. Being #1 comes with a whole new set of expectations and having lost to Alcaraz in the last slam the pressure of this rivalry has shifted back to him which is what makes this new rivalry fun (the back and forth) because the pressure was on Alcaraz prior to the French.

I hope your guy Murray can win one more match at Wimbledon, nobody wants him going out of his home tournament in the 1st round. I'm not optimistic about his chances, he looks as cooked as BBQ chicken sadly.
 
I didn't say it was Sinner's tournament to win lol. I said he's on a short list of guys that can win it.
I do agree that he's under the most pressure to win Wimbledon. Being #1 comes with a whole new set of expectations and having lost to Alcaraz in the last slam the pressure of this rivalry has shifted back to him which is what makes this new rivalry fun (the back and forth) because the pressure was on Alcaraz prior to the French.

I hope your guy Murray can win one more match at Wimbledon, nobody wants him going out of his home tournament in the 1st round. I'm not optimistic about his chances, he looks as cooked as BBQ chicken sadly.

The saying “his tournament to win” was referring to the pressure to win, not that he is somehow predestined. It’s going to be a tough road for him.

As for Murray, he will be lucky to win the first round match, and I hope he can bow out with some grace and dignity. No doubt they will have prepared some sort of ceremonial showing for his departure. It’s almost certainly his final grand slam.
 
The saying “his tournament to win” was referring to the pressure to win, not that he is somehow predestined. It’s going to be a tough road for him.

As for Murray, he will be lucky to win the first round match, and I hope he can bow out with some grace and dignity. No doubt they will have prepared some sort of ceremonial showing for his departure. It’s almost certainly his final grand slam.
Is it going to be tough? I name exactly three players who can play with him on grass, one Charlie, one Hurkbot, and one a geriatric with a knee issue who in all likelihood doesn’t even step foot in SW19.
 
Is it going to be tough? I name exactly three players who can play with him on grass, one Charlie, one Hurkbot, and one a geriatric with a knee issue who in all likelihood doesn’t even step foot in SW19.

The pressure to win will be tough. Others have said the surface favours Alcaraz but I think they are evenly matched on grass. It definitely suits Sinner for being fast low bounce, especially if Sinner finds his first serve. I also disagree with people saying Sinner lacks variety. He has the drop shot, the half-volley, the serve, is not afraid to go for approach shots or serve/volley, the net game, the pace off both wings, and the movement has improved. The only question mark is his physical fitness.
 
I respect Alcaraz, it would be stupid to deny such a young and accomplished player. I have seen a few posts but they have been given a lot of push back by this forum. I certainly don’t see any dominance of these types of trash-talkers. What I dislike more than the open trash talk is the trash talk that is disguised as level-headed criticism. I can read between the lines.
There's some ironic trolling here. I'm cool with it. But there's also some unironic trolling that I often find distasteful.

Look I feel you man. But just know that most Sinner and Alcaraz fans are fans and haters of specific Big 3 players pretending to be something else.

There are very few genuine fans of Alcaraz and Sinner here, but so many more trolls who tarnish the reputation of these fandoms -- particularly the Sinner fandom but then again, now is the time for Alcaraz, and when he inevitably loses again, there'll be roaches crawling around hyping Sinner up for the lols and dumping on Alcaraz.

It's a vicious cycle.
 
I'm not going to call them out by name but there's a group of specific posters that constantly have been speaking of Sinner's dominance over Alcaraz being inevitable, posters that have already posted in this thread. One of them literally said that Sinner will give Alcaraz a straIght set beating at Wimbledon and diminished his FO win over Sinner unsurprisingly.

I'm sorry but what did I say was over before it began? I'm so confused.

I literally said Wimbledon is up for grabs and that Sinner could very well win it but he hasn't displayed this grass dominance that he's bound to have apparently unlike the guy who actually won the tournament last year so I'm saying that this isn't Sinner's tournament to lose, that the other guy has a chance too, ya know the defending champion who beat the 4 time reigning champion.
Precisely. It's silly to write off the world number 1, but it's even sillier to write the current world no.2 off to absurd reasons such as the ones said posters pontificate.
 
I would never be so simple as to dismiss Alcaraz so easily, but I am old enough to remember 2 years ago when Sinner absolutely whipped his ass here.

Carlito obviously came along way since then, but so has Sinner. Both of them looked incredible last year until Sinner's forehand (nothing else about his game, just his forehand) collapsed against Djokovic. It's going to be great to see how they follow up in 2024. Hope we get that rematch.
Carlos was terrible on grass in 2022, didn’t play a single lead-up event and instead got badly beaten in an exho tourny before WB. IIRC even Ruud beat him. Then he barely survived Struff in WB and was lucky to make it to the 4R. He’s improved much more on the surface than Sinner, who was better on the surface in 2022 and worse in 2023.

We’re yet to see how Jannik does on grass now, he should be better after two years of stagnation there, but his fans definitely disrepect a guy who went undefeated on grass last season, all while beating in a spectacular fashion a player that hadn’t lost in Centre Court in a decade, in the final no less. Bottom line, Sinner hasn’t proven himself on grass at that level while Alcaraz has. So let’s wait and see.
 
I would never be so simple as to dismiss Alcaraz so easily, but I am old enough to remember 2 years ago when Sinner absolutely whipped his ass here.

Carlito obviously came along way since then, but so has Sinner. Both of them looked incredible last year until Sinner's forehand (nothing else about his game, just his forehand) collapsed against Djokovic. It's going to be great to see how they follow up in 2024. Hope we get that rematch.
You also need to remember Carlos was only 19 then and Sinner was the age Alcaraz is now. Carlos had very little grass experience at that point and in very short order figured it out and won the whole thing last year.
They literally only have that one meeting on grass so far so not really enough to say it's a trend.

This all being said 2 fantastic players who are going to keep us all entertained for the next 10-15 years. Can't wait.
 
Carlos was terrible on grass in 2022, didn’t play a single lead-up event and instead got badly beaten in an exho tourny before WB. IIRC even Ruud beat him. Then he barely survived Struff in WB and was lucky to make it to the 4R. He’s improved much more on the surface than Sinner, who was better on the surface in 2022 and worse in 2023.

We’re yet to see how Jannik does on grass now, he should be better after two years of stagnation there, but his fans definitely disrepect a guy who went undefeated on grass last season, all while beating in a spectacular fashion a player that hadn’t lost in Centre Court in a decade, in the final no less. Bottom line, Sinner hasn’t proven himself on grass at that level while Alcaraz has. So let’s wait and see.
I think you're being pretty harsh on Jannik tbh. 2022 he played one warmup event on grass and lost his first match, and while he played 2 and a half very convincing matches at Wimbledon against Isner, Alcaraz, and Djokovic, saying he was better than he was in 2023, where during the lead-up he beat good grasscourt players like Sonego, Gasquet, and Bublik, and then pretty much rolled through his first 5 rounds at Wimbledon looking as good as anybody, is pretty unfair. He was worse against Novak, yes, that's all.

At the same time, Alcaraz was not TERRIBLE on grass in 2022. The Struff match was a hell of a scrap he did really well to come through, and then he absolutely destroyed Griekspoor and Otte, both of whom are good grasscourt players who had decent grass seasons that year.
 
Carlos was terrible on grass in 2022, didn’t play a single lead-up event and instead got badly beaten in an exho tourny before WB. IIRC even Ruud beat him. Then he barely survived Struff in WB and was lucky to make it to the 4R. He’s improved much more on the surface than Sinner, who was better on the surface in 2022 and worse in 2023.

We’re yet to see how Jannik does on grass now, he should be better after two years of stagnation there, but his fans definitely disrepect a guy who went undefeated on grass last season, all while beating in a spectacular fashion a player that hadn’t lost in Centre Court in a decade, in the final no less. Bottom line, Sinner hasn’t proven himself on grass at that level while Alcaraz has. So let’s wait and see.
Carlitos played perfectly fine on 2022 given the circumstances, "barely got past stuff" "Lucky to get to 4r" how was he Lucky? He beat griekspoor in straights playing great and otte Who had just won a grass tournament, struff was a super tricky first found on the surface and a super Young Carlitos managed It being super clutch, i dont know how you could expect more
 
i love the "barely beat" part everyone uses all the time with alcaraz lol, 6-4, 6-3 in the last two sets... coming from an injury and missing the whole clay season, when carlos stops having those up and downs in matches (which is normal at his age) sinner is not gonna be able to win a set against him

Son, Sinner also has injury and that derailed his first season in prime.
 
Nah. The goal post will be moved for as long as it takes for the two-years-older Sinner to hit his mythical prime.

Not really, I am more convinced in his abilities after FO. On his weakest surface where everyone wrote him off he thrived even though he didn't play his best , could have won as well. If he doesn't beat Alcaraz at Wimbledon I'll stop keeping faith in him.
 
Now Alcaraz wins RG but yet still Sinner is going to win WB completely overlooking that Alcaraz is the player who has proven himself on grass winning both Queens and WB, while Sinner has won nothing on grass. Alcaraz has also won both his meetings with Sinner this year while Sinner is supposed to be the best player in the world currently.
Alcaraz thus far has proven himself to be the better player with 3 slams and 5 masters while Sinner has 1 slam and 2 masters.
Sinner reached a new level only last fall. So he didn't have the opportunity to show off on the grass. I don't count the semis of the last Wimbledon, where Sinner's draw was at the challenger level. But in 2022 he reached the quarters, beating Alcaraz and taking the first 2 sets from Djokovic. So we can expect him to perform very well on grass with his much improved serve.
 
Sinner reached a new level only last fall. So he didn't have the opportunity to show off on the grass. I don't count the semis of the last Wimbledon, where Sinner's draw was at the challenger level. But in 2022 he reached the quarters, beating Alcaraz and taking the first 2 sets from Djokovic. So we can expect him to perform very well on grass with his much improved serve.
I don’t dispute any of that. I expect a lot from him going forward even though, right now, Carlos is the better player in my book and he has shown that to be the case.
 
I don’t dispute any of that. I expect a lot from him going forward even though, right now, Carlos is the better player in my book and he has shown that to be the case.

How he's a better player when Sinner almost beat him on his weakest surface?
 
Carlitos played perfectly fine on 2022 given the circumstances, "barely got past stuff" "Lucky to get to 4r" how was he Lucky? He beat griekspoor in straights playing great and otte Who had just won a grass tournament, struff was a super tricky first found on the surface and a super Young Carlitos managed It being super clutch, i dont know how you could expect more
Alcaraz did OK for a first timer, but the gist of it is he wasn't half the player on grass he proved to be last year. Which is perfectly fine, but renders any conclusion drawn from his 2022 season pointless from a 2024 perspective. You liked Carlos's 2022 grass season? Fine. It still doesn't mean jack when talking about 2024 since he already proved to be much better on the surface a year later.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top