Down_the_line
G.O.A.T.
Anyone know when the women's qualifying begins, or even when the draw is out? Odd that the men's draw was already released and has already started and the women's draw isn't even anywhere to be found.
They should seed their tournament based off ATP ranking. What's with all this special needs on grass; there isn't much of a grass season so it's really pointless. Maybe RG should seed based off clay performance, US/AO off hardcourt performance... psh.![]()
Federer has played the Big 4, 8 times out the last 8 SFs he has played in grand slams since 2011. Might explain why he hasn't made it to the finals more often. He could win this depending on his draw.
^^^I say Novak has NO chance if he plays Federer
Get it! You definitely won't regret it. I switch to direct TV 2 years ago and have loved it. Almost all ATP and WTA matches are shown, many live. I hated being only to watch a few matches after Optimum dropped tennis channel.
Are you sure it wasn't that bus driver that looks exactly like Nadal? Why the hell would he go back down to Spain from Germany,and then back to London?Telefonica HQ in Madrid.
Why not?Are you sure it wasn't that bus driver that looks exactly like Nadal? Why the hell would he go back down to Spain from Germany,and then back to London?
Are you sure it wasn't that bus driver that looks exactly like Nadal?
Why the hell would he go back down to Spain from Germany,and then back to London?
^^^I say Novak has NO chance if he plays Federer
Raonic 8th on grass just seems crazy to me. Am I the only one?
Surprised to see Tsonga seeded below dimitrov and guilbis. Tsonga's reached the semis of wimbledon twice. The other two have yet to make a dent at wimbledon.
At least it's unconditional. Federer and Nadal would have been bumped in the exact same circumstances, using the same formula.
I actually quite like it. The rankings aren't always black & white when it comes to determining seeds. A lot of sports have a seeding system based on formulas, as opposed to just copying rankings.
Are you sure it wasn't that bus driver that looks exactly like Nadal? Why the hell would he go back down to Spain from Germany,and then back to London?
If players are that goo on grass then it shouldn't matter where they are seeded they should be able to beat everyone just like Rafa di winning RG last year even though he was seeded 4.
Why have seeds, then? At any tournament?If players are that goo on grass then it shouldn't matter where they are seeded they should be able to beat everyone just like Rafa di winning RG last year even though he was seeded 4.
Wimbledon should stop using it's seeding formula and go along with the rankings as they do with the WTA. I remember Guga boycotted Wimbledon in 2001 because he was not seeded 1 as #1 in the world.
The seeding impacts on chances of more points and more prize money and it seems wrong to me because only Wimbledon does that. Rafa was 7 times Champion at RG last year and was seeded 4 at the FO. Andy, just a one time Wimbledon Champion and World 5 has leapfrogged Federer, a 7 times Wimbledon Champion. What's that about?
It's just as well Federer is seeded in the top 4 otherwise he would have been rightfully peed off.
Andy, just a one time Wimbledon Champion and World 5 has leapfrogged Federer, a 7 times Wimbledon Champion. What's that about?
.
There is nothing absurd about it. Wawrinka is a Slam champion and earned his ranking. Just because he's not a great Grasscourter doesn't mean he doesn't deserve a higher ranking than Murray. The seedings are fair, and so are the rankings.It had to do with Wawrinka at #3, which is a ranking he absolutely doesn't deserve on grass and which- absurdly- bumped Murray (the last 2 edition finalist AND title holder) to an awkward 5th position.
Wimbledon should stop using it's seeding formula and go along with the rankings as they do with the WTA.
I remember Guga boycotted Wimbledon in 2001 because he was not seeded 1 as #1 in the world.
The seeding impacts on chances of more points and more prize money and it seems wrong to me because only Wimbledon does that. Rafa was 7 times Champion at RG last year and was seeded 4 at the FO. Andy, just a one time Wimbledon Champion and World 5 has leapfrogged Federer, a 7 times Wimbledon Champion. What's that about?
It's just as well Federer is seeded in the top 4 otherwise he would have been rightfully peed off.
Not a great grass courter, that's exactly what we're talking about. It's Wimbledon, it's grass and Wawa at #3 would make the draw imbalancedThere is nothing absurd about it. Wawrinka is a Slam champion and earned his ranking. Just because he's not a great Grasscourter doesn't mean he doesn't deserve a higher ranking than Murray. The seedings are fair, and so are the rankings.
You said it was absurd that Wawrinka pushed Murray down to 5. How is it absurd? Did he not earn his rank? You'd have had a point had you said, "Wawrinka being seeded over Murray at Wimbledon would be absurd."Not a great grass courter, that's exactly what we're talking about. It's Wimbledon, it's grass and Wawa at #3 would make the draw imbalanced
Why have seeds, then? At any tournament?
He didn't earn it on grass, no, and that's the whole point of having the special seedings. (the fact that there aren't enough big events on grass for the regular seedings to reflect abilities on that particular surface). Really not that hard to understand unless one doesn't WANT to :-?You said it was absurd that Wawrinka pushed Murray down to 5. How is it absurd? Did he not earn his rank? You'd have had a point had you said, "Wawrinka being seeded over Murray at Wimbledon would be absurd."
You said ranking, not seeding. Here: "Wawrinka at #3, which is a ranking he absolutely doesn't deserve". Why doesn't Wawrinka deserve his #3 ranking? I'm not saying he deserves #3 seeding. I'm saying he deserves #3 ranking.He didn't earn it on grass, no, and that's the whole point of having the special seedings. (the fact that there aren't enough big events on grass for the regular seedings to reflect abilities on that particular surface). Really not that hard to understand unless one doesn't WANT to :-?
Anyone know when exactly draw ceremony takes place on Friday? and any live coverage of it that we can watch? It is so exciting..
TIA![]()
Murray has slipped to as low as 8 this year so it is a miracle he is seeded as high as 3 at Wimbledon. If the seeding system was any different he would face a top 4 player in the QFs.There is nothing absurd about it. Wawrinka is a Slam champion and earned his ranking. Just because he's not a great Grasscourter doesn't mean he doesn't deserve a higher ranking than Murray. The seedings are fair, and so are the rankings.