Win or lose to eventual champion at Grand Slam - Federer/Nadal/Djokovic

[McEnroeisanartist]

Looking at the number of times that each player won a Grand Slam or lost to the eventual champion.

Federer - 42nd Grand Slam - 2009 US Open - Won 15 Grand Slams, lost to the eventual champion 9 times

Djokovic - 42nd Grand Slam - 2015 French Open - Won 8 Grand Slams, lost to the eventual champion 17 times

Nadal - 41st Grand Slam - 2015 French Open - Won 14 Grand Slams, lost to the eventual champion 7 times

 

[tennisaddict]

Please clarify. Not sure what you mean.

 

[SQA333]

Impressive consistency from Djokovic. Nothing surprising.

 

[bullfan]

Looking at the number of times that each player won a Grand Slam or lost to the eventual champion.

Federer - 42nd Grand Slam - 2009 US Open - Won 15 Grand Slams, lost to the eventual champion 9 times

Djokovic - 42nd Grand Slam - 2015 French Open - Won 8 Grand Slams, lost to the eventual champion 17 times

Nadal - 41st Grand Slam - 2015 French Open - Won 14 Grand Slams, lost to the eventual champion 7 times

Stupid stats.

 

[powerangle]

With the OP, I always get the feeling he is trying to boost up Fed's stats somehow. But with this post, I'm not sure how he is trying to achieve that...

 

[daddy]

This one was obvious since Djoker lost a bunch of finals.

 

[Thetouch]

OMG Fed has been so bad since 2010. He won 2 GS only and lost to like 12 eventual champions and runner ups. I feel so sorry for him.