With Federer going downhill, how many non-French Open slams for Nadal/Djokovic in 08?

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by anointedone, Aug 18, 2007.

?

How many of 3 non-French Open slams for Djokovic/Nadal in 2008, if any?

  1. all 3 non-French Open slams for Nadal, 0 for Djokovic

    2.7%
  2. all 3 non-French Open slams for Djokovic, 0 for Nadal

    2.7%
  3. 2 non-French Open slams for Nadal, 1 for Djokovic

    5.4%
  4. 2 non-French Open slams for Djokovic, 1 for Nadal

    2.7%
  5. 1 non-French Open slams for both Djokovic and Nadal

    18.9%
  6. 1 non-French Open slam for Djokovic, 0 for Nadal

    8.1%
  7. 1 non-French Open slam for Nadal, 0 for Djokovic

    5.4%
  8. 2 non French Open slams for Djokovic, 0 for Nadal

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  9. 2 non French Open slams for Nadal, 0 for Djokovic

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  10. 0 non French Open slams for both Djokovic and Nadal

    54.1%
  1. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,653
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    With the way Federer's game is slipping backwards, the door looks wide open for Djokovic and Nadal to have a shot at the non-French Open slams next year, assuming one or the other wins the French. So how many non-French Open slams do you think either will win next year, if any?
     
    #1
  2. ninman

    ninman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Messages:
    3,898
    Is that a sarcastic comment?
     
    #2
  3. Challenger

    Challenger Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    702
    Firstly, I think it's a bit early to start writing off Federer.

    Secondly, even IF Federer declines next year, I still wonder if Nadal or Djokovic will win USO, AO, or Wimby. I like Djokovic's game, but he still hasn't shown us anything in terms of GS play. I'd take a declining Fed over Djoker still. Nadal would have a better chance, but every GS (minus FO) with him is still an adventure...there's always those matches where he's on the ropes and nearly pushed out. I don't think he'll always be able to make it out on top in those situations.
     
    #3
  4. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,653
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Not at all. The decline of Federer does open the door for Djokovic and Nadal imparticular to have more chance at a non-French Open slam. I am assuming one of Nadal or Djokovic will win the French Open next year regardless, more likely Nadal I think.

    However the decline of Federer opens the door at the other 3 slams too. Granted Federer still might win 1, 2, or even all 3 of the non-French Open slams, but certainly there is more chance he does not it appears. Even if Federer does not win certain one(s) there are others that might do it aside from Nadal and Djokovic at all. So all in all nothing it set in stone, which is why I made the poll. However with Federer more vurnerable now, it certainly makes raises the intrigue to what will happen with regards to Djokovic and Nadal at those non-French Open slams.
     
    #4
  5. Kim

    Kim Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2007
    Messages:
    515
    Another troll post. Fed getting downhill? Ha ha ha...Again, let's take the Sampras example...compared to the current Fed, Sampras' AT HIS BEST was always going downhill.
     
    #5
  6. ninman

    ninman Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2007
    Messages:
    3,898
    Christ people get ahead of themselves, how does making 5 consecutive finals mean you are going downhill?
     
    #6
  7. tennispro11

    tennispro11 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,583
    Location:
    Kansas
    Your an idiot. Get a life or go find somebody to beat you up, you ignorant troll.
     
    #7
  8. plain jane

    plain jane Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    531
    i dont get it. djokovi beats fed and nadal and all of a sudden the only way he can not win the US Open is if he meets fed in the semis. yet no one is mentioning that he is by no means unbeatable by other members on tour. He has played youzhny twice this year on hardcourts and lost both times. also he has yet to beat nadal in a best of five set match.

    I also believe that you are being a bit ridiculous to write off fed in a grandslam period. Is it so easy to forget what he has accomplished so far for the year? Wait until fed loses a grandslam other than the french open to post these types of threads because they just look foolish after the fact.
     
    #8
  9. jukka1970

    jukka1970 Professional

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,068
    Are you for real? He's made 9 straight Grand Slam Finals, and won 7 of those 9. He's done better in the hard court season this year then last year. If he makes it to the finals of the US Open he'll have made 10 consecutive grand slam finals. Care to tell us anyone else in history who is even close to this? 1He's been the number 1 player since February 2nd, 2004. He's held the number 1 position for 189 consecutive weeks, well above anyone else, and the earliest he could lose it, is somewhere in 2008.

    Yeah, he's really been slipping backwards. I can think of about 1000 other men who wouldn't mind having his so called slipping backwards year (that be anyone ranked in the ATP). Yet another example of a stupid post.

    Jukka
     
    #9
  10. Defcon

    Defcon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,068
    Its time for the semi-annual 'Fed should retire' thread :) !!
     
    #10
  11. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Over a thousand posts and you say the Fed is going downhill? Ridiculous. Odd that a troll type thread would come from someone with so many posts...:confused:
     
    #11
  12. tennispro11

    tennispro11 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,583
    Location:
    Kansas
    I have figured out that just because someone has a lot of posts it doesn't mean that they actually have a brain. ;)
     
    #12
  13. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    You are right. I mean the guys has five losses and they call him washed-up? ;)
     
    #13
  14. Dimonator133

    Dimonator133 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    2,070
    Location:
    Atlanta
    this is the dumbest poll i have ever seen


    i'm ashamed that i dignified it with a vote (but at least I voted without hesitation for zero for both)
     
    #14
  15. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    I didn't vote. I know Rafa and Roger will challenge one another. But the mere fact that someone called Roger washed up and on a decline is just ridiculous and not worthy of a vote.

    More worthy of an admission to a mental institute....
     
    #15
  16. saram

    saram Legend

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2007
    Messages:
    5,371
    Yeah, and I think about thirty of those popped up after the finals last week. Just ridiculous. Dominate tennis and lose once and you are on a decline...

    ...if I were only that good to dominate and lose only five times a year while retaining #1 in the world....
     
    #16
  17. tennispro11

    tennispro11 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,583
    Location:
    Kansas
    ......lol......... He should be taking his meds. :)
     
    #17
  18. anointedone

    anointedone Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,653
    Location:
    Ottawa, Ontario
    I think I will wait until after the U.S Open before casting my final vote.
     
    #18
  19. lambielspins

    lambielspins Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,715
    Roger will probably win all 3 slams that are not the French Open again. I am surprised only half think Nadal or Djokovic wont win a non-French next year.
     
    #19
  20. Gilic

    Gilic New User

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    33
    As a Djoker's fun I can only say, you are to early with this thread about 2years. At least let's wait after AO.
     
    #20
  21. LafayetteHitter

    LafayetteHitter Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,954
    Location:
    Lafayette, Louisiana
    The guy is currently number one in the world for more weeks than Nadal has been even number 2 and you are writing him off as downhill. There are definately people here with severe ADD.
     
    #21
  22. Chauvalito

    Chauvalito Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,591
    I just wanted to add a comment about todays match:

    Fed was not exactly playing well, and he still won. Today I finally realized that Fed can play like shiza for the length of a tournament, and depending on the draw, he could still win.

    There are only a few guys that will beat Fed if he is off, The joker included, otherwise Fed is going to hang around the top 10 for a very long time.

    And if he is playing well, he will be able to take out anybody.
     
    #22
  23. king of swing

    king of swing Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    328
    Location:
    chicago
    there is absolutely no chance of nadal or djoker to win a non-FO slam..... in fact I'd say the Nadal's chances of wining to FO or going down and pretty sharply
     
    #23
  24. Chauvalito

    Chauvalito Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,591
    Furthermore as I have said before, if Nadal reaches number 1, he will be there for a very short period of time.

    Djokovic will be able to beat him almost anywhere except clay...I am not trying to say the Nadal is not a threat on hardcourts, I am just saying that Djokovic is a little bit better.
     
    #24
  25. LafayetteHitter

    LafayetteHitter Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,954
    Location:
    Lafayette, Louisiana
    For some of the ****s on this forums that shoot their mouth off about Federer I think a visit to Wikipedia could be of some help.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ATP_number_1_ranked_players

    Yea, 185 consecutive weeks at number 1, Whew that guys game is way off slipping and going downhill fast. At some point here Federer needs to start stepping up and accomplishing something. I'm not even a big fan of his but some people here are just way off base.
     
    #25
  26. Ztalin

    Ztalin Guest

    Nadal isn't good enough to make the finals of USO or AO, so how Federer is doing is pretty irrelevent. Too many people can beat Nadal on hard courts. But to say Fed's on a major decline is just retarded.

    Djokovic has a shot on hardcourts, but I still take Federer to win in a grand slam.

    Nadal survived a couple scares last Wimbledon. Will he be able to do it again? Regardless if he does, I still pick this "declining" Fed over Nadal.

    Federer will likely win them all again.
     
    #26

Share This Page