WOMEN'S - 2010 Australian Open

Who will win the 2010 Women's Australian Open Championship?


  • Total voters
    108
  • Poll closed .

soyizgood

G.O.A.T.
With that Win, Li is now in the top 10. Oh my! Radwanska will be mad because not only can she only play 2 MM tourneys for finishing 2009 in the top 10, she didn't even keep her spot that long.
 
Last edited:

soyizgood

G.O.A.T.
2-2 all. All 4 games had break pts. At 1-0 Azarenka had to serve through 9 deuces to hold.
Triple BP for Azarenka. Azarenka breaks!
3-2 Azarenka
 

Bud

Bionic Poster
Wowee! Azarenka up a set and a double break on Serena :shock:

This is the best I've ever seen Azarenka play.

6-4, 3-0 and Azarenka serving

She's broken Serena 5 times in this match already

4-0 Azarenka!
 
Last edited:

Love Game

Talk Tennis Guru
23lm892.png


Starting a new thread b/c some poll options were missing from the other one.
...

I'd like to vote for the no. 7 seed, but she's missing from this poll! :shock:
 
Last edited:
I'd like to vote for the no. 7 seed, but she's missing from this poll! :shock:

Oh well...doesn't look like you need to anymore.

I picked the players who were the oddsmakers 9 favorites to start the tourney, no need for p!ss poor revisionist history.
 
Last edited:
S

Serendipitous

Guest
Wowee! Azarenka up a set and a double break on Serena :shock:

This is the best I've ever seen Azarenka play.

6-4, 3-0 and Azarenka serving

She's broken Serena 5 times in this match already

4-0 Azarenka!

HAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAH :)
 

Kpt

New User
I havent seen good collection of jerks in one place as much as in serena vika match thread. is this the norm here?
 

Topaz

Legend
I havent seen good collection of jerks in one place as much as in serena vika match thread. is this the norm here?

Unfortunately, yes...sometimes actually discussing a match can be difficult!

Look around for JBfan#1, soy, and LoveGame, and those are usually good threads!

Oh. I guess that explains it then! :eek:

Speaking of which...hi Love Game! LOL

Edit...wow, just caught up on some of the Aza/Serena thread. Pretty sad...JB, LG...what the heck???
 
Last edited:

Topaz

Legend
I only watched the beginning of the Serena match, then had to go to bed (but recorded the rest)...geez, from the chatter here, I had thought Vika won, but just checked the scores! Would have been awesome for her to finally break through like that!

Serena was definitely not 'all there' when I was watching...
 

Love Game

Talk Tennis Guru
Oh well...doesn't look like you need to anymore.

I picked the players who were the oddsmakers 9 favorites to start the tourney, no need for p!ss poor revisionist history.

2dgq1yr.png


http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=306701

"p!ss poor revisionist history" he says? Too bad jamesblakefan#1 just had to get nasty, because one bad turn deserves another (according to the moral of one Esops Fable): I prefer true, honest history to "p!ss poor revisionist" threads for the sake of "the oddsmakers"

True history: mrDamien started his AO WTA thread (above) @ 01-14-2010, 07:20 PM ... then jamesblakefan#1 announced his intention to start a new thread because he didnt like the choices on mrDamien's poll, and he went right ahead and did so three hours later @ 01-14-2010, 10:33 PM! :eek:

Sure, we all have the right to start new threads if we don't like the one already in existence, but the tried and true standards and practices here on TT ever since I've been a member is to stick with whichever thread was posted first. ... And that's the truth.
 
2dgq1yr.png


http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=306701

"p!ss poor revisionist history" he says? Too bad jamesblakefan#1 just had to get nasty, because one bad turn deserves another (according to the moral of one Esops Fable): I prefer true, honest history to "p!ss poor revisionist" threads for the sake of "the oddsmakers"

True history: mrDamien started his AO WTA thread (above) @ 01-14-2010, 07:20 PM ... then jamesblakefan#1 announced his intention to start a new thread because he didnt like the choices on mrDamien's poll, and he went right ahead and did so three hours later @ 01-14-2010, 10:33 PM! :eek:

Sure, we all have the right to start new threads if we don't like the one already in existence, but the tried and true standards and practices here on TT ever since I've been a member is to stick with whichever thread was posted first. ... And that's the truth.

You ignore the fact that the original poll didn't have the #3, #4, or #5 seeds, nor Azarenka, yet criticize me for just leaving out Azarenka? So yes, my poll was more suitable.
 
Nope. Didnt criticize you for that. Remarked on it @ http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=4333974&postcount=1265 ..... but did not criticize.

Well what's the point of remarking on it if the other poll had far bigger flaws? Just stirring the s##t, I see...

(Go ahead, use your cute little smileys and pull the innocent card again.)

In my poll I put the top 6 players and the 3 other options were the players outside of top 6 who most thought had a chance to win the event (Sharapova, Henin, Clijsters). And there's an option for "other" as well. There you are more than welcome to vote for your pretty little headcase Azarenka. (Which I see you didn't BTW so this whole discussion really is meaningless) ;)

Interesting 23 posts and 64 pages in and this is the first time you mention Azarenka, let alone say you want to pick her to win the title. Talk a/b jumping on a bandwagon.
 
Last edited:

Love Game

Talk Tennis Guru
Well what's the point of remarking on it if the other poll had far bigger flaws? Just stirring the s##t, I see...

(Go ahead, use your cute little smileys and pull the innocent card again.)

In my poll I put the top 6 players and the 3 other options were the players outside of top 6 who most thought had a chance to win the event (Sharapova, Henin, Clijsters). And there's an option for "other" as well. There you are more than welcome to vote for your pretty little headcase Azarenka. (Which I see you didn't BTW so this whole discussion really is meaningless) ;)

Interesting 23 posts and 64 pages in and this is the first time you mention Azarenka, let alone say you want to pick her to win the title. Talk a/b jumping on a bandwagon.

okay ... whatever .... if you really must have the last word ........ bit paranoid sounding ....... tho just because youre paranoid doesnt mean they're not after you! ;)
 

Cyan

Hall of Fame
I hope Serena wins. It will look really bad if Serena loses to 2 players who have been retired for years:oops::shock:
 

Leelord337

Hall of Fame
me too serena 4 the win i dont like her and then again henin is a total borefest and not much to look at either

haha are you serious? who do u like to watch play then...vaidisova? vesnina? kirlienko? baseline ball machines" Lol... of all wta women, Henin is my favorite player to watch period, she's just basically the female version of federer
 
nasty, nasty, nasty (as usual) ... tsk, tsk, tsk ...

Playing the innocent card again, as always...at least I don't try to hide my true nature behind a bunch of smileys. I am who I am, take it or leave it. But you, you try to be a nice person then stir things up by doing trollish things and thinking everyone will overlook it. It gets quite old after a while, and I for one am sick of it.
 

Love Game

Talk Tennis Guru
. . . p!ss poor revisionist history.

Just stirring the s##t, I see...

Keep stirring the s##t . . .

Playing the innocent card again, as always...at least I don't try to hide my true nature behind a bunch of smileys. I am who I am, take it or leave it. But you, you try to be a nice person then stir things up by doing trollish things and thinking everyone will overlook it. It gets quite old after a while, and I for one am sick of it.

Pobrecito sees the world thru potty-colored glasses ...
10_4_4v.gif
 
Top