Woodbridge: Forget ‘NextGen’, it’s time for ‘NowGen’

Otacon

Hall of Fame
With several serial Grand Slam winners struggling for fitness, now is the time for the ATP’s next generation to grab their chance.

This year’s Australian Open was one of the first events when the ATP’s ‘NextGen’ showed signs that it could become what we’ve been looking for.
We still had Roger Federer and Marin Cilic in the final, but with Kyle Edmund and Hyeon Chung reaching the semis – Chung taking out Alexander Zverev and Novak Djokovic along the way – it indicated that the ‘NextGen’ could just be the ‘NowGen’.

I love the way the ‘NextGen’ concept has been promoted but it’s time to actually move on from ‘can they?’ and ‘will they?’ to find out who’s going to stand up and be counted.
This younger generation of men has had enough years to be left alone and develop. Now is the time to answer those questions about who’s going to take on the mantle at the top of the game.
It’s now or never in my mind, especially for those guys that are around 22 and have come through the ‘NextGen’ project. Now is the time.

Young players are sometimes protected to the extent that they’re almost wrapped in cotton wool with positivity. The reality is you have to lay your soul bare to become as good as you can.
Federer lays it bare with his emotions, Rafa Nadal with the physicality, Andy Murray with how he wears his heart on his sleeve. But I’ve watched Andy learn to suck it up, take a lot of media negativity in terms of his behaviour, and actually go and work harder than anyone else to prove how good he is.

They are the issues that these younger players must now deal with.

It’s no good being touted as talent – talent is the worst word in sport for me. Talent is a package that you build around your ability to hit a tennis ball. It’s not just what you can do on court, it’s how you handle the pressure you put on yourself, the pressure from your sponsors, time management. All of that comes down to the ability of the athlete to take control, themselves, of everything off court as well as on it.

It always worries me a little bit with our younger players that we have two icons to look up to and emulate in the men’s game, and many don’t copy them. Roger and Rafa transcend every sport. They are the ones every other athlete in the world looks up to in terms of how to brand themselves, how to behave, how to do everything the right way.
You have to be your own person, but any young player has the blueprint right there of how to behave off court and how to sell your sport.

Are the younger generation respecting and paying attention to what Roger and Rafa are doing? And are the people around these young players actually educating them to be the best that they can be?
The danger is a player thinks they are at the top of the game when they really haven’t made it.

Yes, they’re good players and making a good income, but have they got every ounce of their ability out of themselves? Probably not. Some of them are cruising and people are telling them, ‘It’s cool, you’ve got time.’

You don’t have time in sport. You basically have a 10 to 12-year window to achieve everything you want to achieve. And if you don’t have your plan in place, you will underachieve.

https://tennismash.com/2018/03/13/woodbridge-forget-nextgen/
 
With several serial Grand Slam winners struggling for fitness, now is the time for the ATP’s next generation to grab their chance.

This year’s Australian Open was one of the first events when the ATP’s ‘NextGen’ showed signs that it could become what we’ve been looking for.
We still had Roger Federer and Marin Cilic in the final, but with Kyle Edmund and Hyeon Chung reaching the semis – Chung taking out Alexander Zverev and Novak Djokovic along the way – it indicated that the ‘NextGen’ could just be the ‘NowGen’.

I love the way the ‘NextGen’ concept has been promoted but it’s time to actually move on from ‘can they?’ and ‘will they?’ to find out who’s going to stand up and be counted.
This younger generation of men has had enough years to be left alone and develop. Now is the time to answer those questions about who’s going to take on the mantle at the top of the game.
It’s now or never in my mind, especially for those guys that are around 22 and have come through the ‘NextGen’ project. Now is the time.

Young players are sometimes protected to the extent that they’re almost wrapped in cotton wool with positivity. The reality is you have to lay your soul bare to become as good as you can.
Federer lays it bare with his emotions, Rafa Nadal with the physicality, Andy Murray with how he wears his heart on his sleeve. But I’ve watched Andy learn to suck it up, take a lot of media negativity in terms of his behaviour, and actually go and work harder than anyone else to prove how good he is.

They are the issues that these younger players must now deal with.

It’s no good being touted as talent – talent is the worst word in sport for me. Talent is a package that you build around your ability to hit a tennis ball. It’s not just what you can do on court, it’s how you handle the pressure you put on yourself, the pressure from your sponsors, time management. All of that comes down to the ability of the athlete to take control, themselves, of everything off court as well as on it.

It always worries me a little bit with our younger players that we have two icons to look up to and emulate in the men’s game, and many don’t copy them. Roger and Rafa transcend every sport. They are the ones every other athlete in the world looks up to in terms of how to brand themselves, how to behave, how to do everything the right way.
You have to be your own person, but any young player has the blueprint right there of how to behave off court and how to sell your sport.

Are the younger generation respecting and paying attention to what Roger and Rafa are doing? And are the people around these young players actually educating them to be the best that they can be?
The danger is a player thinks they are at the top of the game when they really haven’t made it.

Yes, they’re good players and making a good income, but have they got every ounce of their ability out of themselves? Probably not. Some of them are cruising and people are telling them, ‘It’s cool, you’ve got time.’

You don’t have time in sport. You basically have a 10 to 12-year window to achieve everything you want to achieve. And if you don’t have your plan in place, you will underachieve.

https://tennismash.com/2018/03/13/woodbridge-forget-nextgen/
I want my time back wasted reading this.:rolleyes: Kyrgios his views.
 
Well that's Zverev in a nutshell.

Let's not kill Zverev just yet. I think he'll win at least a major by the time he's done. Chung? Only if he improves his service game.

It is funny though... when Chung beat Zverev at the AO... It wasn't just simply losing the tennis match. Chung absolutely destroyed Zverev mentally. By the 2nd game in the 5th set... Zerev, Chung and everyone else watching knew Chung was going to win.
 
Let's not kill Zverev just yet. I think he'll win at least a major by the time he's done. Chung? Only if he improves his service game.

It is funny though... when Chung beat Zverev at the AO... It wasn't just simply losing the tennis match. Chung absolutely destroyed Zverev mentally. By the 2nd game in the 5th set... Zerev, Chung and everyone else watching knew Chung was going to win.

I actually agree, but I do think that quote encapsulates where Zverev is at in his career right now.
 
We have two icons to look up to and emulate in the men’s game, and many don’t copy them. Roger and Rafa transcend every sport. They are the ones every other athlete in the world looks up to in terms of how to brand themselves, how to behave, how to do everything the right way

No mention of Novak? Somebody ought to tell this to Chung.

And aside from AZ on court, who among the technically NextGen have really shown they're not exactly "branding" themselves or behaving well? Will they only be acknowledged for doing the right things when 1-2 of them win a slam, or when they surpass Fedal in the rankings?
 
Last edited:
GlisteningGargantuanIndigobunting-max-14mb.gif
 
Absolutely agreed. While Federer and Nadal are still at the top, make no mistake, this is a transitional era if I've ever seen one. Someone needs to seize the mantle and actually start winning big events consistently.
 
I know every sport is always looking for fresh blood to keep going but tennis has overplayed this NextGen thing too much simply because the era of the Big 4 has paid big dividends for their coffers with so much interest in tennis for so long. There could well be a drought after the current top players move on. This has always been the case. After the heady days of Connors, Borg, McEnroe, Becker, Edberg etc. it took a while to get going again.
 
Spain doesn't have another Nadal in the pipeline; Switzerland doesn't have another Fed, Serbia doesn't have a Djokovic to follow and GB doesn't have another Murray. These 4 players are a one-off. Even Djokovic's younger brothers haven't made it. They can't just wave a magic wand and have great players on tap.
 
I know every sport is always looking for fresh blood to keep going but tennis has overplayed this NextGen thing too much simply because the era of the Big 4 has paid big dividends for their coffers with so much interest in tennis for so long. There could well be a drought after the current top players move on. This has always been the case. After the heady days of Connors, Borg, McEnroe, Becker, Edberg etc. it took a while to get going again.

Except, you wouldn't know about the "heady days of Connors, Borg, McEnroe, Becker, Edberg etc.(sic)"

8-)
 
Today’s ATP outlook is very open. Anything can happen.
I believe we can proclaim the end of the Big 4 era.
Volatility era is coming.
 
This guy can't hit a volley into the ocean. The crazy part is his brother is one of the last serve and volleyer on tour and hasn't taught him anything?
Zverev is the youngest guy on the tour who has had considerable success.
criticising him comes close to criticising modern tennis as a whole.
Zverev's tennis shows what you need and what you don't to be successful at a, for modern standards, very young age.

doesn't mean i disagree with your post.
but modern tennis is still better than 90s tennis, even if they hardly volley anymore.

Imagine how it feels to be Raonic, Dimitrov, or Nishikori and read these words. No longer even part of the conversation!
(Nishikori is turning 30 next year. :eek:)

Dimitrov may still have a fruitful career autumn. :cool:

Tell you what, here's the plan :

Felix AA = Fed
Tiafoe = Nadal
Chung = Djokovic

now make it happen.
copying DJ (at least more or less) seems the easiest task of the 3.

Fedr2000 will come along with less net game, but aside from that resemble our current Fedr 2.0.
yup, this should be doable. a 'ballbasher deluxe', so to speak.

replacing RAFA gonna be the toughest part.

...replacing Mu not so easy either.

I want my time back wasted reading this.:rolleyes: Kyrgios his views.
as a thread idea, maybe one could further expedite this comparison clownery. :D
maybe something like "who resembles the Big4 best?".

(Wawa will be surpassed by Thiem soon anyway. that's not so challenging or interesting.)
 
Last edited:
^ Zverev is not even 22 yet and has already won 2 Masters, so he's the counter example.
the only counter example in a while at that.
 
^ Zverev is not even 22 yet and has already won 2 Masters, so he's the counter example.
the only counter example in a while at that.

Yeah he got a couple but he's useless at the slams and his net game and confidence is getting worse not better.
 
Yeah he got a couple but he's useless at the slams and his net game and confidence is getting worse not better.
he's in the classical first slump right now, like every recent young gun before him was. only that he's 1-2 years younger than his famous "predecessors" in this category were at their times.
remember Dimitrov, Tomic, Thiem, (Pouille,) Kyrgios, who all were overhyped, but one after the other soon turned out to be overrated.

with that said, yeah, game wise does Zverev actually not strike me as the greatest prospect. and Meles, believe it or not, has even already found first statistical signs of natural decline in him.
 
Back
Top