I was scrolling this page and this came to my mind too, just a very couple of seconds before seeing your post!This was what I immediately thought of.
didn't bernie also complain to be scheduled after 8pm when he was younger?Tomic made up some crap excuse when he tanked in his loss to Andy Roddick in the 2012 US Open, something about all the celebrities in the crowd distracting him.
He was doing his player imitations again and tried to do ShapovalovDjokovic just after hitting the lineswoman: “sorry I thought she was the umpire”.
Ok, I just made this one up![]()
Not sure what your point is. They were both used as bizarre excuses for his defeats. The timing of such statements and who said them wasn't specified in this thread.
Depends when the excuse is usedSome posters like the one you quoted are downright pathetic on insisting that Federer was not suffering from mononucleosis and/or even saying that he's lying.
There's a difference between making an excuse after the match and making up some BS to sell your book more than a decade later.
LOL, hypocritical much from Davy? Then why did he participate?
For some Fed was not making Rome deep runs between his prime of 2004 and 2012, I think one final only in 2006( granted that was great performance by him)To my memory, not to diminish prime Fed, just seemed he must not have cared to be routed by a random guy like Volandri 2-6, 4-6 (career high rank 25 & only made one respectable slam run), especially in '07. He later admitted (or it became apparent) at the time he was splitting up with his then coach Tony Roche at the time, still peak Fed usually made every final if he cared about the tournament
![]()
Federer loses to Volandri at Rome Masters | Taiwan News | 2007-05-10 23:12:29
Federer loses to Volandri at Rome Masters | 2007-05-10 23:12:29www.taiwannews.com.tw
So you're saying that it's impossible to hit a single good shot at a given light level, rather than that the light means you don't always see the shot coming perfectly? Do you even play tennis?Hmm, on the 1st match point it was light enough for Federer to hit his best backhand service return of the entire match but mysteriously 2 minutes later it was as "dark as hell" ... Bud, this doesn't happen on planet earth.
Fillipo played out of his mind on that day and the crowd really carried him. Foto Italico rocked. I was luckily in town actually and saw it happen there.To my memory, not to diminish prime Fed, just seemed he must not have cared to be routed by a random guy like Volandri 2-6, 4-6 (career high rank 25 & only made one respectable slam run), especially in '07. He later admitted (or it became apparent) at the time he was splitting up with his then coach Tony Roche at the time, still peak Fed usually made every final if he cared about the tournament
![]()
Federer loses to Volandri at Rome Masters | Taiwan News | 2007-05-10 23:12:29
Federer loses to Volandri at Rome Masters | 2007-05-10 23:12:29www.taiwannews.com.tw
So you're saying that it's impossible to hit a single good shot at a given light level, rather than that the light means you don't always see the shot coming perfectly? Do you even play tennis?
It was the same light for both players. I didn't notice Nadal wearing a miner's lamp.
Yes because they have the exact same play style and use the exact same equipment, so the scenario was completely even.