Would Federer be nearly as good without the talent and hard work?

kraggy

kraggy

Banned
Would Federer be nearly as good without all the talent and hard work?

Watching Federer play, it became painfully obvious to me that his entire game is based on taking advantage of his tennis talent and the hard work he puts into the game.

As far as I'm concerned, Giles Simon is the only top player that has achieved what he has without hard work or talent. The rest are all cheaters.
 
Last edited:
Obvioulsy anyone without talent and hard work won't be good!

Talent comes with practice of the ability...you are never born with it..only slight genetic advantages...but a guy who puts hard work will usually achieve more.

Roddick isn't as talented as Berdych,Nalbandian, and Safin to some people, but defiently he worked harder.

Federer had to work for his talent...and he has a good body beacause of his training!

Federer
 
What's worse. The thread this is a parody of, or that most people don't realize this is a parody?
 
If only he was made of wood, he'd be better. In fact, I hear that humans used to be made of different things, like wood.

These modern day materials that compose humans, they mean that Federer is, as you say, just the product of talent and training. If only he were wood, he'd be more, well, wooden, in a woody kind of way.

Oh - and despite there being less televisions in the past (though back then, they were often encased in wood), more people would watch the wooden Federer.

Rodger Federwood, it even sounds, well....woodier.
 
OrangeOne said:
If only he was made of wood, he'd be better. In fact, I hear that humans used to be made of different things, like wood.

These modern day materials that compose humans, they mean that Federer is, as you say, just the product of talent and training. If only he were wood, he'd be more, well, wooden, in a woody kind of way.

Oh - and despite there being less televisions in the past (though back then, they were often encased in wood), more people would watch the wooden Federer.

Rodger Federwood, it even sounds, well....woodier.
Click to expand...

Brilliance.
 
OrangeOne said:
If only he was made of wood, he'd be better. In fact, I hear that humans used to be made of different things, like wood.

These modern day materials that compose humans, they mean that Federer is, as you say, just the product of talent and training. If only he were wood, he'd be more, well, wooden, in a woody kind of way.

Oh - and despite there being less televisions in the past (though back then, they were often encased in wood), more people would watch the wooden Federer.

Rodger Federwood, it even sounds, well....woodier.
Click to expand...

The first part of this post makes no sense at all. I'm sure that if in the past human beings were made of wood, there would have been something in our science books. Evolution typically takes thousands or millions of years, such drastic changes to body composition hardly make sense. I feel that you might be trolling.

The second part makes sense though. My grandma used to tell me how when they had wooden TV's picture quality would be much worse because wood is not a good conductor of light (or electricity).
 
kraggy said:
The first part of this post makes no sense at all. I'm sure that if in the past human beings were made of wood, there would have been something in our science books. Evolution typically takes thousands or millions of years, such drastic changes to body composition hardly make sense. I feel that you might be trolling.

The second part makes sense though. My grandma used to tell me how when they had wooden TV's picture quality would be much worse because wood is not a good conductor of light (or electricity).
Click to expand...

Well firstly, you're wrong, because I must be right.

Secondly, the main point is, evolution isn't good. If only we'd stayed made of wood, all of our problems would be solved.

As per the interview after Federer's recent loss:

Pioline: Would wood help?
Federer: Would wood? Wood would.
 
OrangeOne said:
Well firstly, you're wrong, because I must be right.

Secondly, the main point is, evolution isn't good. If only we'd stayed made of wood, all of our problems would be solved.

As per the interview after Federer's recent loss:

Pioline: Would wood help?
Federer: Would wood? Wood would.
Click to expand...

You know, I'd love it if they had a 'like' function so that I could 'like' your post (like in facebook).

:)
 
Serena Williams on Roger Federer:

"he is a good framer"

hope grumptards get the joke within
 
Once those daily 5 hour practice sessions end, so does Fed.
 
Yes. This thread's just bait.

I'll state this and then leave it alone. Without talent OR hard work, he probably wouldn't be nearly as good. Without talent AND hard work, he wouldn't be any good at all.
 
No, every tennis player working very hard. That how they on top of tennis.
 
OP is hilarious.

Times like these I wish Ken M followed tennis and posted on these boards. I'd never leave!
 
Considering that talent and hard work are only the two most important things that make a player great, no he wouldn't be nearly as good without them.
 
I think Federer relies on outrageous talent first and foremost, and talent is his strongest point of all as he is probably in the top few in history in raw talent, but he combines it with an outstanding work ethic, smart decision making and planning, delivery processing, and a pretty good mental game. Not the best mental game, I think guys like Nadal and even Djokovic (although Djokovic has some iffy spots here, along with some outstanding ones) are superior, but you cant have an excellent slam finals record and dominate for 4 years straight without considerable mental strength.
 
kraggy said:
Would Federer be nearly as good without all the talent and hard work?

Watching Federer play, it became painfully obvious to me that his entire game is based on taking advantage of his tennis talent and the hard work he puts into the game.

As far as I'm concerned, Giles Simon is the only top player that has achieved what he has without hard work or talent. The rest are all cheaters.
Click to expand...
Question should: Federer without weak era
 
Kind of a silly question. Isn't talent, and hard work, what comprises a professional tennis player? Take that away, and you've got an average, doubles-playing hack.
 
Thread is obviously a joke and people are getting all worked up...next thread should ask if Rafa would be nearly as good without steroids and perfectly placed water bottles.
 
Simon no work ,no talent-looool
Guy is physically weaker then 90% players and yet manages to get to top 6.
He is insane talented
9,5/10
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BreakPoint
Would Stosur be nearly as good without all the technology?
18 19 20
Replies
958
Views
74K
Rock Strongo
Rock Strongo
GasquetGOAT
Nadal is talented in discipline n hard work but Federer is a tennis player from GOD..
2 3
Replies
148
Views
18K
Bhagi Katbamna
Bhagi Katbamna
GRASScaraz
Would Peak McEnroe be competitive on the Challenger Tour?
Replies
0
Views
54
GRASScaraz
GRASScaraz
Sysyphus
  • Poll Poll
What if Federer had the talent of Dimitrov?
Replies
28
Views
2K
oble
oble
chjtennis
The reason Federer is being so successful in 2017
Replies
31
Views
2K
Daniel Johnson
D
Back
Top