Just wondering if a guy who's still good and needs to win 1-2 more Slams to be considered the best of all time would play better than if he already had most majors won already? Just look at Sampras. He broke the record at Wimbledon in 2000 and went 2 years slamless, had a perfect draw at the 2002 US Open when he avoided both Safin, Hewitt and had Agassi in the final against whom he had a huge mental advantage. Is Federer going the same pattern? After he won Wimbledon in 2009 (thus breaking the record), he only won 1 Slam in favorable conditions. I mean, he's playing ok at the moment in Slams but he might just need that extra pre-2009 motiation to win another big title.