Would Prime Federer really destroy Prime Djokovic on all surfaces so easily or would the matches be closer?

Prime Federer vs Prime Djokovic

  • Federer destroys him very easily

    Votes: 10 9.7%

  • Federer defeats him somewhat easily

    Votes: 7 6.8%

  • Federer defeats him more often than not, but with some difficulty

    Votes: 44 42.7%

  • 50/50 match-up

    Votes: 20 19.4%

  • Heck, prime Djokovic WINS against prime Federer!

    Votes: 22 21.4%
  • Total voters
    103
Third Serve said:
*takes troll mask off*

Here’s what I actually think: the two are close enough in ability that I think most matches between them at their peak would be close, but obviously it depends on the tournament since they’re better in different conditions. All the big tournaments:

AO: Djokovic wins this, moderate margin. The one thing that makes me pause here is Fed’s 2007 run which stands up with some of Djokovic’s best matches at the AO.

IW: Federer, slight margin

Miami: Djokovic, heavy margin

Monte-Carlo: Djokovic, moderate margin

Madrid/Hamburg: It depends on if we choose to equate Madrid with Hamburg (the Masters it replaced on the calendar). Fed was excellent at Hamburg, better than Djokovic has been at Madrid, so I’d take him here if we did that. If not, Djokovic.

Rome: Djokovic, slight margin. This would be a much bigger margin if Rome 2006 didn’t exist.

RG: Gonna say 50/50, slight edge to Fed. Djokovic has been better at the tournament in the long run, but we’re talking prime vs prime here. Fed had some great performances in 2009 and 2011 that can stand up to Djokovic’s best matches in 2013, 2015, and 2016. Djokovic matches up better against Nadal but between the two I might go Fed slightly.

Wimbledon: Fed, moderate margin. I really don’t think prime Djokovic ever came that close to prime Fed on grass. Fed’s game at his peak was just perfectly built for the post-2000 surface.

Canada: Djokovic, moderate margin

Cincinnati: Fed, heavy margin

U.S. Open: Fed, moderate margin. Djokovic has had a number of great performances here, but he’s had struggles with form at some point in almost all of his runs, even the very best one in 2011 (he had an injury in the final and didn’t serve well). Fed on the other hand consistently delivered the goods in his prime. You can poke holes at 2005 and 2007 maybe but 2004 and 2006 were pretty much perfect displays (outside of the wind in the Agassi QF)

Shanghai: Djokovic, moderate margin

Paris: Djokovic, heavy margin. Fed has never been that good here. I mean he was good, but he never really delivered the kinds of masterclasses Djokovic was known to have in his prime.

YEC: Fed, slight margin. Again, Djokovic had great results at this tournament, but so many of Fed’s very finest matches happened here.

So basically I think Djokovic mostly outdoes Fed in the Masters and the AO, but Fed can just bank on a big advantage at Wimbledon and the U.S. Open. RG is pretty much a tie in their primes.
Click to expand...



Nadalaraz up to their Age 22 year would be pretty funny.


AO: Neither have levels worth boasting about but Ned pushed Hewitt in '05 and beat a decent Murray in '07. Slight but negligible edge to Nadal because neither turned in any title-winning form.

IW: Alcaraz, but I don't know if he wins two in Nadal's place.

Miami: Edge Nadal.

MC: Huge W Nadal.

Rome: Huge W Nadal.

Hamburg/Madrid: Big W Nadal.

FO: haha

Wimbledon: Nadal.

Canada: Nadal up to 2007, don't think Raz is outdoing Canada '05/'08 this year.

Cincinnati: Might be a push...Raz currently, but he struggled through all of '23 Cincy and the final wasn't great. '08 Nadal did fine at Cincy, but it's Raz's for the taking.

Olympics: Nadal.

US Open: Carlos.

Madrid/Shanghai: Nadal up to '07/'24.

Paris: Nadal up to '07/'24.

YEC: Nadal up to '07/'24.

Davis Cup: Nadal up to '07/'24.

Final count: 13-3 Nadal.
 
Last edited:
I think in the next 5-10 years, we're could potentially get these partially answered via AI through simulated tennis matches. The AI would learn and model the tennis player through hours of footage per selected tennis player and then simulate a hypothetical match. Would be interesting to see how it plays out.
 
GabeT said:
A practically teenaged version of Novak, very far away from his best level, had set points on two different sets in the USO final. What do you think a peak Novak would have done?
Click to expand...

This sounds suspiciously like time-travel tennis to me. Do you want to ask for a 2011 Djokovic v 2007 Federer ten-match series? Or are you happy merely to report on their Levels?
 
Even back in 2007 USO - Djokovic gave tough fight to Federer. So no easy wins. But Federer would beat him on fast hard courts/ Grass courts and occasionally on clay- if they were of same age.
 
Roger Federer is the only ATG level skill sport athlete in world history who was at his peak throughout his 30s, and therefore should be directly compared to a rival who was 6 years younger, had every precedent to chase, and every psychological and physiological advantage working in his favour on that chase.

EVERYONE knows this.

Thus, Djokovic - the eternal GOAT - would beat him on every surface.
 
Sinner is better than prime Djokovic? Did I read that right?

10 years ago, Djokovic nearly won all slams and nearly all Masters he competed in, while having to play against Nadal, Federer, Murray and Wawrinka. Djokovic in 2015:

- 3 slams, plus 1 more final
- 6 Masters 1000, plus 2 more finals (he played 8 Masters tournaments that year)
- 11 tournament wins, 15 finals (he played 16 tournaments that year), including ATP finals
- most ranking points ever


Jannik Sinner never won more than 3 Masters in a season, or more than 2 slams in a season. While he has to compete against Alcaraz, 38 year old Djokovic and…Zverev, I guess?

How is Sinner better than prime Djokovic?
 
Roger by his own admission was playing better in 2015 than ever, he absolutely destroyed peak Murray in Wimbledon S/F in 2015, with one of his best ever displays. At that stage he was 33 and to me that was his last year where he was playing truly elite tennis

Yet Novak still beat him comfortably in 4 sets in the final.

Even those slam matches back between 2010 and 12 , Novak still had slight edge albeit not by much.
 
Third Serve said:
*takes troll mask off*

Here’s what I actually think: the two are close enough in ability that I think most matches between them at their peak would be close, but obviously it depends on the tournament since they’re better in different conditions. All the big tournaments:

AO: Djokovic wins this, moderate margin. The one thing that makes me pause here is Fed’s 2007 run which stands up with some of Djokovic’s best matches at the AO.

IW: Federer, slight margin

Miami: Djokovic, heavy margin

Monte-Carlo: Djokovic, moderate margin

Madrid/Hamburg: It depends on if we choose to equate Madrid with Hamburg (the Masters it replaced on the calendar). Fed was excellent at Hamburg, better than Djokovic has been at Madrid, so I’d take him here if we did that. If not, Djokovic.

Rome: Djokovic, slight margin. This would be a much bigger margin if Rome 2006 didn’t exist.

RG: Gonna say 50/50, slight edge to Fed. Djokovic has been better at the tournament in the long run, but we’re talking prime vs prime here. Fed had some great performances in 2009 and 2011 that can stand up to Djokovic’s best matches in 2013, 2015, and 2016. Djokovic matches up better against Nadal but between the two I might go Fed slightly.

Wimbledon: Fed, moderate margin. I really don’t think prime Djokovic ever came that close to prime Fed on grass. Fed’s game at his peak was just perfectly built for the post-2000 surface.

Canada: Djokovic, moderate margin

Cincinnati: Fed, heavy margin

U.S. Open: Fed, moderate margin. Djokovic has had a number of great performances here, but he’s had struggles with form at some point in almost all of his runs, even the very best one in 2011 (he had an injury in the final and didn’t serve well). Fed on the other hand consistently delivered the goods in his prime. You can poke holes at 2005 and 2007 maybe but 2004 and 2006 were pretty much perfect displays (outside of the wind in the Agassi QF)

Shanghai: Djokovic, moderate margin

Paris: Djokovic, heavy margin. Fed has never been that good here. I mean he was good, but he never really delivered the kinds of masterclasses Djokovic was known to have in his prime.

YEC: Fed, slight margin. Again, Djokovic had great results at this tournament, but so many of Fed’s very finest matches happened here.

So basically I think Djokovic mostly outdoes Fed in the Masters and the AO, but Fed can just bank on a big advantage at Wimbledon and the U.S. Open. RG is pretty much a tie in their primes.
Click to expand...
There's a bit of nostalgia going on in our Fed fanbase with regards to his supposed untouchability at many of these events. Federer is going to be the heavy favorite at Wimbledon, but this is the same Federer who lost a set to Goddick in the 2004 final, and supposed "pusher" Nadal took him to 4 and 5 in 2006 and 2007. I suppose Nadal's win over 2008 Federer "doesn't count" but Nadal's performances in 2006-2007 suggest that a 7 time slam winning Novak would be able to make Fed work.

The Australian Open is heavy in Novak's favor of course, but then Novak lost a set to Murray in the 2013 final, and I would expect 2007 Federer to at least match that performance.

I can't for the life of me understand why RG is considered such a coin toss. Peak Federer doesn't have a performance nearly on par with Djokovic's 2013 SF against Nadal, is trailing 1 slam to 3, and has an inferior record at the tournament as well. Does the 2011 SF REALLY carry so much weight? Djokovic should be a clear favorite here.

The US Open is more the "coin toss" event, as a "pre-prime" Djokovic was able to make "Peakerer" work in the 2007 final, as did a "pre-prime" Djokovic in the semis of 2008 and 2009. Neither Federer nor Djokovic were "peak" in 2010, and Djokovic won that battle in 5, and of course won the rest of their matches there as well. Federer's superior record at the event, as well as some of his performances make him a slight favorite here, but it is not a blowout by any means.

Overall I think it's the expected AO, RG to Novak, and W to Rog. USO is a coinflip with the "Rog side" slightly weighted.
 
ForehandCross said:
Why are you guys this obvious. Murray had an injury and post his surgery in 2014 went into a bad slump and has some of his worst two years in 2014 and 2015. How was he peak Murray?
Click to expand...
That's because they never watched tennis back then. They just look at the scoreboard and assumed that everything were played in a vacuum
 
NoleFam said:
Well it's the 1st time in history it's happened in tennis for anyone to make 3 straight Slam SFs in a season at his age.

Yea just sports in general and any physical activity. 23 and 24 olds just will always have a significant advantage over a 38 year old.
Click to expand...
Hence, Djokovic’s minimal decline. Zverev also has a significant physical advantage over him, and yet he’s beating Zverev even more easily in 2025 than in 2021 as long as he’s healthy. Nobody could even push him to 5 until he was soundly beaten by Sinner. In the AO, he even beat Alcaraz before retiring with injury in the SF.

It’s clear that he’s been able to offset the physical disadvantage with precision, versatility, adaptability and incredible serving. In the slams, he’s still beating all the young players like Zverev, Lehecka, De Minaur, Norrie, Machac, Fritz, Musetti with minimal problems. Djokovic doesn’t have a problem with young players; he has a problem with Sinner. Sinner is just too good for him. Take Sinner, and to a lesser extent, Alcaraz, out, and we’re still in 2021-2023.
 
Sputnik Bulgorov said:
Hence, Djokovic’s minimal decline. Zverev also has a significant physical advantage over him, and yet he’s beating Zverev even more easily in 2025 than in 2021 as long as he’s healthy. Nobody could even push him to 5 until he was soundly beaten by Sinner. In the AO, he even beat Alcaraz before retiring with injury in the SF.

It’s clear that he’s been able to offset the physical disadvantage with precision, versatility, adaptability and incredible serving. In the slams, he’s still beating all the young players like Zverev, Lehecka, De Minaur, Norrie, Machac, Fritz, Musetti with minimal problems. Djokovic doesn’t have a problem with young players; he has a problem with Sinner. Sinner is just too good for him. Take Sinner, and to a lesser extent, Alcaraz, out, and we’re still in 2021-2023.
Click to expand...
What 38 year old in the history of tennis had minimal physical decline? Djokovic would be the 1st. There's a reason he's the only one to make 3 Slam SFs in a season at this age. It's because their bodies historically can no longer consistently hang with younger players.

Djokovic can beat most of them because that shows the vast difference he has over them skillwise but in the process he keeps injuring himself because, well he's 38. He was dealing with an injury in the last 4 out of 5 Slams.

He's already told everyone last week he has physical problems now and he's struggling, and going into matches with Sinner and Alcaraz with a half empty tank in Slams and it's not enough. So I have no idea why you think any of this is "minimal".
 
NoleFam said:
What 38 year old in the history of tennis had minimal physical decline? Djokovic would be the 1st. There's a reason he's the only one to make 3 Slam SFs in a season at this age. It's because their bodies historically can no longer consistently hang with younger players.

Djokovic can beat most of them because that shows the vast difference he has over them skillwise but in the process he keeps injuring himself because, well he's 38. He was dealing with an injury in the last 4 out of 5 Slams.

He's already told everyone last week he has physical problems now and he's struggling, and going into matches with Sinner and Alcaraz with a half empty tank in Slams and it's not enough. So I have no idea why you think any of this is "minimal".
Click to expand...
What player in history has 24 slams? What player in history has won as much in his 30’s as in his 20’s? What player has won every big title in tennis? What player posted a 27-1 record in slams TWICE at the age of 34 and 36? Djokovic. You of all people should know that the rules that apply to 99.9999% of tennis players don’t matter to the GOAT. The reason he made 3 SFs is because he’s the GOAT and he only declined minimally from 21-23.

So the vast skill difference allows him to beat all the 20+ year olds, but when he gets beaten by Sinner, he’s old? What happened to the massive advantage of a 14 year age difference? That’s trying to have your cake and eat it too. Djokovic has won slams injured before. He beat Medvedev in straight sets with an oblique tear. He beat Tsitsipas in straight sets with a hamstring tear. Beat Cerundolo with a torn meniscus. Beat Alcaraz with a leg injury. The difference isn’t the injuries - it’s Sinner.
 
Sputnik Bulgorov said:
What player in history has 24 slams? What player in history has won as much in his 30’s as in his 20’s? What player has won every big title in tennis? What player posted a 27-1 record in slams TWICE at the age of 34 and 36? Djokovic. You of all people should know that the rules that apply to 99.9999% of tennis players don’t matter to the GOAT. The reason he made 3 SFs is because he’s the GOAT and he only declined minimally from 21-23.

So the vast skill difference allows him to beat all the 20+ year olds, but when he gets beaten by Sinner, he’s old? What happened to the massive advantage of a 14 year age difference? That’s trying to have your cake and eat it too. Djokovic has won slams injured before. He beat Medvedev in straight sets with an oblique tear. He beat Tsitsipas in straight sets with a hamstring tear. Beat Cerundolo with a torn meniscus. Beat Alcaraz with a leg injury. The difference isn’t the injuries - it’s Sinner.
Click to expand...
Massive advantage of a 14 year age difference? LMAO. That's some grade A level trolling there. It's obviously a massive physical disadvantage, and he still dominated Sinner until he was 36.5 and then started losing to him consistently. After it all though, no tennis player's body can last at that level forever. I know you can't possibly look at their matches at the end of 2023 and when Djokovic destroyed him in the ATP Finals, and think that Djokovic is basically the same as the one playing now. For one thing, he's getting injured often now and he's obviously slower around the court. Just because Djokovic can pull off a great victory here and there doesn't mean he doesn't have significant physical decline and that should be pretty obvious to any tennis fan.
 
MichaelNadal said:
Yeah Fed's peak level is insanely high at the AO, it's close imo. But it's hard to see him winning against the level Novak brought against Stan in 2013, Nadal in 2012 etc for example, where he had both the shots, offense, defense, and STAMINA that would just get the best of Fed when it went long
Click to expand...
BorgTheGOAT said:
USO 2011 SF is not the best version of Djokovic at the USO. I also disagree that Fed's best at the AO > Djoko's best.
Click to expand...
Djoko is better than Fed at AO and no version of Fed is beating 2011 Djoko and 2012 Djokodal at AO, IMO
 
NoleFam said:
Massive advantage of a 14 year age difference? LMAO. That's some grade A level trolling there. It's obviously a massive physical disadvantage, and he still dominated Sinner until he was 36.5 and then started losing to him consistently. After it all though, no tennis player's body can last at that level forever. I know you can't possibly look at their matches at the end of 2023 and when Djokovic destroyed him in the ATP Finals, and think that Djokovic is basically the same as the one playing now. For one thing, he's getting injured often now and he's obviously slower around the court. Just because Djokovic can pull off a great victory here and there doesn't mean he doesn't have significant physical decline and that should be pretty obvious to any tennis fan.
Click to expand...
I was talking about the 14 year advantage in favor of the 20+ year olds that counts for nothing as Djokovic slaughters them, in case it wasn’t clear. When healthy Djokovic beats all the 20+ year olds except one, these advantages the young guys have don’t seem to matter, do they?

I can look at their matches at the end of 2023 where Sinner edged him 2-1, and then destroyed him at the AO just 1 month later. Are you going to argue that Djokovic declined from the 2023 WTF to the Davis cup and then the 2024 AO? The difference is Sinner’s rising and maturing as a player, not Djokovic declining.

Djokovic isn’t just pulling great victories here and there, he’s consistently making it deep into slams, and only losing to one player. You need to win 5 matches to make the SF, and Djokovic just did that 3 slams in a row, and 5 of the last 6 when he didn’t withdraw. Like I said, take out Sinner and to a lesser extent, Alcaraz, and Djokovic is still winning slams. Do you agree? If not, who is beating him?
 
Sputnik Bulgorov said:
I was talking about the 14 year advantage in favor of the 20+ year olds that counts for nothing as Djokovic slaughters them, in case it wasn’t clear. When healthy Djokovic beats all the 20+ year olds except one, these advantages the young guys have don’t seem to matter, do they?

I can look at their matches at the end of 2023 where Sinner edged him 2-1, and then destroyed him at the AO just 1 month later. Are you going to argue that Djokovic declined from the 2023 WTF to the Davis cup and then the 2024 AO? The difference is Sinner’s rising and maturing as a player, not Djokovic declining.

Djokovic isn’t just pulling great victories here and there, he’s consistently making it deep into slams, and only losing to one player. You need to win 5 matches to make the SF, and Djokovic just did that 3 slams in a row, and 5 of the last 6 when he didn’t withdraw. Like I said, take out Sinner and to a lesser extent, Alcaraz, and Djokovic is still winning slams. Do you agree? If not, who is beating him?
Click to expand...
Oh ok fair enough and I misread that. Djokovic has been rapidly declining since the 2023 season wrapped. Outside of the Olympics, his 2024 season was very disappointing for his standards as was his level of play, and he wasn't just losing to Sinner. He lost to Pospisil at the USO and Alcaraz at Wimbledon before that, both who are 13+ years younger. Sinner and Alcaraz are this generation's two ATGs so of course they will be harder to beat for him than the others because they are just better players.

If you take away Sinner and Alcaraz, the field would be lesser than what it was in 2021-2023 with Medvedev and Tsistipas having fallen way off, and dangerous floaters like Hurkacz not a factor at Wimbledon because of injuries. So yea he could win Slams with this field without those two players but it would be against a pretty depleted one.
 
They were 4-4 head to hear clay but 1-1 at RG where Roger won a really hard fought 4 setter and the Novak crushed him in straight sets the following year.

H2h much closer than overall record but I reckon if they played 10 best of 5 sets on clay it would be 6-4 Novsk purely down to Novak being tougher mentally.
 
TheFifthSet said:
Nadalaraz up to their Age 22 year would be pretty funny.


AO: Neither have levels worth boasting about but Ned pushed Hewitt in '05 and beat a decent Murray in '07. Slight but negligible edge to Nadal because neither turned in any title-winning run.

IW: Alcaraz, but I don't know if he wins two in Nadal's place.

Miami: Edge Nadal.

MC: Huge W Nadal.

Rome: Huge W Nadal.

Hamburg/Madrid: Big W Nadal.

FO: haha

Wimbledon: Nadal.

Canada: Nadal up to 2007, don't think Raz is outdoing Canada '05/'08 this year.

Cincinnati: Might be a push...Raz currently, but he struggled throughout all of '23 Cincy and the final wasn't great. '08 Nadal did fine at Cincy, but it's Raz's for the taking.

Olympics: Nadal.

US Open: Carlos.

Madrid/Shanghai: Nadal up to '07/'24.

Paris: Nadal up to '07/'24.

YEC: Nadal up to '07/'24.

Davis Cup: Nadal up to '07/'24.

Final count: 13-3 Nadal.
Click to expand...
Forgot to check this one out but I pretty much agree. But I would soften Alcaraz's advantage at Indian Wells. Can't overlook the 2007 run.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

REKX
  • Poll Poll
Prime Big 3 Level vs Prime Sinner/Alcaraz Level
Replies
35
Views
2K
thrust
T
TsitsiBH
  • Poll Poll
Prime Stef Tsitsipas against the 2012 top 8 on all surfaces : who wins ?
Replies
27
Views
2K
Dane_is_Finnish_OJ
Dane_is_Finnish_OJ
kragster
I think prime Fed is overrated on this forum
9 10 11
Replies
505
Views
48K
Povl Carstensen
P
The_Mental_Giant
Prime ROger would have owned the whole tour bar Nadal/ Rafael Saved Tennis
Replies
27
Views
3K
Deleted member 688153
D
Nadalgaenger
Is the notion of "Prime Federer" problematic?
3 4 5
Replies
238
Views
22K
FeroBango
F
Back
Top