Rafa4LifeEver
G.O.A.T.
You read the title.
Both have similar height at 198 cm.
Vote and discuss.
Both have similar height at 198 cm.
Vote and discuss.
Tandil with Z’s backhandYou read the title.
Both have similar height at 198 cm.
Vote and discuss.
Where is your copyright image?What’s this an original thread that isn’t a GOAT debate or an attempt at trolling? I’m not sure that’s allowed.
Anyway I’d go with Delpossum even if he just had his original BH. Zedrot is still going to be a mental midget with no Wilanders and a WTA 2nd serve.
Don't you think Zverev who has a better court coverage, BH, 1st serve etc would benefit more from a nuclear forehand over his current mediocre one?I'd go with (a healthy) Delpo with Z's backhand.
That's why your question is a good one: Z is more BH dominant and Delpo more FH dominant.Don't you think Zverev who is has a better court coverage, BH, 1st serve etc would benefit more from a nuclear forehand over his current mediocre one?
ZverevWho has better movement between Zverev and Del Potro?
Who has better first serve?
Who has better stamina?
Who is better at the net?
Who is better returner of the ball?
But all of this doesn’t matter even if it favors Zverev. Del po won a slam at 21. Zverev will never win oneWho has better movement between Zverev and Del Potro?
Who has better first serve?
Who has better stamina?
Who is better at the net?
Who is better returner of the ball?
Djokovic can beat him. He has some flaws. Mostly stamina. Second serve.Zverev with Delpo's FH would be unbeatable
Some nice takes by you here.That's why your question is a good one: Z is more BH dominant and Delpo more FH dominant.
I can only answer for myself, but I think that many went with Delpo, as he has the better mentality, is more popular (and injuries deprived him of more success) and his FH is much more of a weapon - and "sexier" - than any single component of Z's game.
Also, the sense is that Z, with so much skill, has underachieved while Delpo hasn't achieved his potential due to injuries.
Not on natural surfaces, where mobility is even more important than on hard courts.Delpo with Z backhand would be unstoppable force.
Do we really need to bring Djokovic in every discussion, pal?Djokovic can beat him. He has some flaws. Mostly stamina. Second serve.
je suis heureux de te voir ici, mon ami.Not on natural surfaces, where mobility is even more important than on hard courts.
That is why I believe that even if he had not been seriously injured, Del Potro would not have won either Roland Garros or Wimbledon, where his competition would make him pay dearly for his size in those GS tournaments.
Who will beat Zverev with Delpo forehand according to you? The comment said he would be unstoppable. We can't disrespect Djokovic.Do we really need to bring Djokovic in every discussion, pal?
Delpo was a beast for sure.But all of this doesn’t matter even if it favors Zverev. Del po won a slam at 21. Zverev will never win one
Merci beaucoup, pareil pour toi.Je suis heureux de te voir ici, mon ami.
And faced a peak Federer and crushed him in the fifth. Zverev had so many chances in 20’ USO and still couldn’t get over the line and likely never willDelpo was a beast for sure.
Praising X isn't a disrespect to Y.Who will beat Zverev with Delpo forehand according to you? The comment said he would be unstoppable. We can't disrespect Djokovic.
Thank you.Some nice takes by you here.
Fed should've won that one in straights but his ego clouded his mind. Thankfully Rafa never suffered from such tactical arrogance anytime.And faced a peak Federer and crushed him in the fifth. Zverev had so many chances in 20’ USO and still couldn’t get over the line and likely never will
He really shouldveFed should've won that one in straights but his ego clouded his mind. Thankfully Rafa never suffered from such tactical arrogance anytime.
You're welcome, pal.Thank you.
And Alcaraz should've beaten Sinner in straight sets at Miami earlier this year & also at Umag last year & USO tooHe really shouldve
Not sure about these two lol. Sinner had chances to win 6-2 in the first set in Miami. Umag. Sinner choked the tiebreak. Anyways no sense speculating the results will not changeAnd Alcaraz should've beaten Sinner in straight sets at Miami earlier this year & also at Umag last year.
That was just a light-hearted friendly provoke attempt anyways xDNot sure about these two lol. Sinner had chances to win 6-2 in the first set in Miami. Umag. Sinner choked the tiebreak. Anyways no sense speculating the results will not change
I figuredThat was just a light-hearted friendly provoke attempt anyways xD
I figured
That's how myths are born. Like Safin Nalbandian supremecy. I say anytime you see a hyperbole, always check once.Praising X isn't a disrespect to Y.
Additionally, Djokovic/Rafa/Federer would be tough matchup for any combination whatsoever. But that's not the point of this thread.
Why is the Djokovic fanbase (except for a few sane ones) so usecure and snowflake-ish that they need to bring him up everywhere and feel attacked even when he isn't the topic??
Djokovic can beat him. He has some flaws. Mostly stamina. Second serve.
Zverev has stamina issues and he was a quitter until recently. Only this year during Sinner match did we see Zverev unleashing his full potential.I view stamina as a strength of Zverev's, not a flaw. But even if you think it's a flaw (which is slightly confusing to me, frankly), it would be mitigated by a vastly improved forehand capable of ending points much quicker. His second serve problems are mostly behind him. He still occasionally hits some shockingly bad seconds, but I'm not sure it would matter all that much.
But more to the point, I also view Zverev's forehand as average-at-best (among the top 50 or so). He hits a fairly heavy neutral ball and can attack short balls with decent success when his footwork is in order, but on the whole it's a shot that he can't -- or at least doesn't -- really do a lot with. He hardly ever even controls rallies with his forehand. Substituting his FH for Delpo's would be completely transformative in a way that I'm not sure we're properly appreciating in this thread.
Zverev has stamina issues and he was a quitter until recently. Only this year during Sinner match did we see Zverev unleashing his full potential.
He lost the USOpen final because he couldn't hang on. He said so himself.
Why do you think he does not have stamina issues?
Tough to see how the rest of del Potro's game is being overrated. With a good backhand, he won the U.S. Open at 20 (beating Nadal/Federer in the SF/F) and then made the WTF finals. If you replace his good backhand with a great backhand, it's tough not to see him being hugely successful going forward.ITT people really underestimating how bad Zverev's forehand is and how much it actually causes his muggery.
Del Potro's game outside his forehand is also heavily overrated.
Zverev with a Delpo FH would've definitely achieved more. Though that is mostly due to era he played in.
Delpo's original BH was better than Zverev's BH. Zverev with
Fair. I still think he has stamina issues but he is such a loser that he was never beaten solely due to stamina problems. He has always been a loser vs top 10. But now it's changing a bit.I think his stamina has been a strength since 2021.
I don't really know what counts as a good answer to your question, though. He plays many long rallies and never gets tired. He often outlasts Djokovic and Medvedev in protracted exchanges and has beaten each of them several times by playing attritional tennis. He was completely fine physically in the 5th set of the 2021 USO SF, and he was going toe-to-toe with Nadal at Roland Garros 3.5 hours into a match in which the second set hadn't yet concluded. To me that's pretty compelling evidence.
I don't know about that. Zverev hadn't tired out yet in the 2022 French Open SF with Nadal, but they were still in the second set. We have no idea how he would have looked for the remainder of the match. As for the 2022 U.S. Open SF, every match he played before the SF was a straight set win except for the win over Sock, where Jack retired at 2-1 in the fourth set. So, Zverev had minimal wear and tear going into that SF.I think his stamina has been a strength since 2021.
I don't really know what counts as a good answer to your question, though. He plays many long rallies and never gets tired. He often outlasts Djokovic and Medvedev in protracted exchanges and has beaten each of them several times by playing attritional tennis. He was completely fine physically in the 5th set of the 2021 USO SF, and he was going toe-to-toe with Nadal at Roland Garros 3.5 hours into a match in which the second set hadn't yet concluded. To me that's pretty compelling evidence.
Tough to see how the rest of del Potro's game is being overrated. With a good backhand, he won the U.S. Open at 20 (beating Nadal/Federer in the SF/F) and then made the WTF finals. If you replace his good backhand with a great backhand, it's tough not to see him being hugely successful going forward.