Well, I started out the year thinking I was a 3.0 (self-rated). I have been playing 9 months. I was going to join a 2.5 team but the tennis director/head pro said he thought it was too risky since I might get bumped up. This would, in turn, take away any wins I had received for myself and the team as a whole.
So, I have played two USTA 3.0 tournaments-one in doubles and one in singles. I lost 6-0 6-1 in both.
Then, I played a USTA 3.5 because nobody entered my 3.0 division and the tournament director asked me if I would play up as one other 3.5 player entered. So, I did. I lost 6-0 6-3.
Now, I am wondering if I am really a 2.5? I played a non-Usta match and won (in a tiebreak) but the head tennis lady said my opponent was somewhere between 2.5 and 3.0 (um..kind of a huge range there).
I wish there was a novice 3.0 or maybe a 2.75! :evil:
Granted, my USTA 3.0 losses came to players with at leat two wins at 3.5 who are probably on the bubble (but who knows the way the NTRP computer thing works).
So, any opinions on if I should stay at 3.0 or try to play league at 2.5?
I play 4 times a week (including 2 1 1/2 hour lessons with pro) and am very athletic.
I am thinking I underestimated the ratings. It seems that people who play tournaments (which is my thing) are like the cream of the crop at their level...at least around here, anyways. They are not like me who are new to the game. In fact, my 3.0 singles loss came to a player that has been playing at that level for 5 years! A total 3.0 veteran in my book with tons of match experience.
I have also found there is a HUGE difference between a club player whose club says they are a 3.0 and what USTA tournament 3.0 players can really do......I think clubs over rate but this is just my limited experience.
I have , oh, 11 or so tournaments mapped out for the rest of the year at 3.0. But, wondering if I should play if I am losing with those scores or if I should play 2.5 to get experience and more "match comfortable" and then go for 3.0 next year?
When I play 3.0 (tournament quality 3.0 not club as I am competitive against the weak club designated 3.0 players) I feel rushed. When I play people somewhere between 2.5 and 3.0 the game slows down and I can work on placement and control. My down the lines are much more solid because I have so much time to set up. I have confidence to mix in both off pace (offensive topspin lobs) and strong pace shots and really direct my approach shots. I don't know...it just seems like the game REALLY slows down for me and I can "think". Is this normal?
I don't know when the game will be slow like this for me at 3.0 tournament level. I always feel like I am rushed and on my heels. I tend to overhit and am less controlled. *sigh* Does this mean I am not really a 3.0 yet?
Lastly, I don't know why I played better against a 3.5 than I did a 3.0. I guess I don't mind hitting with topspin and pace as it is easier for me so the 3.5 match seemed more solid-hitting wise. Of course, I don't have a slice yet or a great serve or multiple serves like the 3.5 player.
I guess I am just feeling frustrated. I am happy to finally win a non-club match but wish it was against a stronger opponent as now I am questioning where I belong.........
Not to moan but it cost $40+ for my single elimation tournaments so I want them to be, at least, a bit productive!
So, I have played two USTA 3.0 tournaments-one in doubles and one in singles. I lost 6-0 6-1 in both.
Then, I played a USTA 3.5 because nobody entered my 3.0 division and the tournament director asked me if I would play up as one other 3.5 player entered. So, I did. I lost 6-0 6-3.
Now, I am wondering if I am really a 2.5? I played a non-Usta match and won (in a tiebreak) but the head tennis lady said my opponent was somewhere between 2.5 and 3.0 (um..kind of a huge range there).
I wish there was a novice 3.0 or maybe a 2.75! :evil:
Granted, my USTA 3.0 losses came to players with at leat two wins at 3.5 who are probably on the bubble (but who knows the way the NTRP computer thing works).
So, any opinions on if I should stay at 3.0 or try to play league at 2.5?
I play 4 times a week (including 2 1 1/2 hour lessons with pro) and am very athletic.
I am thinking I underestimated the ratings. It seems that people who play tournaments (which is my thing) are like the cream of the crop at their level...at least around here, anyways. They are not like me who are new to the game. In fact, my 3.0 singles loss came to a player that has been playing at that level for 5 years! A total 3.0 veteran in my book with tons of match experience.
I have also found there is a HUGE difference between a club player whose club says they are a 3.0 and what USTA tournament 3.0 players can really do......I think clubs over rate but this is just my limited experience.
I have , oh, 11 or so tournaments mapped out for the rest of the year at 3.0. But, wondering if I should play if I am losing with those scores or if I should play 2.5 to get experience and more "match comfortable" and then go for 3.0 next year?
When I play 3.0 (tournament quality 3.0 not club as I am competitive against the weak club designated 3.0 players) I feel rushed. When I play people somewhere between 2.5 and 3.0 the game slows down and I can work on placement and control. My down the lines are much more solid because I have so much time to set up. I have confidence to mix in both off pace (offensive topspin lobs) and strong pace shots and really direct my approach shots. I don't know...it just seems like the game REALLY slows down for me and I can "think". Is this normal?
I don't know when the game will be slow like this for me at 3.0 tournament level. I always feel like I am rushed and on my heels. I tend to overhit and am less controlled. *sigh* Does this mean I am not really a 3.0 yet?
Lastly, I don't know why I played better against a 3.5 than I did a 3.0. I guess I don't mind hitting with topspin and pace as it is easier for me so the 3.5 match seemed more solid-hitting wise. Of course, I don't have a slice yet or a great serve or multiple serves like the 3.5 player.
I guess I am just feeling frustrated. I am happy to finally win a non-club match but wish it was against a stronger opponent as now I am questioning where I belong.........
Not to moan but it cost $40+ for my single elimation tournaments so I want them to be, at least, a bit productive!