WTA offers ranking protection for mothers returning to tour

Shells15

Rookie
WTA offers ranking protection for mothers returning to tour

Players will use previous rankings at select tournaments
Return of Serena Williams after giving birth prompted debate


The WTA has given additional protection to the rankings of mothers returning to the tour after giving birth.

Players who have returned from maternity leave – or have been absent through injury – will now be allowed to use their previous ranking to enter 12 tournaments over a three-year period following their comeback.

The WTA will guarantee players will be able to avoid facing the top seeds in the opening rounds of tournaments. But the decision does not necessarily mean players will be seeded at tournaments in line with their ranking. Seedings will still be at the discretion of tournaments.

Discussions about mothers returning to the circuit were prompted after Serena Williams’s comeback after giving birth to her daughter. Her world ranking had fallen to 453 during her absence and, despite the fact she had won 23 majors which included the Australian Open in which she triumphed while seven weeks pregnant, she was not seeded for last year’s French Open. She was, however, seeded No25 for last year’s Wimbledon despite being ranked outside the world’s top 32 players.

Williams had wanted players to be seeded in line with their protected rankings, and she was supported by her old rival Maria Sharapova and world No1 Simona Halep.

The WTA also clarified its regulations around clothing this week. At this year’s French Open Williams’s ‘catsuit’ outfit attracted the ire of the French Tennis Federation president, Bernard Giudicelli. He said “It will no longer be accepted. One must respect the game and the place”. The WTA has ruled that going forward “leggings and mid-thigh length compression shorts may be won with or without a skirt, shorts, or dress”. However, dress code is still down to individual tournaments, and Giudicelli may well still push to restrict Williams’s fashion choices in Paris next year.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2...ings-tennis-motherhood-tennis-serena-williams
 
these and also the post about possibly keeping serena and ramos apart sounds like they're changing the WTA into the Williams Tour Association...lol
WTA also said that Serena's catsuit type outfit is fine to wear on tour (though individual tournaments may have dress codes).
 
This is fantastic. All of us who hoped that Serena’s pregnancy would be used as a catalyst for change have had our hopes delivered.

It’s a shame it took so long but I’m glad it’s here now. Definitely needed to happen considering a lot of the top 10 women are of an age where having children may be an option but they may have been deterred due to the restraints of returning to tour.

Great news.
 
Seedlings are meant to represent potential or expected progression. Ranks are meant to ensure top players don't meet other top players. This goes beyond that. 3yrs is extreme. If a player can not show previous level of play within 12 month, a full tennis ranking cycle they should not be unfairly biased. This is unfair to those that grind out the season. Seedlings should be based purely on potential not past history.
 
The WTA always has it priorities in order. How 'bout changing sweaty shirts on court (w/a sports bra underneath, of course!)...??

WTA...? Hello...?

Well, what does Sorena say...?
 
Seedlings are meant to represent potential or expected progression. Ranks are meant to ensure top players don't meet other top players. This goes beyond that. 3yrs is extreme. If a player can not show previous level of play within 12 month, a full tennis ranking cycle they should not be unfairly biased. This is unfair to those that grind out the season. Seedlings should be based purely on potential not past history.
3 years is intended to give the option of taking a longer break. Personally I'd have gone with 18 or 24 months. But remember, they still have only 12 tournaments to use previous ranking. So it doesn't really matter, whenever they start the comeback it'll run out within a few months to a year and then after that the ranking will be pure performance.
 
The article is a bit confusing. So their protected ranking is used for them to enter tournaments but they may nor may not be seeded??

“The WTA will guarantee players will be able to avoid facing the top seeds in the opening rounds of tournaments. But the decision does not necessarily mean players will be seeded at tournaments in line with their ranking. Seedings will still be at the discretion of tournaments.”

This paragraph is full of contradiction. how do they guarantee these players will avoid facing top players in opening rounds? If a player’s previous ranking was under 32, how do you guarantee she won’t be drawn to top seeds in slams? Rig the draw? If their protected ranking is top10, well they won’t meet the tops seeds anyway if seeding is to go by their ranking. But then the article says ‘their seeding may not be in line with their ranking’. My head is spinning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDJ
The article is a bit confusing. So their protected ranking is used for them to enter tournaments but they may nor may not be seeded??

“The WTA will guarantee players will be able to avoid facing the top seeds in the opening rounds of tournaments. But the decision does not necessarily mean players will be seeded at tournaments in line with their ranking. Seedings will still be at the discretion of tournaments.”

This paragraph is full of contradiction. how do they guarantee these players will avoid facing top players in opening rounds? If a player’s previous ranking was under 32, how do you guarantee she won’t be drawn to top seeds in slams? Rig the draw? If their protected ranking is top10, well they won’t meet the tops seeds anyway if seeding is to go by their ranking. But then the article says ‘their seeding may not be in line with their ranking’. My head is spinning.
It sounds like they don't have to get the exact same rank they had, just a discretionary seed? I agree, it isn't that clear.
 
@MLRoy
It was a mistake to cite her
US OPEN 2018

"We regret that a code violation was assessed to Ms. Cornet yesterday. We have clarified the policy to ensure this will not happen moving forward. Fortunately, she was only assessed a warning with no further penalty or fine.
"Female players, if they choose, may also change their shirts in a more private location close to the court, when available. They will not be assessed a bathroom break in this circumstance."
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDJ
It sounds like they would prefer players to be seeded in line with their ranking, but they will only enforce a seeding sufficient to avoid collisions with top seeds.

There is not so much a contradiction as a deferral to the authority of the tournaments and an unwillingness to trample on their discretion with regard to seeds.

It may work by simply picking an arbitrary point at the backend of the seedings, say 12 in a tournament with 16 ranked players, and inserting a player there.

The article is a bit confusing. So their protected ranking is used for them to enter tournaments but they may nor may not be seeded??

“The WTA will guarantee players will be able to avoid facing the top seeds in the opening rounds of tournaments. But the decision does not necessarily mean players will be seeded at tournaments in line with their ranking. Seedings will still be at the discretion of tournaments.”

This paragraph is full of contradiction. how do they guarantee these players will avoid facing top players in opening rounds? If a player’s previous ranking was under 32, how do you guarantee she won’t be drawn to top seeds in slams? Rig the draw? If their protected ranking is top10, well they won’t meet the tops seeds anyway if seeding is to go by their ranking. But then the article says ‘their seeding may not be in line with their ranking’. My head is spinning.
 
That’s all well and good but the WTA are missing the most important point of all, who will protect these mothers from silly and disrespectful umpires like Carlos Ramos ???
 
This is fantastic. All of us who hoped that Serena’s pregnancy would be used as a catalyst for change have had our hopes delivered.

It’s a shame it took so long but I’m glad it’s here now. Definitely needed to happen considering a lot of the top 10 women are of an age where having children may be an option but they may have been deterred due to the restraints of returning to tour.

Great news.

Change and catalyst for what exactly?
 
There is some grey area here (as reported), but it strikes me as fair overall. Essentially, a player shouldn't be punished for having a child and then returning to the tour. Clijsters and Serena aside, I would imagine that it is not easy to return to the tour with success.
 
Back
Top