WTA: who can win USO 2022?

Champion?


  • Total voters
    19
  • Poll closed .

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Predicting the winner is impossible. Even at the QF stage it might be very difficult. Always a crap-shoot, at least in recent years.

However, I can tell you which players have no chance, which have very small chances, and which belong to that "narrower" circle of favourites.

Based on recent results, mental strength, past results and other things.

Sweetek - Has a pretty decent draw. Should reach R4 comfortably, where she might face Pinko or Annie Simova, which she might or might not survive. But she won't win the title. She's been confused and sub-par lately, and she complained about the USO balls used by women. She basically hates them.

Counterfight - The posh Estonian has an easy beginning, but in R3 Tomljanovic will defeat her. Anyway, she's been a failure at slams, and her recent form has been average. 100% won't win the title.

Alexandrovna
- coming back from an injury, she's struggling to find form. 100% no chance.

Jabba the Ons
aka Jabberwocky - Her R2 opponent might defeat her, and if not, then R4 or QF is her limit. She's been average this HC Summer, and is generally anyway too pressured to win a slam, which is not a good thing. After Wimbledon, expectations will be high - and on the WTA tour we know that means the results will be low... 100% she will not win this.

Gauff
- should reach R4 where Halep might be waiting. Then Garcia or Haddadoper in QF. So I don't expect a slam title from her at this USO. Not impossible but chance is 15%.

Haddad
- fingers crossed she loses to Garcia in R3. If not, she gets Halep or Gauff in QF. Chances of winning are solid, she can do it. Top 10 favourites.

Andreeeescu - Loses in R2 to Haddad. She doesn't practice very much - is my impression. The rest of her career will be nothing until she steps it up. Zero chance.

Garcia
- Good chance of winning. One of the top 5 favourites. Leading acer this year, Garciabot has variety, confidence and experience.

Bencic - her best slam by far, so she could perhaps reach R4 or QF, her absolute maximum though. However Pliskova or Bouzkova can beat her in R3. Zero chance of winning title.

Badosa
- a good draw, should reach R4 or QF, but I definitely don't expect her to win it. She just isn't good enough. Very low odds, nearly zero.

Pegula
- at her age having just one title... No chance. She can get very far, SF for example, but she would have to beat Pera in R4. Zero chance.

Pera - One of the top 3 favourites. She can definitely win this. Chances are high she wins this. Fingers crossed she doesn't, she is so boring...

Q Zheng - she's not good enough yet, will win a slam in a few years. Zero chance.

Ostapinko - has a very tough draw, almost every step of the way. Her bombing style won't work in 7 matches in a row. Zero chance.

Raducanu - getting the giant-killing Cornet in R1 is unlucky, and she might lose that one. If not, Osaka in R3 could beat her. Zero chance.

Shabalenka - very unpredictable, but the draw allows for a SF. Eventually she'll win a slam title, but when, nobody knows. I have no clue.

Annie Simova - Very up and down, inconsistent, no plan B, recent form is average. Zero chance.

Potapova - highly motivated, a fighter, but zero chance.

Kvitova
- lost her last 3 big finals, she is no longer clutch, hasn't won a slam in 8 years. Zero chance.

Pliskova
- she will never win a slam, so zero chance. Her draw is quite tough, in every round, so likely she loses by R3.

Halep - USO is her weakest slam, so I doubt it. Places too much pressure on herself. She won Cincy but nevertheless low odds.

Sakkari
- will never win a slam, no chance. If she survives R1 and R2, R4 is a given but there she will definitely lose to Haddad or Garcia.

Kasatkina - is a pusher, limited ceiling, very low chances. Will have a tough R3 vs Kuder, but if she wins it could reach QF or even SF.

Osaka - has an easy draw, could reach R4, if she beats Shabalenka could go all the way. I doubt it, but it's possible. Has a decent chance.

Tomlja
- will reach R4 where she faces a tough opponent Samsonova. If she beats her a SF is not impossible. She has zero chances for the title though because aged 29 never won a title.

Samsonova - is in great form, can reach QF or SF, but a title is very doubtful. Low odds.

Fernandez
- back from an injury, her form is not good. Will lose early, probably R2 to Samsonova. Zero chance.

Serena
- predictably she was handed a doable R1, but will lose R2 at the very latest, to Counterfight. Zero chance.

Krejcikova
- R3 at the very most, likely even earlier. Zero chance.

Kuder
- if she beats Kazakh Tina in R3 she might reach QF, but that's the limit. Almost zero chance.

Rybakina
- will lose R3 to Shabalenka, or R4 at the latest. Zero chance.

Stephens
- 5 years ago she won USO, she won't win another one slam, zero chance.

Keys
- tough draw, R2 or R3. Zero chance.

Collins
- might lose R1 to Osaka, hasn't played in a while, won't go far, zero chance.

Muguruza
- will lose early, bad form the entire year, zero chance.

Teichmann
- never will win a slam, so no chance. If she survives a tough R1 then she might lose in R3 to Halep.

Cornet - R3 or R4. Zero chance.

I'll be adding more names later, for example qualifiers, until Monday. Some qualifiers can win this potentially. After that, I'm not editing this intro anymore.
 

Jokervich

Hall of Fame
It's a crapshoot like you say. I'll take a wild guess at a Bencic Sakkari final with Sakkari winning in 3 sets.

Now watch them both go out in the first round.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
It's a crapshoot like you say. I'll take a wild guess at a Bencic Sakkari final with Sakkari winning in 3 sets.

Now watch them both go out in the first round.
How did you pick Sakkari though?

She is notoriously bad in big semis, and won just one title out of a bunch of finals.

Also, Bencic is 3-0 in big finals, so in this match-up she'd be the big favourite by far.
 

Jokervich

Hall of Fame
How did you pick Sakkari though?

She is notoriously bad in big semis, and won just one title out of a bunch of finals.

Also, Bencic is 3-0 in big finals, so in this match-up she'd be the big favourite by far.
No clue. Your guess is as good as mine. It's WTA, draw names out of a hat and that's who the winner will be.:-D
 

ttwreader

Hall of Fame
Raducanu. Watched her practice this morning. She's real good, played well with the ball and the court. She might not win any other tournament elsewhere but US Open is just like for her to grab. LOL
 
Last edited:

Mark-Touch

Legend
Predicting the winner is impossible. Even at the QF stage it might be very difficult. Always a crap-shoot, at least in recent years.

However, I can tell you which players have no chance, which have very small chances, and which belong to that "narrower" circle of favourites.

Based on recent results, mental strength, past results and other things.

Sweetek - Has a pretty decent draw. Should reach R4 comfortably, where she might face Pinko or Annie Simova, which she might or might not survive. But she won't win the title. She's been confused and sub-par lately, and she complained about the USO balls used by women. She basically hates them.

Counterfight - The posh Estonian has an easy beginning, but in R3 Tomljanovic will defeat her. Anyway, she's been a failure at slams, and her recent form has been average. 100% won't win the title.

Alexandrovna
- coming back from an injury, she's struggling to find form. 100% no chance.

Jabba the Ons
aka Jabberwocky - Her R2 opponent might defeat her, and if not, then R4 or QF is her limit. She's been average this HC Summer, and is generally anyway too pressured to win a slam, which is not a good thing. After Wimbledon, expectations will be high - and on the WTA tour we know that means the results will be low... 100% she will not win this.

Gauff
- should reach R4 where Halep might be waiting. Then Garcia or Haddadoper in QF. So I don't expect a slam title from her at this USO. Not impossible but chance is 15%.

Haddad
- fingers crossed she loses to Garcia in R3. If not, she gets Halep or Gauff in QF. Chances of winning are solid, she can do it. Top 10 favourites.

Andreeeescu - Loses in R2 to Haddad. She doesn't practice very much - is my impression. The rest of her career will be nothing until she steps it up. Zero chance.

Garcia
- Good chance of winning. One of the top 5 favourites. Leading acer this year, Garciabot has variety, confidence and experience.

Bencic - her best slam by far, so she could perhaps reach R4 or QF, her absolute maximum though. However Pliskova or Bouzkova can beat her in R3. Zero chance of winning title.

Badosa
- a good draw, should reach R4 or QF, but I definitely don't expect her to win it. She just isn't good enough. Very low odds, nearly zero.

Pegula
- at her age having just one title... No chance. She can get very far, SF for example, but she would have to beat Pera in R4. Zero chance.

Pera - One of the top 3 favourites. She can definitely win this. Chances are high she wins this. Fingers crossed she doesn't, she is so boring...

Q Zheng - she's not good enough yet, will win a slam in a few years. Zero chance.

Ostapinko - has a very tough draw, almost every step of the way. Her bombing style won't work in 7 matches in a row. Zero chance.

Raducanu - getting the giant-killing Cornet in R1 is unlucky, and she might lose that one. If not, Osaka in R3 could beat her. Zero chance.

Shabalenka - very unpredictable, but the draw allows for a SF. Eventually she'll win a slam title, but when, nobody knows. I have no clue.

Annie Simova - Very up and down, inconsistent, no plan B, recent form is average. Zero chance.

Potapova - highly motivated, a fighter, but zero chance.

Kvitova
- lost her last 3 big finals, she is no longer clutch, hasn't won a slam in 8 years. Zero chance.

Pliskova
- she will never win a slam, so zero chance. Her draw is quite tough, in every round, so likely she loses by R3.

Halep - USO is her weakest slam, so I doubt it. Places too much pressure on herself. She won Cincy but nevertheless low odds.

Sakkari
- will never win a slam, no chance. If she survives R1 and R2, R4 is a given but there she will definitely lose to Haddad or Garcia.

Kasatkina - is a pusher, limited ceiling, very low chances. Will have a tough R3 vs Kuder, but if she wins it could reach QF or even SF.

Osaka - has an easy draw, could reach R4, if she beats Shabalenka could go all the way. I doubt it, but it's possible. Has a decent chance.

Tomlja
- will reach R4 where she faces a tough opponent Samsonova. If she beats her a SF is not impossible. She has zero chances for the title though because aged 29 never won a title.

Samsonova - is in great form, can reach QF or SF, but a title is very doubtful. Low odds.

Fernandez
- back from an injury, her form is not good. Will lose early, probably R2 to Samsonova. Zero chance.

Serena
- predictably she was handed a doable R1, but will lose R2 at the very latest, to Counterfight. Zero chance.

Krejcikova
- R3 at the very most, likely even earlier. Zero chance.

Kuder
- if she beats Kazakh Tina in R3 she might reach QF, but that's the limit. Almost zero chance.

Rybakina
- will lose R3 to Shabalenka, or R4 at the latest. Zero chance.

Stephens
- 5 years ago she won USO, she won't win another one slam, zero chance.

Keys
- tough draw, R2 or R3. Zero chance.

Collins
- might lose R1 to Osaka, hasn't played in a while, won't go far, zero chance.

Muguruza
- will lose early, bad form the entire year, zero chance.

Teichmann
- never will win a slam, so no chance. If she survives a tough R1 then she might lose in R3 to Halep.

Cornet - R3 or R4. Zero chance.

I'll be adding more names later, for example qualifiers, until Monday. Some qualifiers can win this potentially. After that, I'm not editing this intro anymore.
Poorly worded poll.
Who can win?
Obviously more than one person!
Yet poll doesn't allow multiple choice.
 

snowwhite

Professional
My answer will be the same at your thread about women losing first grand slam final:
No predictions but I hope it will be (if not Serena) Keys, Gauff, Garcia, or Fernandez.
In this US Open, Cornet will break the record of the most consecutive appearances in grand slams (with no achievements), I hope that will give her some motivation to play well in her first round match against the defending champion.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Some helpful (?) facts:

1. The last 4 slams had 8 different finalists. That is a lot, even for women's tennis. The record is 10 different finalists in 5 finals, which happened in 2013/14 and 2020/21.

So it is possible that we get another pair that we haven't had in the last 4 finals. However, the odds are somewhat higher that one of the finalists will be a repeat finalist from the last 4 slams.

On the other hand, only 6 of these 8 women are possible repeat finalists. Barty is retired, and Raducanu is of course an impossibility.

So maybe we will have two new finalists after all i.e. two that hadn't appeared in the last 4 finals.

Basically, the safest bet is Sweetek to prevent a 5-slam streak of all-different finalists. Maybe Gauff too.

2. FIVE of the last SEVEN USO champs are first-timers.

Odds are that we get a new winner. It's USO after all. Perhaps a previous slam finalist loser?

We are due one, i.e. a loser winning a slam, statistically speaking. So perhaps Gauff or Ons? They lost slam finals this year.

Leylah?

Last time a USO finalist went on to win the next USO was... Serena in 2012. Also Henin in 2007. Serena in 2002. Graf in 1995 and 1988.

So it has been known to happen, but only by former slam champs, which Leylah isn't. Coupled with Leylah's recent injury, we can discount her as a relevant factor this time.

3. What are Rybakina's chances of winning it?

How many first-timers followed up their 1st slam with another one right away?

Only 3. Osaka, Venus and Capriati. (And Evert 1974 if we go far back into the early Open Era.)

Bizarrely enough, Venus and Capriati did it one after each other, in a row. 2000 and 2001. Osaka did it a few years ago.

So in the last 33 years, from the 39 women first-timers, 22 eventually won another slam - but only these 3 won another one immediately. 3 out of 39.

So no, Rybakina isn't winning USO 22.

4. What can Serena do?

Absolutely nothing. She can win one or two matches at the very most, but there is no way in hell she's winning this. Not without serious preparation and some good results in August, which she failed to score. Serena is like the empress with no clothes, nobody dares tell her that she can't win a slam while treating tennis as a hobby, basically. She believes she can do magic, but she will find out that she's no Nadal...

5. How often have Canadian Open/Cincy winners go on to win USO?

2020 USO had the repeat final of Cincy 2020 final.

2016: Pliskova won Cincy, played F of USO.

2014 was the last time a Cincy champ won USO in same year.

2019, 2013: Canada Open and USO winner the same.
 

PerilousPear

Professional
This reminds me of a article I read about who will win a slam (I don't remember which one) on the men and women side.

For a men's side they made their pick, but for women, they went to an online randomizer and made it pick a number between 1 and 100 and basically went with whatever ranking it happened to pick.
 

coolcamden

Hall of Fame
All of top ranked women have issues. Swiatek, Kontaveit, Sakkari, Jabeur, Badosa, Sabalenka, Pliskova, Kvitova, Andreescu. Ex Slams like Krejcikova, Rybakina, Williams, Muruguta won’t repeat. Coco has techniques problems that will be exposed by seasoned players in later rounds, Pegula is boring. Don’t mention Raducanu or Fernandez, they won’t get past R3.
So I see there are chances for

Osaka
Garcia
Haddad Maia
Bencic

My pick, sentimental and all, is Bencic. Hoping she channels her Olympic Gold medal winning performance to here.
 

Mark-Touch

Legend
My answer will be the same at your thread about women losing first grand slam final:
No predictions but I hope it will be (if not Serena) Keys, Gauff, Garcia, or Fernandez.
In this US Open, Cornet will break the record of the most consecutive appearances in grand slams (with no achievements), I hope that will give her some motivation to play well in her first round match against the defending champion.
Since you are saying this will be a record, what do the record keepers consider an "achievement"?
 

snowwhite

Professional
Since you are saying this will be a record, what do the record keepers consider an "achievement"?
She will break the record of consecutive appearances that is tied with Sugiyama.
With no achievement= Without a single win in all these appearances
 

Mark-Touch

Legend
She will break the record of consecutive appearances that is tied with Sugiyama.
With no achievement= Without a single win in all these appearances
Win of a point, game, set, match, tournie?

Winning a slam is a tall order, especially for someone her age.

Ah, so I see the "with no achievement" is your concoction, not the record keepers.
They are just tracking consecutive appearances, that's all.
 
Last edited:

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Win of a point, game, set, match, tournie?

Winning a slam is a tall order, especially for someone her age.

Ah, so I see the "with no achievement" is your concoction, not the record keepers.
They are just tracking consecutive appearances, that's all.
Playing so many majors in a row is a big achievement. It means she is tough, consistent, and ranked decently for so many years.
 
Top