I obviously haven’t heard enough of Tsitsipas talking off court as I can’t understand where all this hatred is coming from, seems an interesting and likeable young man to me.It's just one step from that to Kyrgios-Tomic doucchebag-ery.
Thiem should be at his physical peak. Stefanos not quite at his.
Coming from a person who can go in a minute from "Djokovic is done" to "Djokovic will win the next 4 slams".Hate to keep saying it, but Tsits is the real deal, should have picked up on that when he beat Roger at the AO. He will win multiple, multiple slams if he stays healthy.
Hate to keep saying it, but Tsits is the real deal, should have picked up on that when he beat Roger at the AO. He will win multiple, multiple slams if he stays healthy.
So Nadal ended up beating the winner of the tournament? Only here such a joke is possible.Then Tsists came out the next day after a disappointing loss in a 3 hour match and beat Federer, looking fresh as a daisy. Would Nadal at 33 have done that? Unlikely. That's what youth allows you to do. He did try but Nadal was too good.
You really didn't pick up on that after the AO? You just said the other day that Roger was playing well that day and still lost. Even with Breakpointerer in full stride it took a lot of guts for a 21 year old to save that many BPs on that stage. Often with clutch 1st serves and net charging.Hate to keep saying it, but Tsits is the real deal, should have picked up on that when he beat Roger at the AO. He will win multiple, multiple slams if he stays healthy.
Looks like it.is modern day socrates losing concentration?
I obviously haven’t heard enough of Tsitsipas talking off court as I can’t understand where all this hatred is coming from, seems an interesting and likeable young man to me.
Round robin not understood?So Nadal ended up beating the winner of the tournament? Only here such a joke is possible.
Not enough, apparently.HOW MANY TIMES CAN A MAN SHANK AND HIT 20CM INSIDE THE LINES
Thiem is waning and Tsits seems like he has more in the tank. Oh the advantage of being 21 years old. Those were the days.
For me, beating 37- 38 year old Roger isn't the standard for slam success.Hate to keep saying it, but Tsits is the real deal, should have picked up on that when he beat Roger at the AO. He will win multiple, multiple slams if he stays healthy.
They switch around with ESPN.WTH, why the match not on Tennis Channel?
He is simply young and naive. I too find it nauseating. And I am Greek. So do a lot of my countryman.i feel like for the most part nick owns who he is. i cant speak for tomic since i dont know much about it. but between his gamesmanship antics, his faux intellectual tweets where most of the time he is actually quoting someone else and not being original, he just needs to stop talking. he has tweeted some pretty dangerous things imo and people just pretend he is this cute, quirky innocent thing
So Nadal ended up beating the winner of the tournament? Only here such a joke is possible.
For me, beating 37- 38 year old Roger isn't the standard for slam success.
Beating Nadal or Djokovic (until they become too old) is.
I doubt you took wins over 33 years old Federer seriously.For me, beating 37- 38 year old Roger isn't the standard for slam success.
Beating Nadal or Djokovic (until they become too old) is.
Oh shidd thanksThey switch around with ESPN.