Yamaha EOS

moonballer1

New User
Anyone ever played with this frame? I'm looking to pick one up but still not really sure on the quality of Yamaha's racquets. It's from the 90's I believe.
 

tacoben

Semi-Pro
I happened upon a pair of these sticks at a local Goodwill store. The racquets are on the heavier and stiff side, but they are awesome, especially if you hit the ball dead center. The one downside is the color...a hideous purplelish teletubby type.
 

Colpo

Professional
I wouldn't worry about the workmanship of Yamaha frames -- it's pretty exceptional. For this reason, the secondary parts of their 80s and 90s frames tend to hold up very well, such as the grommets, butt caps, and grip bases. That said, the EOS line was, for back then, a LIGHTER performance alternative to their standard weight Secret models. I knew a very good player who swore by the 100 model and could have easily wielded a heavier bat.
 

tacoben

Semi-Pro
I wouldn't worry about the workmanship of Yamaha frames -- it's pretty exceptional. For this reason, the secondary parts of their 80s and 90s frames tend to hold up very well, such as the grommets, butt caps, and grip bases.

I agree about the workmanship. In high school (early 80's) I recall saving up money for a Yamaha YFG 50...one of the best racquets ever made. It makes me wonder why Yamama ever left the racquet making business.
 

moonballer1

New User
Someone told me they got in a patent dispute with Wilson. Something like that...
What's the current "market price" of the EOS?
 

djNEiGht

Legend
I happened upon a pair of these sticks at a local Goodwill store. The racquets are on the heavier and stiff side, but they are awesome, especially if you hit the ball dead center. The one downside is the color...a hideous purplelish teletubby type.


i also saw one at the local goodwill...but no grommets
looked to be in great condition.
 

tacoben

Semi-Pro
If it is in mint condition, I am sure it could fetch $50 from Yamaha afficionados. But I think the market is more for the Yamaha Secret (1st generation). BTW, I also have a Secret 100 and after close inspection, the grommets, it seems, are interchangeable with the EOS.
 

olliess

Semi-Pro
I think the Yamaha racquets were high quality. The EOS I like somewhat less than the others, since it's "Efficiency of Swingweight" design means a light, relatively head-heavy racquet (in the spirit of the Wilson Hammer) but with the stiffness of the other Yamaha Secret racquets. (Ouch).

There was another thread about the EOS a while back: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=339707
 

PBODY99

Legend
I played this frame, after using the Yamaha 30 and YFG 50. Great build quality, lower power than a Wilson Hammer but too close in design, so they withdrew from the US market.
 
Last edited:

neil1b

Rookie
It's too bad, I just sold a NOS EOS on the big auction site for 50 bucks. Had it posted here for a while with no bites. Was supposed to be the lightest racquet at the time.
 

neil1b

Rookie
Here are some pics of the racquet I sold. This was the model in question

bb0d241e.jpg


9826d990.jpg


6c14e6da.jpg
 
My wife played with this racquet, and love it. At the time it was the lightest racquet that still had aspects of a "player's" frame (reasonable head size, stability, not overpowered).

The way I heard it was that Wilson sued Yamaha, claiming that their "Efficiency of Swing" [EOS] technology infringed on their patent for their "Hammer" technology.
Yamaha decided it had too many other businesses to worry about lawsuits, even though this suit should have been easy to fight. (Where is the patent idea in a lightweight graphite frame?) It totally left the tennis racquet business, including discontinuing its fairly popular "Secret" models.
 

Hannah19

Professional
It totally left the tennis racquet business, including discontinuing its fairly popular "Secret" models.[/QUOTE]

They also had a lawsuit on their hands with the Secret rackets. Kuebler claimed that their Resonanz patent was violated by Yamaha in the Secret frames. Wilson's lawsuit may just have been to much for them and maybe that's why they quit making rackets overall.
A pitty though, remember their YWG 99 Image.....Nothing less than a piece of art.
I've got one on the big auction site.
 

BigIJack

New User
I'll never forget when I got my EOS 100 in '91. To me it was a revelation in racquet technology. Light but slightly head heavy, very stiff with zero vibration. Not as stiff as the Secret 04 hammer but an incredible racquet. Stole out of my front seat 3 weeks later in my buddies driveway. I just bought another one 32 years later and can't wait to string it up with some poly and let it rip. Yamaha was at the forefront of racket technology but didn't want to get into it with Wilson so they left. Small biz for them anyway. Can't wait to get my EOS back!
 

BigIJack

New User
I happened upon a pair of these sticks at a local Goodwill store. The racquets are on the heavier and stiff side, but they are awesome, especially if you hit the ball dead center. The one downside is the color...a hideous purplelish teletubby type.
That is not the original EOS. The EOS is a 100 or 110 sq. in. in a kinda ugly glossy brown and grey finish.
 

tennistiger

Semi-Pro
Both are EOS! Same mold two versions: The grey EOS (Graphite, Singapur) and the blue EOS RZ (Graphite/Fiberglas, Taiwan, cheaper and heavier than EOS).
 
Top