kevin qmto
Hall of Fame
I think the green/red EX looks way ahead of its time. First person I handed it to asked if it was a new release.the white secrets look just so good and so does the ex . Always reminds me of Gucci .. the red and green .
I think the green/red EX looks way ahead of its time. First person I handed it to asked if it was a new release.the white secrets look just so good and so does the ex . Always reminds me of Gucci .. the red and green .
Me neither. Email me mvalek@live.co.ukI can't seem to pm you. Can you send me a message?
Secret EX 110 has a measured RA strung of 59 !Is there a soft flexy version of the secret ??? If so what is the #?
Secret EX 110 has a measured RA strung of 59 !
More soft than stiff compared to the others:
EOS 110: 72
EOS 100: 70
EOS RZ 110: 65
EOS RZ 100: 66
Secret 04 100: 79
Secret 04 110: 73
Secret 10: 68
Secret EX 110: 59
Secret EX 100: 67
I love my Kuebler Resonanz 50 and Wilson Profile Hammer 110 with RA 90! So to be correct all other rackets are soft!!!
I can't seem to pm you. Can you send me a message?
Secret EX 110 has a measured RA strung of 59 !
More soft than stiff compared to the others:
EOS 110: 72
EOS 100: 70
EOS RZ 110: 65
EOS RZ 100: 66
Secret 04 100: 79
Secret 04 110: 73
Secret 10: 68
Secret EX 110: 59
Secret EX 100: 67
I love my Kuebler Resonanz 50 and Wilson Profile Hammer 110 with RA 90! So to be correct all other rackets are soft!!!
any of those 100s or the YFG come with 18 mains?YFG-20
You don't have to be physically strong to play with heavy racquet, what you have to have is a good classic technique and good footwork.I bought a Secret 10. It was light and very stiff and I could not play with it at all - it seemed to only flex on volleys and smashes otherwise it was a board. My best friend played with a Secret 04 and played great with it. It gave him lots of power but you had to be physically strong to use it because it was very heavy.
The other top pros used it were Gabriela Sabatini and Ronald Agenor.Absolutely beautiful.
I remember Yannick Noah playing with the Secret 04 in 1990. He made the semis in Australia that year with it.
Great forehand! Noise like rifle shot!Well, my bonehead self hung the tarp mounted camera poorly, but that didn't stop me from making a new sort of video edit. Just contact highlights. I tried to keep this just neutral ball shots where I'm actually in frame. This was just us messing around after playing a match. I didn't use the Secret EX in the match, this footage is actually the first time I've struck balls in anger with it. It feels especially solid on the forehand. Very flat and powerful.
I really dig Agenor’s game and form.The other top pros used it were Gabriela Sabatini and Ronald Agenor.
I got my arse handed to me memorably 30+ years ago by a nationally ranked junior wielding one of these “Stop and Go” Yonex racquets. Felt like he never missed a shot.This arrived yesterday, I was waiting for one of these to pop up online for a decent price, and in good shape to boot! The Secret EX! Slightly thinner in beam, but actually heavier than the Secret 04 (368g strung!) This is my favorite Yamaha paint job, and probably my favorite racket case ever.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
love the little Yamaha branded zippers on the inside and outside of the case!
![]()
yet another effortlessly cool word mark.
![]()
a e s t h e t i c
I think he was the only Haiti born pro tennis player such a top level.I really dig Agenor’s game and form.
Fun Fact: Ronald Agenor’s final professional match (only a few months from his 37th birthday) was against reigning world No. 1 Kuerten, and despite losing, he was up a set and a break at one point, stood a decent chance of winning it.
If you hit flat then you don't have to be physically strong because the weight of the racquet provides the power. But, to hit with spin, you have to be strong because the swing is longer and timing needs to be better.You don't have to be physically strong to play with heavy racquet, what you have to have is a good classic technique and good footwork.
Timing and technique yes not physical power.If you hit flat then you don't have to be physically strong because the weight of the racquet provides the power. But, to hit with spin, you have to be strong because the swing is longer and timing needs to be better.
I used to do this thing (playing tennis) since 1982If you hit flat then you don't have to be physically strong because the weight of the racquet provides the power. But, to hit with spin, you have to be strong because the swing is longer and timing needs to be better.
Yes it was the retail Sabatini frame, 22mm straight beam. But it feels not as soft because of the construction. The later Tour Edition is different to the normal one.Do you know thickness of the beam on the one you quoted as 59? Could it be because it was designed for Sabbatini who was moving over from a softer POG (also 110 as things were quoted back then)?
Secret 10 is 100 which means 97 sq Inch in the Yamaha world.Secret-10 quite a modern racquet even with it's 90" head size.
No way it's 100". The only 100" head size racquet in my collection is Rafa's APD 1st edition and it is visibly bigger. I was mistaken about 90" of Secret-10, i would say it is around 95".Secret 10 is 100 which means 97 sq Inch in the Yamaha world.
I used to do this thing (playing tennis) since 1982![]()
Size is always marketing! Yamaha Katalog says 97 for all the 100 Secret and EOS. So it is. Notice that in real Pure Aero and Drive are slightly bigger than 100! But Babolat would sell only half of that If they would say that they are 102.No way it's 100". The only 100" head size racquet in my collection is Rafa's APD 1st edition and it is visibly bigger. I was mistaken about 90" of Secret-10, i would say it is around 95".
What do you mean 100 Secret? My racquet is Secret-10. It's not the size that marketing but top players that use that racquet (mostly just endorse it). Babolat could not even notice the head size of their PD and APD after they signed Moya, Roddick and especially Nadal. So many times i saw how beginners asked for "Nadal racquet" in tennis pro shops, they just didn't care about head size and other specs.Size is always marketing! Yamaha Katalog says 97 for all the 100 Secret and EOS. So it is. Notice that in real Pure Aero and Drive are slightly bigger than 100! But Babolat would sell only half of that If they would say that they are 102.
I can assume,that Babolats are bigger, don't care about it, i don't like their stuff, i compare my Yamaha with other racquets in head size, especially Dunlop. And i could say that visibly Yamaha is very close to all my 95" sticks, it could be a little bigger, say 96 (even 97, but it is also marketing as you've been mentioned about catalogue data), but no way it is 100" as you posted before. I could compare to other racquets from my collection and i have around 200 of them at the moment.Size is always marketing! Yamaha Katalog says 97 for all the 100 Secret and EOS. So it is. Notice that in real Pure Aero and Drive are slightly bigger than 100! But Babolat would sell only half of that If they would say that they are 102.
Yamaha produced most of the rackets in two sizes and called them 100 and 110. But the real size of the 100 is 97. Thats a bit unlucky.I can assume,that Babolats are bigger, don't care about it, i don't like their stuff, i compare my Yamaha with other racquets in head size, especially Dunlop. And i could say that visibly Yamaha is very close to all my 95" sticks, it could be a little bigger, say 96 (even 97, but it is also marketing as you've been mentioned about catalogue data), but no way it is 100" as you posted before. I could compare to other racquets from my collection and i have around 200 of them at the moment.
Where did you get this information? During some short period? Yamaha produced many different racquets in various head sizes, from mid to oversize.Yamaha produced most of the rackets in two sizes and called them 100 and 110. But the real size of the 100 is 97. Thats a bit unlucky.
More: Christian Ruud, Dan Goldie, Juan Aguilera, Javier Sanchez (both only a few times despite longer contracts), Akiko Kijimuta, coach Dennis RalstonFind another pro used Secret - Francesco Cancellotti.
As a player Dennis Ralston used Head Arthur Ashe Competition.More: Christian Ruud, Dan Goldie, Juan Aguilera, Javier Sanchez (both only a few times despite longer contracts), Akiko Kijimuta, coach Dennis Ralston
Long-time Yamaha user was Bob Lutz, also John Sadri.More: Christian Ruud, Dan Goldie, Juan Aguilera, Javier Sanchez (both only a few times despite longer contracts), Akiko Kijimuta, coach Dennis Ralston
I wish I had the stomach to make it through a Tennis Spin video of that length, but I just can’t stand that guy. I watched a few moments on mute.TennisSpin dude scored a couple in Japan's thrift store:
Watch until 20:35 for the Sabatini stick
Oh no, not another Tennis Spin video…Check it out.
Oh no, not another Tennis Spin video…
Main thing I can’t tolerate is his inability to check his facts, I’m not even an expert compared to most of the gurus here, and in the dozen or so videos I’ve seen of his he’s constantly getting stuff wrong. Which rackets were used by what pros, what years stuff came out, what racket is stiffer and by how much compared to another, just terrible fact checking and no one seems to call him out on it. He strikes me as someone who doesn’t know nearly as much as they think they do…Is it because prices spike and they get harder to find soon after? I assume it does cause it to an extent...
Or it is the cringe factor?
Just read you cant tolerate his voice either..
I typically just move to the SPEC CHECK section of this videos now just for curiosity atleast... sometimes followed by purchases but my 2 attempts to get a Prince Mono at TENNIS SPIN specs failed.
Yes, in this episode it was the wrong racket to say Gabriela Sabbatini used. She used the oversize. Then he compared the EX's strung specs to his guesses of today's Blade unstrung specs! I mean it's literally 5 minutes to check these things before recording. Pretty racket though.Main thing I can’t tolerate is his inability to check his facts, I’m not even an expert compared to most of the gurus here, and in the dozen or so videos I’ve seen of his he’s constantly getting stuff wrong. Which rackets were used by what pros, what years stuff came out, what racket is stiffer and by how much compared to another, just terrible fact checking and no one seems to call him out on it. He strikes me as someone who doesn’t know nearly as much as they think they do…
And that he’s one of those channels that is clearly trying to generate as much content as possible, solely for ad money and algorithm gaming. Not because he has some great insight to share.
Nooo a modern frame so that I don’t have to scour **** looking for them. Some kind of volkl maybe? Pure drive 107?
I managed to hit with me 06 it during a set of an indifferent set of doubles with some friends. This frame is almost unreal. Thinking about its production date makes it far more unreal. Never experienced a frame thus far with so much power yet so much feel. EXCELLENT serving frame and you dont feel the weight at all. I will certainly be coming back to it periodically. Never leaving my bag for sure.