Yes you can take your serve from 3.0 to 6.5/7.0, my progression videos is evidence

Taiss

Semi-Pro
Yes you can take your serve from 3.0 to 6.5/7.0, my progression videos is evidence.

Bellow my initial serve about 3-4 years ago, which was at the level 3.0.

I will try to post a newer video (posted videos in chronological order) each week or so

 
Yes you can take your serve from 3.0 to 6.5/7.0, my progression videos is evidence.

If that photo in your avatar is of you, then you still haven't got the serve right. But do feel free to troll on. I'm sure there will be some entertainment value to be had.

I m scientist making a new science that can make a 3.0 player hit exactly like a 6.0 player within few months/years if he religiously follows the book. It s exactly like building a plane.
 
Last edited:
giphy.gif
 
That original serve is more 3.5... Unless it's missing. But if those balls are going into the service box, there's enough there to be 3.5 level.
 
Is your serve 6.5/7.0 right now, or is this a planned progression? And if so, how would you rate your serve right now?
 
The serve in my avatar is from a year ago. Now currently my serve is about 6.5 and in mine it ll be 7.0 or so and not any 7.0, it ll be about 80% federer s serve, copy paste. I think next year i will come up with a totaly completely new revolutionnizing serve, the kind of serve nothing seen before, the new generation serve. But that s a different topic let s keep it for another thread.

We can argue the serve from few years ago is about 3.5 or 4.0 but i m telling you it s lacking bvasic human proper coordination that most 4.0 servers follow. So the average player may be led to rate my original serve is 4.0 or even 4.5 but i assure you it s no more than 3.0 because i was so sloppy so uncoordinated, foot thrown foreward...etc, although the ball d land in. so let s say my original serve was 3.0

Anyway, keep tuned for next week s video which will be my serve few monbths after the serve above.

P.s: pls some consideration since i m taking my time to help people, with such an unprecedented kind of help
 
Last edited:
The serve in my avatar is from a year ago. Now currently my serve is about 6.5 and in mine it ll be 7.0 or so and not any 7.0, it ll be about 80% federer s serve, copy paste. I think next year i will come up with a totaly completely new revolutionnizing serve, the kind of serve nothing seen before, the new generation serve. But that s a different topic let s keep it for another thread.

So you serve at 130mph and beat top Div. 1 college players handily?
 
OK, so now players are giving themselves NTRP ratings for individual shots? :rolleyes: I applaud your effort to improve, but NTRP ratings are based on results. There is hardly even a mention of the serve in the official self-rate NTRP descriptions. So let me ask you this: Is this new serve of yours winning Futures, Challengers, or ATP tournaments for you? If not, rating your serve 6.5-7.0 is more than a bit of a stretch. ;)
 
Nah, for 99.5 % of player's, the serve tops out at 4.5 and no more, if it even get's there, which for 75% of the tennis player's, never does.
 
OK, so now players are giving themselves NTRP ratings for individual shots? :rolleyes: I applaud your effort to improve, but NTRP ratings are based on results. There is hardly even a mention of the serve in the official self-rate NTRP descriptions. So let me ask you this: Is this new serve of yours winning Futures, Challengers, or ATP tournaments for you? If not, rating your serve 6.5-7.0 is more than a bit of a stretch. ;)
Ntrp system makes no sense, needs full review/reengineering. no wonder semi pros, pros n college players don t give a dime abt it. A proper rating system should look at fundamental body segments coordination, how graceful a player s stroke is, and fluid the player ....like rating dancers and martial artists or divers... rather than considering how many balls a person puts in the court , how many back hands, how many returns.....blablabla
Another thing a proper system should consider is ball speeds, many speeds not one, this new and free info

Now,, if your serve gets to 6.5 following MSE Science, your (my) ground strokes will catch up a little later ie one or 2 years later, although improving ground stroke to thr same level is much harder, however totally n perfectely achievable realizable. believe me n don t take my word for it, u ll see evidence next year

Now if serve won t lead you ton win futures, serving at 6.5 or 7.0 u ll hgave lot of fun, and importantly no injuries, and again same concepts apply to ground strokes so you get the idea. Who s in ?
 
Last edited:
Ntrp system makes no sense, needs full review/reengineering.
Btw, if your serve gets to 6.5 following MSE Science, your (my) ground strokes will catch up a little later ie one or 2 years later, although improving ground stroke to same level is much harder, however totally perfectely achievable realizable. believe me n don t take my word for it, u ll see evidence next year

Now if serve won t lead you tonwin futures, serving at 6.5 or 7.0 u ll hgave lot of fun, and importantly no injuries, and again same concepts apply to ground strokes so you get the idea. Who s in ?

Now there's someone who really doesn't understand either the rating system or tennis in general.
No, you can't teach ANYone to serve at the 6.0 level within even 4 years.
And NO, his groundstrokes have no bearing on his serves, and his serves have no bearing on his groundies.
In 4 year's, a phenom who is at the peak of his athletic ability can indeed reach 5.0, but by then, he's PAST his best year's and improvements becomes really difficult.
 
Now there's someone who really doesn't understand either the rating system or tennis in general.
No, you can't teach ANYone to serve at the 6.0 level within even 4 years.
And NO, his groundstrokes have no bearing on his serves, and his serves have no bearing on his groundies.
In 4 year's, a phenom who is at the peak of his athletic ability can indeed reach 5.0, but by then, he's PAST his best year's and improvements becomes really difficult.
If u can listen and serious about it, you can learn to serve at 7.0 in 2 , 3 years max, ok let s say 6.5 player's exact technique, ok if not exactly with same power then, let s say you ll serve like chang, like beker, like ivan lendel , who are a little older, but serve with less power, yet excellent technique, as a 7.0 or 6.5 player does
 
No you can't. The serve is more complicated than you can know, since you don't have that serve yet.
 
If u can listen and serious about it, you can learn to serve at 7.0 in 2 , 3 years max, ok let s say 6.5 player's exact technique, ok if not exactly with same power then, let s say you ll serve like chang, like beker, like ivan lendel , who are a little older, but serve with less power, yet excellent technique, as a 7.0 or 6.5 player does

Less power mean's it NOT a 6-6.5 level serve.
 
Another thing a proper system should consider is ball speeds, many speeds not one, this new and free info

Now if serve won t lead you ton win futures, serving at 6.5 or 7.0 u ll hgave lot of fun, and importantly no injuries, and again same concepts apply to ground strokes so you get the idea. Who s in ?

Hi Taiss, can you post a video of your current serve? and then show the progression? That way we will be more amazed by the transformation and want to tune in.

If you show the slow progression from 3.0 - 6.5/7.0 you'll probably lose our attention. Sort of like a person showing progression photos of them each day as they lose 0.1 grams a day.
 
I'm not really concerned about you training someone to hit like a 7.0. I'd just be interested to see video showing that you're capable of improving your own serve substantially.

Get to work.
 
The serve in my avatar is from a year ago. Now currently my serve is about 6.5 and in mine it ll be 7.0 or so and not any 7.0, it ll be about 80% federer s serve, copy paste. I think next year i will come up with a totaly completely new revolutionnizing serve, the kind of serve nothing seen before, the new generation serve. But that s a different topic let s keep it for another thread.

We can argue the serve from few years ago is about 3.5 or 4.0 but i m telling you it s lacking bvasic human proper coordination that most 4.0 servers follow. So the average player may be led to rate my original serve is 4.0 or even 4.5 but i assure you it s no more than 3.0 because i was so sloppy so uncoordinated, foot thrown foreward...etc, although the ball d land in. so let s say my original serve was 3.0

Anyway, keep tuned for next week s video which will be my serve few monbths after the serve above.

P.s: pls some consideration since i m taking my time to help people, with such an unprecedented kind of help

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect. I highly recommend that you read up on the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

You're not as good as you think you are. Also, no matter how revolutionary you think your ideas are, the chances are that someone has already thought of them and they've been proven to be ineffective.
 
Last edited:
Yes you can take your serve from 3.0 to 6.5/7.0, my progression videos is evidence.

Bellow my initial serve about 3-4 years ago, which was at the level 3.0.

I will try to post a newer video (posted videos in chronological order) each week or so

I bet there is a grip change coming!!!
 
Back
Top