Not that good... I tried again the ezone 100 today and control is lacking... Then I took back my blade v7 18x20... Unbeatable! Still the king! Rock solid!
Not that good... I tried again the ezone 100 today and control is lacking... Then I took back my blade v7 18x20... Unbeatable! Still the king! Rock solid!
Envoyé de mon ONEPLUS A5000 en utilisant Tapatalk
ok so you took 2 totally different racquets with different spin patterns, beams, head sizes and you expect them to play similar? They fall into 2 worlds of racquets. It is like comparing Babolat PD with any old Head Radical Tour...Not that good... I tried again the ezone 100 today and control is lacking... Then I took back my blade v7 18x20... Unbeatable! Still the king! Rock solid!
Envoyé de mon ONEPLUS A5000 en utilisant Tapatalk
Yes, you’re comparing apples and oranges, of course they’re differentNot that good... I tried again the ezone 100 today and control is lacking... Then I took back my blade v7 18x20... Unbeatable! Still the king! Rock solid!
Envoyé de mon ONEPLUS A5000 en utilisant Tapatalk
^ This. I love my two Blade 98 v7's but even if you were comparing it to the same size Ezone 98 they wouldnt even compare lol. Even the Blade 16x19 feels NOTHING like the Ezone 98.ok so you took 2 totally different racquets with different spin patterns, beams, head sizes and you expect them to play similar? They fall into 2 worlds of racquets. It is like comparing Babolat PD with any old Head Radical Tour...
Wow, surprised how lukewarm this is. Wonder if the 100 will be better.
It is becuase it is worldwide. If you check Michelle and Chris scores they are pretty high around 83-85 mark. And Michelle rarely scores any frame above 8.Wow, surprised how lukewarm this is. Wonder if the 100 will be better.
I agree with everything you said but the swing weight. I feel like when you buy any Ezone you should be expecting that swing weight that corresponds with a whippy racket.It seems that the main reason the Ezone 98 (2020) scores low or gets mixed opinions is due to the low swing weight; something which probably suits intermediate players better. It´s pretty easy to add a few grams of leadtape to a racquett so that should solve it.
For me, the perfect racquet would be like last years Pure Strike 98 (305 grams) but with a slightly lower stiffness rating. It was a very balanced racquet and easy to play with. Any advice?
HelloFor me the perfect racquet would be: project one 98 16x19 with the more plush/soft feel of the 2019 model. The main problem with 2019 is that babolat went up on swing weights (even the 100version is cumbersome) matching the SW of Blades with no f.... reason. Project one was already a solid stick.... still i don’t find it arm friendly (2019) for my taste.
What was that didn’t you like on the V Core 98 ? The harsh feel on contact ?
Watched the video review this morning.@kdm711 ,
Sorry for the delay. The 98 should be up by tomorrow (Friday) and the 100 will follow and be up by next Wednesday.
Thanks,
Brittany, TW
If history repeats, when they release the plus version in 2-4 months, it will miraculously solve all issues with the std length version[ /QUOTE]
Yes, but there will be one more model coming out, together with the plus version, might be even better the ezone dr 98 310g.
Mark this post #672 of this thread
Once your level is high enough, you probablly won´t prefer a racquet such as the Ezone 98.
Yes, but there will be one more model coming out, together with the plus version, might be even better the ezone dr 98 310g.
Mark this post #672 of this thread
You also see the Ezone 98 very often used in the Futures and Challenger tournaments. They are all at least 5.0.I know he doesn't play with the actual Ezone 98 2020 but an Ezone Xi98, however, I'm pretty sure Nick Kyrigios is a high-level player. Osaka plays with a DR98 (I believe)... I'd say she's a pretty high-level player.
Usually professionals have their own racquets with a paint job made to look like the production model. Very few pros play with racquets as light as 305 grams (unstrung). Their racquets of pro's are usually too heavy for most other players.You also see the Ezone 98 very often used in the Futures and Challenger tournaments. They are all at least 5.0.
But the 2018 came close to his XI. Are they gonna really repaint it ?Ezone 98 Pro? NK Autograph?![]()
How far out are we expecting this drop?Yes, but there will be one more model coming out, together with the plus version, might be even better the ezone dr 98 310g.
Mark this post #672 of this thread
Usually professionals have their own racquets with a paint job made to look like the production model. Very few pros play with racquets as light as 305 grams (unstrung). Their racquets of pro's are usually too heavy for most other players.
Still, my point was more that of all Yonex racquets, the Ezone line in general is not the line best suited to advanced players. For those, there is the VCore Pro and VCore racquets.
That was my whole point that very few dvanced player will play with a 305 gram racquet in stock form. Of course virtually all advanced players customise their racquets.Lol. You know that most of these pros use custom resin handles, putty, and tape to alter their racket. Whats stopping literally any consumer from doing the exact same. Even custom resin handles are affordable now.
Are you saying that the Wilson Blade v7 is too light for advanced players because Tsitsipas uses a previous generation Blade which was almost identical in weight but he put putty in the handle?
Even the Vcore is light compared to the specs that were released on Wawrinkas racket. Like almost 20g or something.
Pros like Gasquet use a racket that top out around 340g strung. Even Nadal was using 330g-340g for years.
And of course anyone can customizer their racquet. Something I would moat likely do as well should I buy the new Ezone 98..That was my whole point that very few dvanced player will play with a 305 gram racquet in stock form. Of course virtually all advanced players customise their racquets.
nopeEzone 98 Pro? NK Autograph?![]()
How far out are we expecting this drop?
That was my whole point that very few dvanced player will play with a 305 gram racquet in stock form. Of course virtually all advanced players customise their racquets.
Yes, but there will be one more model coming out, together with the plus version, might be even better the ezone dr 98 310g.
Mark this post #672 of this thread
Most of the 4.5-5.0 players (out of college) and all of the top juniors in my area are using tweener frames - Pure Drives and Aeros, Clash, eZone, Vcore - while most of the college players (like 8 out of 10) use the Blade. If you're not playing every day it's just silly to struggle with a 13 oz old school players racket. I was using a Blade 93 a few years ago and I remember losing constantly in tournaments to guys with Pure Aeros and fighting shanks, needing to swing harder... then got an RF97 liked it but my shoulder was taking a beating... the point is use what makes tennis fun and doesn't ruin your body...
Agree static weight like 300-310 with a SW like 320-330 seems to be the sweetspot for most players nowadays, myself included. Stiff or not this seems to work. The EZone 98 just isnt stiff enough to have such a low SW but would feel brassy if stiffer. The EZone 100 doesnt seem to have any of those problems and plays like my Pure Drives.That's what I see in my area as well. With younger players, there seems to be a trend to go for lower static weight but higher SW. Essentially the Blade phenotype. Most racquets I see are Blades, PDs and PAs. I think the EZone 98 could be used by advanced players, but I don't think in stock form.
what do you mean like PD? It is nowhere as stiff or brassyAgree static weight like 300-310 with a SW like 320-330 seems to be the sweetspot for most players nowadays, myself included. Stiff or not this seems to work. The EZone 98 just isnt stiff enough to have such a low SW but would feel brassy if stiffer. The EZone 100 doesnt seem to have any of those problems and plays like my Pure Drives.
It has a similar playability. Side by side power and spin are virtually the same. The EZone is a lot more comfortable, and I feel the ball more. Like on a heavy topspin forehand I can feel the “brush”. So you are right doesn’t have that super stiff feel. It’s a great racket. I guess I couldve looked at some similar frames but this one solved my problem of PD-like performance without wrist pain...what do you mean like PD? It is nowhere as stiff or brassy
I believe "ustinhaughtmd" is referring to the new Ezone 100, nor the 98 version..That's why the comparing of playability and power with the Pure Drive.It has a similar playability. Side by side power and spin are virtually the same. The EZone is a lot more comfortable, and I feel the ball more. Like on a heavy topspin forehand I can feel the “brush”. So you are right doesn’t have that super stiff feel. It’s a great racket. I guess I couldve looked at some similar frames but this one solved my problem of PD-like performance without wrist pain...
Yes the 100. The 98 2020 I had was a whole different racket. Not similar at all.I believe "ustinhaughtmd" is referring to the new Ezone 100, nor the 98 version..That's why the comparing of playability and power with the Pure Drive.
Thanks. May I ask what strings and at what tension you used in the 98 and the 100?Yes the 100. The 98 2020 I had was a whole different racket. Not similar at all.
Both were strung with Tourna Big Hitter Black 7 @48 lbs. I’ve been using that string and tension for a while, and was using it in my Pure Drive Tour previously.Thanks. May I ask what strings and at what tension you used in the 98 and the 100?
Any chance ould be related to that?
Have you tried the previous Ezone 100 or the Ezone DR 100?i tried the DR 100 and to me it was too much of a Tweener racquet with too much power. Curious to see how this new 100 compares? Just looking at specs, stiffness and beam etc, I would guess they should play fairly similarly.Both were strung with Tourna Big Hitter Black 7 @48 lbs. I’ve been using that string and tension for a while, and was using it in my Pure Drive Tour previously.