ChimpChimp
Semi-Pro
I started to question those string comparison charts -- even official ones.
A) This image is from the official site. I don't know on which web page it is shown.
http://www.yonex.com/_assets/images/cache/autoxauto/11886.jpg
B)
http://www.yonex.com/sports/tennis/products/tennis/string/strings/polytour-fire-120/
http://www.yonex.com/sports/tennis/products/tennis/string/strings/polytour-pro-120/
What does the light-heavy axis mean? This question was discussed in TW. If you believe in the following chart hosted in a third-party site, light = soft feeling, that is, the same as soft-hard axis in B).
Moreover,
In A), 1 and 5 are considered light. In B), Fire and Pro are hard.
In A), 2 (Spin 125) is heavy, and a lot heavier than 1 and 5. In a page similar to B), Spin 125 is marginally harder than Fire and Pro.
It is difficult to judge whether this point is also contradictory, as the scale of the axis is subjective.
===============================
Back to my question. I have used only Fire 120, not Pro of any gauge. Pro is popular but Fire is less known. Pro is cheaper though. Since I don't break strings, I can use thin ones, which should be better in every aspect except durability?
My comments on Fire:
Not much spin.
Is it hard? Maybe the other strings I have used are all hard, so I don't know.
With 52/50 I have never hit so precisely in my life. With 50/48 all precision gone.
How do you compare Fire and Pro?
More specifically, which
--is softer actually?
--has more pocketing? (is it the same as softer?)
--is more low-powered?
--gives more spin?
I am aware of the other post on "pro vs fire vs strike", but my finding of contradiction may be worth its own post.
A) This image is from the official site. I don't know on which web page it is shown.
http://www.yonex.com/_assets/images/cache/autoxauto/11886.jpg

B)
http://www.yonex.com/sports/tennis/products/tennis/string/strings/polytour-fire-120/
http://www.yonex.com/sports/tennis/products/tennis/string/strings/polytour-pro-120/

In A), 1 (Fire) and 5 (Pro) are in the two extremes in the durability-ball pocketing axis. In B), Fire and Pro are identical in durability.
In A), 1 is slightly lighter than 5. In B), Fire is a lot harder than Pro.
In A), 1 is slightly lighter than 5. In B), Fire is a lot harder than Pro.
What does the light-heavy axis mean? This question was discussed in TW. If you believe in the following chart hosted in a third-party site, light = soft feeling, that is, the same as soft-hard axis in B).

Conclusion: The two charts, official they are, contradict to each other, in both x- and y-axis.
Moreover,
In A), 1 and 5 are considered light. In B), Fire and Pro are hard.
In A), 2 (Spin 125) is heavy, and a lot heavier than 1 and 5. In a page similar to B), Spin 125 is marginally harder than Fire and Pro.
It is difficult to judge whether this point is also contradictory, as the scale of the axis is subjective.
===============================
Back to my question. I have used only Fire 120, not Pro of any gauge. Pro is popular but Fire is less known. Pro is cheaper though. Since I don't break strings, I can use thin ones, which should be better in every aspect except durability?
My comments on Fire:
Not much spin.
Is it hard? Maybe the other strings I have used are all hard, so I don't know.
With 52/50 I have never hit so precisely in my life. With 50/48 all precision gone.
How do you compare Fire and Pro?
More specifically, which
--is softer actually?
--has more pocketing? (is it the same as softer?)
--is more low-powered?
--gives more spin?
I am aware of the other post on "pro vs fire vs strike", but my finding of contradiction may be worth its own post.